Source: Jacobin

The New York Times recently ran an opinion piece from Robert F. Kennedy Jr and three other Trump administration officials in which they argue in favor of adding work requirements to Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income Americans.

At one point in the piece, they write that:

A recent analysis from an economist at the American Enterprise Institute [AEI] examined survey data from December 2022 (the most recent month available) and found that just 44 percent of able-bodied, working-age Medicaid beneficiaries without dependents worked at least 80 hours in that month.

I have produced figures like this in the past, typically by analyzing the Annual Social and Economic Supplement of the Current Population Survey (CPS ASEC). I found this particular estimate intriguing because it uses the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) rather than the CPS ASEC. So I figured I would dive into the SIPP to see what numbers it actually provides about this topic.

According to the SIPP, in December of 2022, the US population was 328.6 million people, of whom 73.2 million were receiving Medicaid.

Of those on Medicaid, 6.7 million are elderly, 29.3 million are children, and the remaining 37.2 million are working-age adults.

Of the working-age adults on Medicaid, 9.5 million are parents, 13.8 million are disabled, and 13.9 million are able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs).

Of the ABAWDs on Medicaid, 8.1 million (58 percent) worked eighty or more hours in December of 2022. Another 1.5 million worked eighty or more hours in a prior month in 2022 while another 0.3 million had been enrolled in Medicaid for less than a year. Combining all three of these figures shows that there are only 4 million ABAWDS who are persistently enrolled in Medicaid and work fewer than eighty hours a month. This is about 29 percent of ABAWDs, 5 percent of all Medicaid recipients, and 1 percent of the US population.

My results significantly differ from the results published at AEI for two main reasons.

First, the AEI figures only count people as disabled if they are currently receiving SSI or some other kind of disability benefit. But not everyone who is disabled is currently receiving disability benefits. Some individuals have short-term disabilities. Others are receiving Medicaid while they work through the disability determination process, which can take years. Still others have fallen through the cracks of the disability benefit system in one way or another.

Luckily, in addition to collecting income information, SIPP directly asks people whether they have a disability that makes it difficult for them to work or find employment and asks people whether they have one of the six core disabilities — seeing, hearing, walking, dressing/bathing, doing errands alone, or cognitive problems — regularly tracked by the Census. Including individuals that answer yes to these questions results in another 8.8 million disabled people that AEI wrongly counts as able-bodied.

Second, in addition to looking at whether individuals worked eighty-plus hours in December 2022, I used the longitudinal features of the SIPP to see how many worked eighty-plus hours in one of the other months of 2022 and how many had been enrolled in Medicaid for less than a year. Individuals in these latter two groups are not persistently workless Medicaid users of the sort conservatives want people to believe are extremely numerous in the Medicaid system.

Once these changes are made, what we find is that 71 percent, rather than 44 percent, of ABAWDs on Medicaid are not persistently workless dole scroungers. Of course, some of the 4 million people who end up in the residual “Everyone Else” bucket above are students and people who simply cannot find a job despite trying. Absolutely none of this suggests there is a serious social problem here in need of addressing.


This article was originally published by Jacobin; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version