Some of the most closely guarded documents in the White House are sure to be the ones written by the president’s top media strategist. The public will never get to see the key memos from Karl Rove, but a typical one these days might read something like…


 


To: George and Dick


 


Re: Media Terrain


 


First, don’t worry about Richard Clarke. We’ll fix his wagon.


 


About Condi testifying in public — people forget she can spin with the best. Is history ready for a black female Ollie North with a Ph.D.?


 


Closer to home now. I say this with the fondest high regard, etc., but both of you need to remember my admonition about looking a bit cartoonish on occasion. George, keep practicing that smile like I told you — it still drifts a little too much toward “What, Me Worry?” — and we sure don’t need that in swing states. Repeat after me: “I am not Alfred E. Neuman…”


 


And Dick. Respectfully. The hunched over talking-into-your-wrists thing has just got to go. I don’t know if you and Lynne ever watch “The Simpsons,” but I’ll give you a DVD. Sometimes when I see you on TV you’re a dead ringer for Mr. Burns. Please watch a couple of “Simpsons” episodes and keep in mind that a lot of viewers actually don’t share Burns’values.


 


Been thinking about the next media sit-downs. George, I don’t want to put you through another “Meet the Press” kind of grilling. Naturally, Matthews over at “Hardball” still wants a shot, but of course he’s not the sweetheart Clinton/Gore-basher of yesteryear. For now, we may want to stick with Beachball Jim over at the “NewsHour.”


 


About shoring up the right side of the New York Times op-ed page: I’m trying to find out who can lean on David Brooks without getting his back up. For a right-minded guy he’s been something of a disappointment, I have to say, not even as reliable as Bill Safire (clearly our best regular over there). Speaking of Safire, let’s see if we can do something extra nice — his recent columns spreading our thin stuff about Qaeda and Saddam were quite helpful.


 


Also at the New York Times, it’s great to see Bill Keller backing up Judith Miller. I love his statement posted on the Times website March 25 — “a smart, well-sourced, industrious and fearless reporter with a keen instinct for news … she has sometimes stepped on toes, but that is hardly grounds for rebuke.” Chalabi spins her about weapons of mass destruction before the war, she promptly gets it on Page One as authoritative, and now the top editor is standing behind her. Terrific!


 


Overall, our echo chamber is sounding good. Lapses aside, Rush is punching the bad guys’ lights out. Likewise O’Reilly and the rest of the stallions in the Murdoch stables — especially at Fox News, Weekly Standard, New York Post.


 


Meanwhile, the Washington Times is true to form. (If our luck holds, the rest of the media won’t ever figure out that our dear Rev. Moon over there actually hates America.) And the new squad of editorial-page attack dogs at the Wall Street Journal is performing nicely. If only they could edit the Journal’s news pages, we’d be rid of some pains in the neck.


 


At moments of downbeat news about the campaign, try doing what I do: Think of Ralph Nader. The guy’s still telling reporters he’s opening a “second front” against us. Is he deluded or disingenuous? Either way, you gotta love him when national polls show how he helps us against Kerry.


 


One of my favorite Nader claims is that he’s going to attract a lot of conservative voters. I didn’t even mind Jon Stewart’s quip on the subject. (“Conservatives for Nader. Not a large group. About the same size as ‘Retarded Death Row Texans for Bush.’”) After all, we don’t worry about offending the felons vote. Even if they’re not waiting to be executed, they’ve sure had a hard time getting into a voting booth. (Thank you Jeb!) I’m so happy Nader’s running again, I almost don’t hate tort lawyers anymore.


 


George, stay on that white horse and remember to leave the nitty-gritty to me. I certainly abhor the title of that book about me (“Bush’s Brain”), but a great concept is aptly stated in there: “Bush traveling the high road, Rove pursuing the low.” I won’t get to Scotland before ya, but I fully intend to see you at the Capitol giving your second inaugural address.


 


___________________


 


Norman Solomon is co-author of “Target Iraq: What the News Media Didn’t Tell You.”    

Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. The paperback edition of his latest book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, includes an afterword about the Gaza war.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors707
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors707
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version