Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, the incoming president of Brazil, is demonstrating an uncanny ability to move forward a progressive agenda while keeping his conservative antagonists at bay. This was clearly demonstrated in his meeting with George W. Bush in Washington on December 10. Pablo Gentili, an Argentine international analyst at the State University of Rio de Janeiro declares: “Da Silva reaped the support of the Bush administration while making it clear that his government will set its own agenda and priorities. He has an extraordinary capacity to build broad support for his left-leaning policies in the face of domestic and international adversity.”

Before da Silva’s arrival in Washington key Republican Congressional figures, along with right wing conservatives identified with the Reagan administration’s bellicose policies in Central America, were calling for Bush to take a tough stand against the incoming president who is common referred to as “Lula.” They decried the new leftist threat in Latin America, asserting a “Lula, Castro, Chavez axis” was in the making, referring to Presidents Fidel Castro of Cuba and Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

Lula had also been hit by international speculators prior to his visit to Washington. Fearful that the social policies advocated by the new government will adversely affect Brazil’s ability to make payments of its huge international debt totaling $240 billion, the investment bank of J P Morgan on December 2 down graded its rating of Brazil from “neutral” to “negative.” This shift led to a slide in the value of Brazil’s currency, the Real, and a slump in the country’s stock market.

As Francisco Meneses of IBASE, an independent research institute in Rio de Janeiro, notes, “Lula before coming to Washington positioned himself so that international institutions and politicians like Bush would find it difficult to go after him.” The day after he won the Brazilian election Lula declared that his number one priority when he takes office on January 1 is to end hunger among 23 million Brazilians, approximately one-seventh of the country’s population. The campaign will be accompanied by increased subsidies to poor families aimed at keeping their children in school, by a fairly radical agrarian reform program, and by significant government support for agricultural cooperatives.

“By making the ending of hunger his number one priority, Lula has inoculated himself against many of his detractors,” says Meneses. As an expert on agrarian issues, Meneses has been participating in the planning meetings for the government’s campaign against hunger. He says the World Bank along with the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization have already informally committed their institutions to spending $5 billion over the next four years on the campaign against hunger.

Even the most orthodox international lending institutions have been check mated by da Silva’s announced policies. Just days before Lula left for Washington, the head of the International Monetary Fund, Horst Kohler, went to Brazil. After meeting with Lula, Kohler proclaimed that the incoming president “is a leader for the twenty-first century.” He even endorsed Lula’s call for increased social spending and lamented J.P. Morgan’s downgrading of Brazil’s investment rating.

One major area of discussion between the Bush administration and Lula in Washington focused on the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). Bush has made this agreement the lynchpin of his Latin American policy, calling for all the countries of the hemisphere (excepting Cuba) to begin reducing trade barriers in 2005. Lula has repeatedly expressed reservations about FTAA, asserting that it favors US domination of Latin America.

Lula positioned himself strategically in the FTAA debate by meeting with regional allies before going to Washington. As Marcos Arruda, a foreign policy consultant to the incoming government notes, “Lula intentionally visited neighboring countries before visiting Bush to make it clear he would not grovel for US support and that Brazil has its own agenda and interests in South America.’ On December 2 Lula visited Argentina, Brazil’s leading partner in MercoSur, the regional trade block that also includes Uruguay and Paraguay. Next he went to Chile, an associate member of MercoSur. In his major address in Buenos Aires Lula called for a strengthening of MercoSur “so we can take control our destiny” and end “our dependency on international currency flows.” Lula, in Argentina as well as Chile, asserted that MercoSur should take priority over other trade agreements, and went on to call for a common currency among MercoSur nations and the formation of a regional Parliament.

In Washington Lula was able to seize the commercial high ground by pointing to a series of US protectionist measures that actually run counter to authentic free trade. Approximately 25% of Brazil’s exports valued at over $14 billions currently go to the United States. Twenty of the leading products face average US tariffs of 39%. If the trade barriers were removed on just four products-orange juice, steel, meat and soy products–it is estimated that annual Brazilian exports to the US would jump by $2 billion.

Francisco Meneses of IBASE believes it is doubtful that the talks between Lula and Bush will actually lead to any significant reduction of U.S. trade barriers, particularly on products like orange juice. “Bush’s brother Jeb as governor of Florida obviously has a stake in keeping out Brazilian juice because of his alliance with local orange growers.” Moreover, Meneses worries that even the apparently favorable rapport between Lula and George W. Bush will soon sour. “With Iraq and the Middle East the administration has its hands full, it doesn’t want to create a crisis with the Lula government for now. Bush is biding his time. He will wait for the inevitably deeper reactions of domestic and international interests opposed to Lula’s progressive social policies before moving against the new government.”




Roger Burbach is director of the Center for the Study of the Americas. He co-edited with Ben Clarke the anthology: September 11 and the US War: Beyond the Curtain of Smoke, City Lights Books, 2002.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version