The summer of 2013 saw the largest wave of prison hunger strikes in U.S history. Started by prisoners in solitary confinement at California’s Pelican Bay State Prison, the strike grew to 30,000 prisoners at two-thirds of California’s prisons. Inmates used their bodies as the only weapon available for fighting the prison torture and abuse. The strike ended on Sept. 5, 2013, the 60th day for 41 inmates who had continuously refused food and faced imminent death.

California legislators who agreed to hold hearings on the strikers’ demands, and supporters who vowed to keep the pressure on state officials, urged the strikers to spare their lives. In ending the strike for now, the prisoners declared they would remain “100% committed to seeing this protracted struggle for real reform through to a complete victory, even if it requires us to make the ultimate sacrifice.”

Routine inhumanity. The prisoners’ main demand in earlier strikes and now is an end to long-term solitary confinement. Their four other core demands are to stop penalizing groups for the actions of individuals, stop rewarding those who debrief (snitch) on others, improve nutrition, and institute constructive programs for those in solitary. All considered reasonable in most of the world.

The current strike erupted because the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) broke its promise to negotiate and implement meaningful reforms following two hunger strikes in 2011. See Prison abuses rooted in slavery: Pelican Bay inmates strike against ‘the hole,’ by Mark Cook, in the Freedom Socialist. In February of 2013, strike leaders gave Gov. Jerry Brown and CDCR Secretary Jeffrey Beard five months to meet their demands. They refused, and the inmates struck once again, on July 8, 2013.

Brutal long-term solitary confinement is so mentally and physically destructive that the U.N. Rapporteur on Torture, Juan Méndez, called on the U.S. government to totally abolish it, stating that even brief confinement can amount to torture. At Pelican Bay, more than 400 people have been in solitary for over a decade, some for 30 to 40 years. California currently holds 12,000 prisoners in isolation. Nationally there are at least 80,000, the vast majority are people of color.

Very few prisoners are in solitary because of their original crimes, but rather for prison rule violations, solidarity with other prisoners as jailhouse lawyers, radical political beliefs, or alleged gang association — the definition of which is so broad that a mere greeting to a fellow inmate or a tattoo can land a prisoner in solitary. One prisoner said that, “If the gang investigation unit hears you fart, they will try to decode it for gang messages.” Getting out of solitary is next to impossible unless one accuses someone else of gang association.

State retaliation and PR lies. Gov. Brown and the CDCR callously refused to negotiate with the hunger strikers. Instead, they punished them with additional isolation and sensory deprivation, withheld medications, and confiscated property. Incredibly, state officials claim that solitary confinement does not exist because prisoners have radios and TVs, can talk to guards, can leave their parking stall-sized rooms for one hour of exercise in a slightly larger, windowless room, and can occasionally converse with visitors through thick glass. Further, the state falsely insists that the strike is a power play by gang leaders to get back into the general population so they can carry on their gang business in prison and the community.

On Aug. 19, 2013, the state used these lies to persuade a judge to authorize prison doctors to force-feed prisoners, even if they had previously signed medical orders not to be resuscitated. The lawyer for prisoners in a statewide class action over medical treatment, Donald Spector, shamefully agreed to the order.

The Center for Constitutional Rights represents inmates suing to end prolonged solitary and denounces force feeding without consent as torturous punishment. Such treatment of Guantánamo Bay inmates on hunger strike recently drew wide condemnation. Claude Marks of the Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition declared: “This approach (in California) much like Guantánamo, sets the U.S. apart from all related international human rights standards.”

Prisoner solidarity trumps divide and conquer. The state’s dishonest allegations about gang coercion are directly contradicted by an inmate initiative to end racial hostilities within California prisons and jails. On Feb. 10, 2012, strike leaders called on prisoners throughout the state “to collectively seize this moment in time and put an end to more than 20-30 years of hostilities between our racial groups.” They urged prisoners to settle personal issues between individuals by diplomatic means so these disputes would not “escalate into racial group issues.” They concluded: “We must all hold strong to our mutual agreement from this point on and focus our time, attention and energy on mutual causes beneficial to all of us and our best interests. We can no longer allow CDCR to use us against each other for their benefit!”

Racism is at the root of solitary confinement in the United States, first given government sanction as a means to control slaves. It has been used to varying degrees in prisons since, but was vastly expanded in the 1980s when the so-called war on drugs became the pretext for mass incarceration. In 1972, crime rates were decreasing, and there were 350,000 people in U.S. prisons. Today, crime rates are still decreasing, yet the prison population exceeds 2.3 million. The majority are inmates of color. Attorney and author Michelle Alexander calls this phenomenon the New Jim Crow. Today’s prison hunger strikes are the lunch-counter sit-ins of our era.

Model for the working class. The solidarity intensifying in the depths of prison torture chambers is what the capitalist class fears most and seeks to suppress by brutal means. Not surprisingly, the Guantánamo and California model of abusive prison practices, called the “New Penitentiary Culture” is being exported around the world, including Colombia, Mexico, Honduras, Haiti, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. But resistance to U.S. prison imperialism is rising elsewhere, too. A hunger strike also began on July 8, 2013, at La Dorado, Colombia (one of 16 new prisons in that country partially funded and trained by U.S.).

The determination by California prisoners to transcend racism motivates the rest of the working class to do the same. Labor and all movements for social justice need to embrace prisoner demands and help in the fight.

For updates, visit http://prisonerhungerstrikesolidarity.wordpress.com.

Val Carlson is a civil rights attorney in Seattle, and a lifelong activist for social justice. For feedback, contact vac77@juno.com. 


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors712
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors712
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version