New media revelations have confirmed that the US airstrikes against a Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) medical center in Kunduz, Afghanistan were premeditated and deliberate, constituting a flagrant war crime. The bombings, which lasted for nearly an hour and a half, killed at least 22 civilians, including 12 hospital staff and 10 patients.

Citing an anonymous former intelligence official, the Associated Press reported Thursday that American special operations analysts in Afghanistan had been gathering intelligence on the hospital days before it was destroyed on October 3. The official asserts that the analysts “had assembled a dossier that included maps with the hospital circled,” supposedly because they believed a Pakistani intelligence operative was coordinating Taliban activity from inside the hospital.

The AP report notes, “The intelligence suggested the hospital was being used as a Taliban command and control center and may have housed heavy weapons.” After the attack, “some US analysts assessed that the strike had been justified,” while concluding “that the Pakistani, believed to have been working for his country’s Inter-Service Intelligence directorate, had been killed.”

However, MSF has repeatedly asserted that no gunmen, weapons or ammunition were housed in their facility. Further, none of the victims killed by the air strikes have been publicly identified as Pakistani, and MSF says that none of its staff at the hospital were Pakistani.

Meinie Nicolai, president of the operational directorate of MSF, said, “There were only Afghan staff and nine international staff, none of whom were from Pakistan, working in the hospital. There was absolutely nothing that indicated at any level, including at senior management, that any of our staff was working for Pakistani intelligence.”

Nicolai noted that these new details confirm “that the hospital was intentionally targeted, killing at least 22 patients and MSF staff. …This would amount to a premeditated massacre.”

NBC News also reported Thursday that “cockpit recordings reveal that the crew actually questioned whether the air strike was legal” amid the five separate strafing runs during the attack. The Daily Beast reported that during classified briefings on Capitol Hill last week, the military withheld both the audio and video from inside the cockpit, “even when a lawmaker directly requested to listen to the audio.”

The Department of Defense cited its ongoing internal investigation as their reason not to share the recordings, a further indication that the military operates as a law unto itself. The recordings could contain incriminating dialogue in which higher-ups order their questioning pilots to carry through a premeditated war crime.

In official statements regarding the hospital bombing, US military commanders have changed their story repeatedly. For the first three days after the attack, the military failed to state that innocent civilians were killed. The Pentagon refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing and sought to place the blame on Afghan forces, going so far as to withhold the fact that the air strikes were carried out by the US. A US military spokesman in Afghanistan described the deliberate decimation of the hospital as “collateral damage.”

Days later, US Army General John Campbell told reporters that “Afghan forces advised that they were taking fire from enemy positions and asked for air support from US forces… An airstrike was then called to eliminate the Taliban threat and several civilians were accidentally struck.”

The following day, speaking before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Campbell finally acknowledged US responsibility for the attack, declaring, “To be clear, the decision … was a US decision made within the US chain of command. A hospital was mistakenly struck.” Campbell declared, “We would never intentionally target a protected medical facility.”

When asked about any US troops on the ground, Campbell said, “We had a special operations unit in close vicinity that was talking to the aircraft that delivered those fires.” MSF President Joanne Liu later described these remarks as “an admission of a war crime.”

Nicolai has challenged the blatantly fabricated US narrative, telling the AP that the MSF staff “reported a calm night and that there were no armed combatants, nor active fighting in or from the compound prior to the airstrikes.” Afghans who worked at the hospital have also told the AP that no weapons were fired from inside the hospital compound.

The latest revelations expose all the previous claims by Obama administration and military officials as lies. The deliberate targeting of a hospital is a war crime that flows from the predatory war that has gone on for fourteen years.

The revelations from the AP came the same day as Obama announced that the US will keep 10,000 troops in Afghanistan, likely through at least the end of his presidency.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors716
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors716
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version