The recent Greek tragedy has revealed much about the anti-democratic nature of Brussels, and the victory of austerity ideology over economic wisdom. It has also clearly unveiled systemic weaknesses in the human rights framework, particularly when up against powerful creditors.
In the game of human rights against international financial capital, capital will win – and States whose job it is to protect our liberties have created legal frameworks to make it so.

Fiscal waterboarding. That’s how previous Greek Finance Minister, Yanis Varoufakis, described the imposition of European and International Monetary Fund policies in the country. Austerity equates to having your head forced under water, only to be violently ejected up just as you feel you are losing your breath, drowning.

Between 2003 and 2006 in Polish secret prisons, and potentially Lithuanian and Romanian too, detainees like Bin Attash were violently strapped down by CIA officials, their faces covered with a cloth, and water poured over their nose and mouth to create a terrifying sensation of drowning. U.S. government lawyers and psychologists toiled, writing memos assuring officials that this did not constitute torture.

Their semantics fooled no one. When information about the CIA’s extraordinary rendition, secret detention, and torture program was leaked to the public, European officials spoke out against these torture techniques. From 2006, the Council of Europe and the European Parliament undertook investigations, wrote reports, and issued resolutions calling on complicit European States to guarantee accountability for violations of the basic human right not to be tortured.

Yet, when the United Nations Independent Expert on foreign debt and human rights, Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky, called upon European institutions and the IMF to question austerity policies which “had not worked” in Greece and had, instead, caused a recession, he found himself almost alone against the sea of voices calling for Greece’s head, and for continuing suffering of the Greek people – for dues paid many times over.

Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, Paul Mason, and other renowned economists shouted against the insanity of continuing austerity in Greece. Greece’s debt is unsustainable, and vulnerable citizens are being crushed to pay unconscionable levels of interest back to wealthy French and German banks. Real wages have reduced. Engineers who had earned EUR 1,500 per month in 2007, are now being asked to survive on EUR 500, while doing the same job.

The Independent Expert called on European institutions and the IMF to ensure that any new agreements protected the “right to health care, food and social security” in light of a “humanitarian crisis” in Greece, “with shortages in medicines and food.”

Yet, the idea that austerity policies may violate economic, social and cultural rights went largely unreported in the media and certainly unconsidered by the European Commission, IMF and European Central Bank.

On this occasion, Brussels went further. We did not only witness the customary ambivalence to economic, social and cultural rights. European institutions collaboratively denied the Greek people their basic right to political participation.

The UN Independent Experts on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order, Alfred de Zayas, and on human rights and international solidarity, Virginia Dandan, commended the Greek referendum which resulted in a comprehensive “No” to austerity as an “eloquent expression of the self-determination of the Greek people,” and stressed that there is “much more at stake” than debt repayment obligations.

The result was ignored in Brussels, and the current Greek government was made to pay for instituting the referendum with punishing terms, including being forced to sell of more than EUR 50 billion worth of national Greek assets.

The weakness of human rights against the makers of international financial norms was revealed again. While violations of civil and political rights are often given air time (unless they result in uncomfortable referenda results), economic, social and cultural rights are almost always ignored. Without any effective enforcement mechanisms, all human rights provide pretty rhetoric but little support to those seeking an adequate standard of living.

Countries quickly band together to create international treaties for trade – with problematic but powerful dispute settlement bodies which weaken the power of States to protect our human rights and the environment where corporate profits are threatened. At the same time, States consistently fail to subject themselves to binding mechanisms for the enjoyment of human rights, labor protections, and for the protection of the environment.

This is deliberate, and all too felt in Greece as its economy is pushed to the brink of drowning again.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate

2 Comments

  1. And what about the odious nature of the debt (as determined by the Parliamentary committee? Shouldn’t that have given the Greek government some leverage in negotiations? One of the legal principles of contracting is that the risk of loss should be borne by the party with the best able to carry or manage or bear the risk. In my humble opinion, the large financial institutions and their wealthy owners are better able to manage the risk and bear its negative consequences than pensioners and workers. But alas, as you know well, legal principles that gravitate against the corporate imperative to make profit (a legal mandate) seem to get lost in the fog of financial war. Thanks for the article.

Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors706
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors706
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version