House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy on Monday stripped Rep. Steve King (R-IA) of all his committee assignments, leaving him a fifth wheel with nothing to do in Congress.

The move came after King told the New York Times, “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?”

The phrase “white supremacist” was what finally goaded the GOP into disciplinary action, after winking at King’s racist and xenophobic remarks for years.

Iowa senators Iowa Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst, both of whom had campaigned with King as recently as this past fall, abruptly denounced him.

King has for years backed a border wall with Mexico and proposed it be built with funds appropriated from Planned Parenthood. The stupid wall idea is if anything more offensive than the mere phrase “white supremacy,” though they come to much the same thing.

About 5.6 percent of Americans, some 11 million people, are white supremacists. Many politicians in the Republican Party have been seeking this constituency at the polls for decades. Many political races in the United States are very close, with only two or three percent separating the candidates. When Republicans can attract white supremacist votes, they can add a crucial few percentage points in elections and snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.

Initially their way of achieving this smelly success had been to use dog whistles of various sorts, putting out the call to the white nationalists without explicitly adopting their racist hate speech. Especially after the racist “Nixon Strategy,” in which the Republican Party sought to pick up traditionally Democratic white southerners, the dog whistle became crucial. It is incredible that over a century and a half after the Emancipation Proclamation, white southerners keep their caste system going, mostly declining to intermarry with African-Americans or to share a church or a political party with them, and that they have de facto re-segregated K-12 schools. African-American households typically have one tenth the wealth of white households (the average white family’s median wealth is $171,000, that of African-Americans is $17,600) and have Third World health statistics on things like infant mortality.

Reagan spoke of “welfare queens” and campaigned for re-segregating K-12 schools.

The campaign manager for George H. W. Bush in the 1988 campaign against Mike Dukakis used a furlough program in which an African-American inmate had been let out and committed a rape. Lee Atwater vowed to “strip the bark off the liberal bastard” Dukakis and make “Willie Horton his running mate.”

Willie Horton 1988 Attack Ad

Just watch the ad. There isn’t any doubt that the campaign was racist (the implication was that the rape was of a white woman, so this was an indirect political lynching of Dukakis). Atwater said it was about economics, but then a white inmate who committed a crime on a furlough could have been deployed. (The furlough program was Republican in origin and had nothing directly to do with Dukakis, who inherited it and did not decide on particular furloughs).

The George W. Bush campaign in the Republican primaries of 2000 had help from a group that sent robo-calls to South Carolinian voters with a phony poll that asked “How would you feel about John McCain if you knew he had fathered a black child out of wedlock?” McCain and his wife had adopted a baby girl from Bangladesh and treated her cleft palate, and pictures had circulated of her with McCain, and these pond scum publicists tried to use the image against McCain with white racists in South Carolina. Bush won the South Carolina primary.

The tech billionaire Robert Mercer, who infused the obscure Breitbart neo-Nazi toilet paper of a webzine with enough cash to turn it into a phenomenon, backed Steve Bannon, who hooked up with Trump.

Trump was the first Republican presidential candidate to cross over from a more subtle sort of dog whistle to reviving 1940s style racial slurs and sterotypes in public. In some ways Rep. Steve King and others of his ilk had paved the way for Trump to be acceptable to Republican primary voters.

We are now at the point where Trump has made the 11 million white supremacists fairly central to his leadership of the Republican Party, and punishing Steve King with no committee assignments is a feeble response on the part of mainstream Republicans.

Party leaders need to denounce Trump’s anti-Mexican racism, which is the foundation of his peculiar demand for a border wall with Mexico. This demand has nothing to do with national security, or he would be demanding a wall with Canada, too. He doesn’t care about blue-eyed undocumented immigrants.

The only way Republicans can avoid being taken over by the Neo-Nazis the way they were previously taken over by the Evangelicals is to make a clean break with Trumpism and Breitbartism and Mercerism. And the way to do that is to join the Democrats in saying “Hell no!” to Trump’s racist wall. Together, mainstream Republicans and the Democrats could pass a budget, reopen the government, and override Trump’s veto.

That step would show that McCarthy and other Republicans are serious about repudiating the white supremacist wing of the party. Otherwise, the punishment of Rep. King is a minor sideshow, no more than rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

 

 

Please Help ZNet and Z Magazine

Due to problems with our programming that we have only now finally been able to fix, it has been over a year since our last fund raising. As a result, we need your help more than ever to continue to bring the alternative information you have been looking for for 30 years.

Z offers the most useful societal news we can, but in judging what is useful, unlike many other sources we emphasize vision, strategy, and activist relevance. When we address Trump, for example, it is to find ways beyond Trump, not to merely repeat, over and over, how terrible he is. And the same is true for our addressing global warming, poverty, inequality, racism, sexism, and war making. Our priority is always that what we provide has potential for aiding determining what to do, and how best to do it.

In fixing our programming problems, we have updated our system to make becoming a sustainer and giving donations easier. It has been a long process but we are hopeful it will make it more convenient for everyone to help us grow. If you have any trouble, please let us know right away. We need input on any problems to make sure the system can continue to be easy to use for everyone.

The best way to help, however, is to become a monthly or annual sustainer. Sustainers can comment, post blogs, and receive a nightly commentary by direct email.

Become a Sustainer here.

You can also or alternatively make a one-time donation or get a print subscription to Z Magazine.

Make a one time Donation here.

Subscribe to Z Magazine here.

Any aid will help greatly. And please email any suggestions for improvements, comments, or problems right away.

Thank you,
Michael Albert
Lydia Sargent
Eric Sargent

Juan R. I. Cole is Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History at the University of Michigan. For three and a half decades, he has sought to put the relationship of the West and the Muslim world in historical context, and he has written widely about Egypt, Iran, Iraq, and South Asia. His books include Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires; The New Arabs: How the Millennial Generation is Changing the Middle East; Engaging the Muslim World; and Napoleon’s Egypt: Invading the Middle East.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors808
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors808
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version