The Venezuelan interior affairs and justice minister, Miguel Rodriguez Torres, has given information on an alleged plan to destabilise the country, detailing foreign involvement in the recent militant opposition street barricades.

Sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, former Colombian and Mexican presidents Alvaro Uribe and Vicente Fox, and the U.S. State Department and other institutions were all accused of being involved in fomenting a strategy of internal destabilisation.

According to Rodriguez, some members of the Venezuelan opposition met in Mexico in 2010 to plan a strategy to remove the government of Hugo Chavez. At this meeting, right-wing Venezuelan politician Leopoldo Lopez was elected to lead destabilising actions, it was alleged.

Street actions were employed by opposition youth groups JAVU, Movement 13 and Operation Liberty, who used “hunger strikes”, “self-chaining” and street campsto pressure the government while Chavez received cancer treatment in early 2013, before passing away.

Following this, a street barricade strategy was employed in major cities from January to April this year, in the context of a wave of opposition disturbances, riots and protests. Rodriguez argued that the street barricades were based on an earlier strategy used against the Chavez government in 2004 and “financed by the far-right”.

“This time they have tried other methods, with other techniques, with other people to try and reactivate and improve the method of application of the street barricades,” said Rodriguez.

The minister, who made his presentation on national television with flow charts and photos of alleged meetings and conversations, said the street barricades were employed along with a diplomatic and media strategy to “attack the Bolivarian revolution”.

This campaign allegedly involves the U.S. State Department, which the minister said has the strategic aim of “impeding the continental propagation of the Bolivarian ideal and appropriating and controlling the greatest oil reserves on the planet”.

Rodriguez said that the two main planks of this strategy are to accuse top Venezuelan government officials of financing narco-trafficking or terrorist activities, and to attack the government over human rights issues to make Venezuela appear as a “rogue state”.

On the latter, opposition politicians such as Antonio Ledezma, Maria Corina Machado, Leopoldo Lopez and Diego Arria were indicated as supplying “manipulated” information on human rights issues to U.S. diplomatic and other sources.

“U.S. institutions and NGOs gather manipulated information to make it appear to the world that basic rights are permanently and constantly violated in Venezuela,” Rodriguez said.

Within Venezuela, authorities of some independent public and private universities, the pro-opposition student leader Juan Requesens, and two U.S. embassy officials were also accused of involvement in alleged destabilisation plans.

Rodriguez revealed that 58 individuals with foreign nationality had been arrested while participating in barricades, “almost all implicated in the use of arms”. They include Colombians, an American and a Spaniard, and two of those arrested had an Interpol code red out against them.

Opposition figures deny that the protests and disturbances were a destabilisation strategy to remove President Nicolas Maduro from office, arguing that these were spontaneous demonstrations over economic problems and “authoritarian” government practices.

However while some protests were peaceful and exhibited a range of opposition grievances, a key demand by many protest leaders and on the violent street barricades was Maduro’s “exit” from office. Regular riots in the wealthy east of Caracas and other affected areas also caused significant damage to property, government offices, public transport, supermarkets and free health clinics.

The unrest led to 41 deaths and almost 800 wounded, with opposition activists, government supporters, other civilians and National Guard officers among the fatalities.

Life has gradually returned to normal in affected areas, after the final street barricades were removed last month. Sporadic small protests and acts of violence continue however.

Small groups of opposition students in the city of San Cristobal, in the western state of Tachira, protested their local universities’ return to classes today. One group burned a truck belonging to state oil company PDVSA, and clashes with police also took place, leading to several arrests.

Rodriguez said in his presentation on Friday that the militant opposition had now activated a campaign of “targeted violence” after the failure of the street barricades. He placed the assassination of prominent pro-government politician and activist, Eliecer Otaiza, within that context.

Ewan Robertson is a freelance journalist and policy and communications executive at Scotland's Towns Partnership (STP). From Edinburgh, Scotland, he holds a degree in History and International Relations from the University of Aberdeen, and a postgraduate degree in Latin American Studies from the same institution.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors708
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors708
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version