Source: Jacobin

New polling shows that only about a third of Americans (36 percent) approve of Donald Trump’s handling of the economy, and only about 30 percent think he’s doing a good job lowering the cost of living. This is important because the economy and the cost of living were top issues for Trump voters in the 2024 election, with concerns about the economy the highest since the Great Recession of 2008.

Even more important: that left-wing rag the Wall Street Journal reported last week that 70 percent of Americans said the American dream — that if you work hard, you’ll get ahead — isn’t true or never was. They’re not wrong: virtually all Americans earned more than their parents in the decades after World War II, but only 50 percent of those born in 1980 will. This is the anger that drives far-right populism. Economic populism is about economics.

Trump is now as unpopular on inflation as Joe Biden was in 2022. Does it matter? It won’t if all Democrats talk about is defense of democracy. What we need to do to defend democracy in the short term is different from what we need to do to defend it in the long term. In the short term, we need resistance — in the courts, on the streets. But to defend democracy in the long term, we need to address economic dissatisfaction.

Often the assumption is that this means creating blue-collar jobs. That’s part of it: over 400,000 manufacturing jobs are unfilled in this country. Why? The “college for all” ideal led both to the loss of respect for blue-collar jobs and the loss of funding for vocational programs. Who’s talking about this? Donald Trump, who’s busy posting on social media that he will dedicate the money he’s extorting from Harvard to vocation programs. As usual, he has perfect pitch for reaching working-class voters: taking from the Harvard elites who look down on you and giving to the working man.

But it’s not just blue-collar voters we need to win back. The middle-status voters veering right both in Europe and the United States hold not only blue- but also pink- and routine white-collar jobs. Here’s the rub: if wages had continued to rise when productivity did, as in the decades after World War II, wages would be 43 percent higher than they are today. Instead productivity rose eight times faster than wages, with the lion’s share of productivity gains going to the top 1 percent of households. The “affordability problem” is a wages problem — not chiefly a problem of excessive government regulation (à la “abundance agenda”).

Economic populism is about economics, and the only effective antidote to right populism (“They’re looking down on you”) is left populism (“They’re robbing you blind.”) Why aren’t ordinary people more concerned about defending democracy? Because inequality predicts low trust in institutions, and many working-class Americans feel democracy has let them down. And they’re right. It has.


This article was originally published by Jacobin; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate

Joan C. Williams is an American feminist legal scholar, the founding director at the Center for WorkLife Law, and a distinguished professor of law at UC Law San Francisco. She is the author of several books, including White Working Class: Overcoming Class Cluelessness in America.

Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors685
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors685
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version