Source: Geopolitical Economy

The European Union’s high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Josep Borrell, has acknowledged that the West has hypocritical “double standards”.

Borrell argued that “diplomacy is the art of managing double standards”.

As examples of Western hypocrisy, the top EU diplomat cited international law, the Russia-Ukraine-NATO war, Israel’s bombing of Gaza, the US-led invasion of Iraq, and climate change.

“Wherever I go, I find myself confronted with the accusation of double standards”, Borrell recalled. “I used to say to my ambassadors that diplomacy is the art of managing double standards. Certainly, something difficult, but it is about [that]: to manage double standards”.

The EU foreign-policy chief made these remarks in a talk at Oxford University in May. The EU’s diplomatic service published a transcript of his speech. (Some of the exact wording is slightly different in the transcript, as the website edited Borrell’s comments to correct grammatical errors.)

EU “double standards” on international law, Israel-Palestine, Ukraine, Iraq

International humanitarian law “should be the best safeguard against the normalisation of the use of force that we see all over the world”, Borrell argued.

He acknowledged that Europe has been hypocritical on this: “I know, however, that to be able to rally the world around those principles, we need to show that we, Europeans, respect them always and everywhere. Is that what we are doing? Well, not to the extent we should. And for Europe, this is a problem”.

“The world have not forgotten the war in Iraq”, Borrell continued, noting that some European countries joined in the US-led invasion, which UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said clearly violated international law.

The EU has also been deeply critical on Israel-Palestine, the foreign-policy chief conceded.

“What is now happening in Gaza has portrayed Europe in a way that many people simply do not understand”, Borrell said. “They saw our quick engagement and decisiveness in supporting Ukraine and wonder about the way we approach what is happening in Palestine”.

When foreign countries look at Europe, he acknowledged, “The perception is that the value of civilian lives in Ukraine is not the same than in Gaza, where more than 34,000 are dead, most others displaced, [where] children are starving, and the humanitarian support [is] obstructed”.

“And the perception is that we care less if United Nations Security Council resolutions are violated, as it is the case by Israel with respect to the settlements, [as opposed to] when it is violated by Russia”, Borrell added.

“If we call something a ‘war crime’ in one place, we need to call it by the same name when it happens anywhere else”, implored the top EU diplomat. “One horror cannot justify another”.

Western hypocrisy on climate change

Borrell likewise addressed Western hypocrisy on climate change, given that rich capitalist countries in the Global North are responsible for the majority of historical carbon emissions, but are now putting the burden of the green energy transition onto the Global South, which contributed the least, but already suffers from the worst consequences of global warming.

“We have to have a look at why the world is feeling some resentment about us”, stated the EU foreign-policy chief.

“Yes, there is a feeling of resentment because people believe that there are different responsibilities”, he added.

“We, Europeans, have produced about 25% of all cumulated global CO2 emissions since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution”, Borrell said.

He noted that Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America have each only contributed 3% of historical carbon emissions.

“Sub-Saharan Africa and South Americans [have] almost nothing of the responsibility, and they share the most important and damaging consequences”, Borrell stated.

“So, when we talk about fighting climate change, we have to understand their views and the feeling that this is a problem that someone has created, and others pay the consequences”, Borrell said.

“And the only possible answer is to provide more resources in order to face this problem. More resources – but it has not been the case”, he added, admitting that the rich colonizing nations of the Global North have not honored their promises to provide funding and technology transfer to help the formerly colonized nations of the Global South transition away from fossil fuels.

USA is losing hegemony; “the world is much more multipolar”

In his speech at Oxford University, Borrell conceded that “America has lost its status of a hegemon”, and the Western-dominated order created after World War Two “is losing ground”.

Today, “the world is much more multipolar”, he said, pointing to “middle powers” like India, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Türkiye.

These “middle powers” are “becoming important actors”, Borrell continued. “Whether they are BRICS or not BRICS, they have very few common features, except the desire for getting more status and a stronger voice in the world, as well as greater benefits for their own development”.

“In order to achieve this, they are maximising their autonomy, not willing to take sides, hedging one side or the other depending on the moment, depending on the question”, he added.

Rise of China changes global economic landscape

The top EU diplomat stated that “China is becoming a rival for us and for the United States”.

Borrell cited “China rising to the super-power status” as the main reason for the decline of US hegemony.

“What China has done in the last 40 years is unique in the history of humankind”, he confessed. “In the last 30 years, China’s share of the world’s GDP, at PPP, has gone from 6% to almost 20%, while we, Europeans, went from 21% to 14% and the United States from 20% to 15%”.

“This is a dramatic change of the economic landscape”, Borrell said.

The statistics he cited are based on data from the International Monetary Fund.

European exceptionalism and fearmongering about Russia

Borrell, whose five-year term as the EU’s top diplomat ends in December, is known for sometimes “saying the quiet part loud” – that is, bluntly stating truths that are widely known in elite circles, but typically left unsaid.

In a shockingly straightforward article in February 2024, Borrell acknowledged that the “era of Western dominance has indeed definitively ended”, as Geopolitical Economy Report noted at the time. The EU foreign-policy chief warned that Europe should not divide the world into “the West against the Rest”, as “many in the ‘Global South’ accuse us of ‘double standards’”.

In a blunt moment in 2022, he admitted that the West’s new cold war on China and Russia is not a battle of “democracies vs. authoritarians”, because, as Borrell put it, “On our side, there are a lot of authoritarian regimes”.

In a separate speech in 2022, the top EU diplomat discussed how the West’s “prosperity was based on China and Russia”, including “cheap energy coming from Russia”, “access to the big China market” for exports, and “Chinese workers with their low salaries, [who] have done much better and much more to contain inflation than all the central banks together”.

Despite the fact that Borrell makes these kinds of frank admissions from time to time, he is by no means a dove. In fact, as the EU’s high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, he has often been quite hawkish.

This is especially the case on Russia. In his May 2024 speech at Oxford University, Borrell claimed that Russia is “the most existential threat to Europe”.

He referred to Russian President Vladimir Putin as “an existential threat to all of us”, and called for Western governments to send even more weapons to Ukraine.

Borrell has also at times displayed a very racist, condescending view of the majority of the world population in the Global South.

In an infamous rant in 2022, the EU’s top diplomat argued that “the world needs Europe” as a “beacon” and beautiful “garden” to civilize the barbarous “jungle” in the Global South, as Geopolitical Economy Report highlighted.

This notorious “garden versus the jungle” speech led to global backlash, and Borrell was forced to apologize. But his worldview has not changed since.

In his remarks two years later at Oxford, Borrell again demonstrated a kind of arrogant European exceptionalism.

“The way of living of the Europeans, this best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity and social cohesion that the humanity has never been able to invent, is certainly in danger”, he said.

Borrell concluded the talk referring to Europe’s system as “the best combination of political freedom, economic prosperity and social cohesion that humanity has never been able to invent”.


This article was originally published by Geopolitical Economy; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors716
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors716
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version