Michael Albert’s recent article, “We Need a United Left” is a much needed exploration of the Left’s electoral positions and choices in 2016. Undoubtedly, our movement requires more solidarity and less hostility. Here, Albert’s article attempts to explore how those holding contending positions might better relate to and understand each other.

Albert offers four clearly identifiable positions amongst those who would identify as “leftists” or “progressives.” Those positions include:

Position 1: Vote for Clinton as Greater Good
Position 2: Vote for Clinton as Lesser Evil
Position 3: Vote Green or Don’t Vote
Position 4: Vote for the Best Attainable Overall Outcome

Of the available options, I would choose Position 4: vote contextually. Without doubt, it makes sense to vote according to what’s happening on the ground leading up to election day. As conditions change, voting options should as well.

For instance, if there is a terrorist attack prior to the election, it would become even more important to defeat Trump. At the same time, if I lived in a swing state and the election was close, yes, I would vote for Clinton.

Fortunately or unfortunately, I live in Indiana, a state Trump will likely win by double digits. For me, the choice is already clear: vote Stein. Locally, however, I’ll vote Democrat because I don’t have alternative parties or worthwhile independents to support.

That being said, while it’s important to explore these electoral options and hopefully provide a united position, I would like to touch on something much deeper. As I write this short essay, many on the Left attack each other over the results of the Brexit vote. Indeed, I witnessed the same thing when Obama was running in 2007/08, and again during the Arab Spring, and again concerning Syria, and so on.

These horizontal attacks are toxic and unproductive. Such behavior produces sectarianism at a time when movements around the world require more unity and genuine solidarity.
Without question, we live in momentous times. According to the world’s best scientists, what humanity does in the coming decade will decide whether or not we survive the century. Our economic institutions are failing and militarism remains a global menace. Systemic racism, patriarchy and religious intolerance are still pervasive phenomena in our society. Our collective challenges are daunting.

In this context, a united Left is essential.

Vincent Emanuele is a writer, activist and radio host of “Meditations and Molotovs” which airs every Monday @2:00pm(EDT) on the Progressive Radio Network (prn.fm). He can be reached at vincent.emanuele333@gmail.com


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate

Vincent Emanuele is a combat veteran, writer, and activist who lives and works in Los Angeles, California. Vincent testified to U.S. Congress in 2008 about war crimes and atrocities after refusing a third deployment to Iraq with the United States Marine Corps. Since then, he has worked with a wide range of social movements, community organizations, and labor unions. His writings and interviews have been featured in ZNet, CounterPunch, Alternet, TruthOut, and Verso. Vincent is also a contributor to the anthology ‘Paths of Dissent: Soldiers Speak Out Against America’s Misguided Wars’ (Metropolitan, 2022). He can be reached at vincent.emanuele333@gmail.com

Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors682
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors682
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version