Source: Truthout

The Trump administration promises to double down on what it says will be the fiercest deportation program in U.S. history. Judging by history and rhetoric, the administration has no qualms about stripping kids from their parents and spouses from their partners.

Many asylum seekers in the U.S., their advocates and liberal mainstream media have mused that some cornered refugees may flee up north to “tolerant” Canada, and find reprieve there.

It happened before in 2017, during Donald Trump’s first presidency. Fifty thousand foreign asylum seekers residing in the U.S. suddenly fled north to Canada. They benefited from a substantive exception (what anti-immigrant forces decried as a “loophole”) within the so-called Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA), a law signed in 2002 and implemented in 2004. The agreement sought to ensure that most people who enter Canada via the U.S. cannot claim asylum in Canada, and vice versa. The exception stipulated that the STCA only applied at official land border crossings, so asylum seekers who crossed into Canada through unofficial sites of entry were not subject to the STCA and therefore were still able to make a claim for refugee protection in Canada.

Following a surge of unofficial border crossings in 2017, Canada and the U.S. officially expanded the scope of the STCA in 2023 to remove this exception, making it more difficult for asylum seekers to claim protection in Canada.

Now, the exceptions to the STCA are much narrower: To escape its application, asylum seekers must show they already have family members in Canada who are citizens or permanent residents, or that they are unaccompanied minors, or that they hold a valid work or study permit or that they could face the death penalty in the U.S. if returned.

Desperate asylum seekers from the U.S. cannot safely assume that a “welcoming” Canada perpetually awaits them. The idea of Canada as a “safe haven” for asylum seekers is a myth cultivated for far too long.

The fallacy of a welcoming Canada, an exceptional Canada that has a better moral compass than the U.S., is just that: a fallacy.

Justin Trudeau, the nation’s former prime minister who famously tweeted to the world in January 2017 that, “To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you,” and the Liberal Party he led until recently are chief proponentsof that fallacy.

In reality, Canada could be on course to have a “Trump Lite” government when its federal elections occur, by law, before October 20. Pollsters currently show the Liberals, now led by newly sworn-in Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, neck and neck with the Conservatives, though Trump’s trade war threats are boosting the chances of Carney’s party.

Canadian politicians are pretending to denounce the racist, anti-refugee dog whistles, while at the same time enacting new anti-immigrant laws.

The fiery, anti-refugee Conservative Party of Canada is refining its anti-immigrant rhetoric, emboldened by crass talk from Trump’s GOP across the border. Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservatives and candidate to become Canada’s next prime minister, has lambasted refugees crossing from the U.S. as “illegals.”

Should he win, his first business of the day will likely be to curtail a range of Canada’s refugee intake policies. Already, Canada has scrapped the popular grandparents’ permanent resident visa sponsorship program, which allowed Canadian permanent residents and citizens to sponsor their non-Canadian parents to relocate to Canada as permanent residents. In 2024, when a populist outcry linking “too much immigration” with Canada’s strained public services got hot, Trudeau’s government removed that specific visa.

Refugees fleeing Trump’s immigrant crackdowns up north to Canada can expect swift detentions and pushbacks into the U.S. by Canada whether Poilievre wins or Carney’s party continues in power.

But it is simplistic to blame Canada’s opportunistic politicians alone for anti-refugee rhetoric. A growing mass of ordinary Canadians themselves are getting hostile to asylum seekers coming from the U.S. or elsewhere.

As the cost of living crisis rocks Canada, recent surveys have revealed that the majority of Canadians are now significantly opposed to more immigration and refugee intakes. They demand that the door be shut. Lots of ordinary Canadians wrongly believe that refugees are the reason why the country is facing a massive shortage of housing — 300,000 units for the 2024-2026 period. Hate marches are cropping up in Canadian cities with cowardly protesters making newcomers scapegoats for the government’s incompetence in housing, health care and wage growth.

Canadian politicians on both sides of the spectrum are pretending to denounce the racist, anti-refugee dog whistles, while at the same time enacting new anti-immigrant laws, such as slashing visas for students and skilled immigrants. For example, David McGuinty, the Liberal lawmaker who represents my constituency in Ontario, and who doubles as the public safety minister, is now a regular visitor to Washington, on pleading trips to convince the Trump administration that Canada is serious about militarizing its border.

Trump has publicly groaned that Canada is a bad “abuser,” taking advantage of the U.S. to enjoy a trade surplus while allowing drugs and undocumented immigrants over the border into the U.S. Of course, that’s a plain lie as per available data.

This is bad news for refugees thinking of heading up north. Canada is rapidly stiffening its borders with a high-tech arsenalas a sweetener deal to placate Trump and dodge his tariffs. Though it frames itself as a tougher alternative more ready to take on Trump’s hostile threats of a trade war and even annexation, the Conservative Party of Canada has gone out of its way to massage the U.S. president. It promises to activate all sorts of border drones, sensors and Black Hawk helicopters as part of a package to soothe Trump’s fury. “Send Canadian Forces troops, helicopters & surveillance to the border now,” yapped Poilievre in February, calling to “put Canada First.” It is unclear though whether Canada will source the border securitization gear from U.S. companies, considering how Trump’s tariffs on Canada have gravely soured business relations on either side.

If this Conservative vision becomes a reality, refugees from the U.S. who show up at Canada’s border fleeing Trump’s administration will likely be arrested, thrust back into the hands of U.S. border czars and deported to their home countries.

It’s a double jeopardy.


This article was originally published by Truthout; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Ray Mwareya is the 2017 recipient of the United Nations Correspondents Association Media Prize.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors715
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version