Source: Jacobin

It doesn’t seem to matter which poll you look at: the cost-of-living crisis is at the top of voters’ minds.

Gallup reports that inflation is the issue the most Americans say they worry a lot about, YouGov polling shows “inflation and high prices” ranked as the most important issue area by Democratic and Republican voters alike, and Data for Progress says “economy, jobs, and inflation” is the foremost area of consideration for all voters and undecided voters when they fill out their ballots.

Liberal pundits sometimes write off these sentiments as confused or dishonest or merely partisan outrage, pointing to falling inflation rates. But inflation isn’t the same as cost. The rate of inflation is falling, but prices are not — we’re still living with the effects of past inflationary surges.

Consider food prices. Average annual household food costs have increased 35 percent since 2020, according to my analysis of US Department of Agriculture (USDA) data. How many people’s wages have kept up with this? The three largest annual increases in household food costs on record happened in the last three years. The only years food costs consumed more than 11 percent of household income were 2022 and 2023.

Joe Biden had no answer for elevated food costs at the debate. Literally. In the first question of the evening, Jake Tapper referenced stubbornly high grocery prices before asking Biden, “What do you say to voters who feel they are worse off under your presidency than they were under President Trump?” (In swing states, just 32 percent of respondents say they’re better off under Biden.)

Many voters probably would have liked to hear a plan from the president: 80 percent of Americans say the most notable price increase since 2020 has been for groceries, and 27 percent reported skipping meals because of the surge in costs.

Despite Tapper’s helpful nudge, Biden offered no plan to bring food prices down, or at least help people deal with the new normal (he could’ve proposed a $15 minimum wage, for example). After the debate, CNN’s Erin Burnett said Biden “knows every one of these questions is coming.”

The stark voter emphasis on food prices and the cost of living generally reflects genuine need: polls unrelated to the election show staggering numbers of people reporting food insecurity and financial hardship. Unsurprisingly, recent message testing found that voters respond much more positively to a class-based, economic populist message than they do one centered on abstract ideas like democracy.

“Preserving America’s democracy is the central cause of my presidency,” Biden declared at a campaign rally early this year. Biden’s chief strategist, Mike Donilon, told the New Yorker in March that their campaign is primarily about “democracy” and “the soul” of the nation. By the time the election rolls around, Donilon said in March, “The focus will become overwhelming on democracy. I think the biggest images in people’s minds are going to be of January 6.”

This is not a credible theory of victory. January 6 isn’t even the main thing most people associate with the Trump administration. Just 5 percent of respondents polled in May answered January 6 when asked to name the one thing they remembered most from Donald Trump’s presidency. Donilon is privately reassuring skeptical colleagues that voters will “do the right thing” in November.

Biden’s successful 2020 presidential campaign didn’t rely on this sort of empty moralism. In 2020, the issues the Biden campaign mentioned most, according to an analysis of its TV ads, were COVID-19, health care, and the economy. During the 2020 debates, Biden spoke in support of a multitrillion-dollar climate and social investments and a $15 minimum wage. The strategy was about emphasizing Biden’s policy plan to rapidly reverse deteriorating human security conditions.

The 2024 strategy is devoid of that ambition and empathy. It relies instead on Biden persuading enough people to vote for him through appeals to grand ideas about democracy and “the soul of America.” That would be a tall order for any candidate, and likely impossible for one whose lack of speaking facility is as shocking as Biden’s. The results of this strategy speak for themselves: his approval rating hit a record low before the debate last month and just hit a new record low this month. He is a historically weak candidate.

In December, Biden was asked, “Do you think there is any Democrat who could defeat Donald Trump other than you?” Biden responded, “Probably fifty of them.” To avoid another Trump term, Democrats need to ditch Biden and his strategy.


This article was originally published by Jacobin; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors718
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors718
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version