Source: CEPR

Along with everyone else (okay, not Republicans), I have been celebrating the great economic news we’ve been getting the last few weeks. Inflation is clearly slowing, the unemployment rate remains low, real wages are rising, investment is growing rapidly, and the green conversion is going faster than any of us could have imagined, even if it’s nowhere near fast enough.

To be clear, we have plenty of very serious problems. Close to 40 million people still live below the poverty line and roughly that same number are close enough that paying bills every month is a huge struggle. We’ve made little progress in reducing the racial and gender gaps in wages and even less in wealth. The list is long, there are plenty of things that we should not be happy about, but for now, we seem to be making some progress.

Anyhow, when things seem to be going in the right direction, it’s a good time to ask how events can take a turn for the worse. So, here’s my list – feel free to add to it or make up your own or alter my probability assessments.

 

The Fed gets carried away with rate hikes, even with inflation slowing towards its target – My take on the data is that we are looking at inflation rates that are still above the Fed’s 2.0 percent target, but moving towards it. If that view is correct, the Fed would be absolutely nuts to raise rates further, at the risk of higher unemployment and financial instability, just to hasten the rate at which we reach the 2.0 percent target.

We were below the Fed’s inflation target for a whole decade following the Great Recession. Few seemed to think that was a serious problem. If it takes us another year or year and a half to see inflation fall back to the 2.0 percent target, so what?

If the point is the Fed’s credibility, it has acted aggressively to slow the economy and bring inflation back towards its target. It is hard to see anyone losing faith in the Fed’s commitment to its target if takes until the end of 2024 or even 2025 to reach it.

Just to be clear, I’m talking about a situation where we are near 3.0 percent inflation and the direction is clearly downward. If there is reason to believe that inflation is stabilizing at a 3.0 percent rate, or even accelerating again, that is a different question.

Probability – 5.0 percent

 

Inflation begins to reaccelerate, leading to more aggressive action by the Fed – Virtually all the data that we have seen over the last few months indicates that inflation is slowing and will continue to slow. Two items that were huge in driving inflation, rent and vehicles prices are clearly headed downward. Non-fuel import prices, which rose rapidly in 2021 and the first half of 2022 are now falling rapidly. And wage growth has slowed sharply by every measure.

Given these clear trends, it is hard to see how we could get a resurgence of inflation, but we could try to tell a story. The Teamsters were able to secure big wage gains at UPS. There has been a lot union organizing at Starbucks and other major companies. If increased labor militancy is able to secure larger wage gains, some of this will be passed on in higher prices. It is also possible that we will see slower productivity growth, which would also raise costs. (The second quarter productivity numbers that will be released on Thursday will be very strong.)

Anyhow, if we actually do see the downward trend in inflation reversed, it’s a safe bet that the Fed will go back to hiking rates in a big way. At some point, enough rate hikes mean a hard landing.

Probability – 5.0 percent

Republicans force large spending cuts as a condition of maintaining government funding – All the spending bills will need to be renewed by the end of September or various parts of government will shut down. House Republicans have been more focused on restricting access to abortion and beating up transgender people than budget cuts, but that could change.

The story here is straightforward. If we get large enough cuts to the budget, the economy will slow and the unemployment rate will raise. We’ve seen this movie before. This is what happened in 2011 when the House Republicans insisted on austerity to raise the debt ceiling.

Anyhow, because we saw the movie before, and President Biden played a leading role last time, we can be pretty sure it will not happen again. The budget cuts the Republicans would demand would almost certainly be unpopular. Biden would be very happy to stand tough and say no to the Republicans in this story. He is not going to accept any major cuts beyond what he agreed to in the debt ceiling deal.

Probability – 1.0 percent

 

Expansion of the war in Ukraine – either Russia goes nuclear or brings NATO in directly by attacking a NATO country. This is one that poses a greater threat to humanity than the economy, but if we destroy ourselves it won’t be good for the employment rate.

Probability – 5 percent

A new variant of the coronavirus that is far more harmful and vaccine resistant – In addition to millions or 10 of millions of deaths, this could mean another round of shutdowns, putting us back where we where in 2020. From what I understand, it is unlikely that a new variant will be qualitatively worse than the current variant, but we can add this probability to the probability of an altogether new pandemic.

Probability — 1 percent  

Massive Climate Event – We are already seeing horrific climate events around the planet leading to permanent damage to the environment and massive suffering, especially in developing countries. However, the economic impact, at least in the United States has been relatively limited.

That could change, but it is hard to envision a climate event in the immediate future that would have a large impact on the U.S. economy. In the past, even the strongest hurricanes and largest wildfires have had very limited effects on the economy.

Over the longer term we do see an impact. For example, if hurricanes and flooding make it impossible for homeowners to get insurance in Florida and wildfires destroy the insurance market in California, the housing market in both states will take big hits. Of course, there are legislative fixes that can restore the insurance market through subsidies. That might be bad policy, but it will put off the reckoning being forced by these disasters.

Probability – 1.0 percent

That’s it for my list of bad stories. I am sure that I can think of some more, but I would rather not. So, all in all, I would say the near-term economic picture looks pretty good for now, even if we’re seeing absolutely horrible news on climate and pretty scary news on the war front. What did I miss?

 
 

This article was originally published by CEPR; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC. Dean previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He has also worked as a consultant for the World Bank, the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, and the OECD's Trade Union Advisory Council.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors713
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors713
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version