Source: Progressive Hub

To call what we are witnessing in this country an unprecedented assault on basic democratic freedoms would be an understatement. Universities are being strong-armed by the ruling regime to abandon even the pretense of academic freedom and submit to an authoritarian, ideological takeover. Students are being abducted, criminalized, and held as political prisoners for the exercise of their right to free speech. Others are targeted, detained, and stripped of rights simply for who they are—for being international students in a xenophobic police state.

In their standoff with the Trump Administration, Columbia University chose the path of surrender and capitulation. Elsewhere, university leaders perform outrage at the intensifying crackdown on higher education and the erosion of civil liberties. And yes, they should be outraged. But this liberal indignation obscures an uncomfortable truth: this did not begin with Trump. It began with the universities themselves.

Last spring, university administrators facilitated the mass arrest of over 3,000 students on more than sixty campuses—an extraordinary repressive response to one of the largest student protest movements in U.S. history. These actions were not isolated incidents but a coordinated assault on a generation refusing to remain complicit in a genocide unfolding in Gaza. In doing so, the university betrayed not only its students but its core commitments to serving as laboratories for critical thought, democratic action, and social change.

Worse still, universities themselves weaponized the charge of antisemitism—invoking “Jewish safety” as a hollow pretext to quash dissent and criminalize protest. As a Jewish graduate student, educator, and organizer at UMass Amherst, I experienced firsthand how this narrative was not only disingenuous but dangerous. Jewish students are overrepresented in the Palestine solidarity movement—yet we were told, in effect, that we were threats to ourselves.

The irony was glaring: the greatest threats to Jewish students on campus were not the protesters, 97% of whom engaged in nonviolent civil disobedience, but the very institutions that claimed to protect us. At UMass an “independent investigation” into the excessive police response during the encampment, which led to 134 arrests, included the baseless conclusion that “by acting as quickly and decisively as it did, the Administration provided relief to students and other members of the campus community, especially some (possibly many) Jewish students and faculty, who felt threatened or alienated by the Encampments.”

Nowhere in the report is there any acknowledgment of the many Jewish students—not to mention Arab, Palestinian, or Muslim students—who participated in or supported the protests, and who were not merely made to feel uncomfortable, but were actively threatened by an administration with a documented history of anti-Palestinian bias. That UMass is now one of sixty universities facing a cynical federal investigation for its alleged culture of antisemitism—an accusation invoked by university itself to justify its repression—should come as no surprise.

While the Trump administration has escalated this campaign, it was university administrations that initiated it. They were the ones who conflated anti-Zionism with antisemitism. They were the ones who demonized student protesters. They were the ones who broke with precedent and called in militarized police on students engaged in nonviolent civil disobedience against a genocide. They were the ones who denied students any meaningful avenues to enact democratic change.

In placing themselves in opposition to their students and aligning themselves with state repression, universities abdicated their moral and historical responsibilities—and, in the process, helped author the Trumpist playbook they now claim to reject. Their belated disavowals ring hollow. The irony—if we can call it that—is that through their hypocrisy and collaboration, the universities helped sow the seeds of their own destruction. Should they ultimately not survive this sustained attack from Washington, their autopsy will read: murder-suicide.

As an American and as a Jew, as a historian and as an educator, I know where ethno-nationalism and militarism lead. I know the dangers of criminalizing dissent, of bending education to the will of the state, of deploying fear as a tool to silence voices of conscience.

Whatever stance our universities take, we will not be terrorized into submission. We will continue the struggle for a more just and truly democratic world—one centered on the inherent dignity and humanity of all people. We will continue to raise our collective voice and demonstrate our collective power with unwavering resolve. No to fascism. No to genocide. No to imperialism. No to white supremacy. No to xenophobia. No to deportation.

Not in my name. Not now. Not ever.


This article was originally published by Progressive Hub; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Eric Ross is an organizer, educator, researcher, and PhD Candidate in the History Department at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors713
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors713
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version