Rick Jahnkow’s column on the critical importance of counter-recruitment campaigns to the long-term success of the anti-war movement is a worthy New Year’s resolution and mission statement for peace activists in 2006. As he states, “…counter-recruitment organizing is the most practical way to tangibly affect current U.S. foreign policy.” Hindering the government’s ability to wage war, inciting a cultural shift away from militarism, and providing alternatives to military service to the community are a triangle of potential prizes that counter-recruitment campaigns offer.

The importance of reforming the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy and putting an end to the rampant physical and sexual assault of women soldiers by their own troops are other important goals of counter-recruitment campaigns, and cannot be emphasized enough. Counter-recruitment campaigns offer opportunities to stand in solidarity with the feminist, GLBT, and youth movements. Counter-recruitment campaigns are multigenerational and can attract high school/college students and their influential Flower Power parents.

As the author notes, sooner or later the Iraq war will come to an end, and we are likely to see a kind of “Iraq syndrome” as the aroused public consciousness acts as a brake on the runaway train of American foreign policy. But a return to the covert policies of the Reagon/Bush/Clinton era isn’t much of a victory either. And as Jahnkow also points out, “Iraq syndrome” is not guaranteed. A new terrorist attack on American soil could see renewed public support for costly military interventions.

Jahnkow argues (and Howard Zinn before him) that a true victory for the anti-war movement will only come when we put an end to all wars. To do this, our tactics must go beyond symbolic protesting, and they must address strategic, long-term political and cultural goals. Towards this end, I propose two refinements to the national counter-recruitment campaign:

1) An increased emphasis on protesting Junior ROTC, ROTC, and other military programs institutionalized in our high schools and colleges. For example, at my school the University of Iowa, hundreds of students are enrolled in ROTC programs and have a presence on campus everyday. In contrast, military recruiters looking for enlistees are ‘outsiders’ and have much less of an influence, as they are only on campus a few times a year. We will be more successful at curing the cultural cancer of militarism if we focus on removing the tumor of ROTC from our schools, instead of treating the symptoms of an occasional heart-ache inducing recruiter visit.

At the high school level, counter-recruitment campaigns are best left to students and their parents. However, initiatives like the Campus Antiwar Network’s “Adopt a High School” program are crucial to jump-starting the high school movement in some areas, and similar mentoring programs should be rolled out nationwide to connect younger activists with more experienced role-models.

Attacking class-based systems like J-ROTC and ROTC, which train some to become officers so they can order others to fight and die, may also have additional benefits for transplanting a culture of peace into the organs of the mainstream.

2) An anti-war movement that balances polite civil discourse with serious political disruption. A counter-recruitment protest or alternative-presence educational on Career Day are two good direct actions, but a nuanced approach that mixes traditional tactics with more disruptive ones like trespassing on National Guard sites or blocking ROTC offices from opening provide everyday opportunities for the kinds of accelerated resistance that is now needed.

How a proactive peace movement can organize to end all wars is an exciting new discussion that all activists should now take up and contribute to. Let’s stay mobilized through the midterm elections, indeed, through the next presidential elections, and work on crafting and implementing our own agendas.

David Goodner is a 25 year old International Studies major at the University of Iowa and a copy editor and reporter for College Not Combat, the national newspaper of the Campus Antiwar Network. He may be reached at david-goodner@uiowa.edu or 319-339-4821.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version