With an unprecedented voter turnout of 85 percent and a political mobilization that shook the foundations of the United Kingdom, much was accomplished even in defeat by those who voted for Scottish independence. The Scottish referendum has left a significant legacy.

Very few political issues have made me vacillate as much as the Scotland independence referendum. I started as an instinctive no, but by the end of the campaign significant strands of my thinking had moved so completely over to yes that I woke up the morning after the vote feeling both relieved and disappointed. There are, however, reasons to be universally cheerful, even for people who campaigned for and voted yes.

  1. Hope is a vote-winner

Some have concluded that the result means that “fear works.” The truth is quite the opposite. Remember, this was supposed to be a cake-walk for the Better Together campaign. Instead, the government had to cobble together a contingency-plan in a panic. For a message of optimism to have narrowed the gap to that from 20 points a year ago is a tremendous victory. In fact, Better Together only pushed against that momentum when they made positive promises for future devolution. It is a vision for the future, not fear, that ultimately worked.

  1. Wider political engagement is possible

The unprecedented turnout of 85 percent—but also the astonishing sophistication of debate at every level—means that the voting public are neither congenitally apathetic nor impenetrably thick, as the ruling classes would have us believe. Apathy results from the choices offered being indistinguishable from each other and an electoral system where individual votes do not matter. It could not point the way forward more clearly. Perhaps instead of obsessing about the narrow subset of issues that concern a minority of voters who swing between left- and right-of-center, parties might start looking at the large swathes of people who feel disengaged and have sufficient numbers to affect the result in even the safest seat. At the moment, only Ukip (UK Independence Party) is doing that.

  1. Constitutional reform cometh

By forcing leaders on the Better Together side to make hasty concessions at the eleventh hour, an unstoppable chain of events has been set in motion. People are already talking of further devolution to Wales and Northern Ireland, discussing the West Lothian question, demanding devolved powers for cities and regions, a more federal model, a formal constitution, even. It is a vital discussion which is about half a century overdue. It is tempting to look at the referendum as a throw of the dice in which one side lost. Constitutionally, the dice are still very much in the air.

  1. Indelible lines drawn on the EU

The campaign has provided an illuminating rehearsal of arguments for and against EU membership. These broad principles will be difficult and embarrassing to squirm out of when the debate is transposed to the larger European “family of nations.” Having been apprehensive of an in-out EU referendum for two decades, my feelings have been transformed overnight. Bring it on. Let us have this conversation as rational adults. Let us embrace more democracy, rather than fear it. Let us trust it to make not a right or wrong decision, but a decision which best represents the democratic will of the people of the UK.

  1. What sort of country do we want?

It became clear, relatively early on, that the conversation had mutated beyond nationalism into a profound discussion on the sort of country we want for the future. There are large amounts of mostly unheard voices which are no longer satisfied with the neoliberal view of the world put forward by leaders. Let that tremendous adrenaline now flow into the political bloodstream of the rest of the UK. Let that momentum for change join with the many millions across the other three nations who also demand an alternative to a cynical view of a future in which education and health are a privilege rather than a right; where poverty and division are the norm rather than a source of deep national shame. That can be the yes legacy. It is significant.

Z

 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Alex Andreou was born in Greece and has a background in law and economics. He runs the Sturdy Beggars Theatre Company and blogs at Sturdyblog. Credit for this article goes to Portside Moderator, which provides material of interest to the left that will help them to interpret the world and change it.

Donate

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors690
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors690
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version