The push by federal regulators to break
up Microsoft is big news. Until recently, the software giant seemed untouchable—and
few people demanded effective anti-trust efforts against monopoly power in
the software industry. These days, a similar lack of vision is routine in
looking at the media business.

Today, just six corporations have a forceful grip on America’s mass media.
When The Media Monopoly first appeared on bookshelves in 1983, author
Ben Bagdikian explains, “50 corporations dominated most of every mass
medium.” With each new edition, that number kept dropping—to 29
media firms in 1987, 23 in 1990, 14 in 1992, and 10 in 1997.

Published this spring, the sixth edition of The Media Monopoly documents
that just a half-dozen corporations are now supplying most of the nation’s
media fare. Bagdikian, a longtime journalist, continues to sound the alarm.
“It is the overwhelming collective power of these firms, with their corporate
interlocks and unified cultural and political values, that raises troubling
questions about the individual’s role in the American democracy.”

What are the chances that Bagdikian—or anyone else—will be invited
onto major TV broadcast networks to discuss the need for vigorous antitrust
enforcement against the biggest media conglomerates? Let’s see:

    • CBS: Not a good bet, especially since its merger with Viacom (one of the
      Big Six) was announced last fall.
    • NBC: Quite unlikely. General Electric, a Big Six firm, has owned NBC since
      1986.
    • ABC: Forget it. This network became the property of the Disney Co. five
      years ago. Disney is now the country’s second-largest media outfit.
    • Fox: The Fox network is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., currently
      number four in the media oligarchy.

Then there’s always cable television, with several networks devoted to
news:

    • CNN: The world’s biggest media conglomerate, Time Warner, owns CNN—where
      antitrust talk about undue concentration of media power is about as welcome
      as the Internationale sung at a baseball game in Miami.
    • CNBC:     Sixth-ranked General Electric owns this cable
      channel.
    • MSNBC: Spawned as a joint venture of GE and Microsoft, the MSNBC network
      would see activism against media monopoly as double trouble.
    • Fox News Channel: The Fox cable programming rarely wanders far from the
      self-interest of News Corp. tycoon Murdoch.

Since all of those major TV news sources are owned by one of the Big Six,
the chances are mighty slim that you’ll be able to catch a discussion
of media antitrust issues on national television.

Meanwhile, the only Big Sixer that doesn’t possess a key U.S. television
outlet—the Bertelsmann firm based in Germany—is the most powerful
company in the book industry. It owns the mammoth publisher Random House,
and plenty more in the media universe. Bertelsmann “is the world’s
third largest conglomerate,” Bagdikian reports, “with substantial
ownership of magazines, newspapers, music, television, on-line trading, films,
and radio in 53 countries.” Try pitching a book proposal to a Random
House editor about the dangers of global media consolidation.

Well, you might comfort yourself by thinking about cyberspace. Think again.
The dominant Internet service provider, America Online, is combining with
already-number-one Time Warner— and the new firm AOL Time Warner would
have more to lose than any other corporation if a movement grew to demand
antitrust action against media conglomerates.

Amid rampant overall commercialization of the most heavily trafficked websites,
AOL steers its 22 million subscribers in many directions—and, in the
future, Time Warner’s offerings will be most frequently highlighted.
While seeming to be gateways to a vast cybergalaxy, AOL’s favorite links
will remain overwhelmingly corporate friendly within a virtual cul-de-sac.

Hype about the new media seems boundless, while insatiable old hungers for
maximum profits fill countless screens. Centralization is the order of the
media day. As Bagdikian points out: “The power and influence of the dominant
companies are understated by counting them as ‘six.’ They are intertwined:
they own stock in each other, they cooperate in joint media ventures, and
among themselves they divide profits from some of the most widely viewed programs
on television, cable and movies.”

We may not like the nation’s gigantic media firms, but right now they
don’t care much what we think. A strong antitrust movement aimed at the
Big Six could change such indifference in a hurry.                                Z





Norman Solomon is a syndicated columnist. His latest book is
The
Habits of Highly Deceptive Media
.


























Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. The paperback edition of his latest book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, includes an afterword about the Gaza war.

Donate Facebook Twitter Reddit Bluesky Email
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors711
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version