While

outrage over the Taleban’s requirement that Afghan women wear a head-to-toe veil

continues, a new comprehensive study shows that the majority of Afghan women

consider the Taleban’s dress codes a non-issue, and many choose to wear the

burqa or chadari whether the Taleban decrees it or not.

Physicians for Human Rights’s 2001 study corrects for some biases in its hugely

influential 1998 report, The Taliban’s War on Women. "We made a huge deal in the

last report about the clothing edicts," says PHR’s Susannah Sirkin, sparking

nationwide feminist outrage with the Taleban regime. But that report "was not a

randomized sample," says PHR’s Dr. Lynn L. Amowitz. "It was a discussion of what

was happening to educated Kabulese women who had abandoned traditional

practices." For their first study, researchers interviewed about 80 women in

Kabul, the country’s most modern city, and 80 refugees in Pakistan. Amowitz led

last year’s 3-month study in Afghanistan, which entailed interviews with over

200,000 Afghan women and men, from both rural and urban areas, some under

Taleban control and others not.

While

the media were “all over” the first study, PHR says, there’s been precious

little attention paid to this latest one. A wire service report was apparently

ignored. The Los Angeles Times buried a brief mention on the most obvious

finding—that the majority of Afghan women and men say the Taleban has worsened

their lives—at the end of a story. Barbara Crossette’s article on the study has

yet to be published by the New York Times.

The

results paint a more nuanced and complex view of Afghanistan’s closed society

and the brutal Taleban regime, in particular the vast differences between Kabul

and other urban areas and the Afghan countryside. Whereas many women in Kabul

worked, went to school, and wore Western clothing, in rural areas, tradition,

poverty, and war had prevented many women from entering public life even before

the Taleban rode into town. Most of the adult women in the new survey–subject

to mandatory education during the 1970s and 1980s–attended school for less than

2 years. Today, while Taleban edicts drastically restrict women’s access to

health care, over half of Afghan women say the main reason they can’t get

medical attention is because they can’t afford it.

Most

striking in the face of U.S. feminist campaigns against the veil is the finding

that over 80% of women in non-Taleban controlled areas say they wear the chadari

all the time and over 90% say that their dress rarely affects their daily lives.

Over 80% of all respondents consider persecution for dress code infractions an

unimportant issue.

Feminist campaigns have been crucial in educating Americans about Taleban rule

in Afghanistan. Amowitz, however, says she’s concerned that the attention "is

not for the issues that are most important." Feminist campaigns raised public

awareness in many cases by making the burqa–and American repulsion to it–the

emotional center of their projects. Oprah Winfrey’s critically acclaimed reading

of Eve Ensler’s "Under the Burqa," to 18,000 people at New York City’s Madison

Square Garden told the story of an Afghan woman under Taleban rule, ending with

the appearance of a burqa-clad Afghan woman. Audience members, who afterward

signed petitions against the Taleban in the thousands, pinned bits of fabric

from burqas on their lapels in remembrance.

The

burqa is a "symbol of the total oppression of women," says Feminist Majority

Campaign’s Norma Gattsek. Thus, the centerpiece of the Feminist Majority’s

Campaign to End Gender Apartheid in Afghanistan, launched in 1997 as the group’s

first foray into international politics, is a project that distributes burqas to

schoolchildren across the country. Over 600 groups participate in the Feminist

Majority’s "Back-to-School" campaign. The campaign draws attention to the fact

that the Taleban outlawed female education and employment (today, they allow

girls’ religious education up till the age of 8). In addition to viewing a

wrenching Marlo-Thomas-narrated video, hearing lectures, and donating money to

Afghan girls’ home schools and NGO-run schools, participants are lent burqas to

try on. Thousands of others buy the group’s "symbol of remembrance," a small

swatch of mesh material representing the burqa

"It

is the most smothering experience to put one on," says Gattsek. "Anytime a group

has used one, they have told us that that moment of putting that on was

overwhelming. Because it really made them feel, how could I live like this,

totally cut off from the world?"

A

more accurate rendition of women’s Taleban-induced problems would probably

entail an enforced fast and/or being stoned by classmates. The Taleban continues

to impose hangings, amputations, and deaths by stoning, in a society of gross

deprivations and ongoing civil war. International repugnance with their regime

has isolated the country. This January’s latest round of UN sanctions aimed at

pressuring the Taleban to hand over Osama bin Laden may intensify the civil war

and deepen poverty, human rights advocates say. International flights have been

banned, and a lop-sided arms embargo prohibits military aid to the Taleban but

not to the factions fighting against them, which have openly stated that foreign

powers continue to fund their war.

All

of this has especially dire ramifications for women and children, who comprise

three-quarters of all refugees from the country, making feminist activism in

defense of Afghanistan’s women especially critical. The work of the Feminist

Majority and other women’s rights groups–drumming up humanitarian aid,

funneling funds to women’s clinics and home-schools, petitioning the

administration to pressure Pakistan and other countries to stanch the flow of

arms to Afghanistan–is exemplary. But the tactic of capitalizing on American

horror of the Muslim veil, while it may work well in drawing attention to the

heartbreaking plight of women in Afghanistan, has now been undeniably uprooted

from reality. Let’s drop it.

 

Donate

From my grandmother's second-floor back porch in dusty Coimbatore, I could see the villagers squatting on the crest of the hill, their naked bums neatly lined in a row for the daily purge. At age seven, this was a mesmerizing sight. I gained a reputation for dreaminess, for nobody knew what I was really looking at, resting my head on my arms and staring off into the distance for hours at a time. Up north, at my father's mother's tenement flat in Mumbai, there were toilets to use, but these were located at the end of the open-air hallway, next to the wet, reeking terrace where the building's servants sloshed water on dal-spattered steel plates. The doors to the stalls were covered in a living carpet of brown and green. I avoided them as much as possible, resulting in daily stomach-aches, to be soothed with neem oil. To indulge me, I was sometimes allowed to shit on newspapers in the bedroom, which were then wrapped up and tossed out the window into the alley.
People, I knew, slept in the alley. I had stumbled across a child down there, once. The bottom half of his leg was greyed and pimpled, bloated into a fat cylinder by filarial worms. His toenails stuck out from under the heavy folds and flaps, tiny shards.

As an American-born child, sent to stay with relatives in India every summer, all of this was shocking, and fascinating. Back at home, wads of gossamer-thin, perfumed paper tissue, imprinted with lacy designs, were used to cushion each tiny smear of snot as it swirled down the commode's shiny porcelain. Here, people cleared their nasal passages directly into a stinking gutter. All of this-the poverty, the disease, the disparity-must be related, I thought. For a seven-year-old, every mysterious thing in the world is secretly connected. Growing up meant figuring out how. - Sonia Shah, February 2006

Sonia Shah is an investigative journalist and critically acclaimed author whose writing has appeared in The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, New Scientist, The Nation and elsewhere. Her 2006 drug industry exposé, The Body Hunters: Testing New Drugs on the World's Poorest Patients (New Press), has been hailed by Publishers Weekly as "a tautly argued study…a trenchant exposé…meticulously researched and packed with documentary evidence," and as "important [and] powerful" by The New England Journal of Medicine. The book, which international bestselling novelist and The Constant Gardener author John Le Carré called "an act of courage," has enjoyed wide international distribution, including French, Japanese, and Italian editions.

Her 2004 book, Crude: The Story of Oil (Seven Stories), was acclaimed as "brilliant" and "beautifully written" by The Guardian and "required reading" by The Nation, and has been widely translated, from Japanese, Greek, and Italian to Bahasa Indonesia. Her "raw and powerful" (Amazon.com) 1997 collection, Dragon Ladies: Asian American Feminists Breathe Fire, still in print after 10 years, continues to be required reading at colleges and universities across the country.

Shah's writing, based on original reportage from around the world, from India and South Africa to Panama, Malawi, Cameroon, and Australia, has been featured on current affairs shows around the United States, as well as on the BBC and Australia's Radio National. A frequent keynote speaker at political conferences, Shah has lectured at universities and colleges across the country, including Columbia's Earth Institute, MIT, Harvard, Brown, Georgetown and elsewhere. Her writing on human rights, medicine, and politics have appeared in a range of magazines from Playboy, Salon, and Orion to The Progressive and Knight-Ridder. Her television appearances include A&E and the BBC, and she's consulted on many documentary film projects, from the ABC to Channel 4 in the UK. A former writing fellow of The Nation Institute and the Puffin Foundation, Shah is currently writing a book on the history and politics of malaria for Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

Shah was born in 1969 in New York City to Indian immigrants. Growing up, she shuttled between the northeastern United States where her parents practiced medicine and Mumbai and Bangalore, India, where her extended working-class family lived, developing a life-long interest in inequality between and within societies. She holds a BA in journalism, philosophy, and neuroscience from Oberlin College, and lives with molecular ecologist Mark Bulmer and their two sons Zakir and Kush.



 

Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

No Paywalls. No Billionaires.
Just People Power.

Z Needs Your Help!

ZNetwork reached millions, published 800 originals, and amplified movements worldwide in 2024 – all without ads, paywalls, or corporate funding. Read our annual report here.

Now, we need your support to keep radical, independent media growing in 2025 and beyond. Every donation helps us build vision and strategy for liberation.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version