Jim Hightower
CLINTON FLIES
HIGH WITH HEMP
Bill Clinton did notinhale. We’re clear on that, right?
But, recently, he didswallow. It was on
a return trip toWashington from Mexico City, where the President had
traveled to proclaim that his international drug waris a tremendous
success. Bill has atough time with Mexico on this issue, PR-wise, since
every time he goes to praise the progress beingmade there, one or more of
their topanti-drug officials turn out to be involved in the drug trade
themselves. So who can blame Clinton for kicking back with abeer on
the trip home from his latestsong and dance in Mexico? It’s a
nerve-soothingbeverage-and hey, alcohol is a legal drug.
But hold your Clydesdales right there. The stewards on AirForce One didn’t give the President a
tall Bud . . . but a Hemp Golden Beer!
This brew, made inKentucky, includes not only hops, barley and
water-but also hemp seed. The
hempplant is a cousin of the dreaded marijuana plant. Even though hemp
itself is not a drug and cannot make you high,Clinton’s Drug Czar Barry
McCaffreyhas been on an absolute tear against allowing American farmers to
grow this profitable, highly useful, andenvironmentally sensible crop. So
USbusinesses that use hemp to make paper, fuel, medicines, clothing, food
and beer among other things, have to import thehemp from China, Canada,
Europe orother places that are not so paranoid.
Anita Roddick, founder of the Body Shop, which markets severalhemp-based skin care
products, heardabout Clinton’s beer experience. She wrote to him, saying "Congratulations on breaking the hemp barrier
on Air Force One."
She also said,"Don’t go wobbly with misinformation,"
urging him to support a legal distinction between hemp and marijuana so farmerscan begin to produce the
hemp here. This is Jim Hightowersaying . . . There’s no word from
Billon that, but don’t expect him to have another hemp beer on Air Force
One-the office of National Drug Control Policybanned it from the plane, declaring it
an "inappropriate"
drink for the president.
MICHAEL DELL, TAX
PROTESTER
Time for another peek[soap opera theme] into "The
Lifestyles of the Rich . . . And Cranky."
Poor Michael and Susan Dell. They’re the richest peoplein Austin, Texas, and
among the 20richest people in America-but, gosh, they’ve got to make ends
meet just like your family and mine. And just likefamilies everywhere who
build a house,this founding family of Dell Computer Inc. needs to watch
expenses. Especially when their house is threestories and 33,000 square
feet, haseight bedrooms and bathrooms, 13 half baths, a conference room, a
kitchen bigger than most restaurants, an exerciseroom, an indoor pool, an
outdoor pool,cabanas, and a five-level terraced lawn. Their house is
bigger than a shopping center, though not quite asattractive-hey, money is
about size,not taste.
The Dells didn’t skimp onbuilding costs,
architects,landscaping charges, or interior decorators. Their house is
the most expensive in Texas-and I’m counting RossPerot’s! They only got
cost consciencewhen they received their property tax bill. This is the
money used by the local government to supportpublic schools, roads and
other basicservices. The Dells though whined that their $600,000
assessment was way too high. OK, that’s a lot ofmoney for you and me, but
for these30-somethings who have a net worth of $13 billion, it’s like you
paying $2 a year in property taxes. You should be solucky.
But you’re not the Dells, who hired their own lawyersand appraisers. They
took the county tocourt-costing us taxpayers thousands of dollars in legal
fees-and, sure enough, they got their tax billknocked down to $250,000 a
year-a 60%cut. This means they’re going to be paying what would amount to
about 50 cents a year. This is Jim Hightower saying . . . The tax appraiser said, "Just because they areMichael and Susan Dell doesn’t mean
theyshould pay more than their fair share. Everyone must be treated equally."
Sure . . . as long as we all havelawyers and appraisers and political
clout that’s equal.
PAYDAY
It’s payday . . . do youknow where your next million is
comingfrom? Geoffrey Bible, like all of us, is just trying to make
ends meet-though some of us have a longer stretchthan Bible does. He’s
top dog atPhilip Morris, and his board of directors not only paid him a
nice $1.6 million salary last year, but added asweet dollop of cream on
top: a bonusof $3.5 million. But his payday didn’t end there–add in stock options, incentive pay, and a category
called "other compensation,"
andGeoffrey totaled right at $24 million for 1998. This is not counting
his limousine, country club memberships, companyjet, housing allowance,
executive chef,and a free weekly shampoo for his poodle.
All this was a year in which Philip Morris didn’t do well.Who knows, in a good
year he might’vegotten that poodle shampooed twice a week.
Are there no limits on the excesses of these guys? Well, yes, say thecompanies, we have "executive
compensation committees"
that carefully scrutinize CEO performance and allocate pay accordingly. Sure, andthe monkeys are
guarding the zoo.Guess who heads the compensation committee
at
Philip Morris? John Reed. When he’snot keeping his hawk-eye on Geoffrey
Bible,he’s Chief Executive of Citigroup, the financial services
conglomerate. One reason that John Reed might have aslightly skewed sense
of how muchBible should be paid is that he himself hauled off $1.7 million
in salary last year, plus a $7.8 million bonus andstock options worth
$16.9 million. So,hey, he says, if I made $26 million, how far off is it
to pay Bible $24 million? And so what that Bible’s company had a rough year?–Citigroup, under John Reed, saw itsprofits fall by a
billion-and-a-halfbucks, and thousands of workers were fired, so you can’t
hold tough times against the guy at the top. This is Jim Hightower saying . . . For CEOs, it’s ascratch-my-back-and-I’ll-scratch-yours-world.
THE DOW BUSTS THE
MIDDLE CLASS
Wow, the Dow above10,000!
Is this great news, or
what? USA Today gushed that "
10,000 is more than a number . . . It’s like Mark McGwire beating the homerun record. It’s like the calendar
turning to the year 2000 . . . It’s a cultural milestone."
It’s being hailed notonly as a milestone for the rich, but also for the middle class, with the media reporting deadpan that
"everybody"
is in the stockmarket today.
Time for a Reality Check[echo] . . . check . . .
check. Everybody?! Six out of ten Americans own no stock atall-not
through a broker, a mutualfund, a pension . . . nothing. And of those who
do own stock, the vast majority have a tidbit thatgives them no sense of
ownership in theDow, much less giving them a thrill that the thing is
above 10,000. Millions of Americans are in thestock market only because
their pensionplans got canceled, and now they’ve been thrust into a
401(K), which is nowhere near as desirable, andthey’re not at all happy to
be there.Consider this reality that the establishment
media never
mentions: 90 percent ofthe value of all stocks is held by the richest 10
percent of American families. They’re the privileged10 percent who are
giddy about the Dowbusting 10,000. The rest of us are more concerned
about finding good jobs at good wages, not tomention jobs with decent
benefits and areal pension.
Here’s another statisticthat the media,
the politicians, andthe Wall Street analysts don’t broadcast: Weekly
wages for average workers today are 12 percent belowthe wages of workers
in 1973. And guesswhat? When a corporation cuts jobs and cuts wages, the
stock price of that corporation goes up . . .which raises the Dow Jones
Average. Sothe misfortune of the workaday majority, which is seeing its
income go down, is a boost to the fortunes of thoseat the top.
This is Jim Hightower saying . . . What’s more importantfor America–a rise in the Dow . . . or
a rise in the middle class?
PBS PROMOTES THE
"STOCK MARKET GAME"
Out in Nebraska, whenthey say something is "janked"
-theymean it’s all messed up. Well, PBS the
PublicBroadcasting Service-seems to be janked.
The original idea of establishing a "public" network was thatit would present a non-corporate
viewof the world. But in recent years, PBS has been taking more and more corporate "underwriting,"
which isanother way of saying advertising, and
more and more of its programming now mouths thecorporate line.
For example, a recent feature on public radio’s"All Things Considered"
news showtold about a new game called the "Stock Market Game."
This is a blatant piece of Wall Street propaganda beingdirected at 11 and 12 year
olds-justthe kind of thing that PBS was created to expose and lampoon.
But, no, the new, corporate-friendly public radionetwork broadcast the
feature withoutan iota of journalistic skepticism, much less criticism or
outrage. In playing this "game," teams ofelementary school kids are
given$100,000 each in pretend money to invest in the stock market. Stop
right there. Who in the real world has $100,000 toinvest? Maybe five
percent ofAmericans-but the public radio reporter asked no embarrassing questions. Instead, a "game coordinator"
in one of the schools was
interviewedto tell us that sometimes the kids make a lot of money with
their virtual investments, and sometimes they don’tmake so much. Not a
whisper thatsometimes, you lose everything! Another perky proponent of
the Stock Market Game was interviewed and gushedthat it was a great way "to teach
students about the American economy."
This is Jim Hightower saying . . . Yeah, if you want to teach themfantasy.
