Saul Landau

I

found the May 15 NPR news very even-handed – as always. The host interviewed

Seymour Hersh, who wrote for the May 22 New Yorker Overwhelming Force, an expose

on General Barry McCaffery’s Gulf War conduct. Hersh interviewed soldiers and

officers and reviewed relevant documents that call into question McCaffery’s

battlefield conduct.

On

the morning of March 2nd, Hersh writes, "McCaffrey reported that, despite

the ceasefire, his division had suddenly come under attack from a retreating

Republican Guard tank division.” Officers assigned to McCaffrey’s headquarters

disagreed about the significance and strength of the Iraqi attack and indeed

about whether any attack had occurred. The officers heatedly argued over the

appropriate level for response. McCaffrey, after a delay, "ordered an

assault in force — an all-out attack,” Hersh writes. The strike destroyed some

seven hundred Iraqi tanks, armored cars, and trucks, said Hersh.

On

March 1 and 2, 1991, one and two days after President Bush declared a

cease-fire, US soldiers shot Iraqis who apparently posed no threat to them. On

February 27, US troops dispatched a group of Iraqis who had already surrendered.

The Army "investigated these episodes and, shockingly, found no wrongdoing.

Hersh, as he did three decades ago when he reported about the covered up My Lai

massacre in Vietnam, found witnesses and information the Army missed or ignored.

Then,

NPR interviewed McCaffery, who condemned Hersh for waging a vendetta against him

and for filing an outrageous assertion that he, McCaffery had ordered a virtual

massacre of defeated Iraqi soldiers after the Gulf War had ended. McCaffery

dismissed Hersh’s massive amount of evidence as lies and the NPR host threw a

few softballs at the powerful general before summing up and cojncluding nothing.

NPR

news reports stand on the political equivalent of the fifty yard line. NPR

treated reporter Hersh and Drug Czar McCaffery as equal combatants. Hersh

suggesting McCaffery may have committed a war crime; McCaffery calling Hersh a

liar. Then, Daniel Schorr opined. Hersh, he said, had taken on the powerful, the

Pentagon, Kissinger, the Kennedys, but had goofed by reporting in his last book

— THE DARK SIDE OF CAMELOT — that President Kennedy had paid for a Marilyn

Monroe abortion that didn’t happen. Hersh, you recall, had admitted that he’d

fallen for a bogus document and before publication had excised that part from

his book. Schorr also cited the Pentagon for its history of covering up war

crimes — like the My Lai massacre in Vietnam that Hersh had uncovered three

decades ago. Who’s right and who’s wrong? I don’t know.

I

have known Hersh for twenty five years. I have seen him scrutinize the evidence.

He interviewed more than two hundred enlisted men and officers over a six month

period doing research on these incidents. . And, The New Yorker also has the

world’s best fact checkers.

Weeks

before the article appeared, Drug czar McCaffery called in the media to accuse

Hersh of launching a personal vendetta. An intimidating move! Hersh doesn’t know

McCaffery, but he does have the nose to sniff out the odors that reek of high

level corruption. Most reporters inhale the perfumed aromas emitted by official

sources. If not for Hersh — and a few other reporters and free media outlets —

only Congress and the Courts would protect the public against the power of the

national security state and the corporation.

The

mainstream media has portrayed Hersh’s revelations of war crimes as a battle

between two gladiators, rather than as a reporter who represents public virtue

and a powerful government bureaucrat whose present operation — drug Czar — and

history during the Gulf War have escaped scrutiny.. So, thanks Sy Hersh for

investigating subjects too dangerous for most reporters to ponder. Young

journalists have you as a model.

Hugh

O. La Bounty Chair of Applied Interdisciplinary Knowledge, California State

Polytechnic University, Pomona mailto:slandau@csupomona.edu http://www.csupomona.edu/~slandau

 

Saul Landau(January 15, 1936 - September 9, 2013) , Professor Emeritus at the California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, an internationally-known filmmaker, scholar, author, commentator and Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. His film trilogy on Cuba includes FIDEL, a portrait of Cuba's leader (1968), CUBA AND FIDEL, in which Castro talks of democracy and institutionalizing the revolution (1974) and the UNCOMPROMISING REVOLUTION, as Fidel worries about impending Soviet collapse (1988). His trilogy of films on Mexico are THE SIXTH SUN: MAYAN UPRISING IN CHIAPAS (1997), MAQUILA: A TALE OF TWO MEXICOS (2000), and WE DON'T PLAY GOLF HERE AND OTHER STORIES OF GLOBALIZATION, (2007). His Middle East trilogy includes REPORT FROM BEIRUT (1982), IRAQ: VOICES FROM THE STREET (2002) SYRIA: BETWEEN IRAQ AND A HARD PLACE (2004). He has also written hundreds of articles on Cuba for learned journals, newspapers and magazines, done scores of radio shows on the subject and has taught classes on the Cuban revolution at major universities.

Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors689
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version