“Oh peaceniks, don’t you weep, don’t you moan cause pharoh’s army got drownded….”

Of course it is disappointing and disillusioning that the Congress passed the war financing bill giving the Decider in Chief another victory in his war with dissenting legislators who he knew, and we should have known, lack the votes and the guts to stop the war even with a protracted timeline…

Let me take that back, it is disillusioning only for those with illusions, for those who take poli-tricksters at their word and forget to understand two key facts—the Democratic Majority is slim and divided, and that there is more going on there than meets the eye.

Yes, six out of ten Americans now oppose the war and want out, but a majority also doesn’t want to do so at the expense of shortchanging our troops, thus buying into the Bushevik/media charade of anxiety that suggests that ending the war will be worse for the soldiers that the continuing bloodbath. (Recent articles show that it is the Pentagon that is not even supplying the troops properly.)

Understand that an overwhelming majority of these lawmakers bought the Kool Aid and voted to authorize the war. And sure they knew they were being sold a bill of goods. (A forthcoming hard-hitting documentary executive produced by Phil Donahue shows us of every yes vote cast by these sheep in high places, every last one.) Many fear that those votes will be raised against them in some campaign debate to come.

But beyond that, there beats in the historical memory embedded in the collective consciousness of governments past and present that old canard of being accused of “losing” a war or a country. Back in the 1950’s it was the fear of losing China. In the l960’s, the contrived worry was “who lost Vietnam?”

Today, the same formula and template is in place with that sword of Damocles like concern hanging over every pol, namely, “will I be blamed for “losing Iraq? ” Never mind that this war is already lost despite the endless plans for endless escalations. It’s so much easier for Congress to wait for September to act, when you just know there will be other reasons offered up for delay, as in “there is light at the end of the tunnel.” It’s sickening and so familiar.

This of course assumes that these countries were ours to win or lose. But no matter, there is a superpower syndrome of imperial arrogance or noblesse oblige that infects those for whom positioning and image always trumps morality and principle. It’s an ‘American thing’ going back, believe it or not, to the Manifest Destiny days and the Spanish American War, that Vietnam before Vietnam when we set out to Christianize Pilipinos who no one reminded us had been Catholic for centuries.

Beyond that, it is sometimes hard to remember that war is business, not just politics. The Military Industrial Complex does business in every state and in every congressional district and the politically distributed pork or war booty employs constituents in every district. Members of Congress are very aware of that.

The MoveOn’s and anti-war groups are not the only lobbyists in this game. Behind the scenes, employees of war industries and their lobbyists are pressuring the Congress too. Their pressure comes in the form of threats to cut off political contributions unless those they patronize act “responsibly.” They don’t have to make too many threats to the natural born compromisers on the hill for whom selling out is part of buying in. They know who butters their buns.

And then, forever lurking in the background and in foreground, there is the unbrave world of media that gives endless newsprint and airtime to debates about whether the war has been managed well enough. In a media filled with crime shows, this crime goes uncovered as such. Instead, CBS fires a General whose politics they fear may blowback in their face. The reporting is still mostly one-sided and the anti-war movement is barely heard from or seen. No wonder the public is sending mixed messages. They are still being lied to by our weapons of mass deception. There are more new faces in Congress than on the networks.

So now that it is clear that pressuring politicians is getting us nowhere fast, perhaps its time to start focusing on our powerful media with demands that it tell the truth about the war and about the endless sleaze in this administration.

We still need to press the press and move the media if we are to move the country on the war and so many other issues.

– News Dissector Danny Schechter edits Mediachannel.org. He is the author of When News Lies, a book on media complicity and the war. (Wmdthefilm.com) Comments to Dissector@mediachannel.org

Danny Schechter is a founder and the Vice President/Executive Producer of Globalvision, Inc., a media company formed in l987. At Globalvision, he created the award winning series "South Africa Now," which aired for three years. He co-created and co-executive produces "Rights & Wrongs: Human Rights Television," anchored by Charlayne Hunter-Gault, an award-winning globally distributed weekly television newsmagazine series. Mr. Schechter has also produced and directed seven independent films. Mr. Schechter has written: "The More You Watch, The Less You Know" (Seven Stories Press" (Seven Stories Press and the forthcoming "News Dissector: Passions, Pieces and Polemics (Electron Press.) He is the creator and executive editor of The Media Channel, a media and democracy supersite on the worldwide web. His left involvement stretches back to Ramparts Magazine, through the anti-war and civil rights movements of the sixties, and into the present day.

Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors705
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors705
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version