Idan za mu zaɓi tudun da za mu mutu a kai, da alama ba za a kare wani yariman Biritaniya ba.
A gaskiya, ba ma buƙatar so ko goyan baya - kuma mai yiwuwa ma mu ƙi - makasudin son zuciya na kafofin watsa labarai da aka bayyana a cikin nazarinmu. Burinmu shine kawai don samar da misalai waɗanda suka fi fallasa aikin farfaganda na kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun. Babu makawa, hakan ya haɗa da mayar da hankalinmu ga ƙaya a ɓangaren Ƙungiya.
Ba abin mamaki bane cewa a zahiri akwai abubuwa da yawa da suka raba mu, a ce, masu kishin ƙasa da yaƙi (saɓanin masu son zaman lafiya) tsohon jami'in binciken makamai na Amurka Scott Ritter; daga Guardian-abokiyar mashahuri guru da ɗan wasan Hollywood Russell Brand; daga na gargajiya, mai cizon harshe na Labour Party a jihar Jeremy Corbyn.
Kuma idan muna da matsaloli masu zurfi tare da tsarin zamani kamar irin wannan - tare da haɗin kai mai guba na masu kishin kasa, addinin karya da kuma 'ci gaban masana'antu' - abin da za a ce game da jihohin da ke gudana a matsayin masu mulki, masu mulkin kama karya ta irin su Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, Vladimir Putin da sauran manyan Makiya Yammacin duniya?
Ba mu cika jaddada adawarmu ta zahiri ga waɗannan tsarin mulki ba, ba don mu 'masu ba ne' ko 'masu neman gafara' ba - ko don 'maƙiyi na abokina ne' - amma saboda yin hakan yana ciyar da farfaganda da ke ba da damar nisa fiye da kisa militarized oligarchy wato mulkin mallaka na Amurka. Kamar yadda Noam Chomsky ya lura:
Don haka a lokacin da masu adawa da gwamnatin Amurka suka soki zaluncin da wasu kasashen makiya ke yi kamar Cuba ko Vietnam, ba boyayye ba ne illar wannan sukar za ta kasance: ba zai yi wani tasiri ga gwamnatin Cuba ba, alal misali, amma tabbas zai yi tasiri. taimaka wa masu azabtarwa a Washington da Miami su ci gaba da ƙulla kamfen ɗinsu na wahala a kan al'ummar Cuba [watau ta hanyar takunkumin da Amurka ta jagoranta]. To, wannan shi ne abin da ba na tunanin mai halin kirki zai so ya ba da gudummawarsa.' (Noam Chomsky, Ƙarfin Fahimtar, Sabon Latsa, 2002, shafi 287-88)
Ra'ayinmu na kanmu game da misalan da muka kawo ba su da alaƙa da lamarin da muke yi don nuna son kai ga kamfanoni na jihohi. Medium. Don haka lokacin da masu sukar mu suka nace ba wauta ce a gare mu mu 'kare' Harry, ko kuma 'bamu' mu nuna son kai ga Putin, sukar ba ta da mahimmanci a mafi kyau kuma, a cikin batun Putin, ainihin juyawar gaskiya.
Yayin da batun batun sarauta zai iya zama kamar maras muhimmanci, yawancin labaran da ake yadawa ya nuna cewa hakan ne ba ra'ayi na kafaffen iko.
Sarauta ne ba kawai game da yawon shakatawa da karkatar da jama'a; shi ne batun inda kishin kasa, kula da aji, rashin daidaito, soja, shirya fakery na addini da biocidal kamfanoni-maximimimining haduwa. Coci, jiha, soja, kafofin watsa labarai, kasuwanci da sarauta duk suna goyon bayan juna. Abu ne mai bayyanawa ganin yadda wadannan cibiyoyi na wutar lantarki ke ba da kariya ga juna daga barazanar da ake gani.
Duk abin da muke tunanin Harry da Meghan Markle saga, yana da mahimmanci lokacin da ɗan sarki na yanzu kuma ɗan'uwan sarki na gaba ya rubuta a cikin sabon littafinsa, 'Spare':
'Shin Crown yana samar da kudin shiga na yawon shakatawa wanda ke amfana da kowa? I mana. Shin kuma yana kan filayen da aka samu kuma aka samu a lokacin da tsarin bai yi adalci ba kuma aka samar da dukiya ta ma’aikata da ‘yan daba, hadewa da bautar da mutane? Akwai wanda zai iya musun hakan?' (Harry, 'Spare', Penguin, sigar e-book, 2023, p.322)
Littafin Harry yana da hujja wasu da hankali, idan kawai don maganganunsa game da yakin Afghanistan wanda ya kasance mai gwagwarmaya:
'Wasu kwamandojin sukan ce, a fili da kuma a boye, suna tsoron duk 'yan Taliban da aka kashe za su haifar da wasu uku, don haka sun yi taka tsantsan. A wasu lokuta muna jin kwamandojin sun yi gaskiya: mu kasance haifar da ƙarin Taliban.' (shafi na 183)
Ya kara da cewa:
'Afghanistan yaki ne na kurakurai, yaki na barna mai yawa - an kashe dubban wadanda ba su ji ba ba su gani ba, da kuma nakasu, kuma hakan na ci mana tuwo a kwarya.'
Wannan wata muhimmiyar ikirari ce daga memba na Birtaniya ta 3 Regiment Army Air Corp wanda kuma shi ne na biyar a jerin masu jiran gadon sarautar Burtaniya.
Jaridun Burtaniya sun yi babban wasa na ikirari da Harry ya yi na 'makiyan abokan gaba' da aka kashe. Ya rubuta:
'To, lambata: Ashirin da biyar. Ba lamba ce ta ba ni gamsuwa ba. Amma ba lambar da ta sa na ji kunya ba. A zahiri, da na gwammace kada in sami wannan lambar akan CV na soja, a raina, amma ta wannan alamar da na gwammace in rayu a cikin duniyar da babu Taliban, duniyar da ba ta da yaƙi.' (shafi na 184)
In rahoton wannan, BBC cikin kunya ta juyar da gaskiyar abin da Harry ke nufi:
A cikin tarihinsa, Duke na Sussex ya bayyana kashe mayakan Taliban 25 a Afganistan a matsayin "yankin dara da aka cire daga jirgin".
'Tsohon Kanar Tim Collins ya ce ba haka kuke yi ba a cikin sojoji.'
A cikin abin da dole ne ya zama na farko, a zahiri BBC ta ambaci 'yan Taliban don goyan bayan batancin da ta yi:
Da yake mayar da martani ga kalaman yariman, wani babban jigo na kungiyar Taliban Anas Haqqani ya wallafa a shafinsa na Twitter cewa: “Mr Harry! Waɗanda kuka kashe ba chess ba ne, mutane ne; suna da iyalai da suke jiran dawowar su…
"Ba na tsammanin kotun hukunta manyan laifuka ta kasa da kasa za ta gayyace ku ko kuma masu rajin kare hakkin bil'adama za su yi Allah wadai da ku, saboda kurame ne da makafi a gare ku."
BBC ta sake ambato Collins:
' Ya mugun bar gefen gefe. Ba ma yin notches akan gindin bindiga. Ba mu taba yi ba.'
A zahiri, a wannan shafin da ya bayyana cewa ya kashe mutane 25 a Afghanistan, Harry ya rubuta:
"Don haka burina tun daga ranar da na zo ba shine in kwanta barci ba tare da shakkar cewa na yi abin da ya dace, cewa abin da nake hari daidai ne, ina harbi Taliban da Taliban kawai, babu farar hula a kusa. Ina so in koma Biritaniya da dukan gaɓoɓina, amma ƙari, ina so in koma gida da lamirina. Wanda ke nufin sanin abin da nake yi, da kuma dalilin da ya sa nake yin shi, a kowane lokaci.' (shafi na 184)
Harry ya jaddada cewa an horas da shi ne don kaskantar da mayakan abokan gaba a matsayin 'yankin dara' daidai saboda da in ba haka ba zai yi wuya ya kashe mutanen da ake kallo a matsayin ’yan adam. A wasu kalmomi, duk abin da muke tunani game da Harry da mummunar rawar da ya taka a wannan mummunan yakin, waɗannan ba kalmomin wani ba ne wanda ke yin alfahari game da tattara wadanda abin ya shafa a matsayin 'bakin bindiga'. Mahimmanci, adadin wadanda suka mutu shine kawai bangare na tattaunawar Harry game da Afghanistan da muka gani an tattauna a cikin bita da sharhi.
Don yabonsa, Harry ya zubar da raini a kan 'baron watsa labarai', da farko Murdoch, amma kuma "mai yiwuwa Dickensian mai sauti Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere', mai kula da hannun jari na Daily Mail da General Trust, ƙungiyar kafofin watsa labarai da ta haɗa da Daily Mail. Harry ya rubuta:
A wannan lokacin ne na fara tunanin Murdoch mugu ne. A'a, buga wancan. Na fara sanin cewa shi ne. Hannun farko. Da zarar ’yan barandan wani sun bi ka a kan titunan birni na zamani mai cike da cunkoson jama’a, sai ka rasa shakku kan inda suka tsaya kan Babban Ci gaban Dabi’a. Duk rayuwata na ji ba'a game da alaƙar da ke tsakanin ɓarnawar sarauta da haɓakar ɗaruruwan ɗaruruwan yara, amma a lokacin ne na gane: Rashin bambancin jinsin halitta ba kome ba ne idan aka kwatanta da kunna wutar lantarki. Auren dan uwanku ya yi ƙasa da dicey fiye da zama cibiyar riba ga Murdoch Inc.
"Tabbas ban damu da siyasar Murdoch ba, wanda ke hannun dama na Taliban. Kuma ban ji daɗin cutarwar da yake yi kowace rana ga Gaskiya ba, wulaƙanta haƙiƙanin gaskiya. Lallai, ba zan iya tunanin wani mutum ɗaya ba a cikin tarihin shekaru 300,000 na nau'in da ya fi yin illa ga haƙiƙanin haɗin gwiwarmu.' (shafi na 169)
Harry ya tozarta 'barnar da 'yan jaridu ke yi' (shafi na 201):
'Tun daga tsararraki mutanen Birtaniyya sun ce da dariya mai ban haushi: Ah, da kyau, tabbas jaridunmu na banza ne - amma me za ku iya yi?' (shafi na 143)
Wannan ba Noam Chomsky ba ne, ko ma Owen Jones, amma waɗannan ne maganganu masu ma'ana suna isa ga jama'a masu sauraro daga babban adadi. In ba haka ba, suna ba wa 'yan jarida da 'yan jarida masu niyya da uzuri don bayyana waɗannan batutuwa masu mahimmanci. Kash, kamar yadda za mu gani, irin wannan aikin jarida ya yi karanci.
Farfaganda ba ta da tasiri. Dole ne a isar da shi tare da cikakken tabbaci da girman ɗabi'a. Don haka, akan shirinsa na Talk TV, Piers Morgan ya ce:
'Akwai abu ɗaya da ya shafi wannan littafin. Maimakon saya shi da gashin tsuntsunsa mai kwadayi, yi abin da zan yi yanzu - ɗauki "Spare" kuma ku dunƙule ta inda yake, a cikin kwandon.'
Inda Morgan ya jefa littafin a cikin kwandon shara.
Harry ya kasance alama 'maci amana'. Daga kyawawan halaye, editan mai ba da shawara na Daily Mail, Andrew Pierce, ya ce:
’Yahuda Iskariyoti ya ci amanar Yesu Kiristi don tsabar azurfa talatin. Wannan bloke ya ci amanar Sarauniya, ɗan'uwansa, mahaifinsa, Sarauniya Consort na gaba, don goma na miliyoyin fam. Duk akan kudi ne. Hankalinsa na hakki shine tauyewa. '
Abin farin ciki, Daily Mail ba ta da wani dalili na kuɗi na kuɗi don ba da labarin Harry har abada; kamar yadda yake a cikin rahotonsa, sharhinsa da 'labarun gefe na kunya' fiye da kullum.
Mawallafin jaridar Times Giles Coren, wanda aikinsa ba shakka ba ya amfana daga gaskiyar cewa mahaifinsa shi ne ɗan jarida da ake so da yawa, mai ba da dariya da kuma halin TV na BBC, Alan Coren, yayi sharhi:
'Harry mutum ne mai matukar wauta. Mutumin da ba ya aiki IQ a cikin irin 90s na tsakiya, wanda a rayuwa ta ainihi ba zai iya samun aiki, ko samun iyali, ko yin wani abu ba.'
Hakanan yana yin tsinkaya cikin 'yanci, Nigel Farage, mai gabatar da labarai na GB kuma wanda ya kafa Brexit Party, ya fusata:
'Yana da ban tsoro a kowane matakin. Za ku iya tunanin zubar da dangin ku, zubar da kasarku, zubar da mulkin kasa, zubar da gadon kakar ku… da yin komai don kudi? Ina ganin duka, a gaskiya, abin raini ne.'
Dan kasuwa kuma 'mai fafutuka' Adam Brooks ya haskaka yanayin:
'[Harry's] ya yi kuka, ya farka, kuka-baby… Ni a zahiri - kalma ce mai ƙarfi - amma ina tsammanin Na ƙi, na ƙi Harry saboda abin da yake yi wa Burtaniya.'
Dan jarida AN Wilson ma ya buga katin Hitler:
"Ba na nuna cewa ya yi muni kamar Hitler ba, amma yana kama da karanta Mein Kampf, a cikin cewa Hitler yana tunanin shi jarumi ne kuma kun ajiye littafin da rashin kunya. Kuma kun ajiye wannan littafin ba tare da kyama ba.'
Masu kallon BBC za su tuna da yadda Jennie Bond ta yi aiki a matsayin wakilin BBC mai taka tsantsan kuma mai ra'ayin sarauta na tsawon shekaru 14. A mayar da martani ga littafin Harry, mun ga wani Bond na daban:
'Ka sani, za mu iya watakila tunanin cewa kwakwalwarsa ta kara da, da kyau, da raunin rayuwarsa - saboda shi is damuwa - um, kuma da yawa, yawancin kwayoyi da ya sha?'
Lokacin Da Mace 'Hagu-Liberal' Columnists Hari
Ba abin mamaki ba ne cewa ’yan jarida mata na ‘yan jarida masu sassaucin ra’ayi sun yi jerin gwano don zubar da mutunci a kan wannan namijin da ake yi na Establishment wulakanci, kamar yadda aka jera su don nuna kyama ga Julian Assange, Jeremy Corbyn, Russell Brand da sauransu.
A cikin Observer, Rachel Cooke ayyana kanta ta ruɗe da 'littafin da ya kamata ya zama ɗaya daga cikin mafi ban mamaki da na taɓa karantawa'. Samfurin 'Mai son rai ne, mai son kai, irin mutumin da ba shi da tausayi'.
Tare da ba'a na jima'i a gaba, Cooke ya yi ba'a game da ambaton Harry game da 'todger', 'abu', da kuma yadda ya bayyana cewa ya taɓa 'peed' wando'. Cooke ya nuna cewa tabbas Harry ya fadi gwajin masu lura akan 'mace'.
A cikin Guardian, Marina Hyde kuma mayar da hankali A kan 'kaciya / sanyi matsayin azzakari na sarakuna da watakila kuma an subhead Yana da Royal Cockout'.
Hyde aƙalla ya sami damar ambata Afghanistan:
"A lokacin da ake rikici a Afganistan ya kashe mayakan Taliban 25 daga cikin jirginsa mai saukar ungulu na dala miliyan 50, wani nau'i na yaki wanda ko da yaushe mafi jajircewar Taliban a cikinmu ba su yarda da shi ba."
Wannan magana ce mai ban tsoro daga Hyde ga kisan gillar da kasashen yamma suka yi wa Afghanistan tsawon shekaru ashirin. Za mu iya kwatanta harin atomic na Hiroshima a matsayin 'dan asymmetric'? Yaya game da murkushe 'yan Nazi na Warsaw ghetto? Hyde ya kara da cewa:
'Sai kuma, Taliban ta yi nasara a karshe…'
Bugu da kari, wani mummuna, sharhi mai ban mamaki. Can kowa a Afghanistan za a ce sun 'yi nasara' a karshen mummunan mamayewa da mamayar Yammacin Turai?
A cikin Independent, Lucy Pavia kuma sharhi akai-akai akan 'todgers', akan yadda bayanin Harry game da yanayin 'azzakarinsa na sanyi bayan tafiya zuwa Pole ta Arewa ya ƙare a cikin rashin yarda cewa ya rufe shi a cikin Elizabeth Arden kuma yana tunanin mahaifiyarsa, wacce ta taɓa amfani da kirim'. Watakila fassarar da ake nufi ita ce 'm'.
Daga jin daɗin kujerar ofishin kamfani, Pavia ta rubuta:
'Shafukan da suka shafi cin zarafin sojoji da tafiye-tafiye zuwa Afirka sun cancanci amma suna da kumbura.'
A bayyane yake bai 'cancanci' ba don Pavia don yin kowane ambatar kalaman Harry game da yaƙin Afghanistan.
Ana tsammanin ci gaba zuwa dama akan 'bakan' kafofin watsa labarai, tsohon ɗan jaridar Guardian na dogon lokaci, Hadley Freeman, yanzu yana rubutu ga The Times, an sallami wannan 'baƙon, ɗan ƙarami, ciwon kai na littafin', ƙoƙarin da yake "kamar yadda Harry ya kasance mai son kai amma ba tare da sanin kansa ba". Kalamai masu ban tsoro daga wani wanda ya ba da gudummawa ga wasu munanan farfagandar ta Guardian, kuma wanda ya haura har ma sama da rashin son kai, matakin ɗabi'a na sanin kai ya zama, kamar yadda Harry zai iya cewa, 'cibiyar riba ga Murdoch Inc'.
Littafin, in ji Freeman, 'mai ban dariya ne kuma abin tausayi. Hamlet shine buri, wawa shine, abin ban tausayi, sakamakon'.
Har ila yau, ba'a na jima'i jigo ne: 'Spare' ya jawo Harry "ba'a gaba ɗaya, kanun labarai game da matattu Afganistan da kuma azzakarinsa mai sanyi". Freeman ya lura cewa littafin ya warware batun 'ko Harry da ɗan'uwansa sun yi kaciya'; Ta yi mamaki da babbar murya ga Harry ko yana sane da littafin 'ya sa ka zama ɗan wasa.'
Idan waɗannan masu sharhi sun yi ƙoƙari su nemo harsashi don ci gaba da wulakanta batunsu, wannan shine dalilin da Anita Singh ta bayyana a cikinta fiye da daidaito. review a cikin Telegraph na dama-reshe. Yin rubutu kamar ɗan adam na yau da kullun, maimakon ƙiyayya, Singh ya lura da Harry:
'Marubucin sa na fatalwa, JR Moehringer, ya yi kyakkyawan aiki a nan na sa batun sa ya zama kamar mai hankali a cikin labarin…
'Spare an gina shi da kyau kuma an rubuta shi sosai. Harry zai kasance na farko da ya yarda cewa Moehringer ya yi aiki mai wuyar gaske a nan, kuma watakila ya tura wasu lasisin fasaha.'
Lallai, Moehringer shine marubuci bayan tarihin rayuwar Andre Agassi mai ban sha'awa, 'Buɗe', don haka wannan ba abin mamaki bane. Harry, don haka, aƙalla ya cancanci yabo don zaɓar marubucin fatalwa tare da hazaka don sanya littafinsa ya fi wahalar gogewa fiye da yadda zai kasance.
Kuna son Hasken Haske?
Babu makawa, an gano Harry yana fama da 'narcissism'. A cikin Express, Leo McKinstry sharhi:
"Amma zuriyarsa zuwa cikin psychobabble na Amurka ya ba da himma ne kawai ya ciyar da kishi, fushi, girman kai da jin haushinsa. Maimakon a sa shi ya daidaita, da alama jiyya ta kasance mai kara kuzari ga yawaitar ra'ayinsa.'
Alexander Larman, editan littattafai na Spectator World, rubuta ko:
"Ba a yarda da narcissism na Harry da Meghan's Netflix Documentary"
Kafin Kirsimeti, a cikin ci gaba da yajin aikin layin dogo, mashahurin likitan kwantar da hankali Piers Morgan lura Mick Lynch, babban sakatare na Ƙungiyar Rail, Maritime da Ma'aikatan Sufuri, ya kamu da wannan cuta:
'Mick "The Grinch" Lynch ya fara yarda da nasa bugu da ƙari * t. Yana son zama tauraruwar watsa labarai, don haka ba shi da kuzari don warware yajin aikin saboda hakan zai hana shi iskar iskar TV ɗin da yake sha'awa.'
BBC ta fitar da kanun labarai guda biyu kusan iri daya a shafinta na farko a rana guda. Na farko:
'An zargi mai kashe gobarar da satar Kirsimeti'
Na biyu, mai hoto daban:
'An zargi mai kashe gobara da satar Kirsimeti'
Matt Frei na Channel 4 Labarai tambaye Lynch: 'Kuna son haske?'
Lynch ya amsa:
'A'a, yanayi ne ya sa ni nan, ba ta zabi na ba… Ina so in ci gaba da aikina kuma in ci gaba da tafiyar da kungiyarmu.'
We tambaye Frei:
'Shin * kuna * son haske, @mattfrei? Kuna yin hogging shekaru da yawa. Kuna da kyau sosai; dole ne ku ji daɗin waɗannan lokutan. Kuna ba da sha'awar kula?'
Frei ya yi watsi da mu, ba shakka.
Don yabonsa, Lynch ya yi babban aiki na kawar da batancin kafofin watsa labarai ta hanyar fallasa dabarun 'yan jarida a ainihin lokacin ga masu kallo. (Duba nan, nan da kuma nan.)
A cikin 2019, Daily Mail ta sadaukar da shafuka hudu ga Julian Assange, rahoton ' faɗuwar mai baƙar magana' wanda aka cire daga 'cikin ɗakinsa na fetid' zuwa ƙarshe 'ya fuskanci shari'a'.
Ko da ana jayayya da Korar Assange zuwa Amurka, tsohon mai gabatar da shirye-shiryen siyasa na BBC Andrew Neil rubuta a cikin Daily Mail a watan Yunin da ya gabata:
'Assange ba dan gwagwarmaya ba ne a cikin makamai masu haske. Ba shi da halin ko-in-kula, ya fi son rayuwar mutane, mai narkar da kai, “mai farautar jima’i”. Rashin kula da tsaftar kansa, galibi shi ne babban abokin gaba nasa. Yakan raina abokansa ya kori abokansa.'
Idan muka mai da hankali, za mu ga cewa kafa abokan gaba suna shafan su a zahiri iri ɗaya. Don haka, a cikin jaridar Sunday Times, Katie Glass ta kwatanta hippy mara lahani, Russell Brand, a matsayin 'mai baje kolin narcissist mai sha'awar shahara'. (Katie Glass, 'Mafi kyawun Marmite Brand,' Sunday Times, 22 Satumba 2013)
Don haka, a cikin The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin hukunta Jajirtaccen mai busa usur Edward Snowden a matsayin "babban dan iska wanda ya cancanci zama gidan yari". Bob Schieffer na CBS yayi sharhi:
"Ina tsammanin abin da muke da shi a cikin Edward Snowden wani matashi ne kawai mai raɗaɗi wanda ya yanke shawarar cewa ya fi sauran mu hankali."
Glenn Greenwald wanda, ba kamar yawancin masu sukar ba, ya sadu da Snowden kuma ya yi aiki tare da shi. sa wannan a cikin hangen nesa tare da élan da ya saba:
"Daya daga cikin abubuwan ban dariya da ban dariya shine yadda masu neman afuwar gwamnati da ma'aikatan watsa labarai ke tafiyar da su ta hanyar dabi'ar makiyaya gaba daya: dukkansu ba tare da tunani ba sun dauki rubutun iri daya sannan kawai suna maimaita shi saboda suna ganin wasu suna yin haka kuma, kamar aku, suna kwaikwayi ne kawai. Abin da suke ji… Daruruwan mutanen da ba su san ma'anar "narcissism" ba - kuma waɗanda ba su san abu na farko game da Snowden ba - sun yi ta maimaita wannan kalmar akai-akai saboda wannan ya zama ƙwaƙƙwaran da ake amfani da shi don lalata shi.'
Ana ba da shawarar yin taka tsantsan. Jaridar Daily Banter ya lura:
'Glenn Greenwald ya kasance yana neman ya sauke Obama kuma ya ciyar da narcissism na kansa shekaru da yawa yanzu. Ya dai sami nasarar cim ma ɗaya daga cikin waɗannan buƙatun a cikin faɗuwar rana…'
A mataki ɗaya, duk wannan shirme ne. Amma akwai mahimmanci - kowane lokaci wani mutum ko kungiya, a ko'ina, yana barazana ga bukatu masu karfi ta kowace hanya, ana iya dogaro da kafofin watsa labarai na kamfanoni don fitar da ambaliyar ruwa mai guba don haɓaka gaba da jama'a don haka kawar da barazanar. Wannan ba makirci ba ne: tsarin ya zaɓa don manyan manajoji da ƙananan cogs waɗanda kawai 'fahimtar' wanda ke buƙatar hidima, sanyawa da zagi, idan za a sami riba mai yawa.
A gaskiya, wani nau'i ne na na'ura mai saurin gudu, yana aiki kusan kai tsaye. Mummunan labari, ba shakka, a lokacin da ake fuskantar rugujewar yanayi, shi ne cewa wannan na'ura tana yin kyakkyawan aiki na kawar da muryoyin ƙwararrun masana kimiyyar yanayi da ke ƙoƙarin yin gargaɗi game da bala'i da ke tafe. Irin wannan kwarin gwiwa, raha, abin duniya, cin zarafi, korar da aka yi na yau da kullun suna hana a ji masana kimiyya kuma jama'a su dauki su da mahimmanci. Ya rataya a wuyan mu na ciki da wajen tsarin nan, mu yi duk abin da za mu iya don murkushe wannan farfaganda mai halakarwa.
ZNetwork ana samun kuɗi ta hanyar karimcin masu karatun sa.
Bada Tallafi