(sabunta a kasa - Sabunta II [Fri.])
In The New York Times wannan safiya, Charlie Savage ya bayyana sabon tunani daga DOJ game da yadda ake tuhumar WikiLeaks da Julian Assange da laifi. Masu bincike na tarayya "suna neman shaidar duk wani hadin gwiwa" tsakanin WikiLeaks da Bradley Manning - "kokarin gano ko Mista Assange ya karfafa ko ma ya taimaka" Sojoji masu zaman kansu sun ba da takardun - sannan "sun tuhume shi a matsayin maƙarƙashiya a cikin ledar. , ba kawai a matsayin mai karɓar takardun ba wanda ya buga su." Don cimma wannan, yana da mahimmanci musamman don "lallashe Manning mai zaman kansa ya ba da shaida ga Mista Assange." Ina so in kawo abubuwa biyu game da wannan.
Na farko, gwamnatin Obama na fuskantar abin da take ganin ya zama babbar matsala: shi ne - kamar yadda Savage ya rubuta - "a karkashin matsananciyar matsin lamba don yin misali na [Assange] a matsayin abin da zai hana kara zubewar jama'a," amma babu abin da Assange ko WikiLeaks suka yi. a zahiri ya saba wa doka. Haka kuma, kamar yaddawaɗannan malaman Makarantar Jarida ta Columbia sun bayyana a cikin masu adawa da kara, ba zai yiwu a ƙirƙiro ra'ayoyin don tuhume su ba tare da aikata laifuka da yawa na aikin jarida a lokaci guda ba. Don haka, iƙirarin cewa WikiLeaks ba wai kawai karba da buga keɓaɓɓun bayanai bane, a'a yana nemansa da ƙwazo da taimakawa masu leken asiri, ƙoƙarin DOJ ne na bambanta shi da aikin jarida na "gargajiya". Kamar yadda Savage ya rubuta, wannan ka'idar na nufin "gwamnati ba za ta fuskanci tambayoyi masu ban tsoro ba game da dalilin da yasa ba ta kuma gurfanar da kungiyoyin labaran gargajiya ko kuma 'yan jarida masu bincike wadanda su ma suka bayyana bayanan da gwamnatin ta ce ya kamata a boye - ciki har da The New York Times."
Amma wannan bambance-bambancen kwata-kwata ne. Da wuya 'yan jarida masu bincike kawai suna aiki a matsayin masu karɓar bayanan sirri; Shirye-shiryen gwamnati na sirri ba a yawanci ba da rahoto saboda leaks kawai ba zato ba tsammani ya bayyana wata rana a cikin akwatin imel na mai ba da rahoto. Kusan ƴan jarida suna ɗaukar kwararan matakai don ƙarfafa yada shi. Suna ƙoƙarin sanya masu leken asiri su ba da takardu don tabbatar da iƙirarin su da kuma yarda da buga su. Suna kiran wasu majiyoyi don samun tabbaci da bayani ta hanyar ƙarin leken asiri da takardu. Jim Risen da Eric Lichtblau aka bayyana yadda suka ba da suna ga "kusan dozin dozin na yanzu da tsoffin jami'ai" don sa su bayyana bayanai game da shirin sauraran bayanan NSA na Bush. Dana Priest tuntuɓa da yawa "Jami'an Amurka da na ƙasashen waje" don bayyana cikakkun bayanai game da shirin ''baƙar fata'' na CIA. Dukansu labarun sun sami kyaututtukan Pulitzer kuma sun ƙunshi matakai masu yawa, masu aiki don cajole kafofin don bayyana keɓaɓɓen bayanan don bugawa.
A taƙaice, 'yan jarida masu bincike a kai a kai - da gaske, ta ma'ana - suna yin daidai abin da sabuwar ka'idar DOJ za ta nema don tabbatar da WikiLeaks ya yi. A tuhumi wani a matsayin mai laifi "maƙarƙashiya" a cikin ɗigogi a kan cewa sun ɗauki matakai don ƙarfafa bayanan zai zama laifin aikata aikin jarida na bincike kowane abu kamar tuhumar Assange da "leken asiri" don buga bayanan sirri.
Na biyu, labarin Savage ya bayyana yana ba da haske sosai labarina daga jiya game da yanayin danniya da ake tsare da Manning. Bukatar samun Manning ya yi maganganun cin zarafi a kan Assange - don samun sa ya yi iƙirarin cewa Assange da himma, a gaba, ya taimaka wa Manning samun damar yin amfani da waɗannan takaddun - zai zama dalili ɗaya bayyananne na sa Manning ga irin waɗannan yanayi na rashin jin daɗi: idan kuna son samun ingantacciyar magani, dole ne ku zargi Assange. In The Huffington Post jiya, Marcus Baram ya nakalto Jeff Paterson, wanda ke kula da asusun kare shari'a na Manning, yana cewa Manning ya fusata matuka game da yanayin da ake tsare da shi amma bai fito fili ba game da su dangane da kokarin lauyansa na yin shawarwari mafi kyau.
Ko menene kuma gaskiya ne, DOJ da alama yana da niyyar matsawa Manning don laifin Assange. Zai zama abin ban mamaki a yi yarjejeniya da ma'aikacin gwamnati da ya bace domin a tuhumi wanda ba ma'aikacin gwamnati ba wanda ya buga bayanan sirri kawai. Amma hakan na iya yin bayani aƙalla aƙalla (ko da yake a fili bai ba da hujja ba) dalilin da yasa Gwamnati ke riƙe Manning a ƙarƙashin irin waɗannan yanayi na danniya: domin "zama" sa ya faɗi abin da suke buƙata ya faɗi don tuhumar WikiLeaks da Assange.
** * * *
A kan MSNBC a daren jiya, Keith Olbermann ya yi a sashi kan yanayin tsare Manning, tare da mai ba da labari na FBI Colleen Rowley. Akalla a gidan yanar gizon sa, Labaran CBS shi ma ya ruwaito labarin. Kuma ina kanDemocracy Yanzu A safiyar yau ina bayani kan labarina na Manning jiya, da kuma tattauna labarin Savage a safiyar yau da kuma batun sakin Assange daga kurkuku:
UPDATE: Wasu da yawa suna yin irin wannan batu game da ka'idar gabatar da kara na DOJ, gami da Yale Law Farfesa Jack Balkin ("ka'idar makirci kuma tana barazana ga 'yan jarida na gargajiya"); tsohon Shugaban Bush OLC kuma Farfesan Lauyan Harvard Jack Goldsmith ("ba zai bambance Times da sauran kafafen watsa labarai da dama ba a yawancin lokuta da 'yan jarida suka yi nasarar nema tare da shirya karɓar bayanan sirri da takardu kai tsaye daga jami'an gwamnati" kuma "zai zama babban mataki na ƴancin ƴan jarida na gargajiya a Ƙasar. Jihohi"); POLITICOJosh Gerstein ("Masu rahoto suna neman bayanan sirri a kowane lokaci a cikin tattaunawa ta wayar tarho, a cikin tarurrukan sirri da sauran abubuwan da suka faru" don haka "banbancin . . . ya same ni a matsayin abin ba'a"); kuma A Amirka, yiwuwaAdam Serwer ("Tsarin zamewa shine kawai ɗan ƙaramin ƙasa mai zurfi" fiye da cajin Assange a ƙarƙashin Dokar Leken asiri).
Lallai, manufar Bob Woodward gabaɗaya a rayuwa a wannan lokacin ita ce taƙama, matsa lamba har ma da karkatar da jami'an gwamnati don bayyana masa bayanan sirri don ya buga a cikin littattafansa, waɗanda ya saba yi. Shin hakan ya sa shi ya zama “maƙarƙashiya”? A karkashin ka'idar DOJ, zai. Duk wannan yana nuna hujja guda ɗaya da ba za a iya gujewa ba: babu yadda za a yi a tuhumi Assange da WikiLeaks ba tare da aikata laifin aikin jarida ba saboda WikiLeaks ta tsunduma cikin ayyukan jarida tsantsa: fallasa tare da bayyana sirrin ƙungiyoyin mafi girma a duniya. Wannan hali ne - kuma ba duk wani laifi da ake tsammani ba - wanda ke bayyana dalilin da yasa DOJ ke da matsananciyar yanke hukunci.
LABARI II: Abubuwan da ke da alaƙa a bayyane:
(1) Dubi wannan labarin daga The Guardian, kanun labarai: "Magoya bayan sun ce lafiyar Bradley Manning na tabarbarewa a gidan yari."
(2) Wannan labarin daga Mai zaman kansa ya bayyana yadda jami'an Amurka ke kallon "lallashi" Manning don ba da shaida a kan WikiLeaks - musamman "lallashe shi" ya ce WikiLeaks ya taimaka masa samun dama da yada bayanan sirri - yana da "mahimmanci" ga nasarar gurfanar da Assange.
ZNetwork ana samun kuɗi ta hanyar karimcin masu karatun sa.
Bada Tallafi