Okulotshiweyo kwe-Z Video DVD Chomsky Sessions II, Isayensi, Inkolo kanye Nemvelo Yomuntu, Ingxoxo noNoam Chomsky kanye noMichael Albert (https://znetwork.org/zstore/products/114).
Kafushane nje, yini ukungabi nangqondo? Futhi-ke, ngokuphambene, yini ukucabangela?
Hhayi-ke, isibonelo esiphelele sokungabi nangqondo okwedlulele yilokho ebesikhuluma ngakho. Lokho u-Orwell akubiza ngokuthi ukucabanga kabili. Ikhono lokuba nemibono emibili ephikisanayo engqondweni yakho ngesikhathi esisodwa futhi uyikholelwe yomibili. Yilokho okuphakeme kokungabi nangqondo. Futhi lokho kuchaza umphakathi wezihlakaniphi eziphakeme.
Manje ake sithathe izibonelo ezibambekayo zokungabi nangqondo kwe-fundamentalist, ngizokunikeza isibonelo sangempela. Empeleni yisibonelo engangisazi cishe eminyakeni emihlanu edlule, kodwa angizange ngisishicilele ngoba kwakuzwakala njengokuhlanya kakhulu kwakungeke kube yiqiniso. Kuvele kuyiqiniso. Manje isiqinisekisiwe. NgoJanuwari 2003, ngaphambi nje kokuhlasela kwe-Iraq, uGeorge Bush wayezama ukuqoqa ukwesekwa kwamazwe ngamazwe mayelana nokuhlasela, futhi wahlangana nomongameli waseFrance, umongameli uChirac. Futhi kulo mhlangano noChirac, waqala ukukhuluma ngesiqephu esivela kuHezekeli, incwadi kaHezekeli, isiqephu esingacacile esingaqondwa muntu. Kuyisiqephu esikhuluma ngoGogi noMagogi, akekho owaziyo ukuthi bangabantu noma izindawo noma ngabe bayini. Kodwa uGogi noMagogi kufanele beze bevela eNyakatho bezohlasela u-Israyeli, bese singena ebuhlanyani bobuvangeli bamaKrestu obushiseka kakhulu. Kunendaba enkulu yokuthi uGogi noMagogi behla kanjani bezohlasela u-Israyeli, kunempi e-Armageddon, wonke umuntu uyabulawa, futhi imiphefumulo esindisiwe inyukela eZulwini.
KULUNGILE, uhlobo oluthile lwendaba enjalo. Ngokusobala uReagan wayekukholelwa lokho. Lapho abaphathi bakhe bengamlawuli ngokwanele futhi esevele eyedwa, wayeqala ukubhuqa ngale nto. Kuye, uGogi noMagogi babeyiRussia. KuBush, uGogi noMagogi babeyi-Iraq. Ngakho utshele lokhu ku-Chirac, futhi u-Chirac wayengazi ukuthi ukhuluma ngani. Ngakho waya eHhovisi Lezangaphandle LaseFrance, i-Elysรฉe, wathi: โUyazi ukuthi loluhlanya lukhuluma ngani?โ. Futhi nabo babengazi. Ngakho-ke baya kusazi sezenkolo esaziwayo saseBelgium esabhala uhlobo oluthile lwesimo kulesi siqephu kanye nendlela esihunyushwa ngayo nanoma yini esingase siyisho njalonjalo. Kulungile, ngazi kanjani? Nokho, ngiyazi ngoba leso sazi semfundiso yenkolo saseBelgium [esingazwakalayo] singithumelele ikhophi yayo, enesizinda sendaba. Angikaze ngiyishicilele ngoba lokhu kuzwakala nje ngaphandle kodonga.
Ekugcineni, ngangikhuluma nesifundiswa sase-Australia, umcwaningi, futhi ngamtshela ngakho. Wanquma ukuyibheka. Kuvela ukuthi kulungile. Eqinisweni indaba ivela emibhalweni yokuphila kukaChirac nakwabanye ubufakazi. Ngakho yebo, lokho kwenzeka ngempela. Ngakho-ke nali izwe ezandleni zohlanya oluphanga, owaziyo, lukhuluma ngoGogi noMagogi ne-Armagedoni nemiphefumulo ekhuphukela eZulwini. Futhi umhlaba wasinda. Hhayi-ke, kulungile, lokho akuyona into encane e-United States. Angazi ukuthi iphesenti liyini, kodwa mhlawumbe bangamaphesenti angama-25, 30 abantu. Yebo, lokho kuwukungabi nangqondo okungathi sรญna.
KULUNGILE. Isayensi-ke. Iyini isayensi? Ngisho ukuthi, kungani into ethile ingokwesayensi, yini ephawula into njengesayensi enengqondo noma isayensi engenangqondo ezenza izenze njll. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, futhi, njengoba uzophendula ngokugcwele, uzizwa kanjani ngokugxekwa kwesokunxele kwesayensi? Abanxele abagxeka isayensi ngokuthi, uyazi, noma yini abayishoyo, ingeyasebukhosini noma ingokobulili noma igxile eNtshonalanga noma yini, njalonjalo.
Uyazi, njenganoma yini esiyiqondayo nhlobo, mayelana nezinto eziyinkimbinkimbi njengezindaba zabantu, izimpendulo zincane kakhulu. Uma ingeyona into encane, asiyiqondi. Kukhona isigaba songqondongqondo ngokungangabazeki abaqotho ngokuphelele, okuthi, uma ukubheka ngaphandle, empeleni abakwenzayo ukusebenzisa amagama a-polysyllabic kanye nezakhiwo eziyinkimbinkimbi, okusobala ukuthi babonakala beqonda 'ngoba bakhuluma bodwa. . Isikhathi esiningi angiqondi ukuthi bakhuluma ngani. Ngisho nabantu okumele ngabe basensimini yami. Futhi, konke kukhushulwe kakhulu futhi, niyazi, ukuhlonishwa okuningi nokunye.
Kunomphumela omubi emhlabeni wesithathu. Ezweni lokuqala, emazweni acebile, le nto ayinandaba kangako. Ngakho-ke, uma kuqhubeka umbhedo obuningi ezindaweni zokudlela zaseParis noma emnyangweni wezincwadi wokuqhathanisa waseYale, kulungile. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, emhlabeni wesithathu ukunyakaza okudumile kudinga ngempela ongqondongqondo abakhulu ukuze babambe iqhaza. Futhi uma bonke bekhuluma izinto ezingezinhle zangemva kwesimanje, sebehambile. Ngisho ukuthi, ngibone izibonelo zangempela, bengingakunika zona. Kodwa, ngakho kukhona leso sigaba. Futhi kubhekwa njengophiko lwesokunxele kakhulu, futhi luthuthuke kakhulu nokunye nokunye nokunye.
Nokho, okunye okuvela kuyo, empeleni kunengqondo. Kodwa uma uyikhiqiza kuma-monosyllables, kuvela ukuthi i-truisms. Ngakho yebo, kuyiqiniso ngokuphelele ukuthi, uma ubheka ososayensi baseNtshonalanga, iningi labo bangamadoda. Kuyiqiniso eliphelele ukuthi abesifazane babe nesikhathi esinzima sokungena emikhakheni yesayensi. Futhi kuyiqiniso eliphelele ukuthi kunezici zesikhungo ezinquma ukuthi isayensi iqhubeka kanjani ebonisa izakhiwo zamandla. Ngisho, konke lokhu kungachazwa, ngokwezwi nezwi, kuma-monosyllables. Futhi kuvele kube amaqiniso uma wenza, KULUNGILE. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, awutholi ukuba ungqondongqondo ohlonishwayo ngokwethula ama-truisms kuma-monosyllables.
Ngakho-ke, lapho kwesokunxele, okubizwa kanjalo kwesokunxele, angicabangi ukuthi kushiywe, kodwa lapho ukugxeka kwesokunxele, okubizwa kanjalo, kwenzeka kunembile, kulungile, kulungile. Ngakho-ke, uma uveza, izinto eziningi, njengalokhu engikushilo, kulungile, kulungile. Khomba, wonke umuntu angakuqonda, ubheke futhi ubone ukuthi kuyiqiniso nokunye. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, okuningi kwalokho okubizwa ngokuthi ukugxeka kwesokunxele kubonakala kuwumbhedo omsulwa kimi. Eqinisweni, lokho kuboniswe ngokuphelele. Ngakho-ke, kunencwadi ebaluleke kakhulu kaJean Bricmont no-Alan Sokal, ngiyakhohlwa ukuthi ibizwa ngokuthini, I-Dangerous Illusions noma okuthize, [I-Fashion Nonsense, ngo-1997] lapho bevele badlule khona, bagxile eParis okuyisizinda sokubola, kodwa konke sekuphelile. Futhi badlula ezihlakaniphi ezihlonishwa kakhulu zamaFulentshi, futhi badlule kulokho abakushoyo ngesayense, futhi, niyazi, kuphoxa kakhulu ukuthi nithi ukudikibala uma ukufunda. Eqinisweni, omunye ogqama kakhulu ungomunye wabambalwa kakhulu empeleni ongusosayensi, owaziyo okuthile ngesayensi, [Bruno] Latour, onesizinda sesayensi nefilosofi yesayensi. Badlula esihlokweni sakhe, ngicabanga ukuthi ngikhumbula kahle, lapho eโฆUmuntu othile eFrance noma ndawana thize wayethole ukuthi omunye woFaro wayebulawe yisifo sofuba. Futhi bakwenza ngokuhlaziya noma yini, niyazi, iDNA noma okuthize. U-Latour ubhale indatshana ehlekisa ngalokhu ethi: akunangqondo neze, isifo sofuba satholakala kuphela ngekhulu leshumi nesishiyagalolunye, futhi yonke into iwukwakhiwa komphakathi...
Ngakho-ke ibingakakhiwa, ngakho...
โฆNgakho-ke, akwenzekanga. Ngisho, uyazi, isezingeni likaBush noChirac. Kodwa kuthathwa ngokungathรญ sina kakhulu, futhi lokhu kubhekwa njengokushiya kakhulu.
Kodwa iphuzu elilodwa okufanele ngibheke, ngicabanga, ukuthi incazelo yezihlakaniphi, incazelo yezintatheli, futhi manje incazelo yalo mkhakha noma ingxenye yalokho okuzibiza kwesokunxele. Unokuthile okufanayo okwenzekayo nakuba intengo iphansi kakhulu. Unalabo bafana abahlezi emakamelweni anesimo somoya abaqhumisa isihogo emhlabeni ngenxa yemisebenzi yabo, ngenxa yesimo sabo, ngenxa yezifundo abazifundile. Futhi-ke lapha unabantu abasekugxekweni kwemibhalo noma kunoma yimuphi umkhakha abangase babe kuwo, nabo abahlukanisile ngokuphelele neqiniso, noma bakusithe, noma ukulikhipha, ngenxa yezizathu ezifanayo, yiqiniso, intengo incane kakhulu.
Intengo, emhlabeni wesithathu, iphezulu.
Yebo, kodwa kuse...
Emazweni acebile kubuhlungu nje entanyeni. Kodwaโฆ
โฆNoma kunjalo, akufani nokuqhunyiswa kwamabhomu emhlabeni.
Ngicabanga ukuthi, akunzima kangako ukukuqonda. Ngiqonde ukuthi, ake sithi ungumfundi wezincwadi enyuvesi ethile esezingeni eliphezulu. Noma, niyazi, i-anthropologist noma yini. Ngisho ukuthi, uma wenza umsebenzi wakho ngokujulile, kulungile, uyazi. Kodwa awutholi noma yimiphi imiklomelo emikhulu ngakho. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, ubheka inyuvesi yonke futhi uthole laba bafana bomnyango we-physics kanye nomnyango wezibalo futhi banazo zonke izinhlobo zamathiyori ayinkimbinkimbi, okuyinto esingeke siyiqonde, kodwa. kubonakala sengathi bayabaqonda. Futhi banezimiso, niyazi, futhi bathola izinto eziyinkimbinkimbi ezimisweni futhi benza izivivinyo futhi bathola ukuthi ziyasebenza noma azisebenzi. Futhi lokho empeleni, uyazi, izinto ezihlaba umxhwele. Ngakho nami ngifuna ukuba njalo. Ngifuna ukuba nethiyori. Ezifundweni zabantu, uyazi, ukugxekwa kwemibhalo, i-anthropology nokunye, kunomkhakha obizwa nge-theory. Sifana nezazi zefiziksi. Bakhuluma ngendlela engaqondakali, singakhuluma ngendlela engaqondakali. Anamagama amakhulu, sizoba namagama amakhulu. Bafinyelela, uyazi, iziphetho ezifinyelela kude, sizofinyelela iziphetho ezifinyelela kude. Sihlonishwa njengabo. Manje uma bethi, bheka, senza isayensi yangempela futhi nina aniyenzi, lokho ngowesilisa omhlophe, othanda ubulili, niyazi, onxiwankulu noma ngabe impendulo iyini. Sehluke kanjani kubo? KULUNGILE, kuyathandeka lokho. Futhi zikhona ezinye izinto ezaqhubeka.
Khumbula ukuthi eziningi zalezi zinto zivela eParis. Futhi izinto ezithakazelisayo zazisenzeka eParis ngawo-1970. Izihlakaniphi zesiFulentshi zaziyiqembu lokugcina lezihlakaniphi emhlabeni, ezazingamaphesenti ayikhulu, kodwa, niyazi, kwakuyizinga eliphezulu futhi elihlonishwayo ukuba uStalinist noMaoist ozinikele.
KULUNGILE, maphakathi nawo-'70s lokho kwase kuba yisimo esinzima kakhulu ukusisekela. Ngakho-ke obunakho, uma ubheka ukuthi kwenzekeni, kube nokushintsha okungazelelwe. Abantu ababevutha amaMaoist kanye namaStalinists ngokuzumayo baba abantu bokuqala emhlabeni ukuthola i-gulag. Futhi yaqhubeka nokukhala ngokuthi wonke umuntu usekela kanjani, uyazi, unya lukaStalinist noMaoist futhi, siyiFrance, ngakho-ke kufanele sibe phambi kwawo wonke umuntu, ngakho-ke sikudalule futhi manje sesiyikho, lokhu. yayibizwa ngeNhlakanipho eNtsha noma okuthize, futhi kwadlula konke. Ngiqonde ukuthi, ngikhumbula ngihlangana, ngeke ngiwasho amagama ngoba kuyabangela amahloni, omunye wabaqambi bamasiko baseFrance abahamba phambili owangivakashela cishe ngo-1974 futhi wayengumMaoist ovuthayo. Eminyakeni embalwa kamuva waba ngomunye wabantu bokuqala ukuba baqonde, ukuthi bathole, uyazi, unya lukaStalinist noMaoist. Hhayi-ke, KULUNGILE, ngenkathi udlula kulolo shintsho, kufanele wenze enye into. Uzoba kanjani, uyazi, emakhasini angaphambili? KULUNGILE, kuhambisana nokusungulwa kwe-post-structuralism.
Kulungile, kuthiwani ngenkolo? Ucabanga ukuthi iyini inkolo?
Nokho, into eyodwa ukuthi cisheโฆ Kuye ngokuthi usho ukuthini ngenkolo, ngisho ukuthi, uma usho izinkolo zika-Abrahama?
Sisesimweni esibuthakathaka lapha, ngoba vele angifundile ngokwenkolo, kodwa...
UbuJuda, ubuKrestu nobuSulumane.
Cha, ngisho, ngiqageleโฆYebo, nenye inkolo enjalo yalolo hlobo, ziyini lezo na?
UbuBuddha buhlukile, izinkolelo ezingokomoya phakathi kwaboMdabu baseMelika zazihlukile, kukhona zonke izinhlobo zezinkolo.
Kodwa umehluko esikhuluma ngawo lapho...
Sikhuluma ngezinkolo zika-Abrahama?
Cha, ubuKatolika...
KULUNGILE, lokho...
UbuProthestani, ubuHindu ngicabanga ukuthi...
Cha, amaHindu ahlukile. Lokho, ngisho, okwehluke kakhulu. UbuBuddha buhluke kakhulu. Ngisho ukuthi, uma ubheka ngempela lezi zinhlelo zokukholelwa, ziyehluka kakhulu. Eqinisweni, umaโฆ
Cha, kodwa engikubuzayo ukuthi iyini inkolo ngayinye, hhayi...
Enye inkolelo yokuthi kunento emhlabeni engingaphezu kwamandla ami okuyiyona enquma indlela izinto ezenzeka ngayo nokuthi zizokwenzeka kanjani, uyazi, kuzoba induduzo kimi, mhlawumbe, uyazi, uma ingane yami ifa ngizofa. ngimbone futhi eZulwini ndawo ndawo, ngisho, lezi zinhlobo zezinkolelo na? Futhi ukuthi kukhona uhlobo lwamandla angokomoya endaweni ethile engingenakukwazi ukuwubamba, futhi lokho kuchaza ukuthi kungani izinto zenzeka? Lokho kugcwele yonke indawo. Futhi kuyaqondakala ngokuphelele. Ngisho, uyazi, kwenzeka izinto eziyinqaba. Njengokuthi, ilanga lijikeleza umhlaba, ungalibona. Ngisho ukuthi akwenzeki kodwa uyabona. Hhayi-ke, kufanele kube kukhona okwenza kwenzeke. KULUNGILE, ngakho ngu-Apollo enqoleni yakhe edonsa ilanga. Futhi okufanayo nakho konke okunye okuqhubekayo, awuqondi noma yini eyenzekayo emhlabeni. Kungani ingane yami, le ngane encane enhle kangaka, ifa? Akenzanga lutho. Ngakho kufanele kube khona incazelo ndawo ndawo.
Ngakho-ke iqoqo lezindaba zokwenza umqondo weqiniso, ngaphandle kwesayensiโฆ
Ngisho ukuthi, u-Apollo odonsa ilanga ngenqola, kuyisayensi yakuqala. Ngisho ukuthi, kuwuhlobo lwethiyori yesayensi, isisebenzile, hhayi into encane, njengokuthi, isibonelo, amaGreki asendulo athola izinto eziningi.
Kodwa uma ukusho manje, lapho kunobufakazi obuningi ngaphandle kwalokho, leyo akuseyona isayensi.
Lokho kusho ukuthi ukuqonda kwethu sekujule. Kodwa, niyazi, uguquko olusuka kumlingo luye kwisayensi luwushintsho oluhle kakhulu. Ngisho ukuthi njeโฆNgiqonde ukuthi, ngisho igama elithi โisayensiโ ngesiNgisi alizange livele kwaze kwaba maphakathi nekhulu leshumi nesishiyagalolunye. Ngisho ukuthi kwakukhona igama, kodwa lalisho okunye, lisho "ulwazi". Maphakathi nekhulu leshumi nesishiyagalolunye kwakukhona isehlukaniso phakathi kwesayensi nefilosofi. Ngaphambili, kwakuyifilosofi nje. Eqinisweni, uma uya e-Oxford, ake sithi, ungafunda ifilosofi yemvelo nefilosofi yokuziphatha. Ifilosofi yemvelo yilokho esikubiza lapha ngokuthi isayensi yemvelo, ifilosofi yokuziphatha yilokho esikubiza ngokuthi ubuntu. Wonke umqondo wesayensi ngomqondo wethu ungowakamuva kakhulu.
Futhi kwaba khona uguquko lwengqondo, oluqala ngoGalileo futhi oluqhubekayo futhi oluholela ekuqondeni okukhulu futhi ngemva kwesikhashana, isayensi ivele yasuka yaba isizinda esikhethekile. Ngisho, thatha, uthi, Kant. Wayengeke akutshele ukuthi uyisazi sefilosofi noma usosayensi. Wafundisa isayensi yezinkanyezi, wafundisa ifilosofi yokuziphatha, futhi, yebo, umnumzane ohlakaniphile ofundile wenza zonke lezo zinto. Nokho, maphakathi nekhulu leshumi nesishiyagalolunye kwase kuba nzima kakhulu ukwenza zonke lezo zinto. Isayensi yayifinyelela eqophelweni lapho kufanele ngempela uqonde izinto. Futhi ubungeke ube umnumzane owazi konke. Ngakho-ke, KULUNGILE, izinto zaba ngobungcweti, futhi sithola, uyazi, esikubiza ngesayensi, isizinda esihlukile. Kodwa, khumbula ukuthi lokhu kwakamuva kangakanani. Ngaphambi kwalokho abantu babezama ukuthola izinto. Futhi manje singase sibize lokhu abazama ukukuthola โngomlingoโ, kodwa laba abantu abahlakaniphe kakhulu. Thatha, uthi, u-Isaac Newton. Wayengesona isiwula, impela. Ngisho, manje, uhlobo, abantu bayahleka mayelana neqiniso lokuthi wachitha ingxenye enkulu yokuphila kwakhe esebenza kumakhemikhali kanye noFata beSonto, i-alchemy kanye noFata beSonto. Lokho kwakunengqondo ngokuphelele. Ngisho, ngokwalokho okubizwa ngokuthi amathiyori e-corpuscularian, wonke umuntu abemukela, niyazi, umhlaba wenziwe ngamabhulokhi okwakha amancane njengezitini ...
Shift okumbalwa...
Yebo, shintsha okumbalwa futhi uthole igolide kumthofu. Lokho kunengqondo ngokuphelele. Ngokuqondene noFata BeSonto, lokho kwakunengqondo ngokuphelele. Ngisho ukuthi, wayefika ngemva nje kwenkathi ye-Humanist, lapho kwakutholakale kungazelelwe ingcebo nokunotha kwempucuko yasendulo, okwakungaziwa. Ngakho, inkolelo yanda ukuthi laba bafana babeqonda okuthile ngempela. Futhi babefana nokusigcina kuyimfihlo, ngakho babekwenza ngendlela esoteric. Futhi uma singakwazi ukunquma ababekwenza, sizothola lonke uhlobo lokutholwa okumangalisayo. Ngakho kwakungewona ukuphishekela okungenangqondo. Futhiโฆ
Lokho kwakukudala.
Hhayi kudala. Uyazi, leli yikhulu leshumi nesikhombisa. Futhi lo ngu-Isaac Newton...
Empilweni yami kwakunjalo.
Hhayi-ke, Kulungile (ehleka).
KULUNGILE, ngakho uma usondela esikhathini samanje, unezinto ezithile ngenkolo eziye zaba buhlungu, futhi ezibangele ukuhlupheka nokulimala okukhulu. Nezinye izinto eziphathelene nenkolo ezibe yisibonelo esihle futhi ezibe nesandla ebulungiswa.
Impela, thatha, ake sithi, imfundiso yenkolo yenkululeko. Lokho kwakuwukuvuselelwa kobuKristu bokuqala. Futhi kwakusongela kakhulu e-United States kangangokuthi i-US yaqala impi ngokumelene nayo.
Ngifuna ukushintshela kwehlukile kwezepolitiki kwezinye zezinto ebesilokhu sikhuluma ngazo, okuyigama elibizwa ngamahlelo.
Nokho, ngezinye izikhathi kuwukungavumelani kwangempela okufanele kuxazululwe ngokubambisana, ngokuzwelana nokusekelana nokunye. Ngisho ukuthi sonke besisemaqenjini ezishoshovu futhi, uyazi, lokhu kuyaqhubeka. Ninemihlangano emide, ngoba kunezindaba zangempela okufanele nixoxe ngazo. Ngakho-ke lolo uhlobo olulungile, uma uthanda, ihlelo. Okuningi ku-ego tripping. Uyazi, ngifuna ukuba uLenin. Ngakho, uyangilandela, futhi, kuningi kwalokho. Nginezimfundiso zami nemibono futhi, uma ungazamukeli, uyisitha, uyazi, abantu abasebenzayo noma ngabe kuyini. Futhi kuvame kakhulu phakathi kwamaqembu angenakho ukwesekwa kwabantu abaningi, niyazi, aqhelelene, angenakho okuningi okumelwe akwenze noma athanda ukukholelwa ukuthi awanakho okuningi okumelwe akwenze. Futhi ukucwasana kungenye yezindlela zokugwema ukuzibandakanya. Akumele sinikeze izibonelo, ngisho ukuthi, kugcwele. Okuningi kubi kakhulu.
Kodwa akukhona ukuziphatha kuphela, kukhona okuthile ngakho, kubonakala kimi, ukubamba umbono ngendlela yehlelo kufana nokubamba umbono ngendlela eyisisekelo. Inalesi sici sokuthi, โIyiqiniso ngoba iyimfundiso, iyiqiniso ngoba isencwadini, iyiqiniso ngoba ngiyikholelwa noma ngoba omunye umuntu engimthandayo uyayikholelwaโ. Futhi akuphikiseki. Kunjalo nje.
Lolo hlobo lwamahlelo, yiqiniso, lungabhubhisa amaqembu. Eqinisweni, noma yimuphi umuntu ongene kuhulumeni ohloniphekile, futhi kunenqwaba yawo, angafuna ukugqugquzela lolo hlobo lwamahlelo. Sonke sikubonile kwenzeka. Uma ukhumbula, isho ngawo-'60s. Enye yezinto okufanele iqembu ngalinye lizifunde, imvamisa kanzima, ukuthi naphakathi kwendilinga yakho encane kukhona umshoshozeli. Futhi, ngemva kwesikhashana, kwadingeka kube uhlobo olunokwenzeka ukubakhetha. Yibo ababezovela ezivivinyweni futhi, niyazi, leyo nto.
Ngokushesha abantu bathola ukwazi ukuthi uma kukhona othile eqenjini ogqoke okwemvubu yaseHollywood futhi othi, niyazi, โasiwuyeke lo mbhedo, asiphume sibulale amaphoyisa!โ nokunye nokunye, maningi amathuba okuthi uyisishoshovu. Kwesinye isikhathi, akudingekile ukuthi kube umshoshozeli kahulumeni. Iningi lala maqembu amancane liyizimungulu ezenzweni ezithandwayo, futhi azama ukuqasha, niyazi, ukuze ajoyine, asebenze, ahlezi emihlanganweni isikhathi eside kunanoma ubani omunye, uyazi, azama ukuthola isikhundla. kolunye uhlobo lokulawula bese belubuthela ehlelweni labo elithile. Lokho kuqhubeka njalo. Futhi kuphazamisa kakhulu ukunyakaza okudumile.
Kodwa ngikhuluma ngabantu abalungile ezimpilweni zabo abangabantu abahlakaniphe ngokuphelele, okuthi, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi yiziphi izizathu, baba ngamahlelo, okusho ukuthi bamukela iqoqo lemibono futhi abasavulekele ukuthi kungenzeka ukuthi leyo mibono ingaba yiphutha, lokho noma yibuphi ubufakazi bungaphambana naleyo mibono, abasakwazi ukubona umhlaba ngaphandle kwaleyo mibono. Yilokho engikushoyo ngamahlelo.
Kodwa lokho kuyingxenye yokuphila. Uyazi, ngiqonde ukuthi unayo kumasayensi athuthuke kakhulu. Thatha, uthi, u-Einstein.
Ngisebenzisa leso sibonelo njalo.
KULUNGILE, awu, ubengeke akholwe lokho, njengoba ekubeka, uNkulunkulu angaphonsa amadayisi nomkhathi.
Ingabe ukhathazekile ngokuziphatha ngaleyo ndlela?
Impela, noma ubani onengqondo kufanele enze njalo.
KULUNGILE, ngakho...
Akusho ukuthi akufanele ukwenze. Ngoba kwesinye isikhathi ukholelwa ngempela ukuthi uqinisile futhi kufanele ukuphishekele.
KULUNGILE, ngakho-ke yini ikhambi lomuntu siqu kule nto edlangile...
Okomuntu oyedwa?
Yebo.
Ukuzama nje ukuba nomqondo ovulekile nozwela kwabanye ngangokunokwenzeka. Akulula ezimweni eziyimpikiswano, eziyinkimbinkimbi noma ngisho nakusayensi enzima. Ngisho, ngikuthola ngaso sonke isikhathi emsebenzini wochwepheshe. KULUNGILE, wena, zama ukubhekana nakho ngandlela thile.
Futhi ikhambi lesakhiwo? Zicabange u...
Ngokujwayelekile ayikho ngoba yinto enhle. Ngisho ukuthi, angimgxeki u-Einstein ngokungafuni ukukholelwa izindlela ze-quantum-theoretic futhi, empeleni, njengoba wazi kangcono kunami, iziphakamiso eziningi zokuhlola ezinhle zaphuma kulokho, uyazi, njengokuthi, kuyini ebizwa? I-quantumโฆ uyazi, izinto eziqhelelene kakhulu nokwazi ukuxhumana naweโฆ kunegama lalokho, ngiyakhohlwa ukuthi liyiniโฆ [quantum non-locality] Lokho kuvele esihlokweni sokuhlolwa esasenziwe u-Einstein kanye nezithandani ezimbalwa. Ngakho, akukho lutho olungalungile ngakho. Ngisho ukuthi yindlela ukuziphatha komuntu okufanele kube ngayo. Ngisho ukuthi, kungafika lapho kuba uhambo lomuntu siqu, kube umzamo wokuthatha nokulawula. Kodwa lezi yizici nje zempilo yomuntu okumele ubhekane nazo, kungenzeka emndenini. Ayikho impendulo evamile.
Kukhona lesi simo sokudalwa, esihambisana nesayensi futhi. Kube yini ukusabela kwakho?
Okokuqala, okuningi kwakho kuvela emthonjeni ongokwenkolo. Futhi, okuningi kuyiqiniso ngempela. Abantu abafuni ukwamukela umbono wokuthi, lokho abakuhumusha njengencazelo, yonke into inqunyiwe. Isayensi ayisho lokho, kodwa uma unokuqonda okukha phezulu kwesayensi, futhi empeleni noma ufunda lokho okushiwo ososayensi abaningi nezazi zefilosofi. Ngokuyisisekelo isho ukuthi: "bheka, awunayo inkululeko yokuzikhethela, awunakho ukukhetha, yonke into inqunyiwe. Simane nje senza okuthile ohlelweni lokulawula ongahlanganise lutho nalo." Hhayi-ke, angifuni ukukukholelwa lokho, empeleni angikukholelwa. Futhi ngibona kalula ukuthi kungani abanye abantu bengafuni ukukukholelwa. Bafuna ukukholelwa ukuthi kukhona okuhle okwenzekayo emhlabeni. Mhlawumbe angikuqondi, kodwa kukhona amandla endaweni ethile azama ukusenza sibe ngcono, enze umhlaba ube ngcono, enze izinto ezinhle zenzeke futhi ezimbi zingenzeki. Futhi, futhi ngenxa yezizathu zomuntu siqu. Ukubuyela kunina wengane efayo. Uyazi, ngifuna ukuphinde ngibone ingane yami ngelinye ilanga, ngakho ngingathanda ukukukholwa.
Uyazi, omunye umphumela walolu chungechunge lwezinkolelo ukucabanga ukuthi umhlaba wadalwa. Futhi lokho kuvame kakhulu. Ngisho ukuthi, obaba abasungula, isibonelo, ababefuna ukuhlukanisa isonto nombuso, iningi labo lalibizwa ngokuthi amadeist. Umqondo wawuwukuthi - futhi kwaze kwashiwo ngale ndlela - uNkulunkulu ungunjiniyela osewathatha umhlalaphansi. Wayiqala yonke lento, wayikhahlela ebhulukweni wabe esehamba futhi kufanele niyigijime. Nokho, lolo kwakuwuhlobo lwenkolo yezwe olwaluvamile ngaleso sikhathi.
Kepha, ngasikhathi sinye, i-US, kusukela umsuka wayo, ibilokhu ihlukile ezinkolelweni zenkolo ezeqisayo. Ngisho, futhi kukhona izifundo zokuqhathanisa, e-United States inkolelo ezimangalisweni kanye nodeveli futhi, niyazi, umhlaba wadalwa eminyakeni eyizinkulungwane eziyishumi edlule njalo njalo, uvele ungekho spectrum. Ngokwezinga elithile uthola ukuthi kweminye imiphakathi yezimboni njengaseNgilandi, kodwa i-United States ingaphandle kwegrafu. Futhi lokhu kubuyela emuva emsuka wayo. Ngisho ukuthi izwe lasungulwa ngabashisekeli benkolo. Izifiki zaseNew England zazilandela intando kaNkulunkulu.
Kunochungechunge emlandweni wase-US olubizwa nge-Providentism. Ukugqama okukhulu kakhulu, kusuka kobaba abasunguli ababizwa kanjalo, kuze kufike komongameli bamanje njalonjalo. UNkulunkulu unombono womlando. Futhi siyakulingisa. Futhi ezinye zezindlela lokhu okusetshenziswe ngazo ziyamangalisa kakhulu. Ngakho-ke, isibonelo, umnyombo weโฆ thatha, kusho izifiki ezingamaNgisi eNew England. Mayflower nazo zonke lezo zinto.
Umthetho-sisekelo wokuqala wekoloni laseMassachusetts Bay owanikezwa inkosi, iNkosi uCharles, ngicabanga ukuthi wango-1628. Futhi umgomo wekoloni laseMassachusetts wawuwukuletha izinzuzo zempucuko, kuhlanganise nenkolo yobuKristu, kumaNdiya ayeyincenga. Sibenzela umusa. Eqinisweni, uma ubheka uphawu olukhulu lwekoloni yaseMassachusetts Bay cishe ngo-1629, lwembula kakhulu. Kufanele ibe sodongeni kuwo wonke amakilasi ezweni. Ukusungulwa kwezwe. Okubonisayo iNdiya elikhombe phansi imikhonto, uphawu lokuthula. Futhi emlonyeni weNdiya umqulu. Futhi umqulu uthi: "Woza lapha uzosisiza!" Ngakho-ke amakoloni ayefeza lokho manje okubizwa ngokuthi Isibopho Sokuvikela, uyazi, igama elimnandi le-imperialism kodwa livamile. Ngakho-ke babefeza Isibopho Sokuvikela, babengenabugovu ngokuphelele, beza ukuze nje baphendule isicelo sabomdabu ukuba beze bazosisiza.
Yingaleso sikhathi lapho inkulumo edumile ethi "idolobha elisegqumeni" yakhiqizwa. Ngo-1630, uJohn Winthrop wanikeza isitatimende esidumile wathi siyidolobha elisegqumeni, asifani nanoma yiliphi elinye izwe emhlabeni, sinomusa, asinabugovu, siza ukuzophendula isicelo samaNdiya sokuba asize. thina. Lokho kuyaqhubeka kuze kube namuhla. Leyo yindikimba ehamba phambili yokufunda, nobuntatheli kunjalo, ukuthi sihluke nje kwabanye abantu ngoba siyidolobha elisegqumeni. "Idolobha elikhanyayo egqumeni", njengoba uReagan ekubeka. Kuze kube kulo mzuzu. Futhi isizathu sivela ekuphenduleni kwethu isicelo sabomdabu sokubasiza. Nokho, empeleni babaqothule. Kwachazwa nalokho.
Bheka, uyazi, abahluleli beNkantolo Ephakeme abaholayo, abahlaziyi, abanye, bathi, uyazi, izindlela zikaNkulunkulu ziyimfihlakalo. Nakuba size ukuzosiza amaNdiya futhi sazama, uyazi, konke esasikwenza sasikuthakazelisa, ngandlela-thile abuna. Yileyo nkulumo eyayisetshenziswa, efana namahlamvu ekwindla, athi ayaphephuka. Futhi lokhu kuqhubekela phambili kuze kube manje. Ngisho, uyazi, ngasekupheleni kwekhulu leminyaka njengokuthi, ekuqaleni kwekhulu lamashumi amabili, ngisho ukuthi, kunzima kakhulu ukuqhubeka nalokhu ukuze uthole abantu abanjengoTheodore Rooseveldt, omunye wababulali abanobandlululo ngokwedlulele emlandweni waseMelika, yingakho eseMount Rushmore, wachaza ngesikhathi sehlandla lesibili lokuphatha kwakhe, kufanele ukuthi mhlawumbe kwakungu-1906 noma 7, angazi ukuthi nini ngempela. Wanikeza inkulumo eqenjini lezithunywa zevangeli lapho alichazela khona ukuthi sabaqothula ukuze kuzuze abantu bomdabu. Ngokwezwi nezwi, ngisho, cishe amazwi akhe. Uthe, ngoba kwenze umjaho osezingeni eliphezulu wathatha indawo yawo. Futhi lokho kwakuvamile kakhulu.
Ngiqonde ukuthi ufunde izinto ezinjengalezo kuWalt Whitman, uRalph Waldo Emerson, ngisho, amaqhawe amakhulu. Ngisho, leli yizwe elicwasa ngokwedlulele. Futhi basungula inganekwane ye-anglo-saxonism. Sonke singama-anglo-saxon. Uyazi, njengami nawe. Singama-anglo-saxon. UJefferson, isibonelo, owayekholelwa kakhulu kulokhu, wathi kufanele sibuyele emuva, niyazi, ikhulu lesishiyagalombili noma okuthize, lapho kwakukhona ama-anglo-saxon ahlanzekile, ngaphambi kokuba angcoliswe abanye, futhi lokho kungumbono ofanele. of, uyazi, ubuntu kanye nobulungisa nakho konke.
Ngisho, uBenjamin Franklin ngokwesibonelo. Empeleni, uFranklin wacabanga ukuthi akufanele sivumele amaJalimane namaSweden ukuthi afuduke ngoba awamhlophe ngokwanele. Zithi ukunyamalala kancane. Kodwa thina ma-anglo-saxon amsulwa siyisa impucuko phambili. Kuyamangaza umlando wakho, ngeke ngidlule kuwo, kodwa uHitler ubukeka emnene uma eqhathaniswa. Eqinisweni, uHitler wasebenzisa lokhu njengesibonelo. Kudlula ngqo emlandweni waseMelika, kuqhubeke kuze kube namuhla. Kuyingxenye ye-American uniqueism, i-Wilsonian idealism, uyazi. Ukucwasa kakhulu futhi konke sekuphelile.
Esinye sezinkolelo zalezi zinkolelo yilokho iningi lomhlaba elingakubiza ngokuthi ukweqisa kwezenkolo. Lokho okwakubizwa ngokuthi ukuvuswa kabusha okukhulu emlandweni waseMelika. Izinkathi zomdlandla omkhulu ngoba, niyazi, uKristu uyeza noma kungaba yini. Futhi igcwele yonke indawo, ilokhu iphindaphinda. Kwakukhona omkhulu ngawo-1950. Ishintshile eminyakeni engamashumi amathathu edlule ngendlela ethokozisayo. Ngiqonde ukuthi, lokhu bekulokhu kwenzeka ngomlando waseMelika, kepha akuzange kungene emnyombweni wohlelo lwezepolitiki. Ngisho ukuthi, kwaba nomthelela ezintweni, kodwa kwaba noshintsho olukhulu.
Angicabangi ukuthi ike yafundwa, kodwa umbono wami uvela kuJimmy Carter. UJimmy Carter wayengumKristu othembekile, oqotho. Cishe wayekholelwa yonke into ayeyisho, uyazi, efana nensizwa ethembekile. Ngakho-ke lonke leli bhizinisi, niyazi, iningi lomhlaba elilithatha njengokungathi liphuma odongeni, wakholwa.
Ukhetho lwaseMelika ngokuyisisekelo luqhutshwa yimboni ye-PR. Futhi abaphathi beqembu bathole umbono engicabanga ukuthi, angikwazi ukukufakazela lokho kodwa kimina okwenzekile kuwukuthi: Abaphathi beqembu baqaphela ukuthi uma uzenza onjalo, uyazi, ungumKristu ozinikele, uthatha njengamaphesenti angamashumi amathathu ivoti. Futhi empeleni wonke umuntu ongenele ukhetho lukamongameli kusukela uCarter ezisholo ukuthi ungumKristu ozinikele. Thatha, uthi, uBill Clinton, okungenzeka ukuthi ukholwa njengami, abaphathi bakhe babeqinisekisa ukuthi njalo ngoMsombuluko ekuseni kuba nesithombe sakhe esontweni lamaBaptisti noma ngabe yini, niyazi, ecula amaculo nokunye nokunye. phambili. Ngisho, leyo yindlela okhetha ngayo ingxenye yabantu. Futhi angicabangi ukuthi kukhona okuhlukile kusukela kuCarter.
Futhi ubuqotho, ukwethembeka nakho konke okunye kuya phansi njengesithiyo esivamile...
Yebo. Kodwa kuyakhanga kokuthile okujule kakhulu esikweni laseMelika. Kuxhunyaniswe nokucwasa ngokwebala, ne, niyazi, ubuhlanya be-anglo-saxon, โnoza lapha futhi usisize,โ niyazi. Kuyinkinga enkulu nje kwezamasiko.
Ilotshwe ngu Anton G.