The Green party of England and Wales has one MP, two MEPs, two London assembly members and 139 city and county councillors. Last year membership stood at 16,000. At the 2010 general election it fielded 310 candidates winning 265,243 votes. In the 2012 London mayoral election, the Green party’s Jenny Jones beat the Liberal Democrat candidate into third place. Despite this very real political presence the Green party seems to be invisible to many on the left in this country. Here are a few recent examples:

• In the introduction to the book NHS SOS: How the NHS was Betrayed – and How We Can Save It Ken Loach notes the Labour party has been a key player in the privatisation of the NHS before asking rhetorically, “When people ask who they can vote for to defend the NHS, what do we tell them?”

• Writing in the Guardian, Russell Brand urged people not to vote: “The only reason to vote is if the vote represents power or change. I don’t think it does.” However, he ended the article arguing “I believe in change… A system that serves the planet and the people. I’d vote for that.”

• In October 2013 Adam Ramsay, who describes himself as “an active member of the Green party”, published an article titled, Public ownership is ridiculously popular. Why does no one campaign for it?” Ramsay mentioned the Tories, Labour, the Lib Dems, the Scottish National party and Plaid Cymru but not the Green party.

To answer these people: Ken, you can tell people to vote for the Green party because they oppose the privatisation of the NHS; in fact the Greens also want to abolish prescriptions and re-introduce free dental care and eye tests. Russell, you say you would vote for “a system that serves the planet and the people”. Well, earlier this year you described Caroline Lucas MP as someone “who actually cares about things that affect us” and “is endeavouring to enact the needs of the people”. Would you vote for her? And Adam, the Green party 2010 manifesto stated that they want public services “run for public benefit, not private profit. We will … return our energy, water and rail networks to public ownership”.

This invisibility cloak is frustrating because there is considerable evidence to suggest the Greens would receive much more support if they received more exposure. According to a November 2013 YouGov poll, 84% of people think the NHS should be run as a public service, 68% support nationalising the energy companies and 66% want to nationalise the railways – all Green party policy. The Greens opposed the wars on Iraq, Libya and Syria and have long called for the withdrawal of British forces from Afghanistan. A 2009 Guardian/ICM poll found 54% of respondents agreed with the Green party’s policy of scrapping Trident.

All this is confirmed by the fascinating Vote for Policies website. Created for the 2010 general election the website polls people on the policies of the main political parties – without the person being polled knowing the party connected to the policy. So far 347,799 people have completed the survey, with the Green party the most popular party with 24% of the votes (Labour received 20%, the Lib Dems 17%, the Conservatives 15%, UKIP 12% and the BNP 10%).

Of course, the UK’s first-past-the-post voting system doesn’t help, with influential commentators like Owen Jones arguing that voting Green is effectively a wasted vote. This kind of defeatist thinking would have been disastrous for the nascent Labour party in the early 20th century. How would it have grown to become a force for progressive change if voters chose the least bad option in the 1906 general election (the Liberal party) or decided not to vote for Labour because they only had two MPs at the time? As per the invisible rule, Jones himself rarely, if ever, mentions the fact that his own politics often have more in common with Green party policy than they do Labour – such as the Green’s strong opposition to austerity and their proposed Green New Deal solution.

Despite all this, things seem to be looking up for the party. A November 2013 Ipsos Mori opinion poll found 7% of respondents said they would vote Green if a general election were held tomorrow – just 1% behind the Liberal Democrats and Ukip. This hopeful result came on the back of a You Gov poll that found 12% support for the Green party in European election voting intentions – in front of the Liberal Democrats on 10%. If followed through in the May 2014 election this result would likely treble the number of Green MEPs to six.

How long will the left continue to ignore the parliamentary party with the most progressive and radical policies?

I am the author of the book 'The march that shook Blair: An oral history of 15 February 2003', published by Peace News Press: http://peacenews.info/node/7085/march-shook-blair-oral-history-15-february-2003. I also write feature length articles, interviews, book reviews, album reviews and live music reviews for a variety of publications including the Morning Star, Peace News, Tribune, New Left Project, Comment is Free, Ceasefire magazine, Winnipeg Free Press, Columbia Journal, The Big Issue, Red Pepper and London Tourdates.  Based in London, UK.  ian_js@homail.com and http://twitter.com/#!/IanJSinclair


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version