In the summer of 2023, researchers “binge-watched 250 of the most-rated movies” of the past 10 years for climate research purposes.   A mere 13 percent of films made mention of climate-related disasters, some more seriously and others “offhandedly” in dialogue.  In contrast, since the rise of Hollywood as the center of entertainment over a century ago, more than “2500 war-themed movies and TV programs have been made with Pentagon assistance.”  Why does the Pentagon partner with Hollywood?  And why does Hollywood glamorize war at the expense of the planet?  

The Pentagon provides multimillion dollar equipment (tanks, planes such as F-35 fighter jets which cost over $80 million dollars, aircraft carriers) and personnel to operate them, giving movies an air of realism at no cost to the film maker/director.  Partnering with the military obliges Hollywood directors to significant script changes by DoD, telling directors “what to say-and what not to say.”  In the end, movies portray the US military as a force for good in the world and nuclear weapons (in our hands) as critically needed for national security.  They use racist stereotypes of Asians and Africans while portraying US soldiers as noble in purpose and making it appear that US wars “are fought to spread freedom, democracy and human rights.”  They hide the profit motives of Hollywood and the self-serving motives of the Pentagon, which are public approval for their existence and mission, gaining public acceptance of war thus attracting new recruits.  And the result is: Hollywood glamorizes war for greed at the extreme expense of the planet.

War is a driving force in the climate crisis, with the Pentagon being the largest institutional consumer of fossil fuels in the world powering fighter jets, warships and 800 military bases.  Perversely the U.S. used sustained influential effort to keep the military’s impact on climate out of the 1997 Kyoto protocol counting process.  And consequently, there is silence on US military emissions and climate crisis.

Furthermore, the damage to the world’s economy from fossil fuels has been massively underestimated, according to Timothy Neal and colleagues’ recent research.  To date it has been thought to be mild to moderate, they stated, the flawed assumption being that damage to a country’s economy is caused within a country by extreme weather and it doesn’t account for how flooding in one country, for example, affects food supply in another.  The team found that “if Earth warms by more than 3° Centigrade by the end of the century, the estimated harm to the global economy jumped from an average of 11 per cent (under previous assumptions of isolated damage) to 40 per cent,” devastating the livelihoods of a huge part of the world.

Other studies on drought find that increasing evaporation from rising temperatures due to global warming has disrupted the global water cycle in vast regions of North and South America, Africa, East and Central Asia, and Europe.  Some regions would need 10 years of significantly above average rain to recover from long periods of drought.  The southwest U.S., for example, has been drying out for 30-40 years – a megadrought, hemorrhaging groundwater, threatening its food security and economy. “About 40 percent of the contiguous US” are in some stage of drought.  Expected hotter temperatures and prolonged die-off of trees are the recipe for future wildfires.  After a drought for a year or two, scientists would see recovery.  No longer: “Drought is a creeping disaster.”

James Hansen, an early and outspoken expert on the climate crisis, and colleagues have published the most critical warning to date.  We are experiencing sudden global warming of 1.6 degrees Centigrade and temperatures will oscillate “near or above that level for the next few years.” Their warning is unvarnished: More powerful tropical storms, tornadoes, more extreme floods; intensity of heat waves, increase in drought in places of dry weather. The polar ice melt and freshwater injection into North Atlantic Ocean will increase and could slow down AMOC in the next 20-30 years – locking our coasts into sea level rise of several meters.  AMOC, the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, circulates water from north to south and back in a long cycle within the Atlantic Ocean. This circulation also brings warmth to various parts of the globe and also carries nutrients necessary to sustain ocean life. 

Another frightening factor in faster warming is the fact that the planet’s plants and soils peaked in their capacity to absorb carbon dioxide in 2008.  “Natural sequestration of carbon dioxide is in decline: climate change will accelerate,” concluded the authors of the study. 

Conclusion

We are heading toward catastrophe, though it can be mitigated: Though solar is doubling every few years, energy demand is increasing faster and being met by fossil fuels.  “Science is clear: stop using fossil fuels, respect and protect Nature, use resources sustainably.”  Why aren’t we doing it? 

Even before Trump’s nihilist administration cut staff and the budget from our key climate agencies NOAA and NASA while furiously promoting oil and coal, we were in trouble with our injured Earth.  Trump has accelerated our ecocide.  But human societies have been created by us, our human-made problems can and must be unmade.  We owe it to the billions of young people who inherit this Earth.

---

---