After achieving an average annual GDP growth of about 8% over the last decade under Beijing’s push to restore capitalism, the Chinese economy grew at an even more back-breaking pace of 9.1% last year.

But during the March 5-14 annual sitting of China’s rubber-stamp parliament, the National People’s Congress (NPC), the State Council proposed to lower the target GDP growth for 2004 to about 7%. In doing so, the council admitted there were not only nagging supply bottlenecks, but phoney elements in the much-trumpeted “investment rush”.

The minister for development and reform commission, Ma Kai, explained to an NPC press conference on March 8: “[China’s] share of the global GDP last year was about 4%, but we consumed 7.4% of the world’s petroleum, 31% of its raw coal, 27% of its steel, 25% of its alumina, 40% of its cement. As a result, the supplies of coal, electricity, petroleum and transportation were further strained, and other resource constraints worsened.”

Astronomic figures


Ma continued: “Blind investments and duplications of inferior-grade constructions [are] getting more rampant in certain industries and regions. Investments last year soared [by] 96.6% for steel, 92.9% for electrolytic aluminium and 121.9% for cement… these are astronomic figures. While the production and sales in these industries remain buoyant, the excessive construction has planted the seeds for overproduction. Our concern isn’t just over-capacity quantitatively, but also with respect to the irrational [economic] structure.”

“Of the 81 iron furnaces built last year”, Ma pointed out, “only six were of a sufficiently rational scale.”

Ma described how such resource-gorging, irrational investments will produce a vicious chain effect: they further inflate the excesses in fixed investments in China, which rose by 26.7% last year, as well as the associated excesses in credit supply; they worsen the already strained supplies of coal, electricity, petroleum, transportation and other resources; which in turn boosts production costs, and bumps up inflationary pressure. This process, if unchecked, Ma pointed out, “will take the economy on a rough bumpy ride”.

China has been mired in deflation since the 1997-98 Asian economic crisis, but its consumer price index, a key gauge of inflation, climbed to nearly 2% last year. Beijing aims to keep its inflation under 3% this year.

In his March 8 address to the China People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), held March 3-12 in Beijing (which shared some sessions with the NPC), delegate Liu Minfu shed light on the reasons propelling the investment rush.

Liu said the local “leaders” were largely assessed on their contribution to GDP growth and revenue income, thus precipitating a drive to dress up the figures to increase these officials’ promotion prospects. The CPPCC is essentially ceremonial with just over 2000 delegates, meeting annually at the same time as the NPC.

Farmers


In contrast to over-investments, grain production in China has markedly declined for the third year in a row. Liu explained to the CPPCC on March 8 that the problem was closely linked to the rampant, and mostly illegal, acquisitions of farmland in recent years. In 2003 alone, according to Liu, China’s farmland has shrunk from 1950 million mu (130.6 million hectares), or 1.5 mu per person, to 1851 million mu, thanks to widespread conversion of farmland to “industrial parks”.

“The local authorities have excessive and unchecked power to acquire land”, Liu alleged. In order to attract investors to their localities, Liu continued, many local authorities took over farmers’ land-use rights very cheaply — thanks to loopholes in existing legislation — and made them available to targeted investors. All land in China is officially owned by the state, but rural residents are allocated the “right to use” designated plots.

Liu pointed out that despite a Beijing-initiated 2003 campaign to stamp out such illegal land acquisitions, which then officially numbered 128,000 cases, only 132 defendants were given a criminal sentence. Another 925 were subjected merely to “internal” discipline.

There is no solution in sight. A March 8 report from People’s Net news service quoted a recent memo by State Council Premier Wen Jiabao, saying that these problems — and the loss of famers’ livelihoods they entail — have reached a “horrific” scale.

While Wen referred to the problem of officials’ involvement in illegal land acquisitions in his report to the NPC on March 5, he offered no redress. But steps were announced to address the so-called “three rural issues” — those facing the rural sector, the rural areas and rural residents. Pledges were made to protect China’s 900 million rural residents.

Finding it increasingly difficult to eke out a living in their hometowns, in 2002 alone 94 million Chinese farmers went looking for work in the cities. That number rose to 99 million in 2003. Not all of them will find a job.

Even if they do, payment of their wages could be habitually delayed — that’s if they get paid at all. Government-owned establishments are among the key culprits of delayed (sometimes indefinitely) wages. The NPC was told on March 9 that such wages in arrears were estimated at 100 billion yuan (A$16.3 billion).

In his March 5 report, Wen promised to scrap all taxes on specific agricultural products (tobacco was excepted). This will lighten the farmers’ load by 4.8 billion yuan a year. The general agricultural tax is also proposed to go in five years, with reduction starting immediately, which should leave farmers 7 billion yuan better off. In all, Beijing has budgeted 39.6 billion yuan to back such reductions.

In addition, Beijing will divert 10 billion yuan this year from its “grain risk fund” to subsidise grain producers directly to stimulate grain production.

As is common in capitalist economies, irrational over-investments in China sits side by side with “insufficient demand”. In reality, it is only insufficient “effective” demand — demand from those who can pay. There are plenty of social needs that are not being met.

To encourage its citizens to consume rather than to save, Beijing plans to scale down its issuance of construction treasury bonds by 30 billion yuan in 2004, bringing it to 110 billion yuan.

Constitution amendment


The NPC this year was presented with seven reports, which included a proposal for 13 amendments to China’s 1982 constitution, which has been amended three times previously.

The 1988 amendments gave the stamp of official approval for the private economy for the first time, stipulating it should “complement” the nationalised sector. The 1993 amendments introduced the concept of China’s “socialist market economy” , and in 1999, the private sector was upgraded to being an “essential part” of this.

The latest amendments say China will seek to “encourage, support and guide” the private economy and that “legal private property is not to be encroached”.

In fact, Beijing plans to promote the non-public sector “vigorously”, according to the People’s Daily on March 5, quoting Premier Wen’s report to the NPC.

Though the capitalist restoration process and the proposed amendments have provoked heated debate throughout China, of the 2903 delegates at the March 14 voting session, only 10 opposed and 17 abstained from the constitutional proposals, allowing them to pass with 2863 votes in favour.

In the budget for 2004, government expenditure will increase by more than 30 billion yuan to 2676 billion yuan. With only 2357 billion yuan revenue expected, a budget deficit of 319.8 billion yuan is forecast.

The NPC was also told that in 2003, Beijing allocated 77.9 billion yuan to “guarantee” that the living allowances for workers laid off from state enterprises and the old-age pensions for state-employed retirees were paid on time and in full, and that the poverty-stricken urban residents obtained their subsistence allowance entitlements. The non-payment or much delayed payment of such entitlements has been a key cause for widespread protests in China in recent years.

It is doubtful how much will reach its rightful recipients, given the rampant corruption among officials. Wen recognised this in his March 5 report, saying “some government officials” have a “subjective, formalistic and bureaucratic style of work” and are “wasteful, extravagant and fraudulent, and even corrupt”. He presented no solution to the problem.

Some 17 billion yuan is allocated as subsidies for enterprises that are closing or go bankrupt due to “economic restructuring” (read: privatisation). China’s military expenditure for 2004 is budgeted to increase by 11.6% over 2003 to 207.1 billion yuan.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version