Source: Informed Comment

Many pundits have correctly recognized Covis19’s role in exposing extreme class, race, and gender inequalities in this society and the vulnerabilities they foster. This virus also exposes the grave injustices that characterize many American workplaces, where many Americans spend nearly a third of the prime years of their lives. Although many of these workers now are properly recognized as essential, their treatment hardly reflects this support. The gap between rhetorical celebration and the realities of the labor market and the workplace may open up some opportunities for a more democratic restructuring of the workplace.

In our highly interdependent and globalized society a surprisingly varied and large number of workers should be considered essential. Labor historian Jeremy Brecher has chronicled the quest by nurses to obtain basic persona protection equipment needed to perform their life saving tasks safely. This prompts recognition of several other jobs for which such equipment or other protective steps might be necessary.

Brecher comments: “The desperate need for PPE goes far beyond healthcare workers. Janitors are deep cleaning buildings, teachers’ aides are delivering meals to children at home . . . all at greater risk of contracting the coronavirus without enough PPE to lessen exposure.”

Two aspects shared by most such occupations are that the need for PPE is being met only slowly, if at all. In addition these occupations, with the exception of telecom workers, are poorly compensated The compensation issue—an expression of gender and racial discrimination—has been recognized for many years. Less apparent until recently is the vulnerability to disease spread created by low paying care jobs. Many of those who hold them even in our“booming” economy have to work two or more jobs even when sick just to live. Infected by the virus they then can often carry it both to other nursing homes and to their own homes. Such jobs are also often high turnover and offer few opportunities to gain skills.

It is not surprising that nursing homes in both the US and Canada have becomes virtual Covid19 petri dishes. The good news is that the health of workers in this occupation is increasingly seen as the public health issue it is. Though not enough Congress did make a good start toward aiding front line health workers. Congressman Greg Walden (R-Oregon) commented: “Those on the front lines need money. Congress boosted payments by 2 percent for the rest of the year for hospitals, physicians, nursing homes, and home health. Additionally, hospitals treating COVID-19 patients on Medicare will see a 20 percent payment increase for the length of this emergency.”

Helpful as this legislation is, it still leaves many frontline workers extremely vulnerable. Consider this new requirement of a major New York City hospital. Amy Goodman of Democracy Now reports: “New York City health workers now have a new challenge ahead of them: a new policy at the city’s public hospitals that requires medical workers who call in sick to produce a doctor’s note.” To me this is reminiscent of grade school and needing a note from your teacher for permission to go to the bathroom. More broadly the struggle over the medical workplace has moved beyond fighting for the right to exercise sick days to which they are entitled to questions of voice.

As Noam Schelber and Brian Rosenthal reported in a recent detailed piece for the New York Times: “ workers … have clashed with the employers they accuse of failing to protect and properly value them . . . But perhaps the most curious and persistent management-labor tension has arisen between health care providers like doctors and nurses, who are at the forefront of the virus battle, and the administrators they report to…In New York City… every major private hospital system has sent memos in recent weeks ordering workers not to speak with the media, as have some public hospitals.” They point out that hospitals have become more and more corporate.

To this point management has offered no evidence of such ethical lapses. It also appears to be the case that nurses are both widely respected, even loved, and are in short supply. Our health also hinges in part on their health. If hospitals and health care have become more corporate over the last generation these are equally capable of rapid change in a more humane direction during this crisis. And given their leverage and the bottom up orientation of many nurses associations today they may be able to set examples that others would follow and build upon.

The New York City Council is considering forbidding the firing of physicians and nurses who speak out about the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE). This would be a positive step but nurses and their allies should go for much more. The hospital is a workplace with very skilled and vulnerable workers. This fact leads me to offer some preliminary proposals. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), in cooperation with nurses’ organizations and nursing schools, should design safety standards for workers. Most importantly enforcement should be redesigned and strengthened. Over many years even before the complete gutting of OSHA under Trump enforcement was often a matter of scheduled visits for which management could plan ahead. And what few violations were found generally led only to a slap on the wrist.

Rather than such tokenism, each hospital or medical facility should have a safety committee composed of nurses, physicians, and support staff, all of whose actions on the job affect the safety of a patient and their care giver colleagues. Most importantly medical facilities should be required to have a compliance officer paid by the institution but hired by OSHA. That officer should have the right and the duty to bring complaints about safety violations to OSHA and if necessary demand cessation of the hospital license.

Even before the Covid 19 crisis many hospitals were unsafe for both patients and nurses. Staffing levels were too low, injuries from moving patients too common, and medication errors too frequent. Covid19 gives us an opportunity to change those sad outcomes by developing worker- centered models of health and safety regulation.

——-

Bonus video added by Informed Comment:

Coronavirus: LA nurses protest to demand better protection | AFP


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version