Source: Counterpunch

For those who are dismayed and disturbed by Israel’s disproportionate response to the Hamas atrocities on Oct. 7 last year, Oregon’s Senator Jeff Merkley and other progressive Senate Democrats are fighting their battle. They have been pushing for Senate action that would tie further US military aid to Israel on Israel’s adherence to international and US humanitarian law.

Israel’s abuses of the law have been commonplace in recent months. US 2000-pound bombs and other weapons have pulverized cities, hospitals, and villages in Gaza, bringing the civilian death toll of Palestinians to more than 27,000, two-thirds of whom are said to be women and children.

Two specific actions in the Senate are relevant here, both supported by Merkley.

One is a resolution put forward by Sen. Bernie Sanders that would have required the State Department to report within 30 days on any Israeli violations of human rights. The resolution received only 11 votes, indicating that even most Democrats would not go along with monitoring Israel’s behavior.

The other is an amendment to a supplemental military assistance bill authored by Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland that would require the President and the State Department to investigate and report to Congress on any country’s abuse of non-defensive US military aid, such as those bombs sent to Israel, in violation of international and US humanitarian law. The amendment has yet to be voted on.

Interviewed by The New Yorker, Senator Merkley, who has visited Gaza during the fighting, said of his motivation for supporting these kinds of inquiries: “I have been deeply disturbed by the enormous number of deaths, the enormous number of injuries, the hugely inadequate supply of humanitarian aid, and the massive dislocation of the Gaza and Palestinian population.”

Yet very few Democratic Senators, let alone Republicans, seem eager to support either bill, even though both are rather mild. The Sanders bill is exclusively focused on Israel, which is problematic for some Democrats. Yet all the bill does is require reporting.

The Van Hollen amendment applies to all countries, not just Israel, but it too gives to the administration rather than to Congress the initiative on reporting on Israel’s actions with US weapons. Neither bill actually conditions present or future US military aid on Israel’s compliance with humanitarian law and human rights by making clear the link between violations and aid. Still, the Van Hollen amendment is very unlikely to survive a Senate vote.

The Underlying Issues

Merkley understands that underlying the resistance to taking strong action to limit Israel’s wartime behavior is the longstanding taboo against it. So is the counterpart to criticizing Israel: rejecting an independent Palestinian state. As Merkley says:

“It is time to pivot, to recognize that we need to work with Israel, and the international community, in a much more forceful way toward the vision of two states for two peoples. So some of my colleagues are still coming from the vision of, Never suggest that anything is wrong, and, Never suggest a criticism. But, for many of us, that plan has failed, and it’s time for a more assertive, determined collaboration between the United States, Israel, and the Arab League toward producing two states for two peoples.”

When Senators Merkley and Van Hollen traveled to Israel, they visited the Rafah crossing in the south. Merkley came back with very critical observations about the pitiful flow of aid into Gaza, often held up for days or rejected outright by Israeli inspectors. “Before October 7th,” he said,

“more than five hundred trucks would regularly pass each day into Gaza. Why, given the human calamity, can’t there be a lot more trucks passing now? Even just two weeks ago, it averaged, I believe, around a hundred and fifty trucks per day. Wholly insufficient.”

The process should only take one day. Merkley concludes:

“Certainly my impression is that Israel, knowing that they were able to inspect and deliver 500 trucks into Gaza before October 7th, could certainly inspect and deliver 500 trucks by tomorrow, if they were determined to do so.”

Conditioning US Aid

Merkley, Van Hollen, and 20 other Democrats wrote a letter to Biden February 1 with seven concrete suggestions for improving and increasing the flow of humanitarian assistance. The group is almost double the size of the original Van Hollen Amendment co-sponsors with important new signers, some of whom are especially close to President Biden.

As an inducement to Israel’s implementation of these measures, the Senate group should support conditioning the transfer of US non-defensive weapons, as authorized in the Supplemental Appropriation, on Israeli compliance with the proposed actions.

The Senators’ observations have even more relevance now, since Israel has indicated that Rafah, where roughly half the Gaza population has been pushed, is going to be the next center of the Israeli offensive. We can expect that many Gazans will be unable to flee yet again, ensuring that the already unconscionable death toll will be higher still.


This article was originally published by Counterpunch; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.

Mel Gurtov is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Portland State University.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors718
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors718
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version