Source: Inside Sources

Many Americans imagine the federal courts as a guardrail for our democracy. At times, they have been.

It was the Supreme Court that struck critical blows against racial segregation, abortion bans and laws targeting LGBTQ or interracial relationships. And lower courts have often been an early check on the Trump administration.

But these days, America’s deepening polarization is running headlong into anti-democratic deficiencies hardwired into our Constitution. As the trend accelerates, the courts are poised to put a nail in the coffin of America’s already ailing democracy — unless progressives do something about it.

Consider a few numbers.

First, remember that the Electoral College helped Donald Trump become president despite losing the popular ballot by nearly 3 million votes. The Electoral College favors whiter, more conservative states, and so does the Senate. Because 40 million Californians get the same number of senators as 575,000 Wyomingites, 2016 also saw Republicans win the Senate — despite getting 11 million fewer votes than Democrats.

Next, remember that Brett Kavanaugh — a Trump-nominated Supreme Court justice facing credible sexual assault allegations, and who most Americans opposed — got a lifetime appointment to the court when senators representing just 44% of Americans confirmed him.

In short, the United States now has a Supreme Court far to the right of most Americans. It was cemented by a president who lost the popular vote, and confirmed by a Senate majority that lost it by even more. That’s three branches of government with no popular mandate — and it’s only going to get worse.

Even before Trump, the Supreme Court was chipping away at democracy.

With Citizens United, it opened the floodgates to an unprecedented deluge of corporate cash in elections. With Shelby County vs. Holder, which gutted the Voting Rights Act, it green-lit GOP-controlled states to shutter thousands of polling places and erect new barriers to voting.

Under Trump, it’s getting worse. The court recently refused to hear challenges against extreme gerrymandering, which has helped Republicans hold onto majorities — and often supermajorities — even in statehouses and congressional delegations where they lost the popular vote.

Meanwhile, it has defied lower courts to let the president ban travelers from majority-Muslim countries and spend money lawmakers didn’t appropriate on a border wall most Americans don’t want. In 73 5-4 rulings where GOP donor interests have been at stake under this court, the donor interests won 73 times.

In future rulings, watchers worry the Supremes could make the Dreamers eligible for deportation, criminalize nearly all immigrant advocacy, and stop federal agencies from regulating virtually anything related to public health, the environment, or big business. Landmark rulings like Roe v. Wade are also under threat.

Such a court seems unlikely to buck the administration on anything related to the president’s taxes, corruption or impeachment. “What goes around comes around,” Kavanaugh snarled during his tense confirmation hearings.

Meanwhile, the GOP-ruled Senate is packing the lower courts even more aggressively with conservative ideologues — more than 150 so far. That’s thanks in part to GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell’s stonewalling of Obama court appointments, including the Supreme Court seat now held by Trump nominee Neil Gorsuch.

Several of these judges are rated “not qualified” by the American Bar Association. But their job isn’t to weigh the law carefully — it’s to issue reflexive right-wing rulings, like the judge in Texas who struck down the entire Affordable Care Act after GOP tax cuts ended the individual mandate. Observers called the ruling “absurd,” but it’s a harbinger of things to come.

If progressives win power in 2020, they should immediately impose term limits on these lifetime appointments, create and fill new judicial positions, and otherwise reverse this extreme gerrymandering of our judiciary. To help, they could also admit new states (D.C.? Puerto Rico? Guam?) to re-balance the Senate and Electoral College, enfranchising millions of U.S. citizens in the process.

Extreme? A little. But if nothing changes, we’re on track for a generation of rule by right-wing minority governments, a steady rollback of democratic rights, and corporations freed from even the regulations needed to sustain life on this planet. And with voting difficult or irrelevant in much of the country, there will be no foreseeable constitutional remedy.

The left can’t let that happen, especially not for love of norms the right has lost all interest in observing. Progressives, pack the courts!

Peter Certo is the editorial manager of the Institute for Policy Studies.

This essay is available to Tribune News Service subscribers. TNS did not subsidize the writing of this column; the opinions are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of TNS or its editors.

———

©2019 Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Peter Certo is the communications director of the Institute for Policy Studies and editor of OtherWords.org.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors707
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors707
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version