Number of U.S. states that elect their supreme courts: 38

Number of states holding supreme court elections this year: 33

Number of this year’s state supreme court elections that will take place in the South: 10*

Of the Southern supreme court elections being held this year, number that are partisan contests: 4**

Year in which the North Carolina legislature made judicial elections partisan for the state’s appellate courts, including its high court: 2017

Number of seats up for election this year on the North Carolina Supreme Court: 1

The North Carolina court’s current partisan split, with Democrats in the majority and incumbent Republican Justice Barbara Jackson facing re-election against challengers Anita Earls, a Democrat, and Chris Anglin, who recently switched his affiliation from Democrat to Republican and is fighting the legislature to have his new party listed: 4-3

Number of new seats the North Carolina legislature could create on the state Supreme Court if Jackson wins re-election and voters approve a proposed constitutional amendment allowing the legislature to fill “vacancies” on the court, thus creating a conservative majority: 2

Year a professor at the University of Texas at Arlington published a study that found partisan judicial races attract more money than nonpartisan races: 2017

In 1999, number of U.S. states with at least one sitting supreme court justice elected in a million-dollar race: 7

In 2017: 20

Amount that Judicial Crisis Network, a secretive nonprofit with ties to the Koch brothers, spent on the recent Arkansas Supreme Court election before its ads were blocked by the judge in a libel lawsuit against the group: more than $1.2 million

Year in which a study focusing on the Supreme Court of Georgia found a correlation between campaign contributions and judges’ decisions: 2006

Year in which another study found that law firms which contributed more to North Carolina Supreme Court candidates had greater success rates before the court than firms that made smaller donations: 2014

Year in which a study found that supreme court justices of color are re-elected at significantly lower rates than white justices in money-soaked races: 2015

Year in which North Carolina’s Republican-controlled legislature ended the state’s groundbreaking judicial public financing program that’s been credited with boosting racial diversity on the bench, doing so at the urging of leading conservative donor James “Art” Pope, who at the time was serving as state budget director: 2013

In the North Carolina Supreme Court race, which is shaping up to be a top money draw among this year’s high court races in the South, amount raised through June 30 by Jackson, the incumbent Republican, according to reports filed last week: $144,019

Amount Art Pope and his wife, Katherine Pope, have contributed to Jackson’s campaign: $10,400

Amount raised through June 30 by Democratic challenger Earls: $374,782

By Republican hopeful Anglin, who joined the race on the last day of filing and won’t have to disclose his donors until late October: $0

* Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Texas, and West Virginia.

** Alabama, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Texas.

(Click on figure to go to source.)

Editorial director of the NC-based Institute for Southern Studies, publisher of Facing South and Southern Exposure, where she focuses on energy & the environment.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.

Donate
Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors704
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version