WEB Dubois said the greatest challenge of the 20th century will be the color line. Lately I’ve been reminded–repeatedly it seems–just how relevant his words remain in 2004.

The first color to challenge me in this tale is blue. Because of a snag in paper work, what should have been a simple transaction–switching Blue Cross insurance policies from my former employer to an independent Blue Cross policy–became a nightmare.

I was told that the already month delay would be longer as Blue Cross needed to see my old medical records–even though I have been insured with them (Blue Cross) already for 5 years.

To make matters worse I was heavily blanketed in bed with the flu upon discovering I was uncovered by insurance.

The young woman at the doctor’s office gave me the bad news and insisted it could not be resolved by phone. And being forced to gather paperwork from my doctor’s office to expedite the process only escalated my fever.

If things weren’t bad enough, the woman on the phone was rude, abrupt, and in my mind, unhelpful. At the time it escaped me that maybe my being rude, impatient and annoyed at being told I was “no exception” might have had something to do with it.

Needless to say after receiving the news there would be no preferential treatment, my tone was not one of gracious acceptance. Since she seemed unmoved by my displeasure, perhaps I was not the first grumpy patient she had encountered that day.

When I arrived at the doctor’s office, the busy and somewhat distracted, elder, pale-faced woman at the front desk informed me that although I was told otherwise on the phone, my medical records could not actually be released for 72 hours. I would have to make another trip. “That’s the policy–no exceptions” she said.

Once again, I did not greet this news with the equanimity I would like to claim but rather, I huffed and puffed and pled my case.

In rather dramatic fashion, I described my travails of sickness and misfortune and hoping to gain pity mentioned just how unforgivably curt the woman on the phone had been–forgetting to mention that I was rather brusque myself.

Somehow the words spoken to the woman behind glass took on a magic quality. I could see it in her eyes. I had broken the spell. Hallelujah!

Suddenly softening and becoming interested in my plight she said “Do you by any chance remember her name”? When I replied that I didn’t, she seemed non-plussed and with rising determination and a smile she leaned in and asked: “Could you tell if she was Black?”–emphasizing and whispering the word ‘black’.

This was certainly not the first time I have experienced these hushed tones when referring to race and although I was hesitant to respond to her query, I replied that I had no idea what ‘color’ she was but that I guess she could have been black.

As if playing a Vegas hunch, she quickly punched a phone number and within seconds was talking with someone, whom it seemed, was conversant in my situation.

Her nod assured me her suspicions were accurate as she insisted into the receiver that I needed to discuss my urgent situation with someone–now. The person on the phone was apparently unimpressed and unconvinced and once again indicated that I was no exception to the rule.

As she plopped the phone back onto the cradle, the woman behind glass, my ally, said with disgusted exasperation: “black people”–as if this explained everything.

The words reverberated through my entire nervous system with the cold realization that I had been swept into something I wanted no part of. Her arched eyebrows and matching tone suggested that she and I were in this together–we were both comrades forced to endure the anger and un-cooperation of all people of color. Yes, we were the victims.

I could now feel another color rising–it was red. I was ashamed that I had allowed myself to be snared into this conspiracy and I was angry that this woman thought we shared an opinion that was distasteful and absurd–not to mention blatently racist. And at that moment I was aware that my particular brand of white privilege had once again spilled out and was dripping all over the front desk.

The degree of comfort this woman felt in making such a remark–and all that it implies–heightened my nauseous condition. She assumed that she and I agreed that all black people are difficult and uncooperative and angry–and for no reason.

I was reminded again how so often whenever whites are challenged by people of color who disagree with them or assert authority over them in a particular situation, it is often interpreted as ‘getting even with whitey’ rather than a difference of opinion.

I had heard these very words spoken just rently in a political meeting with some white liberal activists fighting against a predominately black district who is inviting a major corporate conglomerate into the neighborhood.

Not allowing for the possibility that those in the neighboring district saw the situation differently, the white liberals interpreted the opposition as having nothing to do with a logical argument. It was simply “a blatent racial issue” and a response to “whitey has beaten us”. That the liberal white group was imposing their views and values on the other district seemed not to matter or be part of the equation.

Just like the white activists, it seemed not to register to the women behind glass that perhaps it was I who had behaved unreasonably. After all, I was the one expecting exemption from policy rules.

In spite of this woman’s absurd generalization and obvious distaste for her black co-worker, I wondered if she was aware and/or cared about the significance of the latest figures from United for a Fair Economy. Figures which reflect how people of color, whom she greets and works with every day, are affected.

Did it matter to her that Black unemployment is more than twice that of Whites or that White households have an average net worth more than six times that of Black house-holds? Or if current rates of incarceration continue, one out of three African American males born today will be imprisoned at some point during their lifetimes.

While one might argue these statistics are unrelated to the situation in question, the findings are relevant when it comes to understanding the stresses that continue to challenge many people of color everyday. Not to mention the added stress of dealing with people like myself who very often behave as though procedures and policies rules are really meant for “others” and expect special treatment.

I have learned in toxic matters such as these that immediate and direct responses are the only antidote to stop conspiracy from spreading. I leaned across the desk and politely, but firmly said: Her response has nothing to do with being black. She is probably having a bad day–just like me”. And what I neglected to mention was how I had contributed to making her day difficult.

It was then that I saw her color change. She appeared flush with embarrassment or perhaps indignation that I had intimated that her perspective was not founded on science or absolute truth.

At this point the woman became hyper-efficient and formal. I had obviously struck a disturbing nerve and our relationship clearly shifted from comrades to strangers. Perhaps it was fear or even betrayal. The fear that her words conveyed how she really felt and that somehow she had miscalculated by exposing herself to me.

I couldn’t help wondering just how many times I have made someone else’s job harder or unpleasant–regardless of their race. How many times my insistence on “having things my way” may have caused someone further alienation because of my impatience, self-righteousness and deluded perception that I deserved special dispensation.

And then it struck me how these qualities were the same ones I have railed against and abhorred in our current administration’s foreign policies.

In these lucid moments the ever-widening gap between races and classes is painfully evident. And even more clarifying are the deeply racist precepts that greet us fresh out of the womb, and unless challenged, will mature over a lifetime and then suddenly erupt, bursting our self-righteous bubble of delusion. We are not really who we think we are–and it is deeply unsettling.

To most people classified as white, the notion that any one characteristic like arrogance or rudeness could be attributed to all whites is absurd and unfair. And yet this how people of color are labeled all the time.

Quite often white’s are heard referring to groups–not in the majority–using language steeped in white supremacist ideology–a code-talk if you will. Most commonly featured is the word ‘they:’ “you know how they are”, “they are so angry”, “those people are lazy” or “they’re such hard workers”, as if there is such a thing as a “they” rather than individuals possessing particular qualities or attributes.

And worse than the conspiratorial tone and insidiousness is the fact that most other whites unconsciously engage in the code talk frequently and without hesitation.

While obviously offensive and inaccurate, this kind of code talk further perpetuates and continues the same tired old stereotypes which have always been inflicted upon people of color. And then we imagine just because these notions generally go unchallenged in daily conversation–because it’s too uncomfortable to confront– that somehow our racist assertions are accurate and justified.

Most whites I know become insulted and indignant if they are ever lumped in with another group or judged because of someone else’s actions. It’s “un-American”–whatever that means–and yet, we all, in our own way, continue to inflict it on those whom we perceive as different from us, every day.

No, it’s not just a ‘white thing’. Everyone does it. But because racism = prejudice + power, the effects are felt more severally when done by the dominant majority group.

At the end of the day the color I am most challenged by is ‘whiteness’.

Feeling compelled to make amends, I called the doctor’s office to apologize to the young black woman for my rudeness. I knew it wouldn’t change much but perhaps acknowledging my behavior would serve two purposes:

Admittedly, appeasing my conscience about having contributed to someone having a bad day not to mention helping perpetuating the myth that all black people are angry and unreasonable. The other reason was that if I did apologize, perhaps I would behave more consciously next time. And if nothing else, maybe taking responsibility for my own behavior might somehow ease the young woman’s load–at least for that day.

Unfortunately, since I had never bothered to inquire, I couldn’t ask for the young woman by name. And as fate would have it, the elder woman at the front counter recognized my voice and intercepted the call. I never accomplished my mission.

Unable to garner a quick fix and escape feeling bad, I was forced to think about the situation and my participation in what happened and perhaps how I might behave differently next time.

When I think about W.E.B. Dubois and how right he was about the greatest challenge in 20th Century America, I wonder if he meant the 21st Century as well.

Molly Secours is a writer/speaker filmmaker and television host of “The Not Just Talk Show” in Nashville TN mollmaud@comcast.net

As a writer, speaker, filmmaker and activist, Molly Secours has been called an “uncompromising fighter for racial equity and social justice.”

For over 10 years, Secours’ writings have appeared in over 50 mainstream and internet magazines and newspapers. In addition to numerous radio and television appearances, she is a host on “Beneath The Spin” a weekly radio show on WFSK at the historic Fisk University campus in Nashville TN. She also pens a weekly column of the same name (“Beneath The Spin”) on Blackcommentator.com, where Secours tackles issues such as racism, white privilege, juvenile justice, health care disparities, and reparations for slavery. On the ABC television Nashville affiliate WKRN, Secours also serves as a regular weekly commentator on a political news program called “This Week with Bob Mueller.”

In 1998, Secours was invited to serve as an Advisory Board Member at Fisk University\'s Race Relations Institute in Nashville, Tennessee. In 2000, she presented an intervention to the United Nations in Santiago, Chile, proposing that the U.S. “repudiate the official histories and language(s) that maintain the hegemonic and unearned privileges accorded to those who are identified as ‘white’.” During the Summer of 2001, Secours attended the United Nations Prep-com in Geneva, Switzerland, and, as a journalist, covered the 2001 World Conference on Racism in Durban, South Africa.

Secours is a contributing writer in Dr. Raymond Winbush’s book Should America Pay? (Harper Collins 2003). Her chapter, entitled “Riding the Reparations Bandwagon,” addresses issues of white privilege and reparations for the African Slave Trade. She has also co-created a workshop entitled “Straight Talk About Race - a Dialog in Black and White” which she co-facilitates with Dr. Winbush, the Director of Urban Research at Morgan State University in Baltimore MD.

Voted one of “Nashville\'s most influential public intellectuals” in 2001, Secours is a strong presence in the community. She uses her skills as a writer and orator to challenge state and local officials to carefully consider the state\'s position on the death penalty and racial disparities in criminal justice and health care.

Through her film company “One Woman Show Productions” and her documentary films, Secours has earned national recognition in the world of social justice. She has produced videos for the Death Penalty Institute and Free Speech TV and her most recent documentary “Faces Of TennCare: Putting A Human Face On Tennessee’s Health Care Failure” is currently being aired on The Documentary Channel. Casting a national spotlight on Tennessee’s health care crisis, the film has been praised by members of the United States Congress including representatives John Conyers, Jesse Jackson Jr. and from Senator Edward Kennedy.

As the creator and co-founder of Youth Voice Through Video (YVTV) Secours teaches video-making to juvenile offenders and incarcerated youth. Her passion for issues relevant to young people in the juvenile justice system makes her a sought-after motivational speaker for at-risk youth.

Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors709
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors709
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version