It was fitting to see so much gushing on TV news about Rev. Jerry Falwell in the hours after his death. He and TV news held the same things sacred: fame, soundbites and uninformed fear-mongering.

At the beginning of his rise 25 years ago, it was mainstream media complicity and gullibility that helped build Falwell’s Moral Majority and the myth of its clout. As documented in Tina Rosenberg’s 1982 Washington Monthly piece, “How the Media Made the Moral Majority,” Team Falwell repeatedly violated the Ninth Commandment by misleading journalists about their numbers and power.

Despite hundreds of outlandishly inaccurate, uninformed and bigoted comments http://www.rightwingwatch.org/individuals/jerry_falwell/index.html over the years (not just the three you may have heard last night), Falwell remained a respected fixture in TV news. The TV producer’s friend – he didn’t need to know much about a topic to say yes to the invitation.

In FAIR’s exhaustive study of ABC Nightline’s guest list during the mid-1980s, Falwell was one of the show’s most frequent guests; he offered his expertise about homosexuality on one episode, and about AIDS on another. (Falwell saw AIDS as a holy punishment of gays, and once asked why people with AIDS were not quarantined like infected cattle.)

My only direct experiences with Falwell were fittingly with Falwell, the TV pundit. We did battle via TV studios, his natural habitat. As a paid pundit at MSNBC in 2002, I had colorful on-air debates with Falwell (described in my book, “Cable News Confidential”). http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/097606216X/sr=8-3/qid=1146516370/ref=pd_bbs_3/002-5161334-4221647?%5Fencoding=UTF8

When I debated Falwell in 2002 on whether to invade Iraq, he pointed his pudgy finger at Saddam Hussein as having been involved in the 9/11 attacks. Falwell was a Republican team player – blaming 9/11 on Saddam was now more important than blaming it on feminists, gays and the ACLU, as he’d done on September 13.

During another MSNBC debate we had on the separation of church and state, Falwell was in fine form and in love with his own voice: “Much of public education today,” he intoned, “is designed to create an atheistic society that totally repudiates our religious heritage. This is a nation under God!”

Near the end of the debate, I restated a point I’d opened with that Falwell had not answered: “Rev. Falwell, if we are a nation under God, it’s interesting that the founders of our Constitution, our framers, didn’t even put the word [God] in the Constitution. That was by design.”

“You haven’t read it very clearly,” Falwell responded. “Let me correct you on that. The Constitution is dated 1787 in the year – of – our – Lord.”

He slowed down to enunciate each precious word, considering it a “gotcha” moment. Falwell and I were on a split screen; as he sternly pointed his finger at me, I shook my head, face in my hands, in disbelief.

The debate closed with Falwell continuing to a big finale: “The separation of church and state is a myth,” declared the preacher, “like global warming.”

We were now on split-screen – with me laughing at the ignorance I’d just heard. Falwell appeared very self-satisfied over his pro-God/anti-environment twofer.

For years after, the factually-challenged Reverend continued as a TV pundit. By contrast, I was silenced for political reasons as the Iraq war neared. With the media cheerleading for war, the last thing TV news wanted was sober and accurate caution about the impact of an Iraq invasion. TV prefers the Falwells and Ann Coulters and Frank Gaffneys.

Instead of so much gushing about how Falwell had involved “values voters” in our democracy, it would be nice to see some introspection from TV news about its own role in foisting factually-challenged rightwing bigots on the American public to the near-exclusion of informed, progressive voices.

* *

Jeff Cohen http://www.jeffcohen.org/ is founder of the media watch group FAIR http://www.fair.org/index.php, former TV pundit/producer, and author of “Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media.” http://www.powells.com/biblio/61-097606216x-0

Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors710
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors710
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version