Solomon

Today, departing from an institution steeped in modernity, you say farewell to a

fine journalism school. Honored to address this graduating class, I will speak

with uncommon candor about the wisdom of your training and the opportunities

that lie ahead.

You

have studied how to write news articles and contrive news releases; how to dig

for truth and how to obscure it; how to produce journalistic sensations as well

as public relations; in short, how to unspin and spin. Like many others around

the country, this school of journalism imparts vital skills of reporting and

distorting.

Last

year, the national journalism magazine The Quill noted what is now occurring on

hundreds of college campuses: "Future newspaper reporters and broadcast

journalists regularly share classes and crowded curricula with aspiring public

relations managers and advertising copywriters." What an idyllic, pastoral,

almost biblical scene this evokes, with lion and lamb bedding down together.

Allow

me to extend the metaphor. It is neither cost-effective nor necessary to be at

each other’s throats. We all rely on the creative use of words and images. Why

perpetuate past rifts between journalists and PR professionals? Why polarize

when we can synthesize? For a fresh generation of media pros, a new modus

vivendi awaits.

Some

object to the efficacy of such pragmatism. We hear claims that public relations

and journalism are incompatible. These are different functions, the naysayers

moan. In recent years, they have steadily lost academic ground. Yet resistance

has not disappeared.

At

the University of Maryland, in 1998, the college of journalism went so far as to

boot out the public relations program. But some big guns in the PR industry

counterattacked and raised hell with top officials at the university. According

to the publication PR News, the embattled program got lots of backing from

"corporate communicators at deep-pocketed companies." Surviving handsomely, the

PR program found a new home at the department of communication.

I’ve

heard complaints from people like Dave Berkman, a retired professor of mass

communication at the University of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, where he was chair of

the department for a few years. He argues that when students take courses in

public relations, they’re learning to become "professional liars." He calls PR

"the antithesis of what journalism is supposed to be."

Berkman taught mass communication for 21 years, and now he doesn’t want to give

up the ghost. He laments that many college journalism departments now feature

public relations as the dominant program of study — and he alleges that "to

house PR with journalism is to give public relations an imprimatur of respect

and propriety that belies its inherently corrupt and corrupting nature." I say,

make that guy an offer he can’t refuse! Ha ha.

Unfortunately, he won’t pipe down about the public relations biz. "On the

occasions where truth and the client’s interests coincide, then you go with the

truth," Berkman grouses. "But because you are paid to make the client or the

client’s cause look good, truth can never win when it conflicts with the

client’s interests." And he goes on: "The purpose of journalism is to ferret out

the truth. The purpose of PR is to protect your client."

But

consider the glorious career of David Brinkley. After decades at NBC and ABC

News, he moved on to voice lofty TV spots touting the humanitarian goals of

agribusiness giant Archer Daniels Midland. You got a problem with that?

As

students, perhaps you feel a twinge of sympathy for Professor Berkman when he

asks rhetorically, "How do I teach a kid in Reporting 101 to go after the truth

and teach a kid in PR 101 how to lie?"

It’s

best to consider Berkman a spoilsport when he contends: "Journalism and public

relations don’t belong under the same academic roof. It’s like teaching

astronomy and astrology in the same department."

Hey,

the wall has fallen. The free market is our secular faith. To those who resist

the convergence, I say, "Get over it!"

In

the current media environment, only the intemperate fail to realize when

missions can be synergistic rather than antagonistic. Look at it this way: In

journalism, the job is to be as truthful as possible. In public relations, the

job is to be as misleading as necessary. Surely, we can find plenty of common

ground. In any case, build your career by proceeding discreetly to scope out the

limits. See what you can get away with.

Congratulations to each and every graduate. Go out there and search for truth.

But please, don’t carry the lantern too high.

 

Norman Solomon’s latest book is "The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media." His

syndicated column focuses on media and politics.

Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. The paperback edition of his latest book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, includes an afterword about the Gaza war.

Donate
Leave A Reply

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

THE WIND CRIES FREEDOM

The Wind Cries Freedom, the new book from Z co-founder Michael Albert, is a sweeping oral history of a future American revolution.

Through thirty interconnected chapters, it draws out the strategies, failures, turning points, and hard-won wisdom of a movement that called itself the Revolutionary Participatory Society. These are not the polished memoirs of politicians: they are the unfiltered accounts of people who organized in neighborhoods, hospitals, universities, stadiums, courthouses, and places of worship, and kept a shared vision alive through cynicism and exhaustion.

The result is speculative political fiction that reads like history: messy, human, and quietly hopeful in the way that only real experience and long thought can produce.

Get your copy and peruse more features on the book’s website below.

“Read it, argue with it, but don’t look away. The future it recalls is one we must still fight to deserve.”

Yanis Varoufakis

“The most unusual and intriguing combination of prophecy, manifesto, and movement building manual that I have ever encountered.”

Bill Fletcher Junior

“This work fills a huge gap in our social movement literature.”

Cynthia Peters

You've just read your article on Z this month.

DOES Z'S SURVIVAL MATTER?

You keep coming back for a reason: serious political analysis, movement reporting, and debate beyond the priorities of corporate media. Today, Z is in a precarious financial position. If Z is part of how you understand the world, help keep it going. The readers who give monthly are the reason this work survives between fundraisers.

Z is in a precarious financial position. If it’s part of how you understand the world, help keep it going.

Number of donors808
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Z is in the most precarious financial position in its history.

Z is a place to think beyond the limits of the present.

For decades, Z has brought together political analysis, movement reporting, debate, and visions of a different future from writers and activists around the world. That work is more than journalism. It is movement infrastructure: movements need places to develop ideas, test arguments, learn from experience, and imagine what comes next.

In the first two days of this fundraiser, 19 donors and 8 new monthly sustainers stepped up. Help us reach 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone.

For decades, Z has published the analysis, debate, and visions movements need, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. If that work should continue, Z needs your support now.

Number of donors808
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version