|
Looking Forward. By Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel 2.Participatory
Workplaces
|
|
|
What do you suppose will satisfy the soul except to walk free and own
no superior. -Walt Whitman |
Simon Bolivar Press -
The Participatory Version
Assuming no change in level of economic
development, what innovations would participatory economics bring to Simon
Bolivar Press? By now the answers should be fairly obvious. Just
as throwing out capitalists and eliminating poverty, starvation, disease, and
corruption were priorities of the anti -imperialist revolution, introducing
workplace and consumer councils, egalitarian consumption, equitable job
complexes, and collective self -management will be the goals of a
participatory economic revolution. Simon Bolivar Press would begin by rotating
dangerous and debilitating tasks, reducing income inequalities, and
increasing job training. But the goal of training would no longer be for
trainees to escape undesirable jobs left behind for others to do, but to
allow job complexes to be balanced with little or no loss of efficiency.
Temporary disparities would persist only because of disparities in skills
which would be steadily reduced. Plans for plant operations would be
regularly distributed to the entire work force, whose proposals for
alterations would be seriously considered before projects were undertaken.
Workers at council meetings would propose projects and policies to be
debated and voted on. Similarly,
the plant's relationship to the island's planning board would change as plans
from above were questioned, alternatives proposed, and finally, once enough
experience and skill developed, Simon Bolivar along with other units would
undertake decentralized participatory planning, first as an experiment
running alongside traditional procedures, then as the main means of
developing plans for the island. The
plant might still have a horribly smelly room for preparation of plates. But
fans would improve things and all would work only short shifts in the smelly
environment. Loading magazines onto trucks remains back-breaking work.
Typesetting is still onerous. But employees who used to do one of these jobs
all day long now spend somewhat less time on these tasks and more time on
creative work or training. Mario spends more time not only in the plate
preparation room, but on the presses and loading dock. He continues to do
some managerial work, though without unilateral authority. The impetus for
plant improvements, whether in the form of adjustments of job complexes,
inexpensive innovations, or largescale new technologies to eliminate
burdensome and/or dangerous jobs, is greatly increased. Since
work at Simon Bolivar is less desirable than average, its workers work
thirty-five hours there, putting in five hours in other plants or in their
communities doing more enjoyable tasks like helping with day care and
children's centers or community gardenmg. At more modem printing plants, job
complexes are more pleasant than average. There, as a result, workers labor
only thirty hours a week, putting in ten hours in agricultural and other hard
labor in the vicinity. Job balancing committees had to make the initial
calibrations, and now revise them on a continual basis taking note of
disparities in job applications. The
result? In the transition from coordinator to participatory economics,
incomes rise significantly for the lower -paid two -thirds of the Simon
Bolivar work force. Quality of work life increases dramatically for those who
previously did the lowliest tasks and considerably for most others. The
quality of life drops materially but not psychologically for a relative few.
Quality of product improves along with morale. Moreover, workers return home
daily with more energy and more inclination to exert themselves in political
and social life further improving work conditions, for example. Home life,
community life, and political participation are thereby greatly enhanced. A plant
tour conducted a few years after participatory transformations would be
punctuated primarily by descriptions of social relations and job complexes.
We hear details of self -management. Workers speak of the change in morale
and participation attendant on innovations. Product and technology are
described with pride as well, but the emphasis is on why they were chosen,
this having become the province of the workers rather than a distant planning
elite. From a
display of the benefits of independence from imperialism, the island becomes
a showcase for liberation from technocratic hierarchy. Organizing democratic
workers' councils, balanced job complexes, and participatory planning was
certainly difficult but not impossible in the absence of high technology. The
point is that participatory organization can work wonders not only in work
places with access to high tech methods, but also in plants with an excess of
manual, dangerous, and debilitating labor, like those that still prevail in
many parts of the U.S. and in most of the third world. To be sure, however,
coordinators are likely to resist such changes that would undermine their
privileges in the economy and in society as a whole. |
|
|