A cikin bita mai taimako da ingantaccen suka game da halin da ake ciki a halin yanzu na ƙungiyar Mamaya, Ismael Hossein-Zadeh ya ba da shawarwari masu kyau da yawa. Kuma na ga wasu maganganun kwanan nan waɗanda da alama sun cancanci rabawa tare da ku, idan ba ku gan su ba. Hossein-Zadeh ya mai da hankali kan gabatar da buƙatun motsi, kuma kamar yadda na yarda gabaɗaya da waccan hanyar, wannan tattaunawar ita ce mafi yawan wannan shigarwar. Amma kuma na kawo tare da kawo wasu sharhi a nan, don gabatar da fitattun ra'ayoyi don taimaka muku yin naku kima.
Ga yadda Hossein-Zadeh ya taƙaita nasarar OWS ya zuwa yanzu:
"Occupy Wall Street (OWS), wanda ke ba da haske ga fushin 99%, ya zaburar da mutane a Amurka da sauran sassan duniya don fallasa tsarin jari-hujja ga abin da yake: tsarin da ke haifar da riba wanda ke da nasaba da wadata. da kuma ba wa ƴan tsiraru ƙarfi a kan kowa. Kungiyar ta yi nasarar nuna yadda na’urar jam’iyyu biyu na tsarin zaben Amurka ke kara zama abin ban mamaki, kasancewar kashi 1% na kudin da ke rike da gwamnati. Ba tare da la’akari da gazawarta da kuma yadda za ta ci gaba ba, nasarorin da ƙungiyar ta samu sun riga sun zama tarihi na gaske, domin yana nuna kyakkyawar farkawa ga mutane da sabon ruhi don yaƙar zalunci.” http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/20/occupy-wall-street-at-the-crossroads/
Zai yi wuya a musanta batun na biyu, cewa kungiyar ta mayar da hankalin jama’a kan yadda manyan jam’iyyun biyu da gwamnati suka samu rinjaye a hannun masu hannu da shuni. Amma ina da wasu ra'ayoyi game da ko za a iya danganta rashin rarraba dukiya da mulki ga tsarin jari-hujja kamar haka. Har ila yau, ya bayyana cewa ba dukkan masu shiga cikin ƙungiyoyin Mamaya ke adawa da tsarin jari hujja ba. Kuma a ƙarshe, ban da tabbacin cewa maye gurbin jari-hujja da wani nau'i na tsarin tattalin arziki ko dai zai yiwu, ko kuma wajibi ne don magance matsalolin da yunkurin ya haifar. Zan faɗaɗa kan waɗancan ajiyar na gaba a ƙasa.
Masu sharhi, na yau da kullun da sauran su, sun ba da shawarar cewa ƙungiyar ta tsara takamaiman buƙatu, ko sukar ta da rashin yin haka. Daga cikin waɗanda ke kare rashin takamaiman buƙatu, ɗayan mafi tunani ya bayyana a cikin Financial Times na karshen mako:
"Mafi yawan sukar kungiyar 'yan mamaya a kafafen yada labarai shi ne cewa ba ta da wata manufa ko wani shiri na musamman. Wannan ya rasa ma'anar. Abin da Ocupy ke yi da farko shine buɗe sarari - wanda za ku iya kiran sararin dimokuradiyya - a matsayin maƙasudin da ya dace ga al'amuran siyasa na hukuma. Abin da zai cika wannan sararin ba za a iya yanke shawarar ba, ta ma'anarsa a gaba." Harry Eyres, "Muhimmin sarari don Mallakawa," FT Janairu 28/29, 2012, Rayuwa & Arts p. 22, wanda ina tsammanin za ku iya shiga ba tare da biyan kuɗi ba http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/fa644c86-428a-11e1-97b1-00144feab49a.html#axzz1ktEmml8C.
A gefe guda, 'yan kwanaki kaɗan kafin haka, mambobi uku na ƙungiyar ma'aikata ta tattalin arziki a Occupy London a haƙiƙa sun ba da shawarar fannoni da yawa don mai da hankali kan: Manufar haraji, ƙarancin gidaje, da rashin daidaiton samun kudin shiga. Duba tattaunawar su a http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/89d242b0-4687-11e1-89a8-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1ktEmml8C (David Dewhurst, Peter Dombi, da Naomi Colvin, "Yadda Hayek ya taimake mu mu sami lahani na jari-hujja," FT, Janairu 25, 2012).
Kuma, akwai abubuwa da yawa masu amfani a cikin mujallar Z ta Fabrairu 2012, gami da wannan sharhi na Kevin Zeese na Occupy Washington, DC kan wata babbar matsala ta dabara da ta gurɓata harkar:
"Lokacin da muke shirya Occupy Washington, DC kafin a fara Wall Street, muna tattaunawa da ƙungiyoyi a duniya. Bacin ran Mutanen Espanya ya gaya mana cewa aikin bai kamata ya wuce makonni biyu ba. Bayan haka ya zama karkata daga manufofin siyasa. Wannan ya samu ta hanyar mamaya a duk fadin kasar.
"Mamaye na ɗan gajeren lokaci yana cim ma da yawa daga cikin manufofin riƙe sararin samaniya - tattaunawar siyasa ta shafi, ana tattara mutane, kuma mutane na iya ganin cewa 'yan ƙasa za su iya ƙalubalantar jihar ta kamfanoni yadda ya kamata. Tsayawa na dogon lokaci yana ci gaba da zurfafa waɗannan manufofin, amma tasirin ya fi iyakance kuma farashin yana ƙaruwa. ”
A matsayina na mai biyan kuɗi, kawai na karanta labarin Kevin game da manufar Occupy da wasu da yawa, ciki har da wanda Andy Kroll ya yi kan yadda kashi 99% suka sami babbar nasara a Ohio, da kuma wani ta Frederick Nagel akan siyasar zaɓe da OWS, a cikin nawa. kwafin fitowar Fabrairu 2012, amma na yi imanin zaɓaɓɓun labarai daga wannan fitowar nan ba da jimawa ba za su kasance a kan layi. Duba a https://znetwork.org/zmag.
Domin ina ganin tasirin shirya Occupy shine mafi mahimmancin nasarar da ya samu ya zuwa yanzu, na sake maimaita a nan nawa kima, daga shigarwa na na Disamba 2011:
"A gare ni, babbar kyauta da nasarar Occupy Wall Street har zuwa yanzu ita ce ta samar da tsari don ingantacciyar duniya. Tsara, bayan haka, mafi mahimmanci shine haɓaka fahimtar juna da alaƙar amana wanda ke baiwa mutane damar yin aiki tare don cimma muradun su. Daga wannan hangen nesa, OWS ya riga ya sami nasara (idan har yanzu farkon), a cikin cewa ya canza sharuɗɗan maganganun mashahuran, kuma ya haɓaka fahimtar juna da alaƙar amincewa, ta hanyar ayyukansa da kuma nasarar waɗannan ayyukan a cikin haskakawa. Hasken da ba za a yi watsi da shi ba a kan tabarbarewar dukiya, samun kudin shiga da mulki a kasarmu. Kuma ina ganin irin wannan shiri ba wai kawai yana da mahimmanci ba amma watakila shine kawai amsa ga matsalolin da ake ganin ba za a iya magance su ba na zamaninmu. Da alama muna fuskantar sauyin yanayi lokaci guda, da raguwar albarkatu, da durkushewar tattalin arziki, tare da jiga-jigan attajirai da madafun iko da ke kula da wata na'urar siyasa da farfagandar da ke sa magance kowace irin waɗannan matsalolin, ko ma gane su, ya fi wuya fiye da yadda ba za a yi ba. . Na damu cewa lamarin zai iya rikidewa zuwa hargitsi, yakin kowa da kowa. Ƙungiyar Occupy (s) ba za ta iya magance duk waɗannan matsalolin ba, amma watakila ta hanyar mayar da hankali da mayar da hankali kan abin da ya dace, za su iya ba da gudummawa sosai don sauƙaƙa sauyawa daga duniyar da muka sani zuwa wanda ke tasowa. . Watakila za mu iya fuskantar nan gaba muna taimakon junanmu, da samar da kuma raba hanyoyin tsira da al’umma, a cikin ruhin Sana’o’i, maimakon fada a kan tarkacen da bai isa ba, a kowane hali, zagayawa.”
A cikin mahallin duk yanayin rashin bege da ga alama mun fuskanta a faɗuwar da ta gabata, waɗannan nasarorin suna da matukar girma. Amma don ginawa a kan wannan farkon, ina motsi ya tashi daga nan?
Hossein-Zadeh ya tattauna manyan zargi guda uku da aka yi wa OWS: (1) rashin fahimtar bukatunta da rashin shirin canji; (2) rashin ko rashin isassun tarurrukan mutane masu aiki; da (3) rashin son tsari da hada kai a kasa baki daya. Bayan tattaunawa mai matukar fa'ida da fa'ida akan wadannan batutuwa, sai ya karkare da cewa;
“Motsin mamaya da alama yana kan tsaka-tsaki. Yana iya ci gaba da tsarin kansa na 'babu jagoranci,' 'babu shiri,' 'babu kungiya'; ta iyakance kanta ga zanga-zangar da ba a saba gani ba da ayyukan sana'o'i a kusa da manufofin gaba ɗaya kamar zaman lafiya, dimokuradiyya da adalci na zamantakewa - kuma tabbas za su shaida raguwar ta a hankali. Ko kuma zai iya girma kuma ya zama abin hawa na gaskiya don sauye-sauye masu ma'ana don goyon bayan 99% ta hanyar samar da takamaiman buƙatun nasara, ta hanyar sadarwa tare da tsara manyan sassan ma'aikata game da irin waɗannan buƙatun, da kuma gina ƙungiyar siyasa ta ƙasa. sannan kuma kashi 99% na da nasa ‘yan takarar kujerar gwamnati.”
Takamaiman, Buƙatun Nasara: Ayyuka don Duk, Medicare ga Duk, ƘARA & MAFI KYAU Tsaron Jama'a
Kamar yadda tarin kasidu a cikin Z da FT ta mahalarta taron Occupy London suka nuna, aƙalla wasu Mamaya suna shirye su tsara buƙatu, kuma ba sa ƙi shiga cikin siyasar zaɓe. Abin da na fi mayar da hankali a nan shi ne abin da buƙatu mafi fa'ida zai iya kasancewa a cikin mahallin siyasa, al'umma da al'adun Amurka, duka don kansu da kuma yadda suke tsara motoci. Kamar yadda aikin ke da wuyar gaske, Ina tsammanin Hossein-Zadeh ya fito da wani shiri mai ban sha'awa kuma mai sauƙi, wanda na yarda da shi gabaɗaya, tare da ba da shawarar cewa motsi yana buƙatar "ayyukan yi ga kowa," "Medicare ga Duk," da " babu raguwa a cikin Social Security. " A wani lokaci ya tsara bukatun kiwon lafiya, a matsayin "kulawa mai araha ga kowa." Kuma bukatarsa ta uku ita ce ta “ceton Social Security.” Tun da yadda muke ƙirƙira ko faɗi abubuwa suna da mahimmanci, Ina ba da shawarar cewa mu tsaya tare da "Medicare don kowa" kamar yadda ake buƙata na kiwon lafiya, kuma mu yi aiki don KARA DA FAɗawa maimakon kawai "ceto" Tsaron Jama'a.
Na fahimci waɗannan buƙatun "sun fi tsattsauran ra'ayi fiye da yadda 'yan Democrat za su iya ciki, amma suna sa wasu 'yan mamaya su yi hamma." Shamus Cooke, "Gyara da Juyin Juyin Halitta A Cikin Mamaya," http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28196. Ina da batutuwan bazara da faɗuwar Adbusters. (Idan ba haka ba, kuna iya samun su: http://www.adbusters.org/. Adbusters ita ce mujalla ta Kanada wacce aka ba da lada tare da haɓaka aikin farko na Wall Street fall na ƙarshe). Na san cewa tushen wasu abubuwan da ke motsawa zuwa Occupy Wall Street babban rashin jin daɗi ne tare da cin kasuwa da sauran halaye da hanyoyin rayuwa waɗanda suka zama masu rinjaye ko aƙalla a cikin al'adunmu, amma hakan ba wai kawai ya kasa gamsarwa ba amma yana damun ƙarshenmu. zurfafa bukatu da sha'awa, kuma suna lalata biosphere, kuma tare da shi yiwuwar ci gaba da rayuwa a cikin kowane nau'i mai kama da abin da muke da shi yanzu, ko kuma mun sani. Ya zuwa dawowar wannan hanyar rayuwa ta masu amfani da bashi ne ake jagorantar ayyukan gwamnatin Obama da Fed. Kuma na yi imanin cewa tashin wannan hanyar rayuwa, idan za a iya aiwatar da shi (ko da yake ban tsammanin zai iya ba), zai sake sabuntawa da kuma hanzarta wannan tsari na halakar, wanda ya dan kadan ta hanyar matsalolin tattalin arziki. Don haka akwai mutane da yawa waɗanda suka ce muna buƙatar fiye da ayyukan “kawai”, kula da lafiya, da kyakkyawar hanyar sadarwar zamantakewa. Kuma suna da gaskiya.
Kuma duk da haka, "ƙaƙƙarfan motsi na gaske na mutane masu aiki ne kawai ke da yuwuwar cimma buƙatun [har yanzu] na ƙungiyoyin Mamaya." [Las ɗin Shamus Cook, a sama.] A gare ni, duk wani abu da ya sayi lokaci, ta hanyar hana rushewar cibiyoyin da ake da su - masu kyau tare da mara kyau - da yuwuwar saukowa cikin hargitsi, yana da yuwuwar faɗaɗa tushen juriya da ba da lokaci daki don ƙirƙirar yanayin ci gaba da wayewa da rayuwar wayewa, na al'umma. Don haka buƙatun da za su iya ɗaukar wasu mutane - ayyuka, Medicare, da MORE Social Security - waɗanda ke ba da tsaro ba kawai na ritaya ba amma taimako ga matasa masu nakasa, ta hanyar – suna da hankali sosai kuma suna jan hankalina. Al’ummar da suka hada kai da hadin kai don cimma irin wadannan bukatu, za su fi samun ilimi da karfafawa da kuma samun matsayi mai kyau don samun sauye-sauye na asali, yayin da mutanen da ke fafutukar neman abinci ba za su ma iya tunanin irin wadannan abubuwa ba. Kuma idan muka ƙara zuwa na uku da bukatar cewa a biya waɗannan abubuwa ta hanyar haraji Wall Street, manyan kamfanoni da masu arziki da kuma lalata injin yaƙi, muna da shirye-shiryen cikakken shiri tare da babban abin sha'awa, idan ba duka 99 ba. %, aƙalla ɗimbin yawa ga kowane bangare da kuma shirin gaba ɗaya. Don haka tare da wannan share fage, bari mu dubi shawarwarin Hossein-Zadeh dalla-dalla.
"Ayyuka ga kowa" yana magana ne don kansa kuma yana da wuyar fassarawa ko rikicewa, kuma muna da isassun misalan tarihi da abin da ya faru a cikin Ayyukan Ci gaban Ayyukan Ayyuka, Ƙwararrun Ƙwararrun Ƙwararru, da sauran shirye-shiryen Sabon Yarjejeniyar.
Zan guje wa samar da bukatu a matsayin "lafiya mai araha ga kowa," kodayake, saboda 'yan adawa da ma mutane da yawa masu goyon bayan ra'ayi na gaba ɗaya na iya jayayya cewa akwai hanyoyi da yawa da za a iya cika shi. Wasu ma suna jayayya cewa mun riga mun sami araha na kiwon lafiya ga kowa (dangane da wadatar dakunan gaggawa). To, na san wannan mahaukaci ne, kuma zalunci ne, amma abin da wasu ke tunani, da jayayya ke nan. Kuma yana da mahimmanci don Sauƙaƙe, Sauƙaƙe, kuma - na ambaci mahimmancin sauƙi? Wani bangare saboda akwai shaitanun da ke jira a fuka-fuki don kashe duk wani kyakkyawan tsarin zamantakewa tare da cikakkun bayanai, kuma ta yaya, a cikin sauƙi akwai bayyananne. Don haka zan buƙaci "Medicare ga kowa da kowa," saboda wannan buƙatar ta dogara ne akan takamaiman shirin da ake da shi, kuma fadada shi don haɗawa da kowa shine hanya mafi sauƙi don biyan bukatun ba tare da hadarin rikicewa game da cikakkun bayanai ba, wanda aka riga aka yi ta hanyar data kasance. Shirin Medicare.
Hakazalika, ba zan tsara buƙatu na uku ba a matsayin "ajiye Tsaron Jama'a," saboda akwai hanyoyi da yawa da za a iya yin hakan, ciki har da yanke fa'idodi da haɓaka shekarun cancanta, waɗanda mutanen da ainihin manufar su ne suka gabatar da su. a karshe don gusar da shirin. Zan tsara buƙatu na uku kamar, "Ƙarin Tsaron Jama'a," wanda nake nufi, FAƊA shirin don rage shekarun yin ritaya da haɓaka fa'idodi. Wannan ba kawai zai taimaka wa mutane da yawa kai tsaye ba, amma zai zama abin ƙarfafawa ga tattalin arziƙin macro. Ana samun ƙarin cikakkun bayanai daga Steven Hill, "Kada ku Yanke Tsaron Jama'a, ninka shi," http://archive.truthout.org/dont-cut-social-security-double-it64139 da Joshua Holland, "Ana Tsare Mu Kan Tsaron Jama'a - Yadda Za Mu Sauƙaƙa Ƙarfafa Fa'idodi ko Bayar da Mutane Su Yi Ritaya Tun da farko," http://www.alternet.org/story/148082/we%27re_being_conned_on_social_security_–_how_we_could_easily_raise_benefits_or_allow_people_to_retire_earlier?page=entire. Neman Ƙarin Tsaron Jama'a kuma yana da fa'idar ɗaukar shirin, wasa da laifi maimakon tsaro, da haɗa haske tare da sauƙi.
Me yasa Juriya daga Occupy Wall Street?
Hossein-Zadeh ya ba da misali na ƙoƙarin samun buƙatu mai amfani ta OWN. A ranar 18 ga Disamba, 2011, "Rukunin Aiki na Bukatu" sun ba da shawarar buƙatu mai zuwa ga Babban Taro na Birnin New York:
“Ayyuka DON ALL — Babban Shirin Ayyukan Jama'a da Ayyukan Jama'a:
“Muna bukatar tsarin ayyukan gwamnati da na jama’a da ke karkashin tsarin dimokuradiyya, tare da aikin gwamnati kai tsaye, don samar da sabbin guraben ayyukan yi miliyan 25 kan albashin kungiyar kwadago. Sabbin ayyukan za su je don biyan bukatun 99%, gami da ilimi, kiwon lafiya, gidaje, jigilar jama'a, da makamashi mai tsafta. Za a tallafa wa shirin ne ta hanyar kara haraji kan masu hannu da shuni da kamfanoni da kuma kawo karshen yakin Amurka. Yin aiki a cikin shirin zai kasance a buɗe ga kowa, ba tare da la'akari da matsayin shige da fice ko rikodin laifi ba” [6. "Shawarwari don Lahadi, 12/18, Babban Taro: Ayyuka ga Duk - Ƙungiya Masu Buƙatun": http://www.nycga.net/2011/12/18/proposal-for-saturday-1217-general-assemblyjobs-for-all-demands-working-group/].
Hossein-Zadeh ya ba da rahoton cewa wannan shawara ba ta zartar da babban taron ba. Ban san yadda zan iya tantance dalilin da ya sa bai yi ba, kuma a kowane hali ba su da lokacin gwadawa, amma gaskiyar ta ba da hutu ɗaya. Na ba da shawarar sama da wasu dalilan da ya sa buƙatun da nake ba da shawara a nan za su iya sa wasu Mazauna su yi hamma, kuma su ɗan yi tsokaci a nan kan wasu hanyoyin. Waɗannan tunanin ba wai kawai don kin amincewa da shawarar da Babban Taro na NYC ta yi ba, har ma da wasu batutuwan da buƙatun da na gabatar za su iya tasowa.
Zan iya yin hasashe kawai, amma watakila OWS na iya jinkirin amincewa da buƙatun fifita Medicare ko Tsaron Jama'a a wani ɓangare saboda dangi na yawancin mahalarta. Ko da yake na san abu ne da ya birgeni har ma ga matasa da yawa a yanzu, kuma matsalolin lafiya na bala'i na iya faruwa a kowane zamani, aƙalla a farkon shekaruna ashirin ban damu da inshorar likita ba, balle ma in yi ritaya, da yawancin matasa. mutane (da sauran mutane na kowane zamani) an yaudare su (ta hanyar kamfen na farfaganda da aka tsara sosai) cikin tunanin cewa Tsaron Zaman Lafiya ba zai yiwu ba, kuma ba zai kasance gare su ba a cikin shekarun su na gaba. Kuma yana da mahimmanci cewa mutane sun damu da samun aiki a wannan kasuwa mai wuyar gaske da kuma sanya abinci a kan tebur, kuma watakila biyan bashin dalibai a cikin tsari, zai kasance da wahala a mayar da hankali kan kudaden shiga na ritaya. Duk abin da zan iya faɗi shi ne cewa a matsayin kayan aiki na tsarawa, kuma a matsayin buƙatu masu amfani da gaske, ina ba da shawarar da hankali ga sassa uku akan ayyuka, kiwon lafiya, da tsaro a cikin tsufa, wanda aka tsara a matsayin "Ayyuka ga Duk," "Medicare ga Duk," da "Ƙarin Tsaron Jama'a."
Waɗannan buƙatun guda uku, da buƙatar da za a biya su ta hanyar harajin Wall Street, manyan kamfanoni, da attajirai, da kuma tarwatsa yawancin injin yaƙi, suna da manyan abubuwa da yawa a gama gari. Kamar yadda jefa ƙuri'a bayan jefa ƙuri'a ya nuna, suna, ko kuma suna da yuwuwar zama, shahararriya ga ɗimbin jama'a. Kowannensu zai bayar da taimakon da ake bukata ga miliyoyin mutanen da suke bukata, tare da karfafa tattalin arzikin kasa baki daya, don haka jimillar fa'idar da za a samu zai fi yawan sassansa. Kuma tare za su inganta duka gaskiyar abin da ake bukata na gama gari da kuma ra'ayin da ya kamata mu damu da juna, cewa muna da bukatu iri ɗaya da za mu iya kuma ya kamata mu magance gaba ɗaya, ta hanyar gwamnati da sauran nau'o'in ƙungiyoyin zamantakewa. . Cewa ba lallai ba ne kuma bai kamata mu shiga cikin yaƙi na dindindin na kowane da kowa ba. Wannan ainihin ra'ayin, tare da yanayin rayuwa na 99%, ana fuskantar hare-hare ba tare da ɓata lokaci ba shekaru da yawa yanzu, kuma kowane ɗayan buƙatun da aka gabatar shine kariyar toshewa. Kawai ta hanyar buƙatar Tsaron Tsaro ya ninka, OWS na iya canza muhawarar akan wannan batu, sanya masu ba da shawara na yankewa a kan kariya da kuma mayar da hankali ga fa'idodin shirin, da sauƙi na fadadawa da ƙarfafa shi.
Dangane da harin da aka kai a kan amfanin gama gari wanda aka shafe akalla shekaru 30 ana yi, kyakkyawan bayyani yana cikin hirar Bill Moyers na Janairu 13, 2012, “Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson on Engineered Inequality,” vimeo da kwafi duka suna samuwa. a http://billmoyers.com/segment/jacob-hacker-paul-pierson-on-engineered-inequality/. Ina kuma ba da shawarar Rikicin Kuɗi da Tattalin Arziki na: Tsarin Aiki da Aiki (http://healingjustice.wordpress.com/the-financial-and-economic-crisis-an-assessment-and-action-plan/), don nazarin matsalar da wasu shawarwari masu mahimmanci game da yadda za mu iya canzawa zuwa sabon tattalin arziki mai dorewa.
Don Zaɓe, Ko Ba Zaɓe ba?
To me ya kamata a yi domin aiwatar da wadannan bukatu? Ƙoƙarin ƙoƙarce-ƙoƙarce na kwanan nan, mai ban mamaki da nasara don hana ƙa'idodin intanet ɗin ya nuna cewa ko da ba tare da fitowa kan tituna ba, yana yiwuwa mutane su tattara tare da fatattakar masu ƙarfi. Sannan kungiyar Occupy ta nuna cewa yin kan tituna ma na iya yin tasiri, a kalla har zuwa wani abu (mai matukar muhimmanci). Amma wasu da ke son canji na asali, na tausayi, watakila har da Mazamai da yawa, na iya cewa ya kamata mu kada kuri’a kwata-kwata, balle a yi kokarin tsayar da ‘yan takarar mukami da gina wata na’ura ta siyasa ko jam’iyya don yin hakan. Chris Hedges ya fito fili, aƙalla a cikin raina, a matsayin ɗaya daga cikin waɗanda ke jayayya cewa akwatin kada kuri'a ba shi da amfani kuma ba komai bane illa aiwatar da kai tsaye yana da ma'ana a cikin rikicin da ake ciki yanzu. Amma kamar yadda na sha jayayya a baya, kuma kamar yadda Noam Chomsky ya yi nuni akai-akai,
“[W] har yanzu yana da babban ’yanci don tada hankali, tsarawa, zanga-zangar da gwagwarmayar neman sauyi. Akwatin zabe ba ta da amfani, kawai ba a yi amfani da shi kusan isa ba. Amma har yanzu muna da shi. Kuma don amfani da shi ya zama mafi inganci, muna buƙatar ƙarin mutane da yawa waɗanda suka gane ainihin matsalolinmu kuma suna buƙatar tsarin siyasar mu da 'yan wasanmu su magance su. Har yanzu ba gaskiya ba ne, kamar yadda Leonard Cohen ya faɗi tuntuni, cewa 'Biranen sun lalace, kuma 'yan tsakiya sun tafi.' Don haka 'bari in sake tambayar ku sau ɗaya, ya ku 'ya'yan kura: Duka. wadannan mafarauta da suke kururuwa yanzu, suna mana magana?'
"Amma ba zai isa a sake tambayar lokaci ɗaya ba. Muna bukatar mu ci gaba da yin tambaya, tada zaune tsaye, da tada hankali, da fadakarwa, da musayar bayanai da nazari - a cikin kalma, tsarawa - don gina isasshiyar adawa mai dorewa ga munanan zamaninmu, da kuma dawo da kare al'umma da ci gaban al'umma." http://healingjustice.wordpress.com/2010/11/
A ce mu yi gangami a wurin kada kuri’a ba wai a ce ana bukatar gina sabuwar jam’iyya daga tushe ba. Wannan zaɓi ɗaya ne, amma kuma akwai ƙungiyoyi da yawa da ke aiki don gina madadin jam'iyyun siyasa - duba su. Akwai kuma kungiyoyi da ke aiki don sake fasalin jam'iyyar Dimokuradiyya. Abin ban tsoro ko watakila rashin bege kamar yadda wannan aikin zai iya bayyana, har yanzu ina samun ƙarfafawa daga aikin Progressive Democrats of America, wanda ke aiki a ciki da wajen Jam'iyyar Demokraɗiyya, kuma ya amince da jerin 'yan takara kaɗan. Don kuɗi na - ko jefa ƙuri'a - zai yi wuya in doke, a matsayin 'yar takara, Elizabeth Warren, yanzu tana neman takarar Majalisar Dattijan Amurka daga Massachusetts. Na ambaci waɗannan cikakkun bayanai don kwatanta hanyoyin da za a bi, amma ainihin abin da nake nufi shi ne, kamar yadda Hossein-Zadeh ya nuna, babu wani abu mai tasiri sosai don matsa wa wani ma'aikaci a matsayin wani ɗan takara da zai tsaya takara ko kuma barazanar yin takara da shi. Don haka ga alama, da kyau, yana da ban sha'awa don guje wa tsarin zaɓe don goyon bayan ayyukan titina na keɓance, saboda dalilai guda ɗaya da alama bai dace a daina tsara kowane takamaiman buƙatu ba.
Bayanin tushe ga tattaunawar: Me game da jari hujja?
Na fahimci yawancin mahalarta a OWS suna ɗaukar tsarin jari-hujja a matsayin mai aibu, kuma na yi imani aƙalla wasu za su buƙaci wani nau'i na sake fasalin tattalin arzikinmu da al'ummarmu. Da kaina, ban tabbata ba har yanzu an ƙirƙiri tsarin tattalin arziƙi wanda ba ta wata ma'ana ba aibi ko aƙalla, wanda masu mulki ke zagi. Na fahimci akwai mutanen da suke tunanin samun gwamnati ta yi komai game da wani abu shine "haɗin kai." Amma hakan yana hana kalmar ma'ana mai amfani. Idan aka ayyana tsarin gurguzu a matsayin mallakar jama'a/gwamnati na hanyoyin samar da kayayyaki, bana ganin shi a matsayin mafita ga duk matsalolin da tsarin tattalin arzikin mu na yanzu ya haifar. A zahiri ina tsammanin babbar amsa ta ta'allaka ne ga al'ummomin da ba a san su ba, mafi yawan al'ummomin da za su iya tafiya, tare da mafi yawan tsarin gwamnati fiye da yadda muke da su a yanzu, kuma hakan na iya zama mafi amfani a kan ƙananan sikelin, yanki ko yanki. Amma ta yaya za mu isa can daga nan? Zan fifita tsarin rashin tashin hankali, haɓaka ko tsarin juyin halitta zuwa tsarin tattalin arziƙin da aka sake fasalin, tare da cikakkun bayanai suna fitowa sannu a hankali kan lokaci. Na yi ƙoƙarin aƙalla nuni ga wasu hanyoyin da irin wannan sake fasalin zai iya ɗauka zuwa ƙarshen takarda ta kan Rikicin Kuɗi da Tattalin Arziki, http://healingjustice.wordpress.com/the-financial-and-economic-crisis-an-assessment-and-action-plan/.
A kowane hali, a gare ni, iko shine maɓalli mai mahimmanci, kuma babbar matsala ita ce rashin adalci ko motsa jiki. “Ƙarfi yana lalacewa; cikakken iko yana lalacewa kwata-kwata." Don haka ina ganin babbar matsalar da muke fuskanta a halin yanzu ta taso ne daga tarin karfin iko da aikin danniya da babu makawa, da kuma kasawar kashi 99% har ya zuwa yanzu wajen tunkararta da kuma bijirewa ta yadda ya kamata. Don haka amsar, a gare ni, ta ta'allaka ne wajen haɓakawa da aiwatar da manufofin siyasa don sake fasalin tattalin arziki, da kuma tsara yadda hakan zai yiwu.
A kan dogon lokaci, tushen juyin halitta, babban rabon mulki ga alama duka biyun kyawawa ne kuma ba makawa. Kuma idan mun kasance da tsari, mafi kyawun juyin halitta zai iya faruwa, kuma mafi mutuntawa da tausayi sakamakon zai iya zama.
Amma gwargwadon yadda yake da ma'ana don magance matsalolin a matakin ƙasa, Ina ba da shawarar cewa muna buƙatar ayyuka ga kowa, Medicare ga kowa, da MORE Social Security. Kuma yin hakan baya bukatar, kuma baya bukatar a jira, rugujewar tsarin jari hujja haka. A zahiri, a matsayina na wanda ya girma a cikin shekaru hamsin da sittin na karni na ashirin Amurka, ina jin daɗin abin da ake kira tattalin arziƙin “gaɗaɗɗen”, tare da tsarin haraji mai ci gaba, ƙarami da sashin kuɗi mai iya sarrafawa, da ƙarancin jindadin jihar. , cewa muna da a lokacin. Rushewar gidan yanar gizon tsaron cikin gida da FDR da LBJ suka gina da ƙungiyoyin da suka matsa musu ya kai mu ga wucewar da muke ciki, da kuma warware matsalar kuɗi da sauran mahimman sassa, ta hanyar soke Bill Clinton na Glass-Steagall kamar yadda ya dace. wani abu kuma, wanda ya tura mu, idan har yanzu ba a gama ba, gaɓar. Abin sha'awa, na sami bayani mai fa'ida kan wannan batu a cikin editan Financial Times na baya-bayan nan, "Jaridar Jari-hujja":
"Ta hanyar jari-hujja, muna nufin ingantaccen tsarin tattalin arzikin kasuwanci mai 'yanci - tsarin da ake sarrafa albarkatun galibi ta hanyar zaɓin mutane masu zaman kansu, a cikin ƙa'idodin ƙasa waɗanda ke bayyane, daidaito kuma ba tare da nuna bambanci ba don yarda da kowane sha'awa ta musamman. …
“Yawan wuce gona da iri da ya haifar da kumfa da rugujewar da ta biyo baya ya faru ne saboda shugabanni sun manta cewa kasuwanci mai ‘yanci na bukatar dokoki. Lokacin da wasu mutane ba su amfana da kawo kayayyaki masu amfani a kasuwa ba amma suna hana wasu yin haka; lokacin da wasu suka yi kasada wanda daga gare su suke samun riba amma wasu suna fuskantar asara; lokacin da aka hana mutane da yawa damar yin hanyarsu a kasuwar aiki - wannan ba jari-hujja bane amma tattalin arzikin da 'yan daba suka kama." FT, Janairu 27, 2012.
Ni da kaina ina ganin ra'ayin FT game da jari-hujja da ɗan kama-karya, ko watakila in faɗi butulci, ta yadda masu gyara suna ganin cewa za a iya sanya tsarin ya yi aiki da adalci wajen cimma moriyar jama'a ta hanyar amincewa da ƙa'idodin da suka dace ta hanyar jagoranci da kuma amfani da su. kyawawan dabi'un 'yan jari hujja da kansu. Duk da yake Adam Smith tabbas ya gane kuma hakika ya ɗauki muhimmiyar rawa da ɗabi'a ya kamata ya taka a cikin tsarin tattalin arziki, a bayyane yake cewa sarrafa wuce gona da iri na jari-hujja yana buƙatar, bugu da ƙari, yin amfani da ikon siyasa ta hanyar jama'a. Amma yin aikin jari-hujja a cikin mutuntaka da alama a gare ni a ƙarshe ba zan gabatar da wata matsala ba fiye da yadda za mu iya fuskantar kowane tsarin tattalin arziki.
To, ina za mu je daga nan? Ƙungiya da Haɗin kai? Taron zamantakewa na hadin kai a Olympia
Hossein-Zadeh yayi magana game da alƙawarin ƙungiyar ƙasa da haɗin kai a cikin labarinsa, a shafi na 4-6, kuma ba ni da wani abin da zan ƙara anan ga waccan tattaunawar, a (http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/20/occupy-wall-street-at-the-crossroads/). Akwai duka ƙarfi da rauni a cikin tafiyar da aka raba. Amma game da abin da ke zuwa na gaba, idan har ba ku riga kun ji ba, Alliance for Global Justice, mai tallafawa kasafin kuɗi na OWS, ta ba da sanarwar taron jama'a wanda Occupy Olympia (WA) za ta shirya kuma za a gudanar a Olympia a wannan Fabrairu 18-19. . Don cikakkun bayanai, shiga tare da Alliance a http://afgj.org/occupy-wall-street-fiscal-sponsorships-the-alliance-for-global-justice, kuma gani http://occupyolympia.org/ossf-2012/. Sannan yadawo!
ZNetwork ana samun kuɗi ta hanyar karimcin masu karatun sa.
Bada Tallafi