Comparing Capitalism and Parecon

Comparing Capitalism & ParEcon Consumption

Income sets bounds on what we can produce, of course, in any economy. But what is the character of the process by which we consume, the character of our relation to consumption, the place of consumption in economic life, etc. This page compares Capitalism and Parecon vis a vis consumption.

Next Entry: Comparing Regarding Workplace Organization

Picture

From “The Epic of American Civilization”
by José Clemente Orozco

“Café Terrace at Night”
by Vincent Van Gogh

Introducing Capitalist
Consumption

WIthin capitalism consumption is largely, though not exclusively, a personal affair. We each encounter a gazillion messages aimed at getting us to buy. We each occupy social spaces bent so that owning commodities is virtually the only means to diverse sorts of social interaction and/or direct fulfillment. We buy to get status, to fit, to feel worthy, to get love, even – and what is most distrubing is that the strategy makes sense. We live in such limited settings that consuming is a sensible route to such goals – even if one that rarely pays off.

Introducing ParEcon
Consumption

In Parecon we of course still consume. But now no one has an interest in our doing more or less than suits our own fulfillment and development. Likewise, we can engage socially and need not try to fulfill non material needs with material goods. WE are not in a rat race where each tries to fleece the other. In fact, the contrary holds, the fulfillment of each is the precondition and outcome of the fulfillment of others, and vice versa.  Prices are not a product of power, but of true assessment of overall material and social coss and benefits.

Evaluating Capitalist Consumption

Shop till you drop is cute, but a severe condemnation. Built in obsolesence. Individual consumption to meet what could be vastly better addressed by collective consumption or actiivity. A process that isolates the boyer from the producer and gives each interests to fleece the other – producing anti sociality and isolation as senisble paths toward horrendously limited fulfillment, given that other wiser and better options are simply unavailable.

Evaluating ParEcon Consumption

We consume in full light of implications for ourselves, producers, and other consumers, in a way consistent with worker and consumer self management, that furthers rather than diminishing solidarity, and that respects and expands diversity – all in accord with equitable remuneration.

 Next Entry: Comparing Regarding Workplace Organization

 
 

Subscribe

All the latest from Z, directly to your inbox.

Institute for Social and Cultural Communications, Inc. is a 501(c)3 non-profit.

Our EIN# is #22-2959506. Your donation is tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.

We do not accept funding from advertising or corporate sponsors.  We rely on donors like you to do our work.

ZNetwork: Left News, Analysis, Vision & Strategy

This is your article this month.

We’re glad you keep coming back. If Z’s work has informed, challenged, or inspired you, that’s no accident: there are no paywalls, no ads, and no billionaire owners here, and there never will be. Independent media survives because readers choose to support it.

Billionaires fund their own media. We fund ours. Help us reach 1,000 sustaining donors:

Number of donors682
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Already a sustainer? Click here and we won’t ask again. Thank you!

Your reading count is stored only in your browser and is never sent to us.

Sound is muted by default.  Tap 🔊 for the full experience

CRITICAL ACTION

Critical Action is a longtime friend of Z and a music and storytelling project grounded in liberation, solidarity, and resistance to authoritarian power. Through music, narrative, and multimedia, the project engages the same political realities and movement traditions that guide and motivate Z’s work.

If this project resonates with you, you can learn more about it and find ways to support the work using the link below.

Independent media is not disappearing because the ideas are weak.

It is disappearing because platforms reward speed, outrage, and algorithmic visibility over thoughtful analysis.

More than 100,000 people read Z every month, free of paywalls, ads, and billionaire owners. It takes fewer than 1 in 100 of them to fund all of it: 1,000 donors who keep Z independent, for everyone, and build what comes next.

Number of donors682
Our goal1,000

Sustainers at $9/month or more receive the digital Z Magazine.

Subscribe

Join the Z Community – receive event invites, announcements, a Weekly Digest, and opportunities to engage.

Exit mobile version