In considering how human rights might serve as a ?guiding value? in American foreign policy, one should not dismiss the historical record, which is ample. There is indeed a close relationship between human rights and American foreign policy. There is substantial evidence that American aid and diplomatic support increase as human rights violations increase, at least in the Third World. Extensive violations of human rights (torture, forced reduction of living standards for much of the population, police-sponsored death squads, destruction of representative institutions or of independent unions, etc.) are directly correlated with US government support. The linkage is not accidental; rather it is systematic. The reason is obvious enough. Client fascism often improves the business climate for American corporations, quite generally the guiding factor in foreign policy. It would be na‹ve indeed to think that this will change materially, given the realities of American social structure and the grip of the state ideological system.
Ní ṣíṣàgbéyẹ̀wò bí ẹ̀tọ́ ọmọnìyàn ṣe lè ṣiṣẹ́ gẹ́gẹ́ bí? ninu eto imulo ajeji ti Amẹrika, ọkan shou…
Noam Chomsky (ti a bi ni Oṣu kejila ọjọ 7, ọdun 1928, ni Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) jẹ onimo-ede Amẹrika kan, onimo ijinlẹ sayensi, onimọ-jinlẹ oye, arosọ itan, alariwisi awujọ, ati alakitiyan oloselu. Nigba miiran ti a npe ni "baba ti awọn linguistics ode oni", Chomsky tun jẹ eeyan pataki ninu imọ-jinlẹ itupalẹ ati ọkan ninu awọn oludasilẹ aaye ti imọ-jinlẹ oye. O jẹ Ọjọgbọn Laureate ti Linguistics ni University of Arizona ati Ile-ẹkọ Ọjọgbọn Emeritus ni Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), ati pe o jẹ onkọwe ti awọn iwe diẹ sii ju 150. O ti kọ ati kọ ẹkọ lọpọlọpọ lori imọ-ede, imọ-jinlẹ, itan ọgbọn, awọn ọran ode oni, ati ni pataki awọn ọran kariaye ati eto imulo ajeji AMẸRIKA. Chomsky ti jẹ onkọwe fun awọn iṣẹ akanṣe Z lati ibẹrẹ ibẹrẹ wọn, ati pe o jẹ alatilẹyin ailagbara fun awọn iṣẹ wa.