Njengoko ndicebise kwikholamu yam yangaphambili ("Ixesha elimnandi leKhohlo eIndiya", iZnet, Sept.,21,2008) iziganeko eWall Street zibonise ukuba yiyiphi imeko enqabileyo ukuba uNdunankulu waseNdiya, ngamazwi akhe, wahlala "likhoboka elibotshiweyo" kumaqela aKhohlo axhasayo de kwaba ngolunye usuku.
Ukuba ebenenkululeko engasikelwanga mda kwimiba yezoqoqosho, iIndiya ibiya kuzika namhlanje ngokukhawuleza kunenqanawa.
Ngokukwanjalo, hayi indlela ekwakulithamsanqa ngayo kumaKristu aseIndiya awayecinezelekile ukuba iNkulumbuso elungileyo ibe “nentloni” ngoxa yayihamba kumazwe angamaKristu kutshanje. Cinga ukuba eFransi, uSarkozy okhohlakeleyo wabiza isiphithiphithi saseKandhamal "njengembubhiso" ebusweni bakhe.
Ngaloo ndlela, ukodlula iintlungu zamaKristu aseOrissa, yayikukukhalinyelwa “kumfanekiso” waseIndiya okwabhaliswa ngamandla. Imeko ekwenza ucinge ukuba "ubuzwe" buhlala bungumcimbi womfanekiso kwaye incinci kangakanani na inkxalabo yokwenene yabantu abahlala esizweni.
Elo "hlazo" ubuncinci lizise izoyikiso ezibambekayo kurhulumente we-BJP/BJD e-Orissa emva kwengxolo yezopolitiko ephathelele ukutshiswa, ukudlwengulwa kunye nokubulawa apho. Ngaba iya kukhokelela ekugxothweni kukarhulumente ngokomgaqo-siseko, nangona kunjalo? Cinga kwakhona; unyulo luyikona kumazwe amaninzi. Kwaye, njengesiqhelo, uMgaqo-siseko kufuneka unike indlela kwiingcamango zezopolitiko. Khumbula ukuba uModi wavunyelwa ukuba aqhubeke ngaphandle kokubandakanyeka ngokupheleleyo kunye nokungqiniweyo korhulumente kwiibhula eGujarat ngo-2002.
Ukuthetha ngale nto, ilishwa elingakanani kumaSilamsi aseIndiya ukuba akukho lizwe lithe yatyelelwa yiNkulumbuso yaseIndiya okanye ekunokwenzeka ukuba alindwendwele kufuneka afune ukumenza iintloni malunga nokugqithisela okwenziwe kumaSilamsi aseIndiya. Into ebonisa ukungabi nakuzinceda okukhulu okuye kwaba yimeko yabo.
Ndicebise kwenye indawo ukuba uqhanqalazo lwelizwe kunye nokuzenzisa kweRiphabhlikhi yaseIndiya kuhlala kuliphepha-ncwadi kule minyaka yobukho beIndiya njengelizwe elizimeleyo ngenxa yokusilela kweqela leCongress ukwamkela ngokunyanisekileyo nangokungoyiki kwaye kunyanzeliswe Umgaqo weRiphabhlikhi yobumi.
Zonke iintetho zayo, nangona kunjalo, iNkongolo ihleli ithandabuza ukudlula ubuni behlelo lamaIndiya ngokwezopolitiko nakurhulumente.
Ukusukela kumhla wokuqala, izithethe zawo zonyulo zithande ukukhokelwa kuqwalaselo lweempawu zezentlalo zabagqatswa-njengalo naliphi na elinye iqela-kunye neenzame ezincinci ezenziweyo ukuguqula ucalucalulo olunikiweyo noluzuzwe njengelifa lopolitiko.
Kanye njengokuba iNkongolo ibandakanyiwe kunokuba ijongane nezenzo zoluntu kunye nolwakhiwo “ngombutho wenkululeko,” iye yazama ukubonelela endaweni yokufundisa ngaphandle kokubakho loo maphulo onyulo lweIndiya ezimeleyo.
Ayimangalisi into yokuba, oku kusilela kwezentlalo nobukrelekrele kuye kwenza iindlela zokunyanzeliswa komthetho kunye nee-arhente zophando zaseIndiya, ngokwenene zihlala amaziko omthetho, kumanqanaba asezantsi ngakumbi, asebenze ekufikeleleni ubugwenxa babantu “abancinci” kunye “nabambalwa” ngokwahlukeneyo. .
Cinga, umzekelo, ukuba isicelo sebheyile samatyala angaphantsi kwamatyala kumcimbi wokutshiswa kukaloliwe iGodhra ngo-2002 sitshixelwe phantsi kwePOTA (Prevention of Terrorism Act) engqongqo yaviwa yeyona nkundla iphakamileyo kulo mhlaba ngoFebruwari-Matshi ngalo mcimbi. unyaka, kodwa isigwebo sihlala simisiwe. Ngeli xesha, elinye ityala elingaphantsi, uHussein Mohammed Dhobi, oneminyaka engama-65 ubudala, ubhubhele apho eluvalelweni-ukubulawa kwesine kulo mbandela. Akukho nto ivele esidlangalaleni malunga nendlela ababanjwa ngayo.
Cinga kwakhona ukuba ngenye imini kuphela i-CNN-IBN/Hindustan Times kwilizwe lonke iPoll yatyhila ukuba i-87% yamaIndiya acinga ukuba amapolisa asekuhlaleni (funda ihlelo kwicala "labaninzi"). Kunye ne-Amnesty International ifumanise ukuba awona maziko anobuqhophololo eIndiya ngamaPolisa, abePolitiki, kunye neNkundla ePhantsi! Kutheni le nto u-Amnesty bekufanele ukuba khange ajonge kulawulo lwe-bureaucracy kunye necandelo leshishini, okanye afumane nto kukho into eyothusayo.
Ezi nyaniso zithathwe kunye zinceda ukucacisa ukuba kutheni le nto i-Congress party engadinwa kuku-tom-tomming indima yayo ekuqulunqeni i-rephabliki yedemokhrasi yelizwe lonke ayizange inike umnxeba wesizwe wonke wokuhlanganisa egameni lomgaqo welizwe. Into eyahluke kakhulu ekulungeni kwabantu baseTurkey ukuhlanganisana kwizigidi nanini na lo mgaqo ubonwa usemngciphekweni. Umntu ebenokucinga ukuba, ukufunda kwiGujarat, kwaye ungqine kumsindo “omkhulu” ngoku kubungqina belizwe emva korhulumente, ngoku iya kuba lixesha elifanelekileyo.
Kungoko xa intloko yendawo ye-Bajrang Dal e-Uttar Pradesh yenza isibhengezo esidlangalaleni sokuba injongo yobuchule yale ngalo yoyikekayo ye-RSS kukuguqula iRiphabliki yelizwe ibe “yiRashtra yamaHindu” (ilizwe lobuthixo lobuHindu; bona AmaHindu, NgoLwesine, ngo-Oktobha 2nd,’08) akukho tyala libonakalayo libonwa lilenziwe. Andithethi ngokungcatsha urhulumente njengoko kumiselwe ngumthetho.
Khawufane ucinge, kwelinye icala, umnxeba ovela kumbutho othile wamaSilamsi ukuba bathetha ukuguqula iIndiya ibe lilizwe lamaSilamsi. Kwimizuzwana nje embalwa, umbutho uya kuvalwa kwaye amalungu awo avalelwe "njengabanqolobi" bejehadi.
Inyani ekrwada kwaye ehlala ihleli yeyokuba iqela leCongress alizange liyifake ngaphakathi inyani ebulalayo yokuqonda ukuba uJawahar Lal Nehru, iNkulumbuso yokuqala yaseIndiya, wayivakalisa ukusukela ngo-1937.
Ebhala “kubuKomanisi bamaHindu namaSilamsi,” uNehru wayelumkisile ukuba nangona ubukomanisi “beqaqobana” buyinto eyiyo-ukumanyana kwamahlelo okuzikhusela—leyo “yoninzi” lwamaHindu ihlala izenza “ubuzwe. .” (Bona Nehru kubuKomanisi, ed. N.L.Gupta, epapashwe yiKomiti yeSampradayikta Virodhi, 1965, p.9). Kwaye, akufuneki ukuthetha, eli linyathelo elifutshane kwi-fascism.
Ngokuqinisekileyo yinyani erekhodiweyo ukuba ngaphakathi kobunkokheli beNkongolo yala maxesha, ngaphezulu kwembinana yayingengomalungu e-Hindu Mahasabha kuphela, kodwa babekholelwa entliziyweni ukuba ubuninzi babantu baseIndiya kwiinkulungwane, nangona kunjalo, iIndiya yayililizwe lamaHindu. .
Ukungena kwentsholongwane yoluntu ngaloo maxesha kufuneka kucebise into ethile yomgangatho wedabi lobukrelekrele, inkcubeko, kunye nezopolitiko uNehru kunye nabanye abambalwa ababandakanya iinkokeli zamaSilamsi (Abul Kalam Azad, Rafi Ahmed Kidwai, Saifuddin Kitchlu, Asaf Ali, ukubala nje abambalwa) kunye nemibutho (i-Jamiat-e-ulema-e-Hind) ibeke ngokuchasene nokungacacanga kwehlelo eliye zonakalisa zombini iindawo zoluntu ukuqinisekisa ukusekwa kweriphabliki yehlabathi.
Kufuneka kuqatshelwe ukuba ukungakhathali ngokwenkolo kwakuza kuchongwa liBhunga loMgaqo-siseko leNkundla ePhakamileyo yaseIndiya njengenye yeempawu “ezisisiseko” zoMgaqo-siseko ongalungisekiyo yipalamente.
Ngokwenene, kwincwadi enomdla enesihloko Iqhawe likaNehru, INkosi u-Meghnad Desai irekhoda indlela ngexesha le-Nehruvian ye-India eZimeleyo, ukugxininiswa kwe-Nehruvian kwi-progressive secularism kunye ne-social pluralism yayihlala ibonakala kwiimveliso ze-cinematic ze-Bombay Film Industry.
Le nkonzo yomlomo ityhafileyo kwinkonzo yobuzwe egameni leqela leCongress emva kokufa kukaNehru ngo-1964 kuthetha ukuba umlo wayo ochasene ne-RSS ye-fascist kunye nemibutho yayo ephambili ye-hydra ibisoloko injalo-intliziyo etyhafileyo, uqhanqalazo lweproforma, ngaphandle kwayo nayiphi na ingcamango engqongqo okanye intando yezopolitiko ukujongana nayo mhlawumbi ngokufundisa abantu abaninzi kunye nokugaya, okanye nayiphi na imisebenzi enzima yezixhobo zombuso, nangona oko kuyalelwe nguMgaqo-siseko.
Iipolitiki zeNkongolo ukuza kuthi ga kulo mhla zicebisa ukuba nangona ingagxeka i-RSS/BJP yokuphembelela udushe lwamahlelo kuza ixesha lonyulo (iKomishini emva kweKomishoni ukusukela ngo-1947 ifumene i-RSS ibandakanyeka kuqhushululu loluntu), iCongress nangona kunjalo isasazi amaHindu. njengebhanki yokuvota njengeBJP.
Yintoni enokucacisa inyani yokuba akukho nzame zikhe zaqalwa, singatsho ukuba zenziwe, ngumbutho weCongress, ukuhoxisa okanye ukuguqula ucalucalulo lwamapolisa aseIndiya?
Okanye into yokuba le mikhosi kunye ne-concomitant investigative/intelligence agencies kuze kube namhlanje isondele kumelo olungahoywayo lwamaSilamsi, ngakumbi kumanqanaba aphezulu okuthatha izigqibo?
Okanye inyani yokuba imiceli mngeni kurhulumente evela nokuba ngabashicileli basekhohlo okanye amaSilamsi abizwa ngokuba "bubugrogrisi" ngelixa imiceli mngeni enjalo xa ivela kwilungelo lamaHindu ithathwa njengesiphithiphithi "sobuzwe", kwaye ibizwa ngokuba yintloko engalunganga kakhulu. ?
Okanye inyani yokuba ngelixa amaIndiya angamaSilamsi emangalelwe kubundlobongela kunye nomsebenzi "ochasene nesizwe" kujongwane nawo ngokukhawuleza ngokwaneleyo, amatyala, xa eqalisiwe konke konke, elindele ukuba abaphangi abakhulu bamaHindu abonakale efikelela nakwesiphi na isigqibo? Okanye ukuba amagosa asebupoliseni kumanqanaba aphezulu afunyenwe ebandakanyeka kwi-pogroms ngokuchasene "nabancinci" banokunqunyanyiswa okwethutyana, kodwa ekugqibeleni ababuyiselwa nje kuphela kodwa banyuswe ngokunjalo? Imeko apha ifunyenwe kwiKhomishoni yaseSrikrishna kwiingxabano zoluntu zaseBombay, i-1992-93; amagosa atyholwa yiKomishoni alungile kwaye akhona kwaye akhuthazwa phantsi kwe-egis yorhulumente okhokelwa yiCongress eMaharashtra. Andithethi ngeGujarat.
Ngokuwohloka okunyukayo kwamandla enkululeko yaseIndiya yenkululeko, yabantu abaninzi, elinganayo ethe yazisa umzabalazo wokuchasana nobukoloniyali, kunye nokudityaniswa kweqela elitsha labaphezulu basezidolophini baseIndiya kwisiseko sentengiso elandela i-Washington Consensus-iNkongolo ubukhulu becala inoxanduva kuzo zombini ezi meko— Ubuzwe baseIndiya behlabathi bagxothwa ngumntu osekwe ekubambeleleni kuhlanga kunye nenkolo (Jonga iVijay Prashad, Izizwe eziMnyama: I-Biography yeHlabathi leSithathu lexesha elifutshane, Ushicilelo lweLeftword, eDelhi, ngo-2008 ukuze kuboniswe ngokucacileyo olu tshintsho). Emva kokuchithwa kolwaphulo-mthetho kwi-mosque yaseBabri ngo-1992 ngamaqela e-fascist e-VHP, i-pogrom apho iinkokeli ezaziwa kakhulu ze-BJP zazithatha inxaxheba ngokubonakalayo, "ubuzwe benkcubeko" yaba sisiqubulo esitsha se-right-wing yamaHindu.
Iyilelwe ukuguqula ingcaciso yegama elithi “isizwe”, olu didi “lobuzwe” lwalulungiselelwe ngokulinganayo ukugcina ubukhosi bamaHindu aphezulu ngaphezu kwendimbane yamaHindu ecinezelekileyo, kuthintelwa ukuba nokwenzeka kokumanyana kwabo kulo naliphi na elinye iqonga lentlalontle. kunye nokuxhatshazwa kwezoqoqosho.
Kufuneka iqondwe into yokuba eyona nto iwacaphukisayo amaHindu akudidi oluphezulu “ngoguquko” sisindululo sokuba olo dluliselo lwentembeko luphuma kwingcinezelo ecekisekayo yodidi oluphezulu kunye nezohlwayo zabo zonqulo kubuHindu. Kwaye ubuKristu bufanele bujongwe ngabaDalits kunye neeTribals njengokubonelela ngovimba wobukho apho imodicum yokulingana kwezentlalo kunye neendlela zemfundo kunye nokhathalelo lwezonyango lufumanekayo.
Umnqamlezo wodidi oluphezulu lwamaHindu nxamnye “nokuguqulwa’ awunanto yakwenza nobuHindu ngokobuqu; inento yokwenza nokuqinisekisa ukongamela kwezentlalo kunye nokuphendula ukukhalinyelwa okwenziwa xa kukhethwa enye inkolo njengokhetho lobomi.
Ngokwenene, ukuba lo mkhosi womnqamlezo ubunokubandakanya nakuphi na ukuzihlola, ishishini liphela belinokusonjululwa yi-RSS ngokukhupha ifatwa ngokuchasene nenkqubo yocalucalulo, kwaye ibhengeze ukuba amaHindu azo zonke iindidi ukususela ngoku aya kunandipha amalungelo alinganayo ezentlalo nawenkolo. Ayizukwenzeka.
Kwaye ayiyonto ngaphandle kokuziphatha okulusizi ukucinga ukuba abahlaseli ngokuchasene “noguqulo” bakholelwa ngokwenyani ukuba uguquko olukhulu lwabantu lusemnyango. Nditsho neRSS iyazi ukuba ubalo luka-2001 lubonise ukuhla nge-0.6% kuluntu luphela lwamaKristu aseIndiya!
Ke ziphi ezi zihlwele zabaguqukileyo? Ukuza kuthi ga kulo mhla akukho nanye imeko yoguquko ngokuhenda eye yabonakaliswa eneneni. Ukuba kukho nantoni na, ubungqina "bokuguqulwa kwakhona" kubuHindu ngamandla ezisoyikiso ezibuhlungu ebomini kunye nemilenze buye bavakaliswa esidlangalaleni ngamaKristu asePana anelishwa eKandhamal kwiitshaneli ze-elektroniki zaseIndiya. Khumbula kwakhona ukuba "ukuguqulwa" okunjalo kwindawo yokuqala kuyimpazamo. Ngaloo ndlela izizwe “ezibuyiselweyo” azizange zibe ngamaHindu kwasekuqaleni; bebesoloko bezibiza ngokuba “ngama-Animists.” Kwaye akukaze kucaciswe ukuba ngaba “baguquleli” bamele ukuba ngabaluphi na udidi emva kokuba benziwe amaHindu.
Nangona uluntu luqhayisa ngentloko ye-Bajrang Dal e-Karnataka ukuba uye wanoxanduva lokulwa nobuKristu apho, okanye yenye inkokeli yendawo ye-BD e-Uttar Pradesh ukuba indoda eyafa ngelixa isenza ibhombu eKanpur yayiyi-BD. indoda, okanye isiqingatha seshumi elinesibini okanye ngaphezulu amatyala aqinisekisiweyo okwenziwa kwebhombu ngamaqela e-BD, i-Dal ivakalisa ngokuvakalayo ukuba de iinkundla zibafumane benetyala ukuba nabani na angaphakamisa umnwe kubo. Hayi nakwabo baye badlwengula nokubulala esidlangalaleni.
Loo ngxabano egameni "lenkqubo efanelekileyo" nangona kunjalo, sixelelwa, ayisebenzi kumaSilamsi okanye kumaKristu.
Ngokomzekelo, phezu kwako nje ukuvunywa esidlangalaleni kwamaMaoist “kumazwe amabi” aseOrissa okuba ngawo abulala uSwami Laxmanananda, iBajrang Dal iye yagqiba ukususela ngomhla wokuqala ukuba amaKristu angababulali beSwamy.
Ewe, ngamanye amaxesha kwimbali yamva nje iSangh Parivar ithathe ngokuvakalayo indawo yokuba izinto zokholo azikho phantsi kovavanyo okanye ukuzimisela.
Oku kwakuza kufika ngokukhawuleza kakhulu ngexesha lokudilizwa kwe-mosque yaseBabri. Nditsho nomntu onqwenela ukuba yiNkulumbuso ye-BJP uhlala ebhengeza ukuba iinkundla azinakuthatha sigqibo ngengxabano ye-Ayodhya kuba ingumcimbi wokholo. Ukuba inokuba yinto yokholo macala omabini ibizwa nje ngokuba “yimpikiswano echasene nesizwe” eyenzelwe ukukholisa amaSilamsi.
Ngokufanayo malunga nomba weRam Sethu ukuya emazantsi, apho iSangh ithatha indawo yokuba, njengoko, ubungqina obucacileyo-kunye nobungqina benzululwazi / bezinto zakudala buyagwetyelwa-ithuthuthu (ibhulorho ka-Adam ngamaxesha aseBritani) yakhiwa nguNkosi uRam ukuwela ukuya eSri Lanka. ukulwa neRavana, akukho sigqibo sehlabathi, senzululwazi, okanye esisemthethweni esinokwenziwa ngalo mbandela. Ilungelo elinjalo, akuyomfuneko ukuthetha, nangona kunjalo, alifumaneki “kubantu abambalwa.”
Isiqendu samva nje kwikhondo "lobuzwe benkcubeko" (ngokuxanduva ngakumbi, ubuhlanga kunye nobuFasi bezenkolo) seso sichaphazela "ukudibana" kwangoku nje kwabafundi abancinci abangamaSilamsi beyunivesithi yaseJamia Milia Islamia-iziko elibuyela eGandhi. kunye neAzad, kwaye yonke loo nto ibisebenza njengophawu lwehlabathi kwiziko lemfundo yaseIndiya.
Ngaphandle kwemingxunya egqobhokileyo kwibali lamapolisa malunga nesiganeko ngabalwela amalungelo oluntu ababandakanya ezinye zezona zikhanyiso ezisemthethweni zelizwe-ukuba amapolisa ayazi ukuba "ngabanqolobi" kutheni ingekho indawo ejikelezwe ngaphandle, kwaye “abanqolobi” bacel’ umngeni, okanye banyanzelwe ngaphandle ngokuphosa zonke iigesi ezisetyenziswa kwiimeko ezinjalo, kwakutheni ukuze ipolisa elibhubhileyo linganxibanga ivesti yokuthintela iimbumbulu? Kwaye ukuba amapolisa ebengazi ukuba ngokwenene "ngabanqolobi" baye bafumanisa njani ngokubabulala ngaphandle kokuncinwa okanye uphando? Ukuba “babengabanqolobi” kwakutheni ukuze banike ingxelo kwifomu yamapolisa esemthethweni, bagximfizwe ngokufanelekileyo, zonke iinkcukacha ezichanekileyo zokuzazisa xa berenta indlu? Kutheni kungakhange kufunyanwe zimbumbulu ezibulele ipolisa ngokuphandle? Kwakutheni ukuze, njengoko ingxelo yophando lwenzululwazi isitsho, kungekho zimpawu zokruthakruthwano, kwaye kwakutheni ukuze kufumaneke amanxeba eembumbulu angama-21 kunye ne-17 kwimizimba yabafundi abancinci ababuleweyo? Ukuba “abanqolobi” ababini baqhweshile, njengoko amapolisa esitsho, baye phi yaye babalekile njani, ekubeni kwakukho indlela enye yokuphuma nokungena eBatla House? “ubugrogrisi” kunye nokuthoba isidima samapolisa. Inene, omnye umfana oseluvalelweni ngoku wayezibhala iimviwo zakhe ngexesha lesehlo. Waleqa kwi-ofisi yesikhululo sikamabonwakude ukuya kuxela esi sehlo, kwaye wathathwa kwangoko kwi-ofisi yejelo njengokuba wayebandakanyeka kweli yelenqe.
Emva kokubanjwa, yonke imigaqo eyamiselwa yinkundla ephakamileyo kumbandela wamalungelo abatyholwa abaseluvalelweni yatyeshelwa ngamandla. Kwaye olo lungiso kwafuneka lufunyanwe ligqwetha lamalungelo oluntu elivela enkundleni njengemiyalelo ecacileyo eya kwabasemagunyeni abachaphazelekayo.
Akukho mntu waziyo enoba aba bantu baselula banetyala okanye bamsulwa; kodwa ngokuqinisekileyo akukho mntu unelungelo lokunxiba “inkqubo efanelekileyo” aze ababhengeze benetyala, ngamandla okumanywa kwenkolo kuphela.
Ke iSekela-Chancellor ye-Jamia Milia, umbhali-mbali odumileyo kunye nendoda eneziqinisekiso zehlabathi ezigqibeleleyo (owayeneminyaka embalwa edlulileyo ekwisiphelo sokwamkelwa kwamaSilamsi kwaye kwafuneka ayishiye iyunivesiti), oye wema ecaleni abafundi, abanikela ngoncedo lwasemthethweni kubo kwiimali eziqokelelwe ngokuzithandela ukulungiselela loo njongo, ngokufanayo babhengezwa njengomkhuseli “wabanqolobi.” Ungaze ucinge ukuba inqaku lama-39 loMgaqo-siseko waseIndiya liyalela ukuba uncedo lwezomthetho luya kubonelelwa kuye nawuphi na umntu ovalelweyo kulo naluphi na ulwaphulo-mthetho. Ungakhathali nokuba yayiyi-VHP eyayibonelela ngeenkonzo ezinjalo kumntu wabo, uDara Singh, kwakhona e-Orissa, owatyholwa ngokutshisa ephila umvangeli wasemazweni, uGraham Steins nabantwana bakhe ababini, waza emva koko wagwetywa ubomi entolongweni.
Ngandlel' ithile, yonke ingxabano malunga nokungakhuliswa komnwe-ukuze kungqinwe-unetyala ayenzelwanga ukuba isebenze kuye nabani na ongenguye oweSangh Parivar.
Kufuneka kukhunjulwe ukuba kwiminyaka yakutshanje inani labantu abamangalelwe “njengabanqolobi” baze bakhululwe ziinkundla njengoko inyambalala yabantu abamsulwa. Naxa imithetho ye-TADA kunye ne-POTA engqongqo yayikhona, izinga lokugwetywa alizange ligqithe i-2% yamanqaku! Kananjalo kulo mba akukho amava awahlukileyo kwihlabathi liphela.
Ngokuchasene noko, iintliziyo ezinesibindi ezibulala abarhanelwa "kwiintlanganiso" ezineshumi elinesibini kufuneka zithathwe njengabasindisi kunye namaqhawe. Ukuba abanye abantu abadumileyo-uDaya Nayak, uPradeep Sharma, uRajbir njl.,-baye bafunyanwa beqeshwe ngamaqela eenjubaqa zabakhi kwaye babulala abantu abanyulelwe iimali ezinkulu, kwaye babagqithisa njengabanqolobi isikhundla “sobuzwe”.
Eyona ngozi inkulu kwimisebenzi yoMgaqo-siseko neyokuthobela umthetho karhulumente kunye nee-arhente zakhe ivela ngokwenene kulwamkelo olukhawulezileyo lokuba esi sikhundla “sobuzwe” siphuma kwiiklasi ezingento yanto, nakumajelo omabonakude ambalwa ngokunjalo.
Ukuba “ngelizwe lehlabathi” sithetha yonke indibano yemisebenzi ekufuneka isekelwe kubumi obungengabo abehlelo, ukulingana phambi komthetho, iinkqubo zophando ezinobulungisa, kunye nenkcubeko ebonakalisiweyo yolawulo neyomthetho engakhathaleli ukunxulumana nenkolo, kunye i-backup ye-public kunye ne-media engavumiyo ukuthatha izinto ngokholo kwaye ayifuni ukubuza imibuzo enzima, i-Indiya inokuba lilizwe elisilela ngokukhawuleza.
Yingxaki edityaniswe kakhulu kukungakwazi kweNxele elilungelelanisiweyo ukwenza nantoni na engaphaya kokwenza ingxolo elungileyo, kuphoswe uqhanqalazo lweproforma.
Naliphi na ilinge elidityanisiweyo lokuhlanganisa abantu abaninzi behlabathi libonakala ngokungabikho kwayo. Oko kushiya kuphela abagcini bezazela phakathi kwemibutho yoluntu ukulwa lo mngcipheko. Enyanisweni, kumaxesha akutshanje, abantu abafana neTeesta Setalvad, iPrashant Bhushan, iShabnam Hashmi, kunye nemiphefumlo ekhethiweyo esebenza nabo baye bathwala umthwalo ngokufanelekileyo welizwe kunye norhulumente welo xesha.
Umbuzo obalulekileyo ngulo: ixesha elingakanani?
I-ZNetwork ixhaswa ngemali kuphela ngesisa sabafundi bayo.
Nikela