Looking Forward. By Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel

 Go to Table of Contents

 

  8. Consumption Planning

 

"Larry knows that if he requests a lot of goods that require work at below average job complexes, he is implicitly changing the societal average work complex and his own labor require­ ments. Self interest and collective solidarity argue against such a request unless he thinks the benefits of consuming the good in question are worth the extra drudgery."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"People of course have different needs and tastes. But the value of Larry's consumption bundle calculated according to the lFB-generated indicative prices and adjusted for MLK s above-average collective consumption request and his individual status as a borrower against past savings, implicitly expresses what he thinks a reasonable average consumption bundle is for all members of society."

 




 

 

Determining Personal Consumption Proposals

 

Since neighborhood collective consumption mirrors the logic of county collective consumption, we move to personal consumption requests. To develop a personal consumption plan, Larry consults the lFB's estimates of indicative prices, assessments for collective consumption for members of his neighborhood, average personal consumption estimates, and settles on a "borrower/loaner" status.

 

To simplify, similar products of comparable quality are grouped together so Larry needs to express preferences for socks, but not for colors or type of socks; for soda, books, and bicycles, but not for flavors, titles, or styles of each. Statistical studies enable facilitation boards to break down total requests for generic types of goods by the percent who will want different types of records, books, or bicycles. There will no longer be competing brands of each product, only "product industries" creating diverse styles and qualities of goods for different purposes,

 

Larry has under-consumed relative to his allowance in the past two years and has decided to even up the balance a bit this year. On the other hand, his county, MLK, has requested a higher than average county collective consumption bundle, some of which is being borrowed, but some of which will be "paid for" in the present by reducing consumption of MLK residents this year.

 

Larry knows there is no point being too modest in his initial proposal-the iteration process will compel him to lower his final request as necessary. But he doesn't want to make requests that are outrageously immodest since that would only lengthen the bargaining process and do little to increase his final consumption.

 

Larry also knows his selections have social implications. It is not that his choice of a particular kind of food or clothing implies that everyone else should get the same amount of that product. People of course have different needs and tastes. But the value of Larry's consumption bundle calculated according to the IFB-generated indicative prices and adjusted for MLK's above-average collective consumption request and his individual status as a borrower against past savings, implicitly expresses what he thinks a reasonable average consumption bundle is for all members of society. It would be pointless for Larry to suggest a value too far in excess of what the lFB has anticipated, unless he thinks it has made a gross underestimation.

So Larry takes his turn at a computer terminal to try out various combinations of different goods, checking on the total value of his proposed bundle. The computer contains anticipated averages, indicative prices, and so on, as well as descriptions of the products and of the work that goes into their creation. This latter information helps Larry assess whether rote or dangerous methods must be employed to produce the goods he wants.

 

Larry knows that if he requests a lot of goods that require work at below-average job complexes, he is implicitly changing the societal average work complex and his own labor requirements. Self interest and collective solidarity argue against such a request unless he thinks the benefits of consuming the good in question are worth the extra drudgery. In any event, detailed information about the production of goods only requires punching a few keys at the terminal.

 

As Larry completes his first proposal, so do other consumers, and all are submitted to the societal planning data bank where they are summed and processed by lFBs. New summaries are presented including updated projections of anticipated indicative prices, average consumption, and the current status of each good. (We discuss how these new estimates are prepared by lFBs in the next chapter.) Data banks also include summary documentation from each workplace and neighborhood describing the logic of their choices to this point in the process.