Xigasho: Marketwatch
Peru hadda waxay wajaheysaa dhibaato halis ah kadib doorashadii madaxtinimo ee 6-da Juun taasoo la mid ah tii aan ku haysanay Mareykanka bishii Nofembar. Musharaxa laga guuleystay ee Keiko Fujimori ayaa diiday inuu aqbalo natiijada. Sida Trump, waxay ku andacoonaysaa iyada oo aan caddayn in doorashada la xaday.
Keiko Fujimori waa gabadha uu dhalay kaligii taliyihii hore ee Alberto Fujimori; Waxay ka mid ahayd maamulkiisa, waxayna ballan qaaday inay xabsiga ka xorayn doonto haddii la doorto. Waxaa lagu xukumay doorkiisa xadgudubyada xun ee xuquuqda aadanaha, oo ay ku jiraan dilal siyaasadeed iyo afduubyo, iyo sidoo kale musuqmaasuq. Keiko Fujimori ayaa hadda wajahaya musuqmaasuq xamuulka oo ay ku jiraan dembiyada abaabulan, lacag-dhaqidda, iyo carqaladaynta caddaaladda.
Wax sal ah malaha eedeymaha
Maamulka doorashada Peru, goobjoogayaasha doorashada caalamiga iyo kuwa qaranka, iyo khubaro kale heshiiyaan in aysan jirin wax aasaas u ah eedeymaha Keiko Fujimori ee khiyaanada, iyo in caqabadaha ay ku leedahay tirinta codadka aysan bedeli karin natiijada. Laakin—sida Trump iyo taageerayaashiisa ee kacdoonkii Jan. 6—iyadu kama quusanayso. Waxayna haysataa inta badan warbaahinta Peru, oo ay ku jiraan wararka TV-ga, oo taageeraya iyada. Boqolaal saraakiil ciidan ah oo shaqada ka fadhiistay ayaa hore u joogay loo yaqaan afgambi haddii qofka ka soo horjeeda, Pedro Castillo, oo ah macalin dugsi miyiga bidix, loo xaqiijiyo inuu yahay madaxweyne.
Her u dambeeyay Guuri, oo hadda dhacaya, waa in la isku dayo in lagu qanciyo madaxweynaha hadda ee Peru, Francisco Sagasti, inuu ku martiqaado Ururka Dawladaha Maraykanka (OAS) si uu u qabto "hantida" doorashada. Tani waa tallaabo halis ah, sida kuwa raacay taariikhda dhow ee OAS, gaar ahaan inta uu joogo Xoghayaha Guud ee hadda Luis Almagro, ay ka warqabaan.
Oktoobar 2019, OAS waxay ciyaartay door muhiim ah doorka taasoo meesha ka saartay natiijadii doorashadii madaxtinimo ee dimuqraadiga ahayd ee ka dhacday Bolivia, taasoo uu ku guulaystay madaxwaynaha talada haya ee Evo Morales, oo ah madaxweynihii ugu horeeyay ee asal ahaan ka soo jeeda dalka oo leh boqolkiiba ugu badan ee dadka asaliga ah ee Ameerika. OAS, oo goobjoogeyaal u soo dirtay doorashada, ayaa soo saartay a qoraal maalintii xigtay isagoo muujinaya "walaac qoto dheer iyo la yaab leh oo ku saabsan isbeddelka ba'an oo ay adag tahay in la sharaxo ee isbeddelka natiijooyinka hordhaca ah ka dib xiritaanka doorashada."
Afgambigii uu Trump taageeray ee Bolivia
Laakiin ma jirin wax caynkaas ah, iyo sida New York Times goor dambe Warbixin, Bayaanka OAS "qallafsan" wuxuu xoojiyey shakiga ku saabsan caddaaladda codbixinta waxayna sii hurisay silsilad dhacdooyin ah oo beddelay taariikhda qaranka Koonfurta Ameerika." Tani waxa ay tilmaamaysaa afgambigii milatari ee uu Trump taageeray ee ku beddelay dawladdii Morales mid laba geesatay xasuuq ee dadka asaliga ah toddobaad gudihiis markay xukunka la wareegeen.
Way fududahay in la muujiyo in eedeymaha OAS ay been yihiin, tanna waa la sameeyay isla markaaba. Ma jirin "isbeddel adag ama adag in lagu sharaxo isbeddelka" ee tirinta codadka hordhaca ah, sida sarkaalka sare ee doorashada OAS uu lahaa qiree si gaar ah maalin uun ka dib. Waxaas oo dhan dhacay codadkaas ayaa ahaa sidaana markii dambana waxa ay ka yimaaddeen degaano ay madaxweynaha iyo xisbigiisaba u xaglinayeen. Ifafaalahan — kala duwanaanshiyaha siyaasadeed ee u dhexeeya meelaha wax soo sheega waqtiyo kala duwan, sida; miyiga iyo magaalada, ama ka saboolka ah iyo kuwa dakhligoodu sarreeyo-ba waa yaqaan qof kasta oo arkay doorashada soo laabashada ee TV-ga.
Xaqiiqda ah in OAS-ay taageerto maamulka Trump-waxay soo saareen dhowr bayaan iyo warbixinno ku saabsan doorashada Bolivia iyada oo aan waligood ka hadlin sharraxaaddan cad waxay muujinaysaa in hadaladooda beenta ah ee soo noqnoqda aysan ahayn khaladaad farsamo laakiin been ula kac ah.
Xubnaha Congress-ka Maraykanka, oo bixiya inta badan maalgelinta OAS, ayaa marar badan kor u qaaday kuwaas su'aalo sax ah oo ay la socdeen saraakiisha OAS - oo ay ku jiraan Almagro - in ka badan hal sano iyo badh. Ma aysan helin jawaabo la taaban karo, wayna heleen dalbaday baaritaan. Waxay u badan tahay, inay ugu dambeyntii heli doonaan mid.
Dhanka kale, Peru ma awoodo inay bixiso OAS "audit" sida kii ay u sameeyeen Bolivia 2019-kaas oo sidoo kale ahaa mid si fiican laga boodo.
Xeeladaha dib u dhig
Maamulka doorashada Peru ayaa go'aamiyay in Pedro Castillo uu helay 44,000 codad ka badan kan Keiko Fujimori. Si kastaba ha ahaatee weli kuma ay dhawaaqin inuu yahay madaxweynaha la doortay, iyadoo la sugayo xalinta caqabadaha Keiko Fujimori ee natiijada doorashada.
Tani waa dhibaato halis ah, sababtoo ah waqti dheer oo ay sugaan, Fujimori ayaa helaya waqti badan - iyadoo la kaashanayo inta badan warbaahinta - si ay u abuurto shaki ku saabsan sharcinimada doorashada iyo in la raaco xeelado kala duwan, oo ay ku jiraan afgambi militari, si loo afgembiyo. . Mid ka mid ah xeeladaha xaqa ayaa ah in dib loo dhigo ku dhawaaqista rasmiga ah ee madaxweynaha la doortay ee July 28, markaasoo la filayo in madaxweynaha cusub uu xilka la wareego. Haddii ay sidaas tahay, madaxweynaha Koongareeska waxa uu isku dayi karaa in uu xafiiska la wareego - kordhinta suurtagalnimada fowdo iyo xasillooni darro dheeraad ah.
Maamulka doorashada ayaa qiimeynaya rafcaannada Fujimori. Laakiin sida cad tani ma sii socon karto ilaa xad.
Dhanka OAS, Ergada Kormeerka Doorashada ee Peru ee doorashadan ayaa ilaa hadda ku heshiiyey maamulka doorashada Peru in doorashadu ahayd mid nadiif ah. Aynu sidaa ku hayno.
Mark Weisbrot waa la- agaasime ka ah Xarunta Cilmi-baarista Dhaqaalaha iyo Siyaasadda Washington, D.C. Isagu sidoo kale waa qoraaga "Fashilmay: Maxay 'Khubaradu' Ka Khaldameen Dhaqaalaha Adduunka” (Jaamacadda Oxford).
ZNetwork waxa lagu maalgeliyaa oo keliya deeqsinimada akhristeyaasheeda.
Nalasoo
1 Comment
Faallooyinka Mark iyo maqaalka uu qoray Scott Ritter ee ku saabsan gudbinta Sec hore. Difaaca Rumsfeld waxa uu muujinayaa sida ay u marin habaabiyeen inta badan xogta ay tahay in aan akhrino ama maqalno wax ku saabsan hoggaamiyeyaasha siyaasadda. Labadan falanqeeye waxay caddeeyaan sida hoggaamiyeyaashu uga been sheegaan arrimaha nolosha iyo dhimashada ee saameeya tiro badan oo dad ah, dhammaan quruumaha. Nasiib darro waxaan “celcelis ahaan” dadka raadiya in la wargeliyo guud ahaan waxay ogaanayaan beenta sanado ka dib, ma aha markii ay dhacday.