Novembres et V Res e gente offensa est. Media blame it on the "Bradley effect": Americans supposedly turned into Klansmen inside the voting booth, and Barack Obama turned up with 6 million votes less than calculated from the exit polls.
Id est visio nocturna. Hic res frigida est.
Swing state
Swing state
Swing state
Swing state
Atque ita deinceps per adductas Civitates a Secretariis Status Reipublicae moderatis.
Turpis Secret
Hic est parum deforme secretum de democratia Americana: suffragia non omnia numeramus. Anno 2004, innixa ex notitiis Commissionis adsistentiae ab US electionibus, suffragia 3,006,080 non sunt numerata: "spoliatum", non legi nequeunt suffragia; suffragia provisoria reprobata; mail-in schedulis reprobus efficiar.
Hoc Martis, hoc pejor erit. Tanto nequior.
Hoc illud inveni, dum iter nationis per annum proxime ad BBC televisificam et ad Rolling Stone Magazine laborantes suffragandi iura attornato Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Hoc praestamus: longe plura suffragia per noctem Martis quam tres miliones perierunt. anno 2004. Suffragium sex decies centena millia, satis probabile, variat 4 centesimas schedulae, intra marginem erroris capitum artissimorum.
Incipe hac statistica dura: ex proximis comitiis plus decem miliones suffragiorum ex registris suffragio nationis purgati sunt. Et furtum mox initium.
Si noncount fortuitus esset, non refert. Sed non temere est. A US CIVILIS IURIS CIVILIS Commissio analysis ostendit casum suffragii nigri "spoliationis" vel blank esse 900 percent altior quam candida suffragii.
Estne istuc subreptum electionis et debes suffragii oblivisci et mox quadriennium cubitum ire? Numquam. Significat suffragium et suffragium sapis, disce quomodo scrutinium tuum scrutinium manus tuas spurcas rimari (non est in fine nexus).
Quam electionem furari in quinque Securus Steps?
Ecce quomodo furtum detrahere possunt. Computum tuum tolle et adde eum.
Gradus unus: "Dumpster" Suffragium - Expurgate suffragii, Provisionales Ballots
Decem miliones suffragiorum purgati sunt? Quid hic infernum geritur? Cur decies centena millia ex rotulis suffragatoris auferimus?
The answer is the GOP’s secret weapon, the Help America Vote Act, signed by George Bush in 2002. When Bush tells us he’s going to help us vote, look out. But Democrats didn’t. They signed on to the GOP bill, believing this "reform" law would prevent "another
Here’s how: Help America Vote empowered secretaries of state to remove fraudulent and suspicious voters from the voter registries. It was the trick used by Katherine Harris in
Tollite
For BBC TV and Rolling Stone, I asked the current Colorado Secretary of State Mike Coffman, "Why all the purging?" No answer, not a word, stonewalled even when I flew into
So, where are the Democrats? That’s the really scary part. I spoke with Paul Hultin, appointed by
Well, don’t worry. Hultin’s official committee will be holding hearings on the voting debacle in
Tunc illic '
Societas et status purgationem "algorithmorum" eligunt illae formulae mathematicae quae, secundum quomodo eas tweak, per suffragium volvunt sicut ferrum calidum per caseum cremorem.
Ita, quid fit suffragii purgati? Nunc ad scrutinium cum ad suffragium perveniunt vel, si clamorem trahunt, "provisionales" sortiuntur in quibus suffragium simulare possunt.
Now, here are the facts about provisionals: they don’t get counted. And there are lots of them. The great unreported story of the 2004 election was that there were more than three million voters shunted to provisional ballots. Over a million (1,090,000) were never counted, just chucked in the dumpster. That’s what caused Kerry to lose
Quicquid te retinet ab acquirendo reali scrutinio — nomen purgatum, verbi gratia — retinet te tam provisorie computatum. Id quod Democratae ius cuiusque suffragii obtinuerat ut schedulam provisoriam obtineret, non tamen ius habendi schedulae numerandae sunt. Et quam multi numerentur? 1.1 decies centena millia damna in 2004 - non solum propter purgationem-maniae GOP, sed propter codicillos vitiosos in Auxilio Americae Suffragium, quod in effectum venit ab ultima electione ...
Gradus Duo: "Verificationis" (et Eliminatio) Novi suffragii
Primum in
So, the Republican game plan is simple: don’t let new voters vote. There are three steps to this block-and-steal tactic. First, under the new law, states can deny new voters registration on the grounds their names can’t be verified against government data files. Sounds reasonable, but it’s not, because we don’t have Soviet-style citizenship files in the
New voter verification losses are huge. In
It used to be that you filled out a registration card and, bingo, you were registered. Not any more. That’s also what happened in
Gradus Tres: Novae ID Leges
Karl Rove dixit, "Ideo ad macello et volo pecuniam pro mea groceria perscriptio solvere pro tantillo ID. Redditus est mihi ostendere. Cur non sit rationabilis ... in suffragii loco eos probare quis possit. sunt, ostendens id aliqua forma. " Itaque, dum Pampers suos emisset, Rove cum luso GOP accessit.
Karl, let me answer your question. The reason, according to several studies by the Bush administration itself, is that lots of folks don’t have government ID. Some are nuns, some are poor, lots are brown or old. I was on Fox TV with Lady Rothschild a couple of weeks ago. The lady, a McCain supporter, approved of the ID requirement – and was truly surprised to find out that some poorer Americans don’t have passports. "Why don’t they?" her Fox-mates asked, incredulous. Well, not every barrio kid has just returned from his estate outside
Rove knows that. He certainly knows that, for example, Professor Matthew Barreto of the
Gradus quattuor: Vastatio Ballots
Tuus chad suspensus est. Tactus velamentum non placet tactui tuo. Vel, schedula tua schedulam illam habuit notam extra notam, quae machinam tuam schedulam exspueret, sicut cervisiam diuturnam cum cigarette innatans.
In proximis comitiis, 1,389,231 schedulae erant, "spoliatae" sunt, quia machinae eas amiserunt, eas legere non potuerunt, eas laceraverunt vel simpliciter non subscripserunt. Sed non temere est, non sagittis velit. In Novo Mexico anno 2004 inveni 89 centesimas schedulae blank et spoliatae in minoritate clausuras missas esse, summam schedulae infinitae per marginem in eo statu "victoriam" republicanam.
Aliud studium ostendit sexies electiones suffragii Hispanici esse quam verisimile est non notari posse, cum versus schedulas computatores suffragii ferant.
In primis ac anno 2006, "vastitas" et blank (" undervote") totae horrificae erant. Omnis ratio est credendi "spoliatio" summa erit tam alta quam in 2004 electione. Hoc est, non minus quam una miliones suffragiorum, valde in minoritate regionum, evanescunt. ("Spoliatio" non est idem quod suffragium sollicitare. Cura est quod computatores "nigri-box" suffragium tuum mutabunt per officium programmatum malum hack. Aliam rem omnino est - et plura suffragia amissa, si contingat, summa est. Non sum hic comprehendo).
Gradus V: Reicientes Mail-in schedulis
CATAPHRACTUS in schedula tua. Novissimo tempore circa, supra dimidium decies centena millia electronicarum in schedulis iunguntur: omnia a vectigalia debita ut subscriptionem tuam ad circulum notatam non impleverint. Mailing in schedula ludit cum eo Roulette Russico. De decima adepto junked.
This time, the GOP has a new game for trashing your absentee vote. In states like
Licet id ius habere, sed notitia historica suadeant quod, cum FTF ludos coniungens cum cursoriis galli-ups usitatis, Obama alia miliones suffragiorum in disqualificationibus electronicis amittet.
Exit Polls et Exit Stratagemata
These millions of uncounted ballots – spoiled ballots, provisional ballots rejected, absentee ballots disqualified – fully explain the difference between exit polls (which, for example, gave Kerry Ohio in 2004 and Gore a win in
Quomodo impune? Bene, incipiunt explicandi quomodo "pollstrorum" nefas pervenit, quomodo suffragia non "Fectum Bradley" mentiendi, racist suffragii instar fecerunt. Dicent nobis novos, iuvenes et Niger Obamaniaci pecuniam dederunt, ad se coit – sed numquam suffragium vexarunt. Sed vera ratio numquam insusurrandum est: Suffragia abjiciunt quae justa non sunt numerata.
An electio die Martis surripiatur? Imo iam surreptum est. Hoc est, plures miliones suffragii calculis suis perituros esse; maxime ne quidem scire. Valde, pauperes, minores, novi suffragii — Obama suffragii. Estne istuc McCain in sacculo obtinuit et inops es? Nequaquam.
Non furtum suffragium tuum
In 2004, I and other investigators wrote, long before Election Day, "
It’s happening again. For six years, the Democratic Party has been snoozing through a quiet, brilliantly executed Republican operation to block, stop and purge voters by the millions. As
Dixit olim Karl Rove "Comitia habemus sicut currunt in regionibus ubi guys praefecti sunt, scitis colonelli in specula speculari." Non est querulus; gloriabatur.
Scio Obamam expeditionem non felicem esse quod eventum electionis furtum possibilis afferret. Metuunt suffragii "deturbabuntur" per facultatem electionem fixam.
Probe, ingenue, si hac factorum recitatione et statistica ad suffragium nimis obumbrata es, fortasse suffragium non mereris aut agere aut effingere. Nonne Rex Martinus Lutherus dixit "Somnium habeo ... ut vado ad somnum"?
Suffragia per "spes" sola salvari non possunt. Simplex viae sunt ad suffragium tuum tuendum, ab ambulando in "mail-in" tuum ut recusans scrutinium provisorium. (Ad album potes download StealBackYourVote.orgscripta apud Bobby Kennedy, juris professorem.
Huc descendit: Dolus margo, suffragium suppressio et interitus schedulae - tria ad sex miliones suffragiorum - superari possunt? Ita. Quia omnia suffragia subripere non possunt omni tempore. Biduo ante electionem, John McCain solum 4 centesimis in quibusdam capitibus descendit. Sed haec suffragiorum capita "verisimile" sunt. Primum tempus excludunt multosque ignobiles suffragii reditus.
Ita, responsum suppressionis suffragii est pro aliquo inopinabile eventurum - nam "inconveniens" suffragii statistica suppositio suae ignaviae opprimit simpliciter. Ut certo scio D. Obama, professor iuris constitutionis, tibi dicere potuit: optima responsio ad suffragium systematicum iuris suppressionis est io asinum dimittunt!
---
Greg Palast is the co-author of "Block the Vote," in this month’s Rolling Stone Magazine, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Palast and Kennedy are also co-authors of the investigative comic book, "Steal Back Your Vote." Palast, who reports on election fraud for BBC Television, is a Nation Institute/Puffin Foundation fellow for investigative reporting. Prior to his becoming a journalist, Palast was a forensic economist, fraud investigator and taught economics and statistics at
ZNetwork sola largitione legentium funditur.
Donate