A few weeks after US President Donald Trump was elected, I was requested to submit to the transition team a very brief (because he doesn’t read) policy brief on what I thought the president-elect should do regarding the Israeli-Palestinian (dormant) peace process. I sent off my paper and understood very quickly that the president-elect would not heed my advice. For the past two years, Trump has been speaking about his intention to put down on the table his proposal “for the deal of the century”. He has engaged in a policy of (negative) intervention, punishing and alienating the Palestinians while backing Israel on every (wrong) move Israel has made. The president moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem, against the advice of every senior adviser and every US ally, and then claimed that he removed Jerusalem from the table. He tried to decriminalize continued settlement expansion and building. He ceased US support for UNRWA and threatened that he was in the process of removing the refugee issue from the table. He canceled US financial support for development projects in the West Bank and Gaza including school building, paving roads, laying water and sewage pipes and on top of that, canceled US support for joint Israeli-Palestinian cooperative peace building projects.
What Trump has actually done is completely removing the negotiating table. Today, there is no credible peace process and will not be as long as he and the world continue to see the role of US president as the primary arbiter of peace.
Now Trump has announced the US exit from Syria and leaving the arena to Russia and to Iran. It is unlikely that he will present his ultimate Israeli-Palestinian peace plan, and if he does, it is very unlikely that anyone, at least on the Palestinian side, will take it seriously. The Russians too, it seems, will not replace the US as the primary interlocutor between Israel and the Palestinians, even after they repeated their invitation to Moscow to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and PA President Mahmoud Abbas. Neither the EU nor will the UN step up to do the job. Suddenly, my initial policy brief that I wrote for the transition team may be relevant. This is what I wrote then:
“IN MY MIND, the Trump victory does not change the bottom line of what I think US policy should be on the Israel-Palestine question. President Barack Obama was the most likely US president to take a firm stand on moving the two-state solution forward, and he did not. There has never really been a possibility for a Pax-Americana – neither Israel nor Palestine would or should accept an imposed solution to the conflict.
The only real solution to the conflict, assuming that I correctly understand what the conflict is about – territory and identity (each side’s demonstrated preparedness to fight, kill and die for a territorial expression of their identity) was and remains two states for two peoples. Israel’s ability to continue to define itself as a democratic nation-state of the Jewish people is more than ever dependent on ending the occupation and seeing an independent, hopefully democratic and peaceful Palestine next to Israel. The Palestinians’ ability to achieve for themselves a piece of land they can call their own is dependent on reaching a peace agreement with Israel in which, in exchange for genuine recognition of Israel, Palestine receives liberation. Any agreement will be dependent on Israel and Palestine assuming full responsibility for security of both states. All of the issues have to be resolved for there to be a genuine agreement.
The only path toward reaching an agreement is through direct negotiations. No one will do it for Israel and Palestine except the Israelis and the Palestinians. No Security Council resolution or another Trump speech will bring about an Israeli-Palestinian agreement if the Israelis and Palestinians don’t negotiate it together. It would be beneficial for both sides to expand the circle and invite Egypt and Jordan to the table, but the core remains Israel and Palestine.
My best advice to the American president is STAY AWAY! Don’t raise hopes of a new American initiative. Don’t offer to help to resolve the conflict. Offer support for any agreement that the two sides reach. Offer significant help – even more than was offered in the past – but the price tag is reaching an agreement. I would not propose cutting US aid to Israel (not only because it would not happen in a Trump administration anyway) because Israel needs to feel secure to make real concessions. I would not propose cutting financial support to the Palestinians, because they also need to feel secure and the Palestinian people have to see the fruits of peace. I would put more financial support into helping the Palestinian private sector because that is where stability and interests for peace will come from. Please don’t encourage unilateral actions of either side that could make the process of reaching agreements more difficult – that means on settlement building and on Jerusalem-related issues.
Let Israel and Palestine know that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not on the agenda of the new US administration – that is the best thing that President-elect Trump could do for Israel and Palestine. Focus on bringing an end to the war and suffering in Syria. Strengthen Egypt and Jordan. Continue to assist the Palestinians, mainly the private sector to build a more secure Palestinian economy. Take a strong stand on radical Islamic terrorism, against al-Qaeda and against ISIS. Help to create a more secure Middle East and a more secure world.
But let the Israelis and Palestinians know that they together must resolve their conflict.”
No one in the White House listened then, and even if they did listen, they have probably resigned by now. Trump will probably not read this, because he doesn’t read. But maybe some of your readers out there, such as the US Ambassador to Israel, does read (or someone on his staff) and maybe one of those people will agree and try to influence US policy. Doubtful, but maybe?
저자는 이스라엘 국가와 이스라엘과 이웃 국가 간의 평화를 위해 일생을 바친 정치적, 사회적 기업가입니다. 그의 최신 저서인 In Pursuit of Peace in Israel and Palestine은 Vanderbilt University Press에서 출판되었습니다.
ZNet과 Z Magazine을 도와주세요
이제서야 고칠 수 있었던 프로그래밍 문제로 인해 마지막 기금 모금 이후 30년이 넘었습니다. 따라서 XNUMX년 동안 여러분이 찾아오셨던 대체정보를 계속해서 가져오려면 그 어느 때보다 여러분의 도움이 필요합니다.
Z는 우리가 할 수 있는 가장 유용한 사회 뉴스를 제공하지만, 무엇이 유용한지 판단할 때 다른 많은 소스와 달리 우리는 비전, 전략 및 활동가 관련성을 강조합니다. 예를 들어, 우리가 트럼프에게 연설할 때, 트럼프가 얼마나 끔찍한 사람인지 계속해서 반복해서 말하는 것이 아니라, 트럼프를 넘어서는 길을 찾는 것입니다. 지구 온난화, 빈곤, 불평등, 인종차별, 성차별, 전쟁을 다루는 경우에도 마찬가지입니다. 우리의 우선순위는 항상 우리가 제공하는 내용이 무엇을 해야 할지, 어떻게 최선을 다할지 결정하는 데 도움이 될 수 있다는 것입니다.
프로그래밍 문제를 해결하면서 우리는 지지자가 되고 기부를 더 쉽게 할 수 있도록 시스템을 업데이트했습니다. 긴 과정이었지만 이를 통해 모든 사람이 우리의 성장을 더 편리하게 도울 수 있기를 바랍니다. 문제가 있으면 즉시 알려주시기 바랍니다. 모든 사람이 시스템을 계속해서 쉽게 사용할 수 있도록 문제에 대한 의견이 필요합니다.
그러나 돕는 가장 좋은 방법은 월간 또는 연간 지지자가 되는 것입니다. 지지자들은 직접 이메일로 댓글을 달고, 블로그를 게시하고, 밤마다 논평을 받을 수 있습니다.
또한 일회성 기부를 하거나 Z Magazine의 인쇄본을 구독할 수도 있습니다.
Z 매거진 구독 여기에서 지금 확인해 보세요..
어떤 도움이라도 큰 도움이 될 것입니다. 그리고 개선사항, 의견, 문제점에 대한 제안사항이 있으면 즉시 이메일로 보내주세요.
ZNetwork는 독자들의 관대함을 통해서만 자금을 조달합니다.
후원