Edward S. Herman
Ƙasar Amurka
kafafen yada labarai sun bi tsarin gwamnatinsu na bai wa Isra'ila carte
Ban sha'awa wajen mu'amala da al'ummar Falasdinawa, a cikin Isra'ila da a ciki
yankunan da aka mamaye. Wannan ya ƙunshi babban hankali da ɗabi'a
kalubale, idan aka yi la'akari da gaskiyar tsananin wariyar wariyar launin fata, Isra'ila ta daɗe
ƙin fita daga yankunan da aka mamaye kamar yadda wani ɗimbin yawa ya buƙaci
yarjejeniya ta kasa da kasa, keta haddin Isra'ila na yau da kullun na Geneva na hudu
Bukatun yarjejeniya kan kula da mutanen da aka mamaye
yankuna—ciki har da babban tsaftar ƙabilanci da aka tsara a fili don amfana
da "zababbun mutane" - da kuma bayyanannun aniyarsu ta samar da tsarin Falasdinu
na dogara da matalauta Bantustans a cikin mamaye yankuna, shirya
tsantsa domin amfanin jihar tsarkake kabilanci.
Bari mu sake dubawa
a taƙaice, tare da wasu misalai na baya-bayan nan, wasu hanyoyin da su
An yi tsawon fiye da rabin ƙarni na Isra'ila, babban tsarkake ƙabilanci
m.
1. Harshe:
Tsaftace Kabilanci, Tashin hankali, Ta'addanci, Rikici. Kalmar "tsarkake kabilanci"
ya fi dacewa da ayyukan Isra'ila fiye da na Serbs a ciki
Kosovo Mummunan zaluncin da Sabiyawan suka yi wa Albaniyawan Kosovo wani bangare ne na wani
yakin basasa da ke gudana, da kuma kashe-kashe da kuma korar da aka yi a lokacin kungiyar tsaro ta NATO
tashin bama-bamai ayyuka ne masu alaka da yaki; ba su kasance cikin aikin dogon lokaci ba
"Ku fanshi ƙasar" daga waɗanda ba Sabiya ba. Albaniyawa a Belgrade ba a iyakance su ba
a cikin mallakar dukiya kamar yadda Larabawa suke a Isra'ila da yankunan da aka mamaye da
Ba a rushe gidajen Kosovo Albaniya da nufin samar da fili ba
don Sabiya. Duk da wannan gaskiyar, a cikin shekaru uku na 1998 zuwa 2000.
da New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Lokaci, da kuma
Newsweek ya yi amfani da furcin nan “tsarkake ƙabila” sau 1,200 wajen tattaunawa
Kosovo, a cikin kusan kashi huɗu cikin biyar na shari'o'in dangane da manufofin Sabiya, yayin da
a cikin duka shekaru goma na 1990s sun yi amfani da kalmar sau 14 kawai a ciki
tattauna Isra'ila, kuma sau biyar kawai yana nufin manufofin Isra'ila. Wannan
yana nuna tsananin son zuciya.
A cikin kafofin watsa labarai
bayar da rahoto a kan Intifada II, "tashin hankali" yana nufin jifa da harbi, shi
bai taba nufin "rikicin tsarin" na kwace filaye, korar ba
mutane daga gidajensu da rushe su, suna kwacewa da karkatar da su
albarkatun ruwa don amfani da zaɓaɓɓun mutane, gina hanyoyi masu lalacewa
damar al'ummomi zuwa tsoffin maƙwabta da ayyukan yi, rufe hanyoyin kai tsaye
ta hanyar umarnin sojoji da shingaye, da juriya da kare mazauna.
hare-hare, lalata, da kwace dukiyoyin Al'ummai. Ko da yake akwai
ya kasance adadi mai yawa na kashe-kashe da raunuka da aka yi wa al'ummai
da sojoji da matsugunai a cikin wannan tsari, wannan babban tashin hankali na rashin ƙarfi yana da
An yarda da shi gaba ɗaya ga Clinton, Bush II, da magabata
gwamnatoci, don haka ga kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun ba a sanya shi a matsayin tashin hankali
ko kuma an ba da kulawa sosai.
Amma ko a ciki
iyakantaccen tunaninsu na tashin hankali, son zuciya da kafofin watsa labarai ke nunawa a lokacin
Intifada II ta kasance mai ban mamaki wajen ba da kulawa sosai da keɓewa
fushin jifa da harin kunar bakin wake da Falasdinawa ke yi, fiye da haka
mafi muni da tashin hankali na sojojin Isra'ila. Mafi kyau fiye da shida zuwa
kashi daya na kashe-kashe da kuma mafi girman rabon raunukan Falasdinawa da na
An kawar da Isra'ilawa ta hanyar kulawa da hankali ga-da kuma mafi girman ɗan adam
na-Isra'ilawan da aka kashe. A cikin sauki kuma m gwargwado na wannan son zuciya, na takwas
Hotunan gaban-shafi na Intifada wadanda aka kashe a cikin New York Times daga
Satumba 28, 2000 zuwa Maris 9, 2001, shida 'yan Isra'ila ne kuma biyu daga cikin
Falasdinawa. Wannan, tare da ɗimbin suppressions, yana taimakawa ci gaba da ci gaba
gano "tashin hankali" tare da jifa da jifa da kunar bakin wake na
jama'a a cikin tawaye.
Hakazalika, da
kafofin yada labarai sun ci gaba da dadadden al'adarsu ta neman Falasdinawa
’yan ta’adda, Isra’ilawa da abin ya shafa—har ma da “a kewaye” da kuma shiga ciki
ramawa kawai. Kusan ba tare da togiya ba, kafofin watsa labarai suna yin Palasdinawa masu kisa
ayyukan ta'addanci, kuma tare da haɗe-haɗe-haɗe-kashen kashe biyu
Sojojin Isra'ila sun kasance "mummunan kisan gilla," wani harin da Falasdinawan suka kai kan wani wurin
motar bas ɗin bas ɗin “ba za ta iya faɗi ba” kuma “bacin rai na ta’addanci” a cikin New York
Times-amma babu daya daga cikin mutuwar Falasdinawa 400 da ya cancanci hakan
siffantawa. Don haka, dangane da wani gagarumin harin bam da Isra'ila ta kai kan wani yanki na farar hula
a Gaza, wannan shi ne "a zahiri… martani mai karfi na Isra'ila" ga wani baya
tashin bama-bamai kan wata motar bas. Isra'ilawa ne kaɗai suka amsa suka rama, suka yi
wannan "wanda aka tsinkaya" (ma'ana mai amsawa da hankali). “Jiya
Ta'addancin Falasdinawa da ramuwar gayya ta Isra'ila…"(ed., NYT, Nuwamba
21, 2000) shine harshen dabara na zurfin son zuciya.
Ta haka
mulkin son zuciya Ariel Sharon, wanda tarihinsa na kashe mutane ba tare da makami ba
farar hula sun zarce na Carlos the Jackal da kashi 20 ko fiye, shine
taba "dan ta'adda" ko "mai laifin yaki" a cikin manyan kafofin watsa labaru, ko da yake
lokaci-lokaci ana cewa “su” (Larabawa) sai su ayyana shi. Maimakon haka, yana da a
"sabon iska na zaɓe" (Philadelphia mai tambaya, Janairu 7, 2001) ko
shi ne "tauri" kuma "jarumi" kamar yadda New York Times ya siffanta shi akan su
shafi na farko na Fabrairu 7, 2001 (da farko, kuma jim kadan bayan Sabra-Shatila.
kisan kiyashi, "babban manufar tsaro ga Isra'ila," NYT,
Fabrairu 11, 1983).
Robert Fisk
ya ce idan ya karanta mutuwa a cikin “giciye-wuta” ko kuma “ci karo” ya san haka
wannan yana nufin Isra'ilawa sun yi kisan. Fisk ya lura cewa ko da lokacin CNN ta Alkahira
An harbe shugaban ofishin Ben Wedeman a baya a wani artabu da aka yi a Gaza.
kusan tabbas ta sojojin Isra'ila, CNN ba ta iya kawo kanta don ba da shawara
wanda ke da laifi "a wannan lokacin." Kuma AP ta ruwaito cewa an kama Wedeman
sama a cikin tashin hankali" (Fisk, "Media: Bayar da Rahoto Mai Raɗaɗi da ke Sa Kisa
karbabbu,” The Independent, Nuwamba 14, 2000). Fisk kuma ya lura da yadda
a sauƙaƙe kafofin watsa labarai suna komawa zuwa "ɗan bindiga Bafalasdine da ake zargi" ko "mai yiwuwa ta
Falasdinawa" lokacin da aka harbe 'yan Isra'ila, yayin da Palasdinawa ke mutuwa a koyaushe
arangama”—“kamar an harbe su da gangan maimakon hari ga Isra’ila
maharba." Kuma idan waɗannan maharba suka harbe yara da yawa, sau da yawa a idanu ko
sauran m tabo, kafofin watsa labarai — wanda ba ya amfani da yawa hotuna na
Yaran Falasdinawa da ke fama da lalacewar ido-sun yi farin cikin ba da tabbaci ga Iraeli
sojojin sun ba da shawarar cewa wataƙila sojojin sun yi farin ciki sosai (Joel
Greenberg, "Sojojin Isra'ila sun damu da wasu sojojin na iya zama masu farin ciki," NYT,
Janairu 17, 2001).
Isra'ilawa
Ba wai kawai "damuwa" game da sojoji masu kishi ba, sun yarda da yin
"Kurakurai," kuma kafofin watsa labarai wani lokaci sun yarda cewa mai yiwuwa martanin su ne
"mafi yawa," "mai nauyi," ko "rashin daidaituwa" wajen ramawa
ta'addanci - amma ba sa shiga ta'addanci da kisa
farar hula, gami da yara, da gangan kuma “ba za a iya faɗi ba.” Kashe su
ba a taba yin “kisan-kiyashi ba,” kamar yadda aka saba sanya kashe-kashen Sabiyawa a Kosovo.
Rikicin Falasdinawa ba zai taba zama martanin “anantacce” ga tsarin Isra’ila ba
tashin hankali da ta'addancin jiha kai tsaye.
2.
Mahimman Frames:
Tare da Tashe-tashen hankulan Jihar Tsabtace Kabilanci. Ƙaddamar da son zuciya yana kusa
yana da alaƙa da son zuciya a cikin harshe, kuma akwai firam masu ƙarfi waɗanda ke sanya wurin
laifin tashe-tashen hankula a jihar kawar da kabilanci da mai daukar nauyinta. Wadannan
'Yan jaridar Isra'ila kamar Amira Hass da Amira Hass ne suka fitar da firam masu mahimmanci
Danny Rubenstein, amma sun yi karanci kamar haƙoran kaji a cikin al'adar Amurka
latsa, kodayake suna bunƙasa a madadin kafofin watsa labarai.
2 A.
Tsarin Zalunci. The
primary madadin frame za mu iya kira da rashin adalci model. Kamar yadda na nuna a Part
1, Amira Hass ta rubuta a Ha'aretz yana amfani da firam mai mahimmanci
wanda ya bayyana Intifada II a matsayin martani mara makawa ga gazawar Oslo zuwa
yi komai ga Falasdinawa, da kuma kara koma bayansu
jindadi da halin kirki. Robert Fisk ya ce iri ɗaya: cewa Intifada "shine
yana faruwa ne a lokacin da al'umma gaba ɗaya suka dafa abinci har ya kai ga fashewa"
(“Ƙarya, Ƙiyayya da Harshen Ƙarfi, The Independent,
Oktoba 13, 2000). Hass, Fisk, Danny Rubenstein in Ha'aretz, da sauransu
'yan jarida da manazarta sun ba da irin wannan fassarar da ke jaddada
ci gaba da kwace da matsugunai da sojoji, masu wariyar launin fata da wulakanci
irin kulawar da masu mulki suka yiwa Falasdinawa, da kuma gaskiyar hakan
Shirye-shiryen Isra'ila-Amurka na baya-bayan nan ba wai kawai sun tabbatar da doka ta bayan-Oslo ba
ƙasa,” sun ba da ba da wani ma'ana warware rikicin 'yan gudun hijira, a'a
tabbataccen ikon Gabashin Kudus, kuma babu wani Palasdinawa mai cin gashin kansa
Jihar.
a cikin wannan
m frame, da Palasdinawa boren ya samo asali a cikin matsananci cin zarafi da
rashin adalci, rashin bege, rashin kunya tare da Oslo da kuma masu cin hanci da rashawa
da jagorancin Arafat mai tausayi suna aiki a matsayin masu tilasta Isra'ila, kuma na ƙarshe
tsokanar Sharon da Barak a al-Aqsa. An yi tsammanin fashewar abubuwa da yawa.
"mai iya tsinkaya," kuma mai iya fahimta, kuma a cikin waɗannan ma'anoni ya kasance "ma'ana"
mayar da martani ga matsananciyar cin zarafi da rashin zaɓuɓɓukan zaman lafiya.
2B. The
Samfurin tsokanar Isra'ila. Tsarin madadin na biyu, wanda a zahiri
yana haɓaka tsarin rashin adalci na farko, yana farawa da gaskiyar cewa Intifada II
A fili ya fara ziyarar da Ariel Sharon ya kai masallacin al-Aqsa a watan Satumba
28, 2000. Ko da Thomas Friedman da kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun sun yarda da wannan
" tsokana ce," amma ta hanyoyi daban-daban suna mayar da martani ga Falasdinu
sanadi mafi mahimmanci fiye da tsokanar.
Dabarar daya tana da
a kwatanta Barak a matsayin mai salama wanda yake ba da abin da ya dace
sulhu, da nisantar da shi daga tada hankali. Don haka, Thomas Friedman
ya ce "A takaice dai, Falasdinawa ba za su iya yin hulda da Barak ba, haka suka yi
don mayar da shi Sharon. Kuma suka yi" ("Yakin Arafat," NYT, Oktoba
13, 2000). Amma Friedman ya danne abubuwan da suka dace. Na farko, Arafat, shugabansa
Mai shiga tsakani Saeb Erikat, da jami'in Falasdinawa Faisal Husseini, duk sun roki
tare da Barak kada ya bar Sharon ya ziyarci saboda rashin zaman lafiya
iyawa, kuma Barak ba kawai ya ƙi su ba ya goyi bayan Sharon
tsokana da 'yan sandan kan iyaka 1,000. Na biyu, a ranar bayan ziyarar Sharon.
'Yan sandan Barak sun kasance da yawa a al-Aqsa kuma sun yi harbi har lahira a cikin
Rikicin da ya barke, ya yi sanadin mutuwar mutane bakwai da jikkata wasu daruruwa. Na uku,
Bayan wannan kara tsokanar Barak bai yi wani abu da ya rage tashin hankali ba.
kuma a gaskiya ya ba da ƙarin nuna ƙarfi. Amma ga Friedman da kuma
kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun, wannan jerin tsokana da gazawar Barak
duk wani abu na zaman lafiya ba ya sanya shi alhakin; Arafat ne ya kamata
kashe mutanensa.
Ta hanyar mulkin zurfi
son zuciya, yayin da kafafen yada labarai suka yi ta rade-radin kan dalilan Arafat ta yiwu
rinjayar da Falasdinu mayar da martani-ya "cancy caca" kamar yadda Time saka shi
(Oktoba 23, 2000)—ba su taɓa ɗaukan yiwuwar Isra’ilawa ba
mai yiwuwa shugabanni suna da manufofin siyasa da ke jagorantar su don tada hankali da kuma hakan
bayyana martaninsu. Cewa Sharon tsokana, tare da Barak
haɗin gwiwa, ƙila an yi niyya don haifar da tashin hankali kuma yana iya zama
yunƙurin siyasar Isra'ila ya bayyana shi ne kawai a waje da neman gafara
Frames na tunani. Eduardo Cohen ya ba da hujjar cewa Sharon-Barak ya tunzura
ya kwarara daga lissafin siyasar su: Sharon yana son ɗaukar matakin tsakiya
kafin Netanyahu ya murmure daga badakalar da aka yi masa — an wanke shi a shari’ar da aka yi masa a kotu
kan zargin cin hanci da rashawa a ranar 27 ga Satumba, 2000, kwana daya kafin Sharon ya tafi
al-Aqsa-da kuma sanin cewa tsauri mai tsauri da sabon yaki zai yi ma sa hidima
muradun siyasa; Barak yana fatan zaluntar Sharon kuma ya haifar da rikici
da farkon zaben da damansa ma zai fi idan ya jira
don dawo da siyasar Netanyahu (Cohen, "Ya kamata 'yan jaridun Amurka
Na Duba Dan Zurfi,” ba a daɗe ba. Ko menene fa'idar wannan layin na
muhawara, gazawar kafofin watsa labarai na Amurka har ma da tattauna yiwuwar siyasa
dalilan tada hankali, da kuma ko an yi nufin su
tsokana tashin hankali da ya biyo baya, yana nuna son zuciya.
3.
Frames masu ban hakuri: Wadanda Suke Laifin Duk Wani Tashin Hankali Akan Wadanda Kabilun Ya shafa
Tsaftacewa. Kusan ba tare da togiya manyan kafofin watsa labarai na Amurka suna tsara su ba
gabatar da batutuwan da ke cikin rikicin Isra'ila da Falasdinu don haka
uzuri ga manufofin Isra'ila tare da dora alhakin duk wani tashin hankali a kan Isra'ila
wadanda abin ya shafa.
3 A. The
Samfurin Zalunci: Kyautar Kyautar Barak, Yaƙin Arafat, Rashin Hankali
Fashewar Falasdinawa. Muhimman abubuwan da ke cikin wannan firam ɗin na yau da kullun
su ne zato cewa Barak ya kasance "matsakaici" da kuma cewa tayi da kuma
"Tsarin zaman lafiya" ya kasance mai ma'ana, ta yadda duk wani rikici ko tashin hankali
don haka rashin gaskiya ne, marasa gaskiya, ko rashin hankali. Trudy Rubin, da
edita mai sharhi kan manufofin kasashen waje na Philadelphia mai tambaya, shine
ba wai kawai a gano cewa "Rashin hankali yana haifar da tashin hankali a yankin"
(Oktoba 18, 2000). Babban mahimmanci don yada wannan firam shine
ƙin tattauna batutuwan da suka shafi adalci da kuma tantance waɗanda ke dalla-dalla-don haka ku
ba zai taba samun Friedman, ko Rubin, yana tattauna manufofin Isra'ila na
kwato Falasdinawa bisa tsare-tsare a yankunan da aka mamaye, da
rushewa, da rabon ruwa don amfanin Yahudawa, matsuguni biyu
yawan jama'a tun 1993, aikin hanyar da ke zama kasar Falasdinu
m, ko manufar kisa da raunata al'ummai kyauta, amma ba Yahudawa ba.
Ba su taɓa yin magana da gaske ba - balle su kwaɗaitar - haƙƙin dawo da waɗanda aka kore
Falasdinawa, ko da yake duka Friedman da Rubin sun kasance masu goyon baya da karfi
'yancin dawowar Albaniyawan Kosovo. Rukunin labarai a cikin takardunsu, da
kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun gabaɗaya, kuma suna bin hukuma (US da
Isra'ila) layin jam'iyya.
a cikin
"Yaƙin Arafat," wanda ke ba mu misali na "zalunci" na Friedman,
halayyar da Times a matsayin ma'aikata, kuma mafi rinjaye
a duk faɗin kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun, Friedman ya ambaci “tsoffin gunaguni game da
zaluncin da Isra'ila ta ci gaba da yi na mamayewa da gina matsuguni.
A gaskiya ma, wuraren bincike na Isra'ila da ci gaba da gina matsugunan su ne
azzalumi.” Ya ci tarar wannan babbar matsala ta hanyar sanya su "tsofaffin" (tsofaffi),
da guje wa cikakkun bayanai, lambobi, ko tattaunawa game da tashin hankalin wariyar launin fata a ciki
kwace ga Yahudawan Isra'ila kawai, manyan take hakki na Hudu
Yarjejeniyar Geneva, ko bara na Falasdinawa a karkashin Oslo. Shi kuma
yana jayayya cewa irin waɗannan batutuwa ba su da amfani yanzu domin Barak ya ba da
"wasu sulhun da ba a taba gani ba," ta yadda idan Falasdinawa ba su fada cikin layi ba
da wadannan duk wani tashin hankali laifinsu ne. Bai taba tattauna dalilin da yasa Sharon ya shiga ba
a cikin tsokanar sa ko kuma ya bayyana dalilin da ya sa wannan aiki da wani shugaban Isra'ila ya yi bai yi ba
cancanci babba nauyi; kuma ya kasa amincewa da goyon bayan Barak
tsokanar da kuma ba ta taba nuna cewa waɗannan ayyukan Isra'ila suna da alaƙa ba
zuwa siyasar Isra'ila. Kuma ba shi da kalmar sukar Isra'ila
kashe-kashen ranar 29 ga watan Satumba ko kuma danniya da ya biyo baya. Ya ambaci
"An kashe sojojin Isra'ila da yawa a Ramallah," amma in ba haka ba
akwai "mako na kisan Isra'ila da Falasdinu" kawai, amma ba a bari "kisan kai" ba
shi kadai "kisan kisa mai dadi" na Falasdinawa.
Friedman taba
ya ambaci cewa m sharuddan Oslo yarjejeniyar yarda Isra'ila, tare da jimlar Amurka
goyon baya, don ninka ƙauyuka da ƙirƙirar gaskiya a ƙasa musamman
mai illa ga rayuwar Falasdinu. Don haka "tsohuwar gunaguni game da zalunci"
da dai sauransu, ya ci gaba duk da cewa yarjejeniyar da ta gabata. Yanzu sabon yarjejeniyar mai kyau yana ba da
Falasdinawa wata hanya ce mai kyau - "fiye da kashi 90 na Yammacin Kogin Jordan don wani
Kasar Falasdinu, wani bangare na warware matsalar 'yan gudun hijira da Falasdinu
mulkin mallaka a yankunan musulmi da kiristoci na tsohon birnin
Jerusalem..." Hatta Bill Clinton na son wannan shirin, don haka me ake bukata
game da adalci? Adadin "kashi 90" shine sigar Isra'ila, wanda ke ba da damar a
“gaskiya a kan ƙasa” Urushalima Babba da za a ƙidaya a matsayin ɓangare na Isra’ila—haka
cewa kashi 70 zuwa 80 na iya zama mafi daidaito. Akwai kuma tambayar da
ingancin ƙasar, da fayyace ikon Isra'ila na tsaunin
a karkashin West Bank, da kuma gaskiyar cewa kasa rabo, Bayahude
ƙauyuka, da kuma "ga Yahudawa kawai" hanyoyin sadarwar hanya sun karya "kashi 90"
zuwa cikin lungunan da ba su da alaƙa, ba su da iyaka sai da Isra'ila. Wannan a
Maganin bantustan wanda ba ya samar da kasa mai dacewa ko mai zaman kanta; kuma na
Hakika ba ya komawa ga Falasdinawa ko daya daga cikin kadarorin da aka sace ko da
tun 1993 don "tsaro" Isra'ila da lebensraum ga wasu zaɓaɓɓu
mutane.
Friedman da
gamsu da "ƙuduri na wani ɓangare" na matsalar 'yan gudun hijirar da ta ƙunshi
Isra'ila ta amince da "zafin" Falasdinawa da kuma yin alkawarin ba da izinin "dawo" zuwa
"Palestine mai tarihi," wanda ya hada da Yammacin Kogin Jordan inda 'yan gudun hijirar suke
sun riga sun taru, ba zuwa gidajensu na asali ba kuma ba masu alƙawarin ba
diyya maimakon irin wannan dawowar. Mulkin Palastinu akan musulmi
da kuma Kirista bariki na Old City ba ya hada da Harim Al Sharif, da
wadancan guraren Musulmi da Kirista sun wargaje su
kwace da gagarumin gine-ginen Isra'ila ga Yahudawa kawai tun daga karshe
mai kyau (1993).
"Yakin Arafat"
ya ta'allaka ne kan gazawar Falasdinawa wajen amincewa da shan kaye baki daya: nasu
rashin son yarda da duk zaluncin da aka yi a baya, gami da bayan 1993
kwace, tsarin bantustan mafi muni fiye da wanda Afirka ta Kudu ta sanya
karkashin mulkin wariyar launin fata, da kuma ci gaba da mulkin soja a kasar da ta kasance
a wee dan “zalunci” (Clinton da Barak sun bukaci Bafalasdine da aka ware
kasa, da kuma ci gaba da hakkin mamaya na Isra'ila a Yammacin Kogin Jordan, daga
la'akari da tsaron Isra'ila). Idan Arafat ba zai yarda da wannan ba, kuma ya sa hannu
wata yarjejeniya da ta sake barin da yawa ga yardar Isra'ila da ta
mai daukar nauyi, duk tashin hankali nasa ne.
Wannan shi ne
"samfurin rashin adalci" wanda ya kai ga ba da hakuri don tsarkake kabilanci. Kuma
da kyar ya keɓe ga Friedman da kuma New York Times Editorial
shafuka. Ya kasance kyakkyawan misali a cikin labarai da kuma shafukan edita cewa shi
shi ne zabin Arafat na "Peace ko Victimhood" (Jane Perlez, "Fork in Arafat's
Hanya," NYT, Disamba 29, 2000).
3B. Arafat
Da Komawar Ta'addanci. Tsawon shekaru Arafat da PLO 'yan ta'adda ne
ga jami'an Isra'ila da na Amurka, don haka ga kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun. Isra'ila
kawai ya tsunduma cikin ramuwar gayya da ta'addanci, ta hanyar mulkin son zuciya na siyasa.
komai gaskiyar lamarin. Sai kuma a shekarar 1991, lokacin da Arafat ya mika wuya ya kyale kansa
da za a tsotse cikin "tsarin zaman lafiya" wanda ya sanya shi mai tilasta Isra'ila, amma
bai ba mutanensa kwata-kwata komai ba, kwatsam ya daina zama dan ta'adda kuma
ya zama shugaban kasa. Tare da Intifada II, duk da haka, da rashin yinsa
aikinsa na kiyaye mutanensa da suka sha kaye, ya kasance
da gangan ya dawo aƙalla a cikin wasu kafofin watsa labarai zuwa aji na ta'addanci.
Don haka mun samu
nassoshi na yau da kullun na kafofin watsa labarai game da alhakin Arafat na kasa ɗaukar nauyin
tashin hankali, hasashe kan ko a zahiri ya tada shi don inganta nasa
ciniki matsayi da Isra'ila, da kuma nasiha ga Arafat don samun mutanensa
karkashin iko. A cikin wasu lokuta da yawa, Time ya d'auka "chancy
caca”; da Mai tambaya Trudy Rubin ya ce "ya so, ko ya kasa kwantar da hankali,
sha'awar addini da na ƙasa" (Oktoba 18, 2000), kuma ta tambayi "Zan iya Arafat".
dakatar da tashin hankali” (Nuwamba 1, 2000). Wasu daga cikin iƙirarin nasa da gangan
tunzura jama'a sun fito daga sojojin Isra'ila da majiyoyin leken asiri, wanda
Kafofin watsa labaru suna samun labarai sosai (Tracy Wilkinson, "Shin tashin hankali ya wuce
ikon Arafat?" Los Angeles Times, Oktoba 4, 2000). Jane Perlez
yayi tambaya "Shin Arafat zai iya kashe shi?" mai taken "Jami'an Amurka Sun Yi Muhawarar Digiri Nasa.
Sarrafa" (NYT, Oktoba 17, 2000). Babu wani labari
mai jigo “Tashin hankali ya fi gaban ikon Barak [ko Sharon]?” ko kuma
kafofin watsa labarai sun iya gano wani don tantance manufar Barak ko Sharon da
alhakin. Kuma a cikin wani gagarumin nuni na son zuciya da wuya su yi
ya ba da shawarar cewa Barak zai iya ko ya kamata ya dakatar da tashin hankalin da ake yi
ya aiwatar daga Satumba 29, 2000; kawai "Arafat yana da zabi" (Rubin),
ba Barak, ko Sharon ba, waɗanda suke a fakaice suna yin “ramuwar gayya” da
"maganin ta'addanci," a cikin al'adar farfaganda mai tsayi.
3C. Turawa
Yaran Gaba A Matsayin Shahidai. A cikin irin wannan tsari mai banƙyama, da
Kafofin yada labarai na al'ada kuma sun yi watsi da ikirarin cewa Falasdinawa ne
da gangan tura 'ya'yansu gaba su mutu, cewa suna fama da a
shahidi ciwo, da kuma cewa iyaye, Arafat, da kuma penchant zuwa ga
Don haka shahada ne ke da alhakin kisan gillar da aka yi
yara (Chris Hedges, "The Deathly Glamour of Martydom," NYT, Oktoba
29, 2000). Shi ma wannan kishin shahada shi ne ke haddasa wargajewa
na salama (John Burns, “Alƙawarin Aljanna Mai Kashe Zaman Lafiya,” NYT,
Afrilu 1, 2001).
The
Philadelphia mai tambaya buga wannan layi tare da jin daɗi, tare da labarin labarai akan
"Larabawa masu baƙin ciki suna samun kwanciyar hankali game da ra'ayin shahada" (Oktoba 25, 2000),
op-ed column na Rubin akan "Yakin yara" wanda ke zargin Falasdinawa
don mutuwar 'ya'yansu (Oktoba 25), da kuma zane mai ban dariya na Tony Auth
ya nuna Arafat yana kwadaitar da yara da su nutse cikin mutuwar shahidai a kan wani dutse
(Oktoba 26). Auth sau biyu yana yin zane-zanen zane mai nuna Arafat da jini a jikin sa
hannu, amma ba shugaban Isra'ila ba.
Uri Avnery
lura cewa wannan shirye dangana alhakin kashe yara zuwa ga
Iyayen Larabawa "sun ci amanar wariyar launin fata" ("Isra'ila/Palestine: Sha biyu
Ƙarya ta Al'ada," Oktoba 21, 2000). Ya kuma lura da cewa Palasdinawa
Iyaye ba za su iya hana ’ya’yansu “lokacin da suke rayuwa a cikin mugu ba
sana'a da 'yan'uwansu maza da mata sun ba da misalai na jarumtaka da
sadaukar da kai” a al’adar da ke komawa ga Joan na Arc ’yar shekara 16. Shi kuma
ya nuna cewa akwai al’adar Yahudawa na yara mayaka da jarumai,
da kuma cewa mazaunan suna cin zarafin 'ya'yansu, "ba tare da jinkirin sakawa ba
su ta hanyar cutarwa,” kuma ba tare da fitar da wasu shawarwari na rashin aiki ba
da kuma son shahada daga bangaren masu sukar iyayen Palasdinawa.
“Dama
tambaya shine me yasa sojojin mu suke kashe wadannan yaran? Kuma a wasu lokuta cikin sanyi
jini?" Amma Eyad Serraj ke rubutu a ciki Le Monde Diplomatique
(Nuwamba 2000), ba tushen labarai na Amurka ba. Da wuya idan aka taɓa yin hakan
Kafofin yada labarai sun nunar da cewa Isra'ilawa na yin harbin, da dama daga cikin
ana harbin yara ne da nufin a raunata su ko kuma a kashe su, da hakan
Isra'ilawa suna amfani da hanyoyin da ba na kashe mutane ba na sarrafa taron jama'a, amma sai a lokacin
magance zanga-zangar Yahudawan Isra'ila.
3D The
Amurka A Matsayin Dillali Mai Gaskiya. Isra'ilawa ba sa son tsangwama
tare da kawar da ƙabilanci, don haka suna "dagas da duk wani canji zuwa wani
tsarin duniya,” kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin wani New York Times
edita na Nuwamba 13, 2000, kuma Isra'ilawa suna farin cikin samun United
Jihohi, shekaru 50 da suka gabata suna tallafawa da kuma rubuta bayanan tsarkakewar kabilanci, kamar
maimakon zama na gaske na duniya. Dacewar wannan
tsari don haka ya zama matsayin hukuma na Amurka da gaskiyar kafofin watsa labarai, da kuma
bukatar kare kasa da kasa ga wadanda rikicin kabilanci na Isra'ila
tsarkakewa ya zama ba batun ɗabi'a da ke cika wannan sabon sadaukarwar Yammacin Turai ba
kare mutanen da ba su da tsaro amma “mafi so ga Falasdinawa” (Keith
Richburg, "Isra'ila ta ki amincewa da kasancewar kasa da kasa," Philadelphia mai tambaya,
Nuwamba 11, 2000). Richard Holbrooke ya ce "babu wani karfi da za a tallafa
ba tare da amincewar Isra'ila ba" (Nicole Winfield, "Arafat ya roki Majalisar Dinkin Duniya
kariya, amma Isra'ila, Amurka suna adawa," Philadelphia mai tambaya, Nuwamba
11, 2000), don haka ya daidaita batun ga manyan kafofin watsa labarai. Babu kwatance
tare da Kosovo, ba a ambaci irin wannan wasan kwaikwayon a Gabashin Timor ba inda
Tawagar Clinton ta jinkirta zuwa ga abokin cinikinta na Indonesia, ta haka ta ba da izinin
lalata Gabashin Timor.
Haka kuma ba
Kafofin yada labarai sun taba tattaunawa kan babban ra'ayin nuna goyon bayan Isra'ila na Amurka
gwamnatin da ta kare haramtacciyar kasar Isra'ila da kabilanci
shekaru da yawa. Kamar yadda muka gani a baya, Thomas Friedman ya ambaci amincewar Clinton
Shawarar zaman lafiya ta Barak kamar tantance dillali mai gaskiya, ba a
bangaranci. A kan dama mai tsaurin ra'ayi mai tsaurin ra'ayi, William Safire
postulates cewa Clinton da kamfani da gaske dillalai ne masu gaskiya, kuma sun yanke hukunci
Wannan gaskiyar a matsayin "Isra'ila na Bukatar Aboki, Bata Bukatar Dillali" (NYT,
Oktoba 12, 2000).
Ko da yake
An fatattaki Falasdinawa ta hanyar soji da kuma tsarkake su ta kabilanci ta hanyar a
hade mai karfi na babban iko da babban abokin ciniki, yana da mahimmanci cewa
jaridu na yau da kullun suna yin riya cewa babban ƙarfin goyon baya yana da haƙiƙa kuma
rashin taimaka wa jihar kawar da kabilanci ta kama amfanin hakan
hamayyar soja marar daidaituwa. Kafofin yada labarai sun ba da cikakken hadin kai wajen yin hakan.
kodayake lokaci-lokaci da Times, alal misali, yana ba da damar a ambaci shi
cewa Falasdinawa suna zama dan rashin aminta da dillalan gaskiya.
(William Orme, "Kamar yadda Sabon Tattaunawar Zaman Lafiya ke Ci gaba, Falasdinawa suna sukar Clinton,"
NYT, 23 ga Janairu, 2001).
3E.
Isra'ilawa marasa haƙuri da masu zartar da hukuncin kisa na Sabiya. Na al'ada
Kafofin yada labarai akai-akai suna gaya mana cewa Isra'ilawa sun "ɓata haƙuri" tare da
Falasdinawa, tare da "tsarin zaman lafiya," da kuma tare da shugabanninsu waɗanda suke da
an yarda da wannan sabon tashin hankali na (Falasdinawa). Idan sun kada kuri'a a ciki
Sharon, kuma yanzu yana goyan bayan mafi munin martani ga Intifada, wannan bai yi ba
tozarta jama'a saboda halayen kisan kai da tsattsauran ra'ayi. Akasin haka,
an ba shi wanda dole ne duniya ta daidaita. A cikin 1999, Stacy Sullivan
tambaya: menene idan mutane “sun goyi bayan tsarkakewar kabilanci—a rayayye ko a hankali? A ciki
a wannan yanayin, muna da husuma da mutane… Shi ne ainihin tunani
na kasar." Amma tana magana game da Serbs a matsayin "Yin Milosevic
Masu zartarwa” (New Republic, Mayu 10, 1999), ba jama'a masu goyon baya ba
tsarkake kabilanci da aka amince.
Dangane da
Serbs, jami'in kuma saboda haka layin jam'iyyar kafofin watsa labarai shine abin da Serbian
dakaru masu dauke da makamai suna yi wa Albaniyawa a Kosovo mummuna ne da laifi kuma
dole ne a dakatar da shi, don haka ra'ayin Serbia "rashin haƙuri" tare da Albaniya Kosovo
don tsayin daka da "ta'addanci" da an yi musu kallon batsa. The
Tambayar ita ce: yaya masu laifi Sabiyawan suka aikata laifukan da suka aikata
gwamnati, kuma ko da yake ana zargin Sabiyawan suna shan wahala a karkashin wani
"mulkin kama-karya," Anthony Lewis, Blaine Harden, da Thomas Friedman a cikin
Times da Stacy Sullivan da Daniel Jonah Goldhagen a cikin New Republic,
da wasu da dama, sun sami Sabiyawan da laifi, ko dai saboda halin ko in kula
game da laifuffukan gwamnatinsu ko goyon bayansu mai kyau, kamar yadda “an so
masu zartar da hukuncin kisa.”
A cikin hali na
Isra’ilawa, da yawa daga cikinsu fiye da Sabiyawa sun fito fili suna goyon bayan tashin hankali
a kan wadanda abin ya shafa na jiharsu, kuma akwai abubuwa da yawa da ake samu
Isra'ilawa suna cewa "Zan kashe dukan Larabawa," "Dole ne a kawar da Larabawa," da
Falasdinawa “ciyawa” ne kawai, kuma ya kamata waɗannan “macizai” su kasance
“An hallaka” (Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, shugaban ruhaniya na jam’iyyar Shas ta Isra’ila,
yana magana a ranar 9 ga Afrilu, 2001). Amma a nan, inda aka amince da tsabtace kabilanci, da
Kafofin yada labarai ba su taba nuna laifin dan kasar Isra'ila ba, kuma goyon bayan Isra'ila na karuwa
An ba da rahoton ta'addancin jihar kan Falasdinawan ba da jimawa ba har ma
cikin tausayi, kamar yadda Isra'ilawa ke fama da "ta'addanci" amma ba
kansu suna ta'addanci. Wataƙila suna kashewa da raunata fararen hula marasa laifi a wani
ƙididdige adadin sau 20 ko fiye da adadin cin zarafinsu da “’yan ta’adda,” amma
hakan ba zai shafi ma'auni ba inda darajar rayuwar 'yan ta'adda da
iyalansu sifili ne.
4.
Danne Bayanan da ba su da daɗi: Nazarin Harka a Daidaita da
Tashin Hannun Rugujewa. Qin ido yana da matuqar muhimmanci a ciki
kare tsarin da aka amince da shi na rashin adalci da kabilanci
tsarkakewa. Don haka, manyan kafofin watsa labaru na Amurka ba za su tattauna dokoki kawai ba
neman ikon mamayewa da nauyin da ke kansu karkashin na hudu
Yarjejeniyar Geneva, da kuma babban keta dokokin Isra'ila na waɗannan dokoki a
kwace, amfani da ruwa na wariya da sauran al'amura da kyar suke yi
lura. Rikicin Isra'ila a cikin kurkuku, azabtarwa, duka, kisa,
da raunuka, da taimako da kariya ga tashin hankalin mazauna yankin ya fi girma
fiye da tashin hankalin Falasdinawa a kan Isra'ila, amma an rage shi kuma yana dacewa
bayanai game da waɗannan al'amura suna fuskantar babban danniya.
Kafofin yada labarai
kula da tsarin rugujewar gidajen Falasdinawa da Isra'ila ke yi na samar da wani
fadakarwa harka nazari a cikin danniya da son zuciya. Manufar rugujewa ita ce
mummunan rashin mutuntaka, tare da maida hankali kan wariyar launin fata a gidajen Falasdinawa.
Akwai ci gaba da yawo da labarai a gidan yanar gizo da Kabilun suka fitar
NewsWatch, kwamitin Isra'ila game da ruguza gidaje (ICHAD), da
Kwamitin Tsaron Ƙasar Falasɗinawa (PLDC), Ƙungiyoyin Masu Zaman Lafiya na Kirista (CPT),
Kwamitin Haɗin kai na Hebron (HSC), da sauran ƙungiyoyi, waɗanda ke bayyana sojoji
rushewar da ke korar Falasdinawa kusan ba tare da sanarwa ba. (Duba
Yanar Gizo na Kwamitin Haɗin kai na Hebron: “CPT Hebron”
[email kariya].)
Wadannan labaran
suna da yawa, ban mamaki, kuma sau da yawa masu ratsa zuciya kamar yadda Yahudawan Isra'ila masu zanga-zangar suke
kuma kungiyoyin kiristoci suna fafutukar kare Falasdinawa daga harin wariyar launin fata
na sojoji da mazauna. Labarun sukan bayyana rusa gidaje
ana sake ginawa ta hanyar masu zanga-zangar sannan kuma a yi musu bijirewa ba tare da wanzuwa ba
sojojin na biyu ko na uku. Amnesty International na da rahoto kan wannan
manufofin zalunci (Disamba 8, 1999), yana jaddada ainihin wariyar launin fata, yaduwa.
Falasdinawa na tsoron rushewa, da kuma halin kisan kai na
manufofin-a cikin wani hali, 100 iyakar 'yan sanda zuwa ba tare da sanarwa, fara zuwa
ruguza wani gida, Falasdinawa sun fara jifa, da 'yan sanda
harbin da aka yi wa Zaki 'Ubayd, mahaifinsa mai shekaru 28. An yi watsi da wannan rahoton AI
'Yan Jarida.
Nexis Nexis
game da rugujewar gidajen Falasdinawa a cikin New York Times,
Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Lokaci, da kuma Newsweek na biyar
shekaru daga Janairu 1, 1996 zuwa Disamba 31, 2000, ya zo da kawai 23
articles: babu a ciki Time, 1 a ciki Newsweek, 5 a cikin New York
Times, 11 a cikin Washington Post, da 6 a cikin Los Angeles Times.
Tare da banda guda ɗaya kawai a cikin Washington Post, waɗannan labaran
Kada a taɓa ambaton kwamitin Isra'ila game da rugujewa, Haɗin kai na Hebron
Kwamitin, da kwamitin tsaron filaye na Falasdinu. 2 kawai daga cikin 23
Abubuwan da aka yi a shafi na gaba, kuma 5 kawai sun ba da cikakkun bayanai game da
zaluncin da ake yi da kuma wahalhalun da Falasdinawa ke ciki. Ashirin na
ashirin da uku sun ba da hujjar Isra'ila cewa gidajen Falasdinawa ne
gina ba bisa ka'ida ba, kuma tara sun ambaci rushewar a matsayin martani ga
Rikicin Falasdinawa; kawai shida bayanin da ba a yarda da Falasdinawa ba
gina, kuma daya kawai ya nuna ko da a kaikaice cewa rushewa da
Matsugunan sun saba wa yarjejeniyar Oslo da kuma yarjejeniyar Geneva ta hudu.
A cikin wannan guda
na musamman, Steven Erlanger ya ce "Yayin da gwamnatocin Kwadago su ma
fadada matsugunan da ake da su da kuma yarjejeniyar Oslo ba ta iyakance su daga
yin haka, Falasdinawa sun koka da cewa a yanzu Isra'ila ta gina manyan sabbi
unguwannin kusa da matsugunan da ake da su domin a kira su fadadawa,
maimakon a yi musu lakabi da sababbi,” (NYT, Satumba 12, 1997). Lura da farko cewa
Maganar Erlanger na cewa Oslo ba ta hana fadada matsuguni ba
tsananin fassarar Isra'ila na harshen gama gari; kuma ba zai iya yarda ba
cewa an yi sabbin matsugunan, amma ana maganar Falasdinawa ne kawai
gunaguni. Ba ya tattauna ko ninka yawan mazauna da
sauran ayyukan Isra'ila na iya keta ruhin Oslo.
A takaice, in a
tsawon lokacin aikin rushewar da Isra'ila ta yi, kafofin watsa labaru biyar sun bincika
bi da batun a cikin ƙananan maɓalli, ba tare da kulawar edita ba. Suka halitta
a phony balance ta bada tsanani nauyi ga zargin gini code-cin zarafin
da martani ga ta'addancin Palasdinawa a matsayin tushen manufofin Isra'ila.
rage cin zarafin Oslo da dokokin kasa da kasa, da girma
fasali na wariya na dokokin Isra'ila, da cin zarafin ta'addanci kai tsaye
sojoji da matsugunai wajen ruguzawa da kwace dukiyoyin Falasdinawa.
Sun magance matsalar ta yadda jama'ar Amurka ba za su sani ba
na wannan al'ada, kuma da kyar za a tashe su zuwa ga fushi, sabanin haka
martaninsu kan yadda kafafen yada labarai suka mayar da hankali kan jifan Palasdinawa da sauran su
rashin ɗabi'a.
5. Rubuta rubutu
Tarihi. A cikin tsarin farfaganda, ba kawai abubuwan da ba su dace ba ne baƙar fata
fita ko bi da su a cikin ƙananan maɓalli inda m, amma tarihi kuma ana sake rubutawa.
Don haka ya daɗe yana zama muhimmin ɓangare na jami'in Isra'ila, Amurka, don haka
farfagandar yada labarai ta al'ada cewa Arafat da PLO sun kasance koyaushe
“mai kin amincewa” alhali Isra’ila da mai daukar nauyinta sun yi hakuri suna jiran a
abokin tattaunawa. Koyaya, an nuna sau da yawa cewa wannan shine
Juyin juya hali na Orwellian-wanda a zahiri kawai masu tsabtace ƙabilanci da masu ɗaukar nauyin su ke da shi
sun yi watsi da yarjejeniyar kasa da kasa, da PLO da Tarayyar Soviet suka amince da su
haka kuma kowa sai “nyet duo,” da zai dawo da
"Yankin da aka mamaye" ga Falasdinawa kuma sun haɗa da amincewa da juna.
Wani maɓalli
tatsuniya ta kasance cewa jirgin Falasdinawa na 1948-1949 ya kasance
da son rai, ba musamman ta hanyar tashin hankalin Isra'ila da gangan ba. Wannan tatsuniya ta daɗe
Fashe da masana tarihi na Isra'ila kamar Benny Morris da Simha Flapan, tsakanin
wasu, amma kuma yana ci gaba da rayuwa har yau a cikin farfagandar Amurka
tsarin. Don haka, Elie Wiesel ya ce “Waɗanda shugabanninsu suka iza su, 600,000
Falasdinawa sun bar kasar sun gamsu cewa, da zarar Isra'ila ta ci nasara, su
zai iya komawa gida” (“Jerusalem in My Heart,” NYT, Janairu
24, 2001), kuma wannan ƙirƙira ba kawai ta buga ta Jarida ta
Yi rikodin, ba a gyara shi a cikin ginshiƙan haruffa ko "Gyara." Haka kuma
ya nuna ba a gyara ba a cikin "labarai," inda dan jarida John Kifner ya ce 52
shekaru da suka wuce “Mutane 750,000 sun tsere daga yakin da aka fara da Larabawa
kai wa sabuwar ƙasar Isra’ila hari” (NYT, Disamba 31, 2000).
Ba su “gudu daga yaƙin ba,” yawancinsu an kore su da gangan
kashi na farko na "fansa ƙasar."
7.
karshe: Media's
Matsayin Taimako a cikin Tsabtace Kabilanci; Inda Zai Ƙare Yin "Safe"
Isra'ila? Robert Fisk ya lura cewa “Abin ban mamaki, yanzu kuna iya ƙarin koyo daga Isra’ila
latsa fiye da kafofin watsa labarai na Amurka. Zaluntar sojojin Isra'ila cikakke ne
an rufe shi Ha'aretz, wanda kuma ya ba da rahoton yawan adadin
Masu sasantawa na Amurka wadanda Yahudawa ne. Shekaru hudu da suka wuce, tsohon sojan Isra'ila
ya bayyana a wata jarida ta Isra'ila yadda mutanensa suka yi wa wani kauye a kudancin kasar fashi
Lebanon; lokacin da aka sake buga guntun a cikin New York Times, da
An yi la'akari da abin da ya faru daga rubutun "(Independent, Disamba
13, 2000).
Amurka
Kafofin yada labarai na yau da kullun kan batutuwan Gabas ta Tsakiya na nuna farfaganda na gaske
tsarin aiki. Kamar yadda na nuna, kafafen yada labarai sun yi gagarumin aiki
na tallafawa manufofin gwamnati ta hanyar mai da tsaftar kabilanci ta Isra'ila.
gano wadanda abin ya shafa su ne tushen tashin hankalin, kuma ta haka ne ake samun sauki
kusan kowane matakin tashin hankalin da Isra'ila ke ganin ya zama dole don karewa
kanta da "ta'addanci." Kamar yadda manufofinta na tsarkake kabilanci babu makawa
samar da martani na biyu ga tashin hankali na farko (Isra'ila), kafofin watsa labarai
don haka ba da gudummawa ga haɓakar tsari ba tare da kyakkyawan ƙarshen gani ba.
A "lafiya" Isra'ila
za a iya samu ta wurin masauki zuwa gaban Falasdinawa tare da adalci, amma
wanda bai taba yin daidai da manufofin Isra'ila na "fanshi ƙasar ba"
daga al'ummai, kuma babu wani shaida cewa ya kasance mai tsanani
la'akari da matsayin zaɓi na siyasa a cikin shekarun Clinton da Oslo ko a kowane Bush
sigina ko hangen nesa na kafofin watsa labarai. Sauran hanyoyin zuwa Isra'ila "aminci", kodayake
m, m, kuma kusan tabbata ga kasawa, sun fi dacewa da
jajircewa na ainihin manufofin, nasarar Sharon, da neman afuwar kafofin watsa labarai akan komai
Isra'ila ta yi har zuwa wannan lokacin. Hanya ɗaya ita ce mafi m manufofin
korar kora daga duk wani yanki da ake takaddama a kai, mafita da aka dade ana ba da shawarar
Netanyahu da Sharon. Sauran hanyar, sauƙin haɗe tare da manufofin
korar, har yanzu wani tashin hankali ne wanda zai iya kashe ko kuma ya raunata ma
lambobi masu yawa a cikin bege cewa wannan zai haifar da ƙaura, kai tsaye
rage adadin Falasdinawa, da kiyaye duk wani abin da ya rage daga tsoro.
Ba ni da shakka
cewa wannan Semi-kisan kare dangi da kuma m siyasa, riga gabatowa a cikin
Fashewar Intifada II, za a iya daidaita shi yadda ya kamata ta hanyar al'ada
kafofin watsa labarai a matsayin martani mai nadama da ya zama dole ga “tashin hankali” da buƙatun
Isra'ila "aminci". Z
Edward
Herman farfesa ne a fannin kuɗi a Makarantar Wharton, Jami'ar
Pennsylvania. Shi ne marubucin littafai masu yawa, ciki har da: Manufacturing
yarda (tare da Noam Chomsky), Nasarar Kasuwa, da Duniya
kafofin watsa labaru, (tare da Robert McChesney). Kawai zai danna Labari
na The Liberal Media: Edward Herman Reader. Tsawon sigar wannan
Ana iya ganin labarin akan gidan yanar gizon ZNet.