T
he
An kai hari da mamaya da Amurka da Birtaniya suka yi wa Iraki
a kai tsaye keta haramcin Yarjejeniya Ta Majalisar Dinkin Duniya
na zalunci don haka ya zama abin da Kotun Nuremberg
da wakilinta na Amurka, Robert Jackson, ya kira “mafi girma
laifi.” Dalilin da aka bayar shine barazanar da ke kusa
Amurka da Biritaniya (da na duniya) "tsaron kasa"
Saddam Hussein na haramtaccen mallakar “makamai
na halaka jama'a” (WMD). Barazanar ta kasance cikin gaggawa cewa
shugabannin Duniyar 'Yanci ba za su iya yarda da haɗarin jira ba
Sufetocin Majalisar Dinkin Duniya su kammala bincikensu na neman wadannan makamai. Yanzu ne
a sarari, kuma a zahiri ya bayyana a gaban mamayewa, cewa
makamai ba su wanzu kuma da'awar wannan barazanar ta kasance
danyen murfin don ƙarancin appetizing ajanda. Amma abin al'ajabi na
Free Press shine gazawar bayan mamayewa don gano kowane WMD
komai, wanda ya sanya mamayewar ba kawai "laifi mafi girma ba"
amma kuma wadda ta ginu a kan babbar karya, ba ta yi wa mambobinta ba
duka. Sun ci gaba da ba da uzuri ga mamaya-mamaya,
yi murna da ƙananan nasarorinta, kuma ku kyalkyali ko watsi da yawa
laifuka. Bush yana da dangantaka da jama'a kamar yadda ya sauka a Amurka
Ibrahim Lincoln don sanar da "aikin cika" da
Gambit ɗinsa na Turkiyya tare da sojojin da ke Iraki an bi da su, ba kamar yadda ake yi ba.
amma a matsayin labarai na gaba mai mahimmanci.
The
masu sassaucin ra'ayi kuma sun daidaita da kyau ga cin zarafi. Yayin
kadan ne suka yi adawa da harin, musamman ba tare da takunkumin Majalisar Dinkin Duniya ba.
da zarar abin ya faru sai ya zama abin da ba su da shi
matsala karba, yana jayayya cewa yanzu yana da mahimmanci ga aikin
don samun nasara. Don Michael O'Hanlon, babban jami'in Brookings,
masu sassaucin ra'ayi wadanda suka damu da jin dadin 'yan Iraqi su "fara
don bambance tsakanin rashin son Bush da amincewarsu
cewa aikin dole ne ya yi nasara." George Packer ya ce, “Kai
ba za ku iya ƙin yarda da kwangila ba, kuna iya ƙin yarda da cin hanci da rashawa
kamar yadda nake yi, ba tare da rushe ainihin fahimtar da muke ba
mun himmatu ga wannan, kuma muna da wani babban nauyi a wuyan Iraqi.”
Babu shakka O'Hanlon da Packer ba za su ce game da Saddam ba
Mamaya na Hussein-mamaya na Kuwait a 1990 cewa ya kamata
za a ɗauke shi azaman bayarwa kuma dole ne mu yi fatan cewa “aikinsa”
yayi nasara. A'a, ba shi da niyyar alheri ga waɗanda abin ya shafa
na zaluncinsa kamar yadda Bush, Cheney da Wolfowitz suka yi, ta hanyar kishin kasa
gabatarwa. (Packer yana ganin son kai kawai kuma babu kwangilar tayin-ba
kisa, rashin tausayi, sulhuntawa, tsare-tsare na tushe da ikon aiwatarwa,
sha'awar sarrafa mai, ko alaƙa da manufofin Isra'ila.) Wannan nau'i na ban hakuri
ana bayarwa ne kawai lokacin da Amurka ko ɗaya daga cikin ƙawayenta ko abokan cinikinta
ya yi zagon kasa karara. Banda zama uzuri ga zalunci
da kuskuren karanta manufar "manufa," O'Hanlon's
kuma hujjar Packer tana da wani aibi mai kisa, wato
idan aikin ya yi nasara hakan zai kara karfafa ta'addanci,
wanda tabbas batu ne da za su yi bayani idan sun bayyana dalilin Saddam
dole ne a kore shi daga Kuwait.
The
kama Saddam Hussein kuma ana ɗaukarsa a matsayin nasara ta farko
wanda akalla zai karawa Bush kwarjininsa da kuma hasashen zabe
kuma sau da yawa ana gabatar da shi azaman hujjar harin (kamar yadda yake a cikin lamarin
Samantha Power, a
New York Times
fi so, rubuta a
da
New Republic
("Ba a hukunta shi," Disamba 29,
2003-Janairu 12, 2004). Duk waɗannan an yi su cikin yanayin biki—“Mu
same shi!”—daidai a cikin kafofin watsa labarai da ke kula da mamayewa, yaƙe-yaƙe,
da kashe-kashen jama'a a cikin firam ɗin da aka tsara su sosai bayan nishaɗin su
labaran ‘yan sanda da ‘yan fashi ko kauyi da Indiyawa. Gaskiyar cewa
laifin da ya aikata wanda ya tabbatar da harin, wanda Saddam ya mallaka
na WMD, Bushies ne suka ƙirƙira shi don haka ba ya aiki
kamata yayi ya tada tambaya a kafafen yada labarai kadan mai gaskiya akan me
“haɗin kai” na iya ma sa shi yaƙi bisa doka
fursuna. Amma a cikin ainihin kafofin watsa labaru na yanzu, kodayake akwai
lokaci-lokaci amma ba kasafai maganganu na shakku cewa kama nasa ya cancanta
harin, irin wannan tambayar ba ta taso ba. Kafofin yada labarai sun shiga
a cikin wani tsari na aljani, tare da shiru na canja wurin manufa
na harin zuwa "yanci," don haka tabbatar da hakan
Saddam ya kasance mugun mutum ne, ƙaramin al'amari na haram kuma
Babbar karya ta bace.
akwai
wata matsala ce mai ban tsoro kuma: manyan laifuffuka na
An gudanar da mummunan mutumin a cikin 1980s tare da Amurka da Birtaniya
tallafi da kariya. Ya yi amfani da WMD ɗin sa ne kawai lokacin da United
Jihohi sun amince da amfani da su - ba in ba haka ba, kuma, mahimmanci,
ba a kan "haɗin kai" na Gulf War wanda ya kai masa hari ba
a cikin 1991-wanda ke nuna cewa "barazana" ko da
yana da WMD kadan, yayi kadan. Don haka dauri sannan kuma a gwada Saddam
Hussein saboda laifukansa na iya zama abin ban tsoro, kamar yadda Reagan, Bush-I, Rumsfeld,
kuma da yawa wasu za su kasance a cikin ma'auni tare da Saddam
a matsayin masu kawo masa kayayyaki da masu kare shi. Amma kuma, wannan yana ɗauka kaɗan
kafofin watsa labarai na gaskiya waɗanda za su iya kawowa kuma watakila ma danna irin wannan m
al'amura.
Duk duniya
haƙƙin Amurka da Burtaniya don yin zalunci da ɗaukar 'ya'yan itace
na zaluncin su kuma an tabbatar da su ta hanyar ayyukan duniya na gaske
a bangaren Majalisar Dinkin Duniya da kuma "al'ummar kasa da kasa," ko da yake
shan wadannan 'ya'yan itatuwa ya zuwa yanzu ya zama da ɗan wahala. The
Kudiri mai lamba 16 na kwamitin sulhu na ranar 1511 ga Oktoba, ya amince da gaba daya.
yarda da "ikon" na Amurka "Haɗin kai na wucin gadi
Hukuma” (watau Bremer) har ma ta bukaci kasashe mambobin su “zuwa
ba da taimako a ƙarƙashin Dokar Majalisar Dinkin Duniya, ciki har da
sojojin,” yayin da suka dage kan komai a bangaren
azzalumai, ko da yake da ƙarfin zuciya "neman" cewa su
"Rahoton" kan "ci gaba" da kuma cewa sun juya
iko ga Iraqis "da zarar an yi aiki." (Ya kammata
a lura cewa wadannan "haɗin kai" ayyuka masu goyan baya ta hanyar
Majalisar Dinkin Duniya da shugabannin duniya ba su da wata alaka da ta dace
abubuwan da mutanen duniya suke so.) Kamar yadda Majalisar Dinkin Duniya da
Shugabannin duniya sun taimaka wa "haɗin kai" tare da dubawa
gambit kafin mamayewa, sannan kuma bai yi wani abu da ya nuna adawa da fili ba
zalunci ta hanyar takunkumi ko barazana, don haka bayan mamayewa
sun daidaita da kyau ga bukatu da matsin lamba na manya
iko. Membobin haɗin gwiwar da abokan cinikinsu ba a keɓance su, a fili
ta hanyar mulki kadai, tare da adalci ba shi da alaka. Amurka
na iya yin ta'addanci a kan ƙasa bayan ƙasa - kwanan nan,
Panama, Yugoslavia, Afganistan, da Iraki-da abokin cinikinta Isra'ila,
wutsiya da ke kayar da kare, na iya shiga cikin tsabtace kabilanci tsawon shekaru da yawa
wanda ya saba wa dokokin kasa da kasa da kudurorin Majalisar Dinkin Duniya, tare da cikakku
rashin hukunci.
The Aggressor "Coalition"
T
he
daidaita laifukan yaki da kuma bin masu laifin yaki ta hanyar kotuna
ya kai manyan matakan zaɓe na son zuciya. Saddam Hussein
da Slobodan Milosevic sun kasance hari na Amurka da Birtaniya, saboda haka
wanda ya cancanci samun hukumci da shari'a, amma Pinochet,
Suharto, da Ariel Sharon — mahautar Qibya, Sabra da Shatila,
da kuma manajan aikin kawar da kabilanci da ke gudana a Falasdinu - su ne
keɓe, tare da Sharon ɗan ƙasa mai daraja, "mutumin zaman lafiya"
a cewar George Bush.
akwai
shi ne, ba shakka, babu tattaunawa game da bukatar gwada shugabannin Amurka
wanda ya kashe 'yan Vietnam da dama a wani babban yakin wuce gona da iri
kuma wadanda suka kashe kai tsaye, ko ta hanyar tallafi da tallafi
irin su Pinochet et al., Ƙari ga miliyoyin marasa laifi (Yohanna
Stockwell, tsohon shugaban hukumar CIA a Angola, ya kiyasta hakan ya wuce
Mutane miliyan shida sun mutu a cikin ayyukan sirri na CIA har zuwa ƙarshen 1980s:
duba laccarsa ta Oktoba 1987 “Asirin Wars na CIA;”
duba kuma, William Blum's
Jihar Rogue
da kuma
kashe
Fata
). Idan muka kai ga mamayar Iraki na baya-bayan nan, a can
ba alamar ko'ina a cikin al'ada cewa shugabannin da suka kawai
aiwatar da "laifi mafi girma" wanda ya saba wa Majalisar Dinkin Duniya
Yarjejeniya, bisa karya, yakamata ya kasance a cikin tashar jiragen ruwa, tare da wanda aka yarda
mugu. A'a, duk sun dauki shi a matsayin ma'auni cewa Uban
ba a ƙarƙashin ƙa'idodi ɗaya da kowa kuma wanda zai iya
sanya wadannan ka'idoji akan wasu ko da a yayin gudanar da ayyuka a
wanda ya karya dokokin da kansa, kuma a kan babban sikelin.
The
Amurka ta dade ta ki mika kai ga wata kotun kasa da kasa
don haka gwamnatin Bush ta yi watsi da shi
Kotun hukunta manyan laifuka ta duniya, barazanar yin amfani da karfi don hanawa
duk wani tsawaita ikon kotu ga ma'aikatan Amurka, da kuma tilastawa
yaƙin neman zaɓe na diflomasiyya don samun ƙasashe su rattaba hannu kan yarjeniyoyi na 98
yayi alƙawarin ba zai taɓa tsare 'yan ƙasar Amurka ba don a tasa keyarsu zuwa kotun ICC.
suna cikin al'ada mai girma. Sakataren Gwamnati Harry Truman
Dean Acheson ya kira dokar kasa da kasa a matsayin "kumburi,"
da Sakatariyar Harkokin Wajen Clinton Madeleine Albright ita ma
a fili yake cewa wannan kasa za ta yi aiki ne ba tare da bata lokaci ba lokacin da manufofinta suka cimma
Ba a iya samun su ta hanyar ƙungiyoyi da yawa kuma mai yiwuwa ikon doka.
(Yakin NATO da Yugoslavia ya saba wa Yarjejeniya ta Majalisar Dinkin Duniya,
kafa misali mai dacewa ga George Bush.) Na al'ada
kafafen yada labarai sun daidaita wannan dabi'a ta Ubangiji kamar yadda abin takaici,
amma sau da yawa ana iya fahimta idan aka yi la'akari da karimcin yardar Uban
don yi wa duniya hidima a matsayin 'yan sanda da ƙarfin adalci da kwanciyar hankali.
The
Dalilin Bush na ƙin shiga ko ba da haɗin kai tare da ICC shine
barazanar cewa za ta iya haifar da "ƙaddamar da siyasa."
Fassara zuwa magana ɗaya, matsalar ita ce Amurka
mai yiwuwa ba za ta iya sarrafa ICC gabaɗaya ba - "siyasa" tana da
an dade ana amfani da shi wajen nuna gazawa wajen bin manufofin siyasarmu.
Wannan wata maɓalli ce a cikin sabis lokacin da gwamnatin Reagan ta ja
wannan ƙasa daga UNESCO a cikin 1984 - a lokacin Reaganites
ba zai iya sarrafa UNESCO ba, don haka an "siyasa",
alhali a shekarun mulkin Amurka ba haka yake ba.
Ana ingantawa
wannan, Kotun Yugoslavia ba ta "siyasa" saboda
Amurka tana sarrafa ajandarta kuma, abin mamaki, yawancin Amurka
masu sassaucin ra'ayi da hagu sun haɗiye wannan kuma suna la'akari da cewa kotun ta kasance
bada adalci. A babban bangare wannan ya faru saboda
tsarin aljanu-dogon abinci mai tsayi da tsauri na zaɓi
bayanai har ma da ƙirƙira, da yawa a yanzu an kafa su gabaɗaya,
da kuma rashin zargi na rashin zargi na Kotun a wurin aiki - suna da
ya yi nasara kwarai da gaske. Gaskiyar cewa an ba da kuɗaɗen Kotun
Da ikon NATO, cewa Albright ya tantance kowane mai gabatar da kara, cewa ta
keta ka'idojin shari'a na yammacin Turai ya kasance a duk faɗin.
Hukumar, da kuma cewa ta bi tsarin tallafi na NATO da
ya yi aiki a matsayin ƙungiyar farfagandar NATO ba tare da wani lokaci ba, bai yi rajista ba
a kasashen yamma.
Ma
misali, ta yi amfani da tuhume-tuhume a matsayin kayan aikin siyasa da
zaton laifin-kafin shari'a a matsayin tushen tsarin shari'a,
wanda ya saba wa ka'idar Yammacin Turai. Lamarin da ya fi shahara
ya faru ne a tsakiyar harin bam na kwanaki 78 a Yugoslavia a watan Mayu
1999 lokacin da NATO ta fara jefa bama-bamai a wuraren farar hula na Yugoslavia don yin hakan
tilasta mika wuya da sauri. Wannan harin ya saba wa doka
dokokin kasa da kasa kuma ta haifar da karuwar sukar duniya. Wannan
ya yi kira da a mayar da martani ga hulda da jama'a da farfaganda. Wannan ya kasance
Mai gabatar da kara Louise Arbour ne ya bayar, wanda cikin gaggawa ya hada baki daya
tuhumar Milosevic a watan Mayu 1999, bisa bayanin da aka kawo
ta hanyar leken asirin Amurka, amma kotun ba ta tantance ba. Wannan ya kasance nan da nan
Albright da James Rubin suka ambata a matsayin nuna adalci na
Dalili na NATO kuma ta kau da hankali daga tashin bam da gaskiya
laifukan yaki na NATO. Wannan shi ne cin hanci da rashawa na karshe na wanda ake zato
harkar shari'a da shari'a, tare da tallafin PR wanda a zahiri ya taimaka
rufe laifukan yaƙi na zahiri na shugabannin Kotun.
halitta
kafofin watsa labarai na yau da kullun ba su taɓa lura da cin hanci da rashawa ba kuma ba su yi ba
masu sassaucin ra'ayi da yawancin hagu. Babu ɗayan waɗannan da zai iya gani, rahoto,
ko fahimtar mahimmancin ma'auni biyu na ban mamaki wanda
ya kasance yana aiki kowace rana a cikin aikin Kotun. Misali,
Zargin Milosevic a ranar 22 ga Mayu, 1999 ya dogara kusan gaba ɗaya
kan zargin kashe albaniya 385 na Kosovo bayan tashin bam
yaki ya fara. Babu wata shaida da aka gabatar cewa wadannan kashe-kashen
alhakinsa ne kai tsaye, amma a duk lokacin aikin Kotun
duk wani kashe-kashen da Sabiyawan da ke karkashin kasa suka yi an same su kai tsaye
alhakin manyan shugabanni. Ba a taɓa amfani da wannan ƙa'idar ba
zuwa kashe-kashen da 'yan Croatia, Musulmin Bosnia, ko Sojojin Sama na Amurka ke yi.
In
ya bambanta da gaggawa, amma PR-serviceable zargin Milosevic
a watan Mayu 1999, ya ɗauki magajin Arbour Carla Del Ponte da
ma'aikatanta watanni da yawa don amsa wata babbar takarda da cikakkun bayanai
yana neman a tuhumi NATO da kashe daruruwan fararen hula na Sabiya
a harin bama-bamai da ta kai kan wuraren farar hula. A ƙarshe, Del Ponte
ya ki ko da bude wani bincike a hukumance na wannan zargi saboda
ofishinta ya gano cewa mutuwar fararen hula 500 ne kai tsaye
ga NATO ba su da yawa da za su iya damuwa da su - "a can
ba kawai wata shaida ce ta tushen laifin da ake tuhuma ba
kisan kare dangi ko laifuffukan cin zarafin bil'adama." Don haka ga Milosevic, an
kashe kashe 385 da ba a tabbatar ba ya isa ya zama tushen laifi don tuhuma,
amma ga NATO, 500 yayi kadan don ko da goyon bayan bincike.
wannan
mizani biyu na misalta kuma yana nuna gaskiyar cewa Kotun
tare da wata manufa daban zai iya sanya Clinton, Albright sauƙi,
Wesley Clark, da wasu da ke cikin kurkuku suna amfani da irin wannan shaida
wanda aka yi amfani da shi ga Milosevic da yawancin Sabiyawan Bosnia masu hidima
zaman gidan yari. Wani fasali mai ban sha'awa na aikin Kotu shine
yawan tuhuma da daure wadanda abin ya shafa a kai
tushen rawar da suke takawa ta kai tsaye ko ta kaikaice a cikin ayyukan da suka zama gama gari
fasalin yaƙe-yaƙe kuma ana iya amfani da shi ga kowane ɗan takara
cikin yakin da ake magana akai. Na tabbata cewa tare da irin girma
albarkatun da aka bayar ga Kotun, kuma ba shakka tare da layi daya
goyon bayan siyasa da kafafen yada labarai don kokarinsa, da ya kasance
zai yiwu a sanya adadi mai yawa na musulmin Bosnia, Croatian, da NATO
shugabannin da ke gidan yari na tsawon zaman gidan yari. Sabiyawan da abin ya shafa akan faretin fare-fare-da
akwai dubbai da yawa a cikin Sabiya da Bosnia—za su samu
ya taimaka wajen shawo kan wadanda suka jikkata. Musulmin Bosniya, Croatian,
da kuma shaidun NATO - ko dai sun yi fushi da shugabanninsu, ko kuma masu neman
talla ko cin hanci ko jawo don faɗin abubuwan da suka dace a musanya
don rangwamen hukunci-zai nuna cewa waɗannan
shugabannin duk sun shirya kashe ko kuma sun kasa takurawa na karkashinsu.
A haƙiƙa, hatta maganganun jama'a za a iya tada su don yin magana.
kamar yadda wasu shugabannin NATO suka amince da cewa harin bam na
Fararen hula na Sabiyawa sun kasance da gangan don sa su yi kururuwa da mika wuya.
Tare da canza tsarin iko, waɗannan zasu zama tushen Kotun
zargin "kisan kare dangi."
It
Ya kasance mai ban tsoro don karantawa a farkon Disamba 2003, cewa Janar na Sabiyawan Bosnia
An yanke wa Stanislav Galic hukuncin daurin shekaru 20 saboda rawar da ya taka a cikin watanni 44
kewaye Sarajevo, domin da gangan ya auna farar hula—“maza
da mata masu shekaru daban-daban… an kashe su a ɗaruruwan su kuma an raunata su
a cikin dubban su, da nufin ta'addanci gaba daya
yawan jama’a,” in ji alkalin kotun Alphons Orie na Netherlands.
An yi wannan a kan babban sikelin da Amurka ta yi a Vietnam,
inda fararen hular da suka rasa rayukansu suka kai miliyoyi, tare da yi musu magani
na farar hula har ma da ban tsoro fiye da wanda aka danganta ga Stanislav
Dakarun Galic, kamar yadda John Kifner ya yi nuni a kai, dan jinkiri,
a cikin
New York Times
("Rahoto kan Kamfen ɗin Ƙarfafawa
Tunawa,” Disamba 28, 2003). Da gangan ake yiwa farar hula hari
wurare da manufar ta'addanci, kuma tare da manyan farar hula
wadanda suka jikkata abu ne mai iya tsinkaya kuma karbuwar fasalin shirin, ya kasance
da kuma yarda da manufa da sakamakon harin bam na NATO a Serbia
a 1999.
Ko
ya fi ban mamaki wajen kwatanta ma'auni biyu da aka hadiye ta
al'ummar duniya da masu sassaucin ra'ayi shine kwatanta tsakanin
dubban fararen hula da suka rasa rayukansu sakamakon "siege na Sarajevo"
tare da waɗanda suka samo asali daga Amurka-British (wanda aka sani da Majalisar Dinkin Duniya).
na Iraki" ta takunkumi daga 1991-2003, wanda John da Karl Mueller
iƙirarin ya kashe fararen hula fiye da duk makaman da aka lalata
a cikin tarihin ɗan adam ("Takunkumin Halakar Jama'a,"
harkokin waje
Harkokin
, Mayu-Yuni 1999). Na farko shine tushen Kotun Koli
gurfanar da Galic shekaru 20 a gidan yari; na karshen ba
har ma an yarda cewa yana da matsala ta ɗabi'a ta al'ada da ɗan adam
ƴan ta'addar haƙƙin haƙƙin haƙƙinsu (ba a ambata ba a cikin Samantha Powers
"Matsalar Daga Jahannama: Amurka da zamanin kisan kiyashi,"
kuma a cikin "Forum on Humanitarian Intervention" a cikin
Nation
,
Yuli 14, 2003).
samar da
tsoro a cikin jama'a gaba ɗaya, da kuma sojojin abokan gaba.
ya kasance wani muhimmin bangare na harin da aka kai a Afghanistan da kuma
mamayewa-mamaya na Iraki. A Iraki an fara mamaya da a
sanannen shiri na "firgita da ban tsoro" bam cewa
kashe akalla fararen hula da dama kamar yadda aka lissafa a cikin Milosevic
tuhumar ranar 22 ga Mayu, 1999, kuma hakan na farko ne. Mun karanta cewa
a lokacin mamayar Iraki, sakataren tsaron Amurka Donald Rumsfeld
dole ne da kansa ya sanya hannu kan duk wani harin iska "tunanin yiwuwar
wanda ya yi sanadiyar mutuwar fararen hula fiye da 30,” da hakan
ya amince da yajin aikin fiye da 50. Ganin cewa dubban Iraqi
an kashe ko jikkata fararen hula a irin wadannan hare-haren—wanda ya saba wa doka
na dokar Geneva da ta haramta kai hari a wuraren fararen hula, sai dai
inda ya zama dole a soja - za a iya yin shakkar hakan
rikodin na Milosevic ko ɗaya daga cikin manyan jami'an sa zai samu
Yadda za a shiga Kotun Koli?
The
Mamaya na Amurka ya yi kaurin suna wajen manufar harbi da farko
da kuma duba abubuwa daga baya, da kuma yawan amfani da wutar lantarki gabaɗaya.
Manufar karfi ta kara karfi yayin da tsayin daka ya karu.
Dexter Filkins a cikin wasu harsuna
New York Times
har ma ya ambaci wani sojan Amurka
Wani jami'i a Iraki yana bayyana sabbin munanan dabarun mamayar
a matsayin "babban tsoro da tashin hankali" ("Tough New
Dabarun da {asar Amirka ta yi, a kan Garuruwan Iraki,” Disamba 7, 2003).
A watan Oktoba, Human Rights Watch ta zargi sojojin Amurka da kashe
akalla fararen hula 94 a Baghdad tun daga ranar 1 ga Mayu “a cikin shakka
yanayi,” amma an fuskanci bincike a cikin shari'o'i 5 kawai, wanda ke ƙarfafawa
imani cewa sojoji na iya kashewa ba tare da wani hukunci ba. A watan Disamba, bayan
kama Saddam Hussein, Robert Fisk ya rubuta, "Amurka. sojoji
sun harbe akalla ‘yan Iraqi 18 a titunan manyan biranen kasar uku
a kasar. faifan bidiyo mai ban mamaki daga birnin Ramadi mai nisan mil 75
yammacin Baghdad ya nuna magoya bayan Saddam Hussein marasa makami
An harbe su a cikin duhu lokacin da suke gudu daga sojojin Amurka."
Hussein al-Jaburi, gwamnan yankin na Amurka da aka dorawa takunkumi ya yi gargadin
mutanen Tikrit, “Duk wata zanga-zangar adawa da gwamnati
ko kuma a yi luguden wuta kan dakarun hadin gwiwa." A farkon watan Disamba,
karkashin umarnin CPA, Ma'aikatar Lafiya ta Iraki ta kare
tattara bayanai kan fararen hula da aka kashe.
In
mamayewa-mallakar da "haɗin gwiwa" ya yi amfani da su duka
tarin bama-bamai da raguwar uranium a hare-haren da ake kai wa wurare masu arzikin farar hula,
wanda ya saba wa yarjejeniyar Geneva. Amma Saddam Hussein kadai
za a yi shari'a kan laifukan yaki da cin zarafin bil'adama. Yana da
gwajin da ya cancanta, amma adalci ne kawai partially da
rashin aiki mara kyau lokacin da aka zaɓa kuma, a wannan yanayin, an tsara shi
ta wadanda suka taimaka wa mai laifi a cikin dama
baya da kuma wadanda suka aiwatar da laifukan nasu wanda zai iya sauƙi
dace da waɗanda aka zaɓa.
Edward S. Herman
masanin tattalin arziki, marubuci, kuma manazarci kan harkokin yada labarai.