A baya lokacin yakin neman zaben shugaban kasa na 2008, Obama, Biden da McCain duk sun sami cikakken nazarin ra'ayoyin addininsu dalla-dalla. A cikin Maris 2008, ABC News ya ji dadi dangane da ra'ayoyin addini, musamman masu ba da shawara na addini, 'yan adawa na farko na Democrat Barack Obama da Hillary Clinton da na John McCain. A cikin Satumba 2007, da Benci Research Center ya ce a zahiri an gudanar da addinin Mormon na Mitt Romney a kansa, amma gabaɗaya, jama'a na son ganin ɗan takara mai sassaucin ra'ayi a matsayin wanda ya fi dacewa.
Albarkatun Ilimi yana ba da jagora ga dukkan ra'ayoyin 'yan takara na 2008. Ga wasu daga cikin Sarah Palin's:
Pentecostalism an haɓaka shi daga 1913 zuwa 1918 kuma an gyara shi a cikin 1946. Ɗaya daga cikin
shi ne:
Sakamakon wannan imani kai tsaye, Pentikostalizim sun gaskanta da baftisma “Yesu kaɗai” ba baftisma cikin Triniti Mai Tsarki ba kuma sun gaskata cewa magana da harsuna lokacin baftisma yana nuna baftisma “gaskiya”. Shin kafofin watsa labarai gabaɗaya sun rufe waɗannan imani da ba a saba gani ba? A cikin Satumba 2008, PBS ya yi a
nazarin ra'ayoyin Palin, yana bayyana hakan kawai
Tabbas, yawancin ɗan gajeren labarin ya mayar da hankali kan yadda zubar da ciki da addini suka haɗu ba akan addini ba
da se
. Binciken Jarida na Columbia
ya bi ta kan cece-kuce daban-daban kan addini da Palin da suka faru a lokacin yakin neman zabe kuma sananne ne saboda galibi yana buga shafukan yanar gizo da kuma ‘yan jarida marasa tushe. The Washington Times da Rachel Maddow sune mafi girman tushen bayanan da aka ambata. Don haka a'a, kafofin watsa labarai gabaɗaya ba su rufe aƙidar Palin ba kamar yadda suka yi na Obama, McCain, Clinton da na Biden.
Irin wannan nisantar batutuwan da ba su ji daɗi ba yana bayyana a cikin abubuwan da suka shafi kabilanci, musamman, ta hanyar da hannun dama ke bi da shi da Shugabanmu. Cewa akwai wariyar launin fata da 'yan Republican masu ra'ayin mazan jiya da kuma
musamman ta bangaren masu shayi
, yana ƙara wuya kuma yana da wuya a musanta. Mai rubutun ra'ayin yanar gizon Digby ya ce, game da amfani da Sarah Palin
kalmar "rabi-baki" mai cike da launin fata
:
Matsalar Matsalar
yayi nazari akan halin wariyar launin fata na baya-bayan nan
da kuma jawaban fitattun 'yan wasan dama kamar Rush Limbaugh da Glenn Beck kuma suna mamakin dalilin da yasa kafafen yada labarai ba sa rufe ra'ayinsu da gaske. Mai sukar kafofin watsa labarai na Washington Post/CNN Howard Kurtz kwanan nan ya yi magana game da sharhin Rush Limbaugh, amma MMFA ta lura da wasu bangarori masu ban sha'awa ga labarin wanda Kurtz cikin ladabi ya yi watsi da shi:
Matsalar ta bayyana ita ce, kamar yadda yake tare da addinin Palin a fili-bidi'a, ba zai yiwu ba a tattauna batutuwan launin fata da kuma yadda 'yan Republican ke magana game da su ba tare da samun hukunci ba. Kurtz kawai ba zai iya nakalto karin maganganun Limbaugh ba tare da nuna nuna goyon baya a kansa ba.
Akwai haƙiƙa iri biyu. Akwai nau’in da mutum ya rike wuta ya yi la’akari da bangarorin biyu ko sama da haka sannan ya zartar da hukunci da aka yi la’akari da shi a hankali, hukuncin da mutum zai iya tabbatar da gaskiya cikin kwanciyar hankali. Sai kuma wani nau’in, inda kawai mutum baya daukar wani matsayi ko kadan ya rike wuta har abada. Lokacin da aka tambayi mutum ra'ayi, mutum ya yi gunaguni ko ya yi daidai da yin gunaguni ta hanyar ba da ra'ayi mai ban mamaki ko rashin daidaituwa.
Abin takaici, ƙungiyoyin jaridun mu na al'ada sun zama kamar sun sami kwanciyar hankali sosai tare da nau'in ɓarna na ƙarshe wanda kawai ya zama abin ƙima. Ina kiran shi tsoro.
ZNetwork ana samun kuɗi ta hanyar karimcin masu karatun sa.
Bada Tallafi