Jaanuaril 25 2010 Times Online’s blogger and Times leader-writer Oliver Kamm told a vale.
Boy, was it a whopper.
"I of course haven’t attempted to ‘justify’ the killings of civilians at
So, what makes Kamm’s denial of his past record on the
Well, as Edward Herman and I point out in our "Oliver Kammi võltsimise koolkond"(MRZine, Jaanuar 22), Kamm used the 62nd anniversary of the
There, we write (see the section we’ve titled "Kamm and Nukes"):
As a genocide denier and facilitator, it is hardly surprising that Kamm defends the nuclear bombing of
Our endnote #72 is also highly relevant here. — As we used it to add:
[72] Oliver Kamm, "Terrible, but not a crime," Eestkostja, August 6, 2007. Instead, see Abbas Edalat and Mehrnaz Shahabi, "Prospects of Armageddon," Eestkostja, August 7, 2007. As these authors rightly objected, the "subtext" of Kamm’s defense of the nuking of
Seega, in fact, Oliver Kamm has gone on the record in the past to justify the mass killings of civilians at
I don’t believe this for one second. But it is the argument that Kamm offers in public.
Nevertheless. Kamm’s real reason for justifying the mass killings of civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki comes down to something much closer to this: Because one of his favorite mass killers (in this case, the
Of course, readers can only speculate how many other peitub Kamm told in his "An apology to my readers."
The next time, he owes his readers a sincere apology.
"An apology to my readers," Oliver Kamm, Times Online, January 25, 2010
"Oliver Kammi võltsimise koolkond," Edward S. Herman and David Peterson, MRZine, 22. jaanuar 2010.
"Oliver Kamm räägib valet," David Peterson, ZNet, January 25, 2010
ZNetworki rahastatakse ainult selle lugejate suuremeelsuse kaudu.
annetama