1. Iraqis are safer because of Bush’s War. In fact, conditions of insecurity have helped created both an internal and external refugee problem:
‘At least 4.2 million Iraqis were displaced. These included 2.2 million who were displaced within Irak and some 2 million refugees, mostly in Syrien (around 1.4 million) and Jordan (around half a million). In the last months of the year both these neighbouring states, struggling to meet the health, education and other needs of the Iraqi refugees already present, introduced visa requirements that impeded the entry of Iraqis seeking refuge. Within Irak, most governorates barred entry to Iraqis fleeing sectarian violence elsewhere.’
2. Large numbers of Iraqis in exile abroad have returned. In fact, no great number have returned, and more Iraqis may still be leaving to Syrien than returning.
3. Iraqis are materially better off because of Bush’s war. In fact, A million Iraqis are "food insecure" and another 6 million need UN food rations to survive. Oxfam estimated in summer, 2007, that 28% of Iraqi children are malnourished.
4. The Bush administration scored a major victory with its Status of Forces Agreement. In fact, The Iraqis forced on Bush an agreement that the US would withdraw combat troops from Iraqi cities by July, 2009,and would completely withdraw from the Country by the end of 2011. The Bush administration had wanted 58 long-term bases, and the authority to arrest Iraqis at will and to launch military operations unilaterally.
5. Minorities in Irak are safer since Bush’s invasion. In fact, there have in 2008 been significant attacks on and displacement of Iraqi Christians from Mosul. In early January of 2008, guerrillas bombed churches in Mosulog sårede en række personer. More recently, some 13,000 Christians have had to flee Mosul because of violence.
6. The sole explanation for the fall in the monthly death rate for Iraqi civilians was the troop excalation or surge of 30,000 extra US troops in 2007. In fact, troop levels had been that high before without major effect. The US military did good counter-insurgency in 2007. The major reason for the fall in the death toll, however, was that the Shiites won the war for Baghdad, ethnically cleansing hundreds of thousands of Sunnis from the capital, and turning it into a city with a Shiite majority of 75 to 80 percent. (When Bush invaded, Bagdad was about 50/50 Sunni and Shiite). The high death tolls in 2006 and 2007 were a by-product of this massive ethnic cleansing campaign. Now, a Shiite militiaman in Bagdad would have to drive for a while to find a Sunni Arab to kill.
7. John McCain alleged that if the US left Iraq, it would be promptly taken over by al-Qaeda. In fact, there are few followers of Usamah Bin Laden in Irak. The fundamentalist extremists, if that is what McCain meant, are not supported by most Sunni Arabs. They are supported by no Shiites (60% of Irak) or Kurds (20% of Irak), and are hated by Iran, Syrien, Tyrkiet, and Jordan, who would never allow such a takeover.
8. Det Irak War made the world safer from terrorism. In fact, Irak has become a major training ground for extremists and is implicated in the major bombings in Madrid, Londonog Glasgow.
9. Bush went to war in Iraq because he was given bad intelligence about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction capabilities. In fact, the State Department’s Intelligence & Research (I & R) division cast doubt on the alarmist WMD stories that Bush/Cheney put about. The CIA refused to sign off on the inclusion of the Niger uranium lie in the State of the Union address, which made Bush source it to the British MI6 instead. The Downing Street Memo revealed that Bush fixed the intelligence around the policy. Bush sought to get up a provocation such as a false flag attack on UN planes so as to blame it on Irak. And UN weapons inspectors in Feb.-Mar. of 2003 examined 100 of 600 suspected weapons sites and found nothing; Bush’s response was to pull them out and go to war.
10. Douglas Feith and other Neoconservatives didn’t really want a war with Iraq (!). Ja, det var derfor de demanded war on Iraq with their 1996 white paper for Bibi Netanyahu og igen ind their 1998 Project for a New American Century letter til Clinton, where they explicitly called for military action. The Neoconservatives are notorious liars and by the time they get through with rewriting history, they will be a combination of Gandhi and Mother Teresa and the Iraq War will be Bill Clinton’s fault. The only thing is, I think people are wise to them by now. Being a liar can actually get you somewhere. Being a notorious liar is a disadvantage if what you want to is get people to listen to you and act on your advice. I say, Never Again.
See also my article in The Nation, "Iraq: The Necessary Withdrawal", og dette stykke i Toronto Star.
Juan Cole underviser mellemøstlig og sydasiatisk historie på Universitet of Michigan. Hans seneste bog Napoleons Egypten: Invaderer Mellemøsten (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007) er netop blevet offentliggjort. Han har optrådt bredt på tv, radio og på op-ed-sider som kommentator på Middle East affairs, og har en fast klumme på Salon.com. Han har skrevet, redigeret eller oversat 14 bøger og har forfattet 60 tidsskriftsartikler. Hans weblog om samtiden Middle East is Informeret kommentar.
ZNetwork finansieres udelukkende gennem sine læseres generøsitet.
Doner